Sunday, January 20, 2013

Statement Analysis Announcement: New Book To Be Released

Question:  What happens if you apply the principles of Statement Analysis, in Hebrew, to the Bible?

Answer:   Fasten your seatbelt. 

I am thrilled to announce that Avinoam Sapir, the father of all Statement Analysis in our country and internationally, has completed the SCAN (Scientific Content Analysis) of the Book of Genesis, from the Bible. 

I will post the official announcement when it is ready, but I wanted fans of Statement Analysis to know about it as soon as it is released in English.  

Having only done a small amount of work from the Bible, I have wondered, for years, what would be the conclusion of the world's top analyst if the principles were applied, in original language, using contextual Hebrew (ancient Hebrew). 

Avinoam Sapir's courses have been taken by law enforcement from all aspects of our country as well as internationally.  

Derivatives of his work are taught federally down to the local levels and are under a variety of names, including "Reid Institute", "Statement Analysis", "Discourse Analysis", "LIES" and so much more.   Mark McClish, John Douglas, Kaaryn Gough, and others studied under him.  SCAN is taught in many countries, and is something that takes not a lot of time to learn, but a great deal of time to become efficient in application.  

The work of Avinoam Sapir is genius. 

 It is second to none.  No matter how much I study, I am continuously impressed with his ability to "see" into a text, ask questions, and get to the truth.  My own work here is but a shadow of what I have learned from him.   At times I have read over a single sentence of analysis, in shock, at how deep the analysis has run.  This continues to today, as I work in his ongoing live, interactive training.  He is a craftsman who has no peer. 

His work has been studied extensively and to have him apply it to the Book of Genesis, to religious, non-religious and scientific people, is something that will be highly anticipated.  Critics will put it under a microscope in search for truth.  

I have many questions that I am certain I share with many here:  

What will Sapir conclude about authorship?  

What of the claims of religious people that authorship is actually Divine?

Do errors or inconsistencies exist?

What happened just before Cain slew Abel, when they talked?

What of the record of giants?

What of the record of  a world-wide flood?  

What will the language reveal?

Is there deception in any portions?

Is something lost in translation?

What will it teach us about context?  Since language is something that shifts over time, ("isn't that cool?" means temperature?), can we know what shifts have taken place from the context?  Must we go outside context to other contemporary writings?

His work on Jonbenet Ramsey case is fascinating but his study on the word "child" (and "lad") in the Bible is amazing.  

Interestingly enough, on January 1st of this new year, I began reading from Genesis chapter 1, reading a portion each day, with the lens of "SCAN" technique.  

I am thrilled to make this announcement and know that all fans of Statement Analysis will want to learn of his findings. 

I understand that the explanations in the book are done fully, so that readership will be able to quickly grasp the principles and concepts used.  

I will post the official notification when it becomes available from the Laboratory of Scientific Interrogation. 

Check back, as well at www.lsiscan.com for coming details.    

I will also seek to interview Avinoam Sapir on "Crime Wire" as we get closer to the date of the English version's release.  

This will be this year's most anticipated release for fans of Statement Analysis, as it should not only be read for those interested in Genesis, but due to the import of principle, for anyone interested in learning how to discern deception.  

It may be an entire textbook on Statement Analysis, unto itself.  I write this considering how, even in SCAN releases, how each case highlights principle, and to have it together in one large volume will be a treasure.  

230 pages!  

Perhaps the most interested will be the non-religious among us who question the notion of faith, especially in a world of pain and suffering.  The honest questioning is something taken seriously and respectfully, as we, collectively, 'question' everything we read (or hear) from people.  Why should Genesis be given an exception?

It should be quite a ride for us, and, I believe, an eye opening learning experience.  

stay tuned for more information!  

83 comments:

Wreyeter72 said...

Sounds fascinating!

Peter Hyatt said...

A few years ago, I asked him if he would put all of his material down in a single book, and he told me that the only book worth writing on was the Bible. He did not explain more beyond that, and I let it go.

During the first week of January, while nightly reading Genesis (slow, with SCAN in mind), I thought it would have been so great to hear what he says about the text.

I am thrilled...this is just so exciting that I even thought of ordering the Hebrew edition and trying to translate it, little by little, myself!

Peter

Eliza said...

That's really interesting news! I would like to know the answers to the questions you posed, Peter!

BostonLady said...

One question Peter. When do you sleep? :)

Peter Hyatt said...

BL,

after ranger losses.

:)

Peter Hyatt said...

I get on a roll and can post a bunch of things quickly, especially when inspired.

I have Sapir's work on the word "child" but not permission to post it.

Perhaps I will seek it.

BL, you'd love it, along with everyone else who loves to study.

It is simple, yet amazing.

There are two Hebrew words for child in the Bible. One is translated "child" and the other is "lad"; and the word "child" is presented when the young human is at risk...dying young, in need of nursing, etc.

It is consistent throughout. The "child" is then weaned and is a "lad" (out of danger)

Suddenly, there is one "errant" use of the word "lad" when the "child" is clearly in danger. How can "lad" be used when confronted with sickness? Can SCAN be wrong?

It is amazingly accurate.

The mother's unbelief at the illness, basically, is the short explanation. The "child" was, indeed, at risk.

Amazing stuff for all of us; those who challenge faith as well as those who embrace it.

He said that his outcomes are not all "standard" beliefs.

I can't wait.

Peter Hyatt said...

years ago, I asked permission from LSI to have the textbook bound.

I had a company do a reprint of a 1591 Bible for me and they did amazing work.

The Printed Tree Bindery

I wanted to take the work book and have it leather bound. It is that valuable to me, even though, as a stand alone (without the lectures) it is not complete.

They declined.

I write this for readers to see just how valuable the work is.

My copy of the workbook is very beat up, and has lots of my own notes added, and is not something that will last.

This is another reason I am glad to see Sapir's work be published. It will last.

I know this is the data age, but I still love to hold a good book in my hands while reading....even as I watch Heather and Christina read from their iPads!

Anonymous said...

(From Ivanna-Anna)

Child vs. Kid

I learned English when I moved to the US for a year at the age of 10. I learned the words kid and kid-napped at around the same time as the word child. I thought that a presiden's son (Kid) had once been napped, and the word kidnapped was derived from that. I did not want to use the word 'kid' as it felt like playing with fate (and I couldn't understand why someone should be called by the name of some other child, especially one with such a horrible experience). I still prefer to use the safe non-jinxed word ''child.'

dadgum said...

Sounds wonderful, Peter!
Dale and I count among our friends several Hebrew and Greek scholars and apologetics professors. I love to see the lectures of those i have known for many years..
http://www.isv.org/

Many of our best conversations have been to return to the oldest version in the original language in order to glean the full meaning if the text.

I can't wait!!

Mainah said...


Peter and others,

I see/saw that. Damn.

I now know some of what it might feel like to be the "fish" in a poker game the moment at which the player goes all in and realizes he/she read it wrong.

I am part of the experiment.

I've been catfished! hahhaha. Perhaps I may have furthered the science of SA without knowledge of my participation. That'd be pretty cool.

I thought I was the student, and ya, I guess I am, but I'm also a guinea pig, I see.

Interesting, in a creepy way.



Hobnob said...

Hi Mainah,

We are all guinea pigs everytime we post on Peter's blog.
For him and also for other commentators the same as he is a guinea pig for us to practice with.

It is amazing how much can be learned from a reply to a post, not only about things they saw and we missed and vice versa, also about the person who writes.

As i have said before (usually aimed at the anons, anything you say can and will be analysed.

How better to learn than by experience and practice, it is fun to see what is revealed by our own words.

Yukari said...

That sounds brilliant.

I have always been puzzled a bit, tbh,by your use of the Solomon story as an example for statement analysis, because it has been translated and we do not have any actual quotes, just the content of what may or may not have been said related and possibly distorted by the person(s) who wrote the story down. This is a fascinating subject to study.

On child vs. kid: When I was at college and used the word "kid" in a sentence, my teacher, a British gentleman in his 50s, asked me not to and said "a kid is a little goat". :-)

What I don´t get... if it´s your own personal copy of the LSI textbook, can´t you do what you want with it (as long as you don´t publish any content) and have it bound for your personal use? Why do you need their permission? O_O

Anonymous said...

I'm just curious, what bible version or translation will he be using? I ask because a "version" means just that, someone's "version." Whereas a translation means just that.

Mainah said...


Q: Can you explain to me, in your own words, your mission statement?
A: Yes.

Ponders sincerity vs honesty.

Mainah said...


A supervisor in my area attended Harvard Divinity School, according to his resume.

dadgum said...

It wouldn't be a translation.

Likely the Incunabula.

Mainah said...

BAM! Facepalm! So what now? Any remaining questions for me?

Peter Hyatt said...

I know but a little on it, and will post the formal announcement when it is available. I am gauging the interest here.

He did say that there is a difference between today's Hebrew and Biblical Hebrew, which I think, most likely knew. This is why context is so vital.

As to what version, I do not know. I know that careful analysis is done even, for example, when we look at the transcripts of the Nuremberg trials with much to be gleaned from principle.

It should provoke a great deal of discussion.

Anonymous said...

On a related note, Peter, I think you would enjoy a book called On Tyranny by Leo Strauss. Strauss conducts a close textual analysis of Hiero by Xenophon, which is a short text of a conversation between a poet and a tyrant. It is not scan per se bit Strauss and his followers pay close attention to the specific words used, and are very particular about translation. Close readings of ancient texts on a topic that is of eternal relevance. It is an amazing book. Whatever else people may say about Strauss and his followers and however his name has been used, his textual analysis unsurpassed. This is Ivy -- I've not had much luck posting with a name from my phone

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
Anonymous said...
(From Ivanna-Anna)
Child vs. Kid
I was corrected whenever I used the word "Kid" by my mother and aunt, they would say "Kids are baby goats!".

~ABC said...

This will be a fascinating read! I'm looking forward to it.

Mainah said...


I sought to find a missing little girl and I found myself. Your work is tremendous, serious and needed and I have mock it, childishly. I worried about aesthetics.

Trigger said...

This sounds terrific!

ME said...

Lmao you judge 1000's of years of "faith"one 1magicians "view"buy his book? Lol NO he's obviously biased look at his name.

Anonymous said...

ONLY IN AMERICA!!!

Lemon said...

Peter Hyatt said...
"I know but a little on it, and will post the formal announcement when it is available. I am gauging the interest here."
_____

~ raises both hands ~

Nic said...

Peter, you should have been a salesman. Your excitement/enthusiasm is infectious.

:0)

Happy Sunday!

Mainah said...


I'm glad Peter didn't go in to sales.

I was raised in my early years in Catholicism. I still have an interest in biblical teachings. I've often offended people and been offended while talking about religion.

My dad taught me to value truth. He was a good, decent man who worked diligently and served his country proudly. I admire that.

Seems my mom was preoccupied by more material things, not as interested in church but had strong vocal beliefs about religion when others were around. Actually, she had strong opinions about everything when others were around.














Anonymous said...

I have the bible had several scribes putting it together. If this is true I wonder if SCAN can pick up the different writers and if so, would their personal lives be revealed.

dadgum said...

Mainah said..
Actually, she had strong opinions about everything when others were around.

sounds all too familiar..

Anonymous said...

" I heard" not I have as written above, dang those cell phones!

ME said...

The USA hires a Jew to discredit the "bible"GOD YOUR STOOPID!!!! ****** waits for a Jewish delete********* lol

Anonymous said...

Peter.,...gosh,.,,golly where u from?just askin mu Hebrew *friend*

Mainah said...


Yes, Dadgum. I got it from her.

I read Genesis once a long time ago and skimmed through it several times.



Apple said...

I am interested

dadgum said...

mainah..apologies..I meant it sounded like my Mom. And, I suppose, me..
:o)

dawnSoCa said...

So exciting!!!!! He really is a genius,and so fascinating to listen to. I can't wait to read his book!

Anonymous said...

I am interested! I would love to read an analysis of scripture. I know from a friend that the Hebrew in the Torah has many levels of meaning, each letter, each number, and each word, so this should be fascinating.

Because it is God's Word, I would imagine it has an infinite depth.

S + K Mum said...

Sounds very interesting - I'm looking forward to this, and the comments...... :)

I am still checking in, hoping to see more about The McCanns - is there going to be any new analysis on them soon? There is no mention of them and their search in the media here in Britain. I'm sure Peter was going to follow up on his last posting about them......and I am soooo desperate to know what he concludes from their interviews....I know what I think but I would love to hear Peter's views, pleeeeease :)

Trigger said...

Mainah said,
"My dad taught me truth"

You are fortunate.

I've spent a lifetime trying to discern truth from fiction. It has paid me big dividends in my life when I could make decisions based on truth instead of a lie.

Hobnob said...

Hi S + K Mum

Have you not heard the latest news (apart from the allged sighting in Brazil that is several years old)

Come Closer my friend and pay attention.

As all us old hands in the mccann story know, every time there is a bad story concerning the mccanns about to break there is always a sighting. it is fun to pick the place and decribe the latest swarthy abductor.

This time what has broken that the british media are avoiding printing and hence the sighting is 2 fold.
Firstly the accounts which are vague as ever with no explanaton on what the money has been spent on since they sacked their private dicks last mrch and the phone line goes unanswered,
The really biggie though they don't wantt publicised is...

They have asked for their case against Goncalo Amaral to be suspended for 6 months whilst they come to an agreement acceptable for him. they have capitulated.
The pro mccanns are flooding the forums claiming he has folded.
if this were the case the mccanns would be shouting it from the rooftops and it would be all over the news, the fat plod from Portugal admits defeat etc. What we have is silence which tells us it is in fact the mccanns who have quit.
This is interesting since we know they never turn down the chance of a quick buck if there is even a sniff of a chance of winning.
Clearly someone somewhere has said we are not paying you legal bills anymore, the fund has said the same, a lawyer has told them since you lost the book case and finally handed the books back, you have no chance of winning a libel case since all the fact in his book can be read in the police files.
They bow have to come to a deal with Goncalo so this will inclide all his costs, lost income from the sale of his book and damages ( damages may not be muchsince Portugal rarely give more than a 5 figure sum although since the Portugues hate the mccanns they may make an exception. No doubt they will try and get a confifentiality agreement in so they can spin it, we hope he turns it down and demands a public apology since they seriously libelled and defamed him in the media and her bewk.
All this has not come out in the britsh media although the forums are buzzing and posting comments in the various news sites ( we are impressed they are even allowing comments since most are negative, we think the media know and are waiting for them to make a statement)

S + K Mum said...

Thanks Hobnob!

I am delighted to hear they are trying to get out of this court case against Amaral! I think he will not go quietly...why should he?...they have behaved in the most disgusting way towards him. (True colours). Actually, I hope they are forced to go ahead with it and it's shouted from the roof-tops that they have been beaten fair and square, rather than getting bowed to and just handed money!!
Do you know the latest on the so called 'British led review'? Do you think the re-think towards Amaral is connected to what's going on with that aswell?
I suppose I have kept away from the sites about this because I get so frustrated by it all! That's why I would love to read Peter's analysis on their interviews. It cuts through all the 'bull' and it is what it is.
:)

Hobnob said...

It then gets interesting.
You may be aware they are suing Tony Bennet in regard to his booklets and posts where he repeats facts from the police files, they forced him to make a lifetime undertaking to pretty much say nothing about the mccanns that even remotely hinted they told porkies and were involved in her death.

Since the news broke about Goncao Amaral (ex lead detective) Tony has kept quiet and the feeling is they will frop their case against him as well as they have no leg to stand on.

they are stuck and cannot win either way.
If they proceed with their case against him it will go to a full libel trial and we all know how courtphobic they are what with telling the truth and such and perjury carries a life sentence.
Since the police files will support Tony and the mccann chums and themselves haven't co-operated and kate admitting she was hindering the search by not answering the 49 questions DOH!(they claim Tony is hindering the search by claiming Madeleine is dead)

Should they by chance win, as soon as it comes out about Goncalo, Tony can then sue them for return of any monies, defamation and so on so they will have to return the money plus pay all the costs.

In te meantime it is possible (we are pushing for it) that when it comes out about Goncalo winning the media can sue them for return of the monies they paid out of court £550,000+ plus all costs.

Then the fun really begins.
the tapas 7 who paid their winnings into the fund may also face being sued by Goncalo and Robert Murat, will they in turn sue the mccanns for returnof their mone in order to fight the charges or settle out of court.
Clarence mitchell will also be in the firing ine as he spoke for the mccanns. Now will he sue them for making him libel and defame by using their own words or will they sue him for claiming what he said as spokesman for them were in fact his own words, WHAT FUN.
Since the fund appears to be light multiple thousands and cannot be used for their legal fees the mccanns are screwed since their backes have walked away and won't continue paying any defence fees.

No doubt they will try and spin it as them all taking money away from the search for Madeleine although no one has been actively looking for her since at least last march.

This then leaves them with few options, the Scotland Yard review is as far as we can tell concurring with the PJ all roads point to death and a cover up.
will the tapas 7 decide to cover their own butts and start seeking a deal especially tanner and david payne ( who loves to bathe other peoples children)
it will also lead to an answer perhaps as to why gerry has a registration number of 19309 in the child abuse CATS system? It shows as empty which begs the question why create an empty file? they don't make a file just in case. This then leads to thoughts that jim gamble ( ex boss of CEOP)who quit in a tantrum when it was amalgamated emptied several files as he was known to do. why would someone delete a child abuse file one asks especially the files of a couple who admitted child neglect, were susect in a homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report towhom he gave his whole hearted support. Hmmmmm

What a tangled web they weave in order the public to decieve.

Hobnob said...

Hi S + k mum

The consensus on the blogs is he will demand a public apology espcially after all the nastiness they said about him.
He left the force in order to be able to freely speak his mind rather than being kept silent.
I also wonder if the blairs and brown are sweating since we know they pulled political strings to support the mccanns.
We know several diplomats who exressed doubt about what was claimed to hve happened were fired or posted to distant climes.

We know a social worker who was i PDL offered her service to support kate, recognised david payne but wasn't sure if it was as a colleague, a witness in a child abuse case or as most seem to think a suspect ( especially given his prediliction for bathing children and the statements from the Drs Gaspar in relation to a conversation they witnessed between gerry and david)

It is also worth noting that david payne bore a striking resmeblance to Robert Murat and also a local estate agent.

It has been wondered if tanner substituted Murat for her husband.

We have also noted that once again raymond hewlett (convicted paedophile) was brought up again in one paper implying he was involved which is convenient since he died of cancer, was cleared by the uk police and refused to talk to the mccanns private dicks who ten said he wasn't involved either.
It was roundly mocked when we pointed out he was in his 60's thin baldng with grey hair and frail, not at all like the tall, swarthy, dark haired foreigner who strolled away as described by tanner but hey why let facts get in the way of a good story that points away from the obvious suspects.

S + K Mum said...

It surely is heating up in the McCann camp!

It all sounds too good to be true.

Yes I am aware of Tony Bennett,I wish him luck and hope things do change for him.

I know it's a review of all the material the PJ have, but do you think they will reinterview them all (McCanns, holiday friends etc)? before the end? They can only be charged through the Portuguese system, is this right?
Do you know if there is an estimated end in sight for the Yard review?

Not forgetting the Smiths sighting of Gerry! ;-)

Trigger said...

"My dad taught me to value truth"

Sorry, for the misquote, Mainah. I have been known to make mistakes and typos.

Faith said...

I'm a student of the Book,so I too would be interested to know what translation is being used for that work. I have some 25+ translations on my PC and at least that many commentaries. I do believe the Book is God's inspired word.

"He who is of God hears God's words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God."
John 8:47 NKJV

Sus said...

Peter,
Did Sapir use SCAN on the entire Book of Genesis? Or Moses' history on? I can't wait to see his work! My main questions are in early Genesis. Those ANDS in the creation story bother me. Also, the use of MEN and SONS OF GOD in the same verses. Oh, I look forward to reading this!

Mainah said...



Hello, My name is Mainah, and I'm a liar. :)

Dee said...

How exciting. This should be really interesting.

Mainah said...


Dadgum, About our moms and ourselves. It's the truth. I'm trying not to judge truth (and lies) as good or bad anymore, rather something that just is. It must take lots of practice and lots of discipline because I want to say, "it's okay", but that would be an opinion without discernment.




R.L. Haley said...

Look forward to it!

Anonymous said...

Despite my deep admiration for the author, I'm not quite sure what the aim of this exercise is. I will, however, be interested to see the results, especially setting the conclusions reached against those from source criticism, redaction criticism and form criticism.

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla

form criticism.
January 21, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Criticism is good as long as it doesn't impede progress…sorry about the passive language. I'm fresh out of humorous satire.

Hobnob said...

From twitter...a tweet
Joana Morais ‏@xklamation

Scotland Yard in Porto for Maddie

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/01/scotland-yard-in-porto-for-maddie.html … Good news, case to be formally re-opened! Reconstruction time! #McCann


Scotland Yard in Porto for Maddie


21 January 2013 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment

by Joaquim Gomes

The Scotland Yard team that is responsible for the British investigation to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is at the Judiciary Police headquarters in Porto to «evaluate the current status» of the case - the SOL learned.

The British officers arrived today to Porto and are currently in a meeting with their counterparts from the Judiciary Police.

The reopening and re-analysis of the "Maddie" case - missing for nearly six years - was initiated 10 months ago, by the National Direction of the Judiciary Police who nominated a special team led by Helena Monteiro, a superior chief coordinator of criminal investigation.

The British authorities expect that eventual new data to be collected by the special PJ team, allow for the process to be formally reopened by the General Attorney's Office.

After an initial investigation led by Gonçalo Amaral, the case went, still at the PJ of Portimão, to Paulo Rebelo, the current director of the Judiciary Police in Lisbon, but without any practical solution.

Madeleine McCann disappeared on the night of May 9(sic) 2007 from an apartment in a tourist resort in Praia da Luz, in the Algarve, she has not been found so far. At the time, Maddie McCann was nine days away of her fourth birthday.

in: SOL, 21.01.2013


brosnanfan said...

I am stoked!

Totally STOKED!

Moar info! Moar!

(I'd love to see one on the Four Gospels.)

S + K Mum said...

Thanks again Hobnob!

I am confused though, is it saying they have no new data yet, or that the British have new data to pass to the PJ? What do you think?

Hopefully the case will be re-opened, this is what everyone wants to see happen including The McCanns, right?

Anonymous said...

Thanks again Hobnob!
I am confused though, is it saying they have no new data
You're confused???? There's five days of reading and hours wasted on an article about a article???? Really? I need to pinch myself. Am I on a "I dream about Bombay" or whatever that movie was called…. my kids are alot smarter then me.

Anonymous said...


January 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM

"form criticism.
January 21, 2013 at 5:15 PM
Criticism is good as long as it doesn't impede progress…sorry about the passive language. I'm fresh out of humorous satire."

I'm the anon you replied to. I'm not quite sure what you mean here, but I also see now that my original post was unclear. What I meant, without actually expressing it at all well, is that it's alway interesting to see a new tool applied to something where long established and respected tools are in place; sometimes it's the only way of seeing weaknesses in those tools, or even invalidating them entirely. At other times, a new approach doesn't invalidate the older ones but adds to the knowledge those techniques supply. So I await the results of this with interest.

On another note entirely: fascinating news re the McCanns, Hobnob. Thanks for sharing.

Lis said...

This is a book I'd really like to read!

Lis said...

Yukari, if the account of Solomon had been reworded, it would no longer make any sense, would it? For it is the language used that makes the story.

Shelley said...

I cant wait! I have questioned things my whole life. Been aware when people did t answer questions, avoided direct responses. Didn't fully understand till I came across statement analysis just this past year.

Now I can't get enough!

Now to analyze something like this is very intriguing to me.

The bible, religion etc has always been one of the things I questioned. I always just felt like it didn't add up, contradicted itself and just left too much unanswered. To me, I felt like if there was a clear explanation and everything had a purpose.. That religion would make sense. It would not just tell people to believe in something "just because" which is basically what it comes down too. There is no proof, no science to confirm what is said. And then depending where you grew up, those stories varied. If we had one god for example that created everything.. It would be one story, one direction, one set of rules. It is not. It has never made sense to me. I respect everyone's beliefs, but in my mind I still doubt and question everything.

So this is something I will eagerly await!

Hobnob said...

Lemon said...
Peter Hyatt said...
"I know but a little on it, and will post the formal announcement when it is available. I am gauging the interest here."
_____

~ raises both hands ~


No lemon juice in your peelpits so you gotta be using antijuice and deoderant.

All new, longer lasting pongbgon for the citrus fruitette on the go, 48 hr protection, no more embarassing juice stains on your peel, invisible spray leaves no marks and leave you smelling naturally citrus fresh.
Try it now or be a rotten apple :)


Hobnob said...

Hi S + K Mum

The gruesomes haveasked for their case against Goncalo Amaral to be suspended until a deal is reached which is acceptable to him.

Ths is why leaks of this sighting (to media that are pro gruesome) came out and also why the accounts were delayed.

So far the media has mentioned the sighting and the police visit to Portugal and no mention at all of them capitulating ( i wonder why hehe)

Cos i am a nice Hobs, i emailed the express pointing out this fake pic ( it was a bomb scare in ibiza in 2007) i also mentioned in passing the gruesomes capitulating and that they should have a quiet word with their lawyers re: returning the monies they had to pay out to the gruesomes and the 7 dwarves re: the claims Madeleine was dead and the parents were suspects in her disappearance ( damn the cadaver dogs, unbelievable timelines, bad acting, refusal to cooperate and general lawyering up with defence and extradition lawyers and spin doctoring on an epic scale)
They read my email so what they do now is up to them.

The gruesomes meanwhile are hunkering down pondering how they can spin this in any positive way and hoping Goncalo Amaral Will agree to non disclosure agreement so nothing can be said by either side allowing them to maintain the facade. The forums seem to think based on his words that he will demand a full and public apology Yaaaaaaaaay. Tony Bennet is also aware and looking at his options since his booklets etc used the facts and conclusions from the police files.

All in all a bad place to be if you are a mccann, a tapas 7 or clarence mitchell

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
Peter, You are modest. Your cumulative knowledge taught on this blog addresses recognizing "embedded statements":

Please note that when this statement is viewed in light of all the other statements made to this point, the analyst is confronted with something possibly horrific.

What is Billie Dunn describing? Use the standard principles of analysis including body posture, reporting what did not happen, was not thought, and the standard sensitivity principle.

Here we have the critical "cluster of blues" that can solve a case. Here Billie Dunn is inviting in to see what she saw, with her own eyes:

BILLIE DUNN: "I did see her in her room, but I saw her watching TV.

Monday morning, I looked in her room and it was dark and it looked like she was laying in bed. But I didn`t go touch her, make sure that was her. I just peeked in to make sure she was in bed to ease my mind and..."

We give "so, since, to, therefore, because" the color coding blue as the highest level of sensitivity that can be found in a statement of someone reported what happened. It is here that the person has a need to tell us "why" something was done. This is often the solving of a case. A single "blue" is a strong sensitivity indicator but two or more "blues" is called a "cluster of blues" in which the information contained with the cluster is the most critical information of a case. Just as we highlight "left" in blue, we highlight "because" in any form that seeks to explain why something was done.

If a question is "what did you do?" and it is answered with an explanation "why", it is critical. etc.etc

S + K Mum said...

@ Hobnob,

Well, I look forward to the outcome in 6 months time!

I can see why Mr Bennett will be watching this closely, however, it may be better for him if a conclusion in Mr Amarals favour is reached before he is taken to court.........

I suspect a few people will have emailed the papers and left comments on articles regarding the new 'sighting'(L.O.L!).

Tricky one to spin.

Very sad that the little girl is still missing (not abducted - contrary to spin, but missing). Hopefully this may be the start of the end.

You are right, the internet is going crazy with these latest developments!

(sorry to everyone for hijacking this thread!)

Lemon said...

Bonus points to Hobs for "citrus fruitette on the go" :)

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla

Each time we gather to inaugurate a President we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution. We affirm the promise of our democracy. We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names. What makes us exceptional -- what makes us American -- is our allegiance to an idea articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” (This is well written)

Today we continue A NEVER-ENDING JOURNEY (HUH? I would use more upbeat language,or leave out entirely) to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time.(Actually the rights named seem timeless, so I’d begin this paragraph with the next sentence) For History tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they’ve never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured .(by His people here on Earth. Not to be mixed up with the Aliens on Mars. Previous sentence should end with secured.) (Applause.) (Star Trek Fans) The patriots of 1776 gave to us a republic, a government of, and by, and for the people, entrusting each generation to keep safe our founding creed. (I deleted what was reported in the negative, it makes the sentence stronger)

And for more than two hundred years, we have.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/21/inaugural-address-president-barack-obama

Ivy said...

Also, Peter, have a look at this if you are interested.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/524142/Leo-Strauss-On-the-Interpretation-of-Genesis

Sus said...

Anon 3:41,
Agreed, The Declaration is well written. President Obama then states but it is only words. We can cry all we want that we are free and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...doesn't make it so.

Do you think Americans are the only people in the world and history that the Creator bestowed these rights upon? Of course not. We pursued them. Patriots fought for them. Our founding fathers then instituted a government to ensure future generations can pursue these inalienable rights. I am fortunate enough to have been born in the United States. I don't have to work too hard for these rights as say...a person in Afghanistan.

I've said many times here...the Constitution is designed to be flexible, to be interpreted and change with the times and the will of the people. That is what President Obama means by "bridge to the realities of the times". I'm certain the founding fathers didn't forsee second hand smoke and the battle with the tobacco companies.

After years of tobacco companies propoganda and deceit, Congress finally took them on. Remember that once upon a time the tobacco companies had such a tight hold on our government that cigarettes couldn't be discussed in relation to cancers. You know...like guns in relation to gun violence.

I liked President Obama's speech. It reminds us that we have rights, but we have to be a part of securing them for ourselves and others based on the reality of the changing times.

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time.

what President Obama means by "bridge to the realities of the times" K, great, you changed his words.

Sus said...

My mistake. Hard to scroll back and forth to quote on a phone. "realities of our time."

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
I' m uneducated I thought he was talking about the Constitution, "the enduring strength of our Constitution" I see where he switches to the Declaration of Independence.
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Yeah. for me anyway, there's no need for politicans to bridge the meaning of self evident

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


to bridge the meaning of those words I thank my Lord and Savior Jesus.

Anonymous said...

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time.

And for more than two hundred years, we have.

When in the last 237 years has an American president questioned the meaning of the Declaration of Independence?

Sus said...

You have got to be kidding!!!
"that all men are created equal..."

A few presidents have commented on that phrase! (Said sarcastically)

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
Roosevelt used it to enact social welfare during the depression, he was clear in his meaning. Sarcasm, critism and lemon are all good; however I suggest more meaningful honest direct dialogue if you're interested, or at least direct links.

Anonymous said...

That's Right! I'm the person that was told to OPERATE OUTSIDE OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE LAW!!!! Because normal citizens can do things that the @$$%&&% can't??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Thought and Reality:
It seemedlike a good idea at the time
Reality Check!

Sus said...

Anon, anon, anon
I don't understand. I was answering to the anon who said that in 237 years a president had never questioned the Declaration of Independence.

Who. MEN is and what EQUAL means has been questioned repeatedly. How we balance life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is why we have government.

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
I see benefits in group analysis.

Anonymous said...

Me too! Sometimes I'm hesitant to go forward with analysis out of fear of messing up...

Anonymous said...

That's why I like to see the feedback on my analysis, because alot of the time I need my goofups pointed out.???