Friday, June 21, 2013

Mark Redwine: Statement Analysis of Letter Part One, Introduction

Statement Analysis has indicated Mark Redwine for deception in the disappearance of his son, Dylan.  In his initial statements, he did not issue a reliable denial, and has also indicated that a dispute of some form took place in which Mark Redwine appears to have lost his temper, and likely caused the death of his son.  His statements show that he has an awareness that Dylan is not alive.

When he appeared on the Dr. Phil Show, he was also deceptive, not speaking from memory, specifically about Dylan and the last time he saw Dylan alive, and stated, on television, that he would take a polygraph.

Statement Analysis showed that this was also not to be, and the next day, on a two part program, we saw that he did, in fact, refuse to take the polygraph.

In his refusal, Redwine blamed the polygrapher, himself, for causing Redwine to refuse it.  This is a consistent pattern in his speech:  blaming others and refusing to take responsibility.

It appeared that Dr. Phil felt that he was close to eliciting a confession (or admission, more likely) from Redwine, even offering him paid legal counsel.

Redwine has consistently blamed others, including Dylan's mother, as well as working from tangents; that is, diverting questions away from him in order to change the topic at hand.

Since he has refused to deny harming Dylan, in Statement Analysis we say:  "If someone is unable or unwilling to tell us that he did not do it, we are not permitted to say it for him."

Behavioral Analysis also indicates guilt on the part of Redwine, though it is not something dealt with extensively here.  Suffice it to say that like others indicated for deception, he has done due diligence in order to hinder the recovery of Dylan's remains.

We also learned of perversity within Mark Redwine's life that was, apparently known to Dylan, which suggests a reasoning behind Redwine's insistence that his son respect him, in the context of being on national television while the son's sibling remains missing.  Whereas innocent parents would care for nothing but the missing, Redwine showed his need to be respected, something that Dylan would struggle to do given not only Redwine's perversity, but his penchant for blaming and likely verbally attacking Dylan's mother, Elaine.

I suggest that Dylan may have died defending his mother's honor, among other things that Redwine was angry about, including Dylan's desire to see his friends more than see his father.  The insult of seeing a photograph of his father in perversity, blaming Dylan's mother, and Dylan's choice to see his friends culminated in the perfect storm towards an acutely immature, selfish, boorish, and easily insulted father who appeared to live life to bring pain to others, especially his ex wife.

Mark Redwine has likely read analysis of his statements and here, in careful preparation, we still see signals of sensitivity, highlighting an important lesson:

When one reads the "I didn't do it" teaching of a reliable denial, he may, like a parrot repeating a phrase, state, "I didn't do it!" yet, it is in the initial hours of the investigation where he was speaking in the "Free Editing Process"; that is, speaking for oneself, without the need for preparation.  It is in the Free Editing Process that the innocent will say so, using an economy of words, and without sensitivity. This is the "Reliable Denial" formula:

1.  The use of the Pronoun "I", something used millions of times, which means the subject has had lots of practice using it, and is exceedingly proficient in its usage.

2.  The past tense verb, "did not" or the more casual, "didn't" is also something understood and used appropriately by age 5 by humans.  We know if something happened yesterday, or if it is yet to happen, and the innocent do not struggle with the verb tense.

3.  The accusation is met without difficulty.  The third component of a Reliable Denial is that the subject knows what he is accused of, and answers it.  "I did not take the missing money" is a good example of such. "I did not cause Dylan's disappearance" was not something Mark Redwine was able to bring himself to say during the initial Free Editing Process.  Reading analysis and simply parroting the words does not make it reliable.  The window on the Reliable Denial closed shortly after Redwine was interviewed.   "I would never harm Dylan" is something common among the guilty.  By itself, it is unreliable, though acceptable if it followed a reliable denial.  "I did not harm Dylan; I never would!"is an example of such.

Here is the letter in its entirety.  This will be followed by Part Two, the analysis itself.
Posting it first allows readership to address it, as is, without emphasis added.  Please put your thoughts in the comments section.  See if you can pick out areas in which he appears to have 'learned' from Statement Analysis.



"I would like to take the opportunity to address the disappearance of my son Dylan as we are now at 6 months. Our community like many across the country are still missing one of our children. I like the many who know him miss his happy personality, smile as well as his outgoing and giving nature. I know Dylan is loved and missed by all those who know him and we owe it to him to continue our search to find him. Over the last several months the focus in finding Dylan seems to have changed to blaming and disrespect. I will be the first to say "I will never give up" and I am honored to have Dylan as my son.

There are many aspects of Dylan's disappearance, I like many in our communities across the country struggle with each day. I am asking that we stop and evaluate the process as a community, to come up with a more productive approach in the search for Dylan and missing children across the country. I feel more should be done anytime a child goes missing. No child who is missing should have to wait for certain 
criteria to be met before the public is notified and an alert be sent out. I want to find my son and bring him home safe. I need the help of every single person out there to do this. Dylan could be anywhere out there so PLEASE look at his picture and the face of every child you see his age to see if it could be Dylan.

There have been many rumors started most of which are untrue and none that have been helpful in our search for Dylan. There are a few members of the community who continue to hamper the search efforts. It's not for me to judge these individuals nor do I believe Dylan would condone anyone else judging them. I thank the many individuals and businesses who have contributed in our search for Dylan. Although several attempts have been made, I would like to publicly invite Dylan's mother too mediation services being offered. I believe the more we all work together to bring Dylan home the more successful his safe return will be.

To Dylan: I know in my heart you are out there and can see all the things that are going on. "I want you to know I love you and will never give up to bring you home safe". Myself as well as many in our community and across the nation have you in our thoughts and prayers everyday. Each day many including me, search for the truth and the person or persons responsible for your disappearance. Speaking for myself, I will not rest until the truth comes out and justice has been served.

To Cory: Like Dylan I love you and will never give up on you. Regardless of the things you say or do I will always care. I feel the same pain, hurt and feeling of helplessness you and your mother feel. I can't make this any more clear, I don't have Dylan, I have never had Dylan and I absolutely do not know where Dylan is.
To whom it may concern: I want you to live each day as it were your last. You can't run far enough or hide under any rock that can't be turned over. Dylan is loved by all who know him. You may find his disappearance entertaining or even amusing. Regardless of who you are and why? All I want is Dylan returned safely. The truth always comes out and when it does may God have pity on your soul.

I love you Dylan,
PaPa"

61 comments:

Jen said...

Although he is clearly trying to choose his words more carefully, he still uses we, our, us, community, I, like many others, etc...when speaking of hopes, wants, feelings, & so on. He still seems to have a hard time just speaking for himself even after studying up on how to do it...he almost always follows his 'I' statements, with 'like others', and then a generic hope or want regarding his own son or other missing children.

He also takes more words and effort to express his concern and hopes for reform of how WE deal with all missing children, than he does directly addressing Dylan. He still DOES NOT directly address the 'kidnapper', instead adding a vague threat to 'whom it may concern'. Also while answering to the rumors, he only says 'most' are not true...meaning some of them are.

Trigger said...

"I know that Dylan is loved and missed...etc.

Past tense references

Mark knows that Dylan is dead.

Trigger said...

"You may find his disappearance entertaining or amusing"

Where did that come from?

Mark thinks that Dylan's assailant has smug feelings of inner happiness that Dylan has vanished without a trace. This indicates that Mark believes that the culprit is savoring his deed and cheerfully reliving it. Like a "nanner-nanner-nanner" act of revenge.

Trigger said...

When I read the first paragraph, I thought, replace the word "disappearance" with the word "death" and it sounds just like something someone would say at a funeral.

Anonymous said...

He also uses the present, " I want you to know I love you....."

Mindy

Anonymous said...

Guilty parent jumping on the ''missing children'' bandwagon, as if you would be as concerned for all missing children as your OWN missing child! Just like the McCanns.

Anonymous said...

''Many including me'' !!!!!

I suspect Redwin doesn't usually lose himself in the crowd in that way.

Very very impersonal,then occasionally he remembers how he should be feeling and puts in an 'I'
Still very distanced ''I want you know'' ''

''To Cory, like Dylan, I love you'' Ver awkward grammar, probably because he can't manage to say ''Cory I love you just as much as I love/d Dylan''

Miss Translated said...

to Cory ''Like Dylan, I love you and will never give up on you'' (in spite of what you do, say etc)

Translation '' you too are dead to me''

He uses the same. phrase to ''give up on''

Still blaming his other son and the boys' mother!

Repellent. Luckily completely unconvincing. He's not going to get away with this :-)

Trigger said...

Miss Translated got it right.

"You too are dead to me"

Bold arrogance from Mark.

Jen said...

To Dylan: I know in my heart you are out there, and can see all of the things that are going on.

Once again, like Marks statements about 'praying' to Dylan, he speaks of him having the ability to see EVERYTHING, as in his spirit/from heaven. Sounds like a eulogy, rather than words spoken to an alive Dylan. Why does Mark not encourage Dylan to find a way to escape, call authorities or just come home if he believes that Dylan can actually see what's going on...because he knows Dylan is gone.

Shelley said...

He clearly is trying very hard to look like a father that loves his son and is searching for him.

Instead of actually just getting out there looking.

All these parents with their letters, their facebook pages. GET OUTSIDE AND LOOk. Facebook is not bringing your kid home. A letter is not getting to Dylan even if he was locked in someones basement.

Go find him.

But clearly hes not looking. Like Billie, they are focused on fighting the rumors of their involvement, and working to "look" like a good parent.

Sorry guys, good parents dont have to try to prove it. They just are.

Skip said...

I will never give up on you... may = I haven't won yet, and I won't give up till I do. I'm not in control, but I will be.

Shelley said...

I also wanted to ask who all of Peters followerings also follow the blog "eyes for lies"? The human lie dector. I used to think I agreed with most of her views.

However, lately.. Not so much.

She feels like Mark is being honest. But that the mom, not so much.

She thinks Madelline Mccanns parents are being totally honest.

So, anyone else out there have an opinion on her?

With these 2, to me being so clearly full of guilt (I mean the Mccanns were more worried about publicity and their legal counsel than finding their child) I was just curious what others that read her blog think.

I did ask why she believes the Mccanns recently on a new post, but she only replied that its just basically her gut. Despite the fact that things she usually addresses as her cause for feeling they are dishonest in other cases (body languate, speech, etc) apply here yet she does not seem to have the same veiw.

Just curious....

Anonymous said...

To Cory: Like Dylan I love you and will never give up on you. Regardless of the things you say or do I will always care. I feel the same pain, hurt and feeling of helplessness you and your mother feel. I can't make this any more clear, I don't have Dylan, I have never had Dylan and I absolutely do not know where Dylan is.

Sounds like a warning to Cory.

katydid said...

" I know Dylan is loved and missed by all those who know him and we owe it to him to continue our search to find him."

[ what a weak reason for a father to search for his missing son. He owes it to him because everyone in the community misses him?]

"I will be the first to say "I will never give up" and I am honored to have Dylan as my son."

[ I will never give up = I will never give it up and confess.]

"Speaking for myself, I will not rest until the truth comes out…"

[ I think he is telling his own truth here---he will not 'rest' until the truth comes out. It must be exhausting to try and cover this evil deed up.]

"To Cory: Like Dylan I love you and will never give up on you. Regardless of the things you say or do I will always care."

[ This sounds like a threat towards Cory, imo. ]

"I feel the same pain, hurt and feeling of helplessness you and your mother feel."

[ This sounds like a description of what he put Dylan through, he hurt him when he was in a helpless position. And it also sounds like the motive, as he now has Cory and Elaine in that same painful, vulnerable, helpless position.]

"You can't run far enough or hide under any rock that can't be turned over…"

[ This sounds like a description of his attempt to dispose of the remains. He had to run off the main road and find an impenetrable hiding place.]


" I can't make this any more clear,…"

[ Obfuscation, smoke and confusion]

"I don't have Dylan, I have never had Dylan and I absolutely do not know where Dylan is."

[ have never had and absolutely are extraneous and weaken the denial.]


"You may find his disappearance entertaining or even amusing."

[ This sounds like a description of his own emotional situation. He is secretly enjoying this and amuses himself by the pain and chaos he creates around him.]

Trigger said...

"I want you to know I love you.."

Mark knows that Dylan doesn't know that he loves him, so he has to clarify it with "I want you to know" before he states "I love you."

What a give away!

Nobody says "I want you to know I love you" unless there is doubt, misgivings, or uncertainty about it.

Mark you are guilty as sin.

Dee said...

@ Shelley...I have followed the lies blog for quite a while. I usually agree with her on what she sees in people. With the two cases you mentioned, the McCanns and Mark Redwine, I completely disagree with her take. I can't see how she came to her conclusion. I can't understand how she sees Mark as truthful and Elaine as dishonest. And you're right, she did not give a clear reason for thinking so, it was more of a "gut" thing.

Hobnob said...

I have never had Dylan and I absolutely do not know where Dylan is

How can he say he never had Dylan if he told us he collected him at the airport, had a drive through McDonald's went to walmart, went home, watched a movie and then spent X amount of time trying to wake him up.

If he never had Dylan then who did all of the above?

Is he telling us he collected Dylan and then promptly murdered him thus allowing him to say he never had Dylan? All he had in fact was a body?

Absolutely weakens the statement, he knows where Dylan is, perhaps not to the inch.

Hobnob said...

another case of kate mccann opening mouth and inserting feet

From her bewk


.p219
Did they really believe that a dog could smell the ‘odour of death’ three months later from a body that had been removed so swiftly?
They were adding two and two and coming up with ten.


p. 253
As we now know, the chemicals believed to create the ‘odour of death’, putrescence and cadaverine, last no longer than thirty days.


This from a doctor?? thank goodness she is no longer practicing ( i wonder what would happen if she stopped practising and diid the real deal?

How does she know the body was removed swiftly?
How does she know there was a body when all along her and hubby have been telling us Maddie has come to no serious harm.

If being dead isn't serious harm, what the heck is?

Trigger said...

"I never had Dylan"

This is a contradiction from Mark's earlier statements.

Shelley said...

Dee,

What I also wonder, at least with the Mccans and "eyes for lies", especially as many things as she has given for her reason she belived others were lying yet these 2 did that..


With all the attacks the Mcanns have done to anyone that disputed them. I mean even with Pat Brown the profiler, they got Amazon.com to stop selling her book. While it may have been temporary... I wonder if she is afraid of them taking action against her?

Just wondering. That did cross my mind as much as the Mccanns have gone after anyone that tried to dispute their claims.

Shelley said...

"I never had Dylan"


That to me almost feels like a slip. That Dylan was never at his home so he never had him in his mind.

I personally do not think Dylan ever made it that far.

Like most of you, I agree that a fight started at some time after dinner. And he never made it home with Dylan.

Faith said...


"To Dylan: I know in my heart you are out there and can see all the things that are going on."

Maybe this language indicates that he is now some place high up with a view from a vantage point higher than the area of the town. I know they were searching the lake and surrounding shoreline ... but maybe he is far higher up than that.

And then we have: "You can't run far enough or hide under any rock that can't be turned over…"

Perhaps he will be found high up with a view to "see all that's going on," placed on or under a rock that needs to be overturned.

Shelley said...

Another site I have come across.

Forensic Astrology.

This one the person focuses on the time of death and the victims astrology chart.

http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/

Now, I think that the fact he does not have the exact time (IE 9:05am vs just the date) can affect charts. I dont do them, but my mom has for years and has been accurates at least for me. Even has told me at times issues I was dealing with.

Anyways.. Im not saying its accurate. Just that I have had some readings that were very much right on.


But... this site tries to find the time of death if not known by going thru different times or if they know, looking at that.

Now, I have found it interesting on one hand, but then found several errors on the other as it does not appear the person has gone back and udpdated. Like many of them said the body would be found by 2005. And well, 2013 no body.

But, then I wonder if the improper time of birth may be a factor?

But what I found interesting, was look at these cases from a differnt view. We have the words spoken here, the body language on eyes for lies, then this was more about who they are inside.

Some could just fit in with what we know or think about cases, others not out there that make me wonder.

For example, he claims Amanda Knox is well, evil inside. And that she is very into weird sexual experiences.

He said that Gerry McCann is violent. And was abusive. Which, when I look in to his eyes... I feel like I can see it? Ive known alot of doctors that put on that perfect front of the great husband and loving father. And it was all fake. Who knows.

Hailey Dunn... He said she was taken to the hotel alive. Was sold/traded for drugs money. And killed later. Sounded like he thought Shawn took her, but some other person killed her.

But interesting reading....

Thought I would share. Most the cases I was not familir with.

But a couple that I mentioned above. there is also some interesting information about Kryon and Casey Anthony.

Shelley said...

The astrology blog I just mentioned, he also talked about the Jeffrey Macdonald case. Which is one I intially was torn on.

I now totally think he killed the family. My biggest reason was the LACK of blood. If your moving bodies to perform CPR (aside from the lack of air he claims he had and that they should have been moved to a hard surface and on their backs which didnt happen) he would have been coverd in blood.

He says he was crawling cause he could hardly breath... there would have been hand prints all over the house. floor. walls.

To me, he was too clean about the whole thing to then state he tried to save lives. ANd, well, if you lie about trying to save your family, that leads me to only one conclusion, you wante them dead...



Anyways......

his comments on that are interesting.

he almost started to say there was someone else, but then its like he later thinks it may have been macdonald himself. stepping outside to get a weapon.

Again, some of the facts I know about done mesh with his timeline, however, I again go back to him not have the exact time everyone was born and my mom has told me that even a couple hours can have a very big effect on a reading for a chart. So could be that.

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla
I think the purpose of this letter is MR wanting to SUDDENLY join the searchers. MR knows where Dylan is located.

Anonymous said...

Please help find Ayla

in our search for Dylan. Although several attempts have been made, I would like to publicly

S + K Mum said...

Mark starts off by saying "I" would like and "my" son, then can't help but trail off into sharing with "we" and "our". He is trying but he still can't bring himself to own his statements because he is deceptive. He would like to take this opportunity....he's had plenty opportunity. Is he leaking his thought process of before Dylan disappeared....he would take this opportunity which may be his only one? Court ordered visit that may not happen again?

Jazzie said...

"Speaking for myself, I will not rest until the truth comes out and justice has been served."

I think this is a truthful statement.

Jazzie said...

"Regardless of who you are and why? All I want is Dylan returned safely. The truth always comes out ..."

I think this is a truthful statement.

Jazzie said...

"I love you Dylan,
PaPa"

I think this is a truthful statement.

Anonymous said...

Off topic: Could you do an analysis of Alan Smith, suspect in the death of his wife in Seattle, WA? Video link below:
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Person-of-interest-in-estranged-wifes-murder-arrested-on-obstruction-accusation-212368921.html

TIA.

Red Ryder said...

Jen-you hit the nail on the head! Exactly.

rkg said...

Trigger,
"IS loved and missed" is speaking in the present tense.

Just because there is an "-ed" at the end of a word does not mean it is past-tense. There is no other way to make that phrase present-tense, and if one were stating it in the past-tense, it would have to be "I know that Dylan WAS loved and missed." That's not what he said.

I'm not taking his side or anything, but if we're going to state something as certain as "Mark knows Dylan is dead," we ought to be very careful to base it on a correct premise, seeing as that is quite a serious accusation to make against someone.

rkg said...

I get the idea that the statement, "I never had Dylan" refers to the time period after he went missing. He hasn't been unclear when stating (whether truthful or not) that he DID, in fact, retrieve Dylan from the airport, take him to Wal-Mart, and to McDonald's. Those portions of his story have not changed, and I don't think he's contradicting himself here.

What I think he is doing in this letter, especially at this point, is vehemently defending himself. As in, "I know you think I did something to Dylan and hid him, BUT, I don't have him, I never had him, and I don't know where he is." If he were referencing the time when he clearly DID have Dylan with him, he wouldn't have used the phrase, "I DON'T have Dylan." The full sentence here, whether true or untrue, is obviously referencing the time when Dylan was/is missing and Dylan's mother and other son were/are accusing him of having done something with Dylan.

Jen said...

Hi Red Ryder,

I keep coming back and re-reading this statment from MR , & every time I find it more bizarre. I keep trying to imagine what I would say to my son if God forbid I ever found myself in such a situation. First of all he doesn't even address the statement to his own 'missing' son until several paragraphs in. He gets arrogant and throws barbs at the FEW people he feels are hindering the search efforts (as far as I know MR is the only one hindering the search/investigation) but in the same breath says he needs everyone's help to find Dylan *but only by looking at his pictures and comparing them to other boys his age. Its a specific request for 'help' which he knows will lead nowhere. Why doesn't he want any help, from anyone, to find Dylan anywhere? Obviously if Dylan were going into public places, then he would have been home with his mom already...a 14yo kidnap victim would be nearly impossible to control in public!

Even stranger, he adds phrases like 'speaking for myself' within the paragraph addressed to Dylan...extreme distancing considering this is supposed to be his statement. Why does he not simply say..Dylan, I will not give up...etc. Even within the paragraph to Dylan he fails to maintain connection because he knowd the words he's speaking will not be read by Dylan. (Note the difference in wording in the Dylan/Cory paragraphs..his statements to Cory are direct with no prefacing or distancing. He uses 'I' and plainly states his declaration, but with Dylan his statements are distant and conditional.

Jen said...

Hi Red Ryder,

I keep coming back and re-reading this statment from MR , & every time I find it more bizarre. I keep trying to imagine what I would say to my son if God forbid I ever found myself in such a situation. First of all he doesn't even address the statement to his own 'missing' son until several paragraphs in. He gets arrogant and throws barbs at the FEW people he feels are hindering the search efforts (as far as I know MR is the only one hindering the search/investigation) but in the same breath says he needs everyone's help to find Dylan *but only by looking at his pictures and comparing them to other boys his age. Its a specific request for 'help' which he knows will lead nowhere. Why doesn't he want any help, from anyone, to find Dylan anywhere? Obviously if Dylan were going into public places, then he would have been home with his mom already...a 14yo kidnap victim would be nearly impossible to control in public!

Even stranger, he adds phrases like 'speaking for myself' within the paragraph addressed to Dylan...extreme distancing considering this is supposed to be his statement. Why does he not simply say..Dylan, I will not give up...etc. Even within the paragraph to Dylan he fails to maintain connection because he knowd the words he's speaking will not be read by Dylan. (Note the difference in wording in the Dylan/Cory paragraphs..his statements to Cory are direct with no prefacing or distancing. He uses 'I' and plainly states his declaration, but with Dylan his statements are distant and conditional.

Evil pig STFU said...

Stfu your WRONG!

Anonymous said...

I Agree with you,"RKG"Is a fuck faced anus!

LW Land said...

I couldn't even finish reading his lies. Wow. How many times in that did he try to sound like the only one who has the right idea, ie, " I believe we should all work together," (like the rest of us don't think so!)And then there's the way he constantly tries to equate himself with EVERYMAN..."LIKE EVERYONE ELSE." YA, RIGHT. IF his son was "missing," I don't think I'd be trying to sound like "Hey, I like him too! Just like all of you out there!" What an idiot. I know if my child were missing, I'd be a lot more selfish than that...I would be making a plea, crying, begging...as a mother, I can't see talking about my child in such a distant way. Gee, MR misses him just as much as the people in the community do? Not way, way more than anyone could ever imagine? Not more than a local store clerk? Unreal. It's a defensive tone, also, albeit very disjointed, showing, to me, a reluctance to stay on any one topic and to steer us all around in a circle. If one isn't really listening, one could be fooled into thinking he is an over-wrought parent, and he is somehow just not able to express himself in the "expected" way. There's just SO much here that screams "GUILTY!" (To me, this reads almost like an apology to the community for taking Dylan from us.)This man is a hollow, SICK, DISGUSTING shell.

Anonymous said...

This was particularly ominous to me: "I know in my heart you are out there and can see all the things that are going on." How would that be so if MR thinks someone is keeping him holed up somewhere? Dylan is an all-knowing, all-seeing, omnipresent being? And also, the times he speaks in grandiose terms about the "whole nation" and the exaggerated emphasis he puts on his own importance...who does he think he is, the President or something? Argh!

Anonymous said...

Yes!

hobnob is warm bussoms said...

Mris a. :poop:

Anonymous said...

OH SHUT UP!

Nic said...

"You may find his disappearance entertaining or amusing"

What struck me odd about this statement is that parents of missing children project the feelings of their missing children. Like fear, vulnerability. They call out to them in a means to comfort their vulnerable child followed by a plea to the person who has their child to let them go or deliver them to a safe place.

In this instance, Redwine projects feelings onto the the person who committed the crime. Dylan doesn't factor into the emotion of what's going on, i.e., during or in any way how to reconcile things so that Dylan is brought home safely.

I'm left wondering if Redwine has a tendancy to scoff at things he reads and/or sees. If it finds the reporting (and his ex wife and son's anguish) entertaining because he's been "smarter".

jmo

Nic said...

I also find it curious that the word "respect" (for Redwine) has found it's way into his letter.

IMO, The only thing that man is concerned about is his image and how he wants to be treated. (With respect.)

Anyone can say "I love you" but it's the behaviour that backs up the sentiment. Redwine distances any love he has for Cory by putting Dylan between the salutation and the words. In fact, Redwine does say, "Dear Cory" *comma* it's "To Cory" followed by a colon. Like some impersonal directive. And why the comparison? Why not be direct and just say, "I love you, Cory."

What a sad case. I hope they find Dylan.

Nic said...

*should have typed, In fact, Redwine DOESN'T say, "Dear Cory" *comma*. It's "To Cory" followed by a colon.

Jen said...

Sorry for the double post...not sure why, but that seems to happen anytime I post from my phone??

Also, good call Nic on the 'To Cory:', its a very cold way to address your son, especially when followed by a sentimental statement, (he also uses To Dylan:) which further supports the idea that MR's words are hollow (and I think a bit threatening towards Cory considering what appears to have happened to Dylan for having a mind of his own). Its like MR is saying to Cory, I doesn't matter what you do, I'm in control of this game.

Jen said...

Sorry for the double post...not sure why, but that seems to happen anytime I post from my phone??

Also, good call Nic on the 'To Cory:', its a very cold way to address your son, especially when followed by a sentimental statement, (he also uses To Dylan:) which further supports the idea that MR's words are hollow (and I think a bit threatening towards Cory considering what appears to have happened to Dylan for having a mind of his own). Its like MR is saying to Cory, I doesn't matter what you do, I'm in control of this game.

Anonymous said...

Stop double posting. It is annoying.

Anonymous said...

RKG & Jazzie, I agree with your analysis in those statements made by Marc that you find to be true. Also there are other statements made by him that appear to be true as well. I do wonder about his comment that Dylan can "see everything"? This is speaking of the spiritual realm and is not possible unless one is dead and their spirit is hoovering about, or one thinks it is. (It isn't).

Shelly; I know you mean well, but your remarks about reading the charts totally sickens me. Whether you want to hear it or not, this is witchcraft, is soothsaying, is the practice of psychics, charlatans, calling up the so-called spirits of the dead and is of the devil; I don't care if it's performed by your mother or someone elses mother. It is an evil thing and is dangerous. Period. You couldn't pay me a million dollars to follow one of these on their path to hell.

I do, however, agree with you concerning Eyes for Lies. She is no better at guessing at lies than I am, IFF even as good as I am and several others who post here. She is particularly wrong in super-guessing based on her "gut" feelings. Major analyists and very well learned multi-degreed psychiatrists and psychologists, as well as forensic detectives, have known for YEARS that our "gut feelings" cannot be ruled as authentic, in fact, are one of the least measures of accuracy.

I haven't read her blog in more than a year, having filtered out several cases that she misguessed. The idiot actually considers the McCanns innocent, when we have only to consider the decomp odor in the room that was found behind the couch, on the floor and in the tire well of an auto they rented; also that the curtains in the room had been freshly washed? One can't get away from actual forensic evidence, but this woman thinks she can? Then she is dumber than a rock; in fact, too dumb to heed the knowledge of others who are more well-learned than she is. I don't waste my time on Eyes for Lies. Observer

Jazzie said...

Dylan Redwine. Where are you?
I have read and reread news sources.
I know his dad looks bad, but I'm not convinced that his dad is responsible for Dylan's disappearance.
Dylan's friends' comments and other things lead me to believe he was taken by a stranger off the road.
Just me thinking.
I know I could be wrong.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if you mean well or not (nor do I care), but your remarks about reading the charts totally sicken me. Whether you want to hear it or not you are a superstitious judgmental bigot who is very obviously projecting their naive understanding and fears of the great mysteries of life and death on some unwitting commenter. It's truly fabulous that some authority figure brainwashed you at some point into believing that God=good and devil=bad so that you would be a good little indoctrinated puppet, mindlessly spouting off warnings of demons and hellfire to anyone who will listen. That sure must save you a lot of time and trouble from actually using your own mind, huh? True spiritual seekers explore ALL the mysteries of the universe, and ultimately can appreciate all spiritual paths for the gifts they offer to humanity. Here's an idea: Why not do the actual work of exploring the unknown, instead of fearfully declaring it all "evil" and "dangerous"? Your spiritual dishonesty and laziness are truly disgusting.

Anonymous said...

nice ass!

~ABC said...

Anonymous said...
That sure must save you a lot of time and trouble from actually using your own mind, huh?
Why not do the actual work of exploring the unknown, instead of fearfully declaring it all "evil" and "dangerous"? Your spiritual dishonesty and laziness are truly disgusting.

June 22, 2013 at 10:02 PM

No comment. I just think all this bears repeating.

Anonymous said...

It might surprise you to know, Anon @10:02 and ABC at 11:52 on 6/22; that I have already been to all the places of 'enlightenment' and done all the things that you two suggest, including the psychic readers, the ouigi board and other so-called spirit guides; and THEN I sought to find out what GOD had to say about all of it in His Holy Word; and it was THEN that I came to knowleedge of the truth from GODS' perspective. Now THIS I believe, and not anything any unlearned person who has not gone directly to God with the matter can say to me.

If you don't want to go a step further and seek out these matters for yourself, then there's nothing I can do about it. For me, at least I found peace, wisdom and knowledge; never to trouble myself again about these mysterious and unseen spirit matters that only lead to derision and destruction. I wish to same for you. Observer

Shelley said...

To Anon 1:38 PM


Your welcome to your opinion. But your lack of knowledge is clear.
Witchcraft is the belief in magical spells that harness occult forces or evil spirits to produce unnatural effects in the world

Astrology is the study of the positions and aspects of celestial bodies in the belief that they have an influence on the course of natural earthly occurrences and human affairs.

So witchcraft would be attempting to alter things in the world. Where astrology is based on the stars, the planets and the effect their positions have on the world. Control vs what is already destined.
For my part in what I wrote above….I was just asking about anyone else that has read about it as it’s another perspective for those of us that follow crimes and want so badly to see these cases solved and to see justice for the victims. I am an open person. If there is other way that justice can be achieved, then that is what I care about. We live in a very vast world. I don’t claim to know it all or claim to know what is or is not right when it comes to beliefs. Not one person on this planet knows how we were created unless you personally have spoken to god himself. Everyone may have a belief because they were “told” that was the way or led to believe other truths. But does not mean it is the truth. A lot of things in science that we can PROVE contradict many things we have been told to believe. Just because its written, does not make it true.
Open your mind. If you don’t like it or agree with it, that’s your decision. But at least understand what you are arguing for.
In this case you were wrong. Astrology is not evil.
Astrology has been around since before Christ. Astrology was at heart of the Mayan, Aztec and Inca religions. Both Einstein and Jung, recognised astrology. The Greeks, Romans used astrology. Astrology centers around the sun. This is not about voodoo or making things happen with magic. It’s about how the world revolves around the sun, the planets, how these movements affect everything else.
Still, I struggle with the concept that just determining future events based on the location of planets, the sun, the moon and how it affects our lives is “evil”.
Yet the bible where its stated god told Abraham to kill his own son to prove his loyalty is proof is love?
Maybe you should go talk to Andrea Yates then. She says she killed her kids because god told her to. Well, if you believe in god as the bible tells us, then you must give her the benefit of doubt. Maybe he did. If god told Abraham to, you cant believe that and yet not at least say “maybe he also told Andrea”.
To each his own. I am not saying that the bible is wrong and astrology is right. But I do not live in a box and I want to understand as many things as I can. There are many things that just can not be explained by the bible alone and I believe that there is so much more to this world and life than any of us will ever know.
But I promise you, the evil in the world is not because of astrology.
Don’t be so judgmental because I am open to a lot of ideas and anything that could help solve these cases.
Save the judgment for the Redwines, Anthonys, Dunns, Ramseys, Celis’s.

Shelley said...

To Anon 10:52pm.....

Thank you! Well said!

Shelley said...

It is so frustrating to watch these parents lie and with hold information yet try to put on this front.

Mark has never been a good father. Corys views of him and the fact that Dylan has to be FORCED to visit prove that.

I would bet that Mr Peter Hayatts children have never been forced to spend time with him.

Good fathers dont have to write a letter to prove that.

I just wish the truth drug could be used.

I see no good reason when we are talking about crimes espeically against another person (my views about theft are different) that anyone should have the right to plead the 5th or not be forced by drugs to tell the truth.



I do think they need to start collecting DNA samples at birth. So that the cases where we have DNA but nothing to match it too. We would someday.

Dani Kekoa said...

Serial Child Killers in CO: When History Repeats Itself, Will We Notice?  Watch new video by Chess Versus Checkers here => http://youtu.be/MTuRTPtPetw 

Who Murdered JonBenet Ramsey, Jessica Ridgeway & Dylan Redwine? Ask "Pastor" Bob Enyart, He Knows -- Call Bob Enyart LIES at 1-800-8-ENYART & tell him to turn himself into the FBI or MORE KIDS WILL DIE.

"VICTORY, S.B.T.C" = *Strangle Bind Torture Children* & Shadowgov Breaks The Case

Psalm 118:27 "Bind the sacrifice with cords to the horns of the altar."

"When the suspect's background, post-murder behavior, and physical evidence are put together, the identity of this monster will be clear to someonewho knows him."
~ The Ramseys

....AND WE KNOW EXACTLY WHO THAT MONSTER IS = *R*O*B*E*R*T *A*D*O*L*P*H *E*N*Y*A*R*T = *6*6*6* = *DAXIS* = *SON of SATAN* waiting for the "Small Foreign Faction" DNA Secrets to be Revealed & Justice to be served to the "Group of Individuals" responsible for this notorious crime and many more crimes against children.

THE WORLD'S MOST EVIL SERIAL CHILD- KILLER is ShadowGov Founder: "Pastor" Bob Adolph Enyart of Denver Bible Cult in Arvada, CO 
DOB: 1-10-59 | FBI# - 678532LA7 | CO License# - CO368941 | SSN# 152-60-4382

*Google: "Bob Enyart JonBenet Ransom Note"
"Bob Enyart Jessica Ridgeway"
"Bob Enyart Austin Reed Sigg"
"Bob Enyart Dylan Redwine"
"Bob Enyart Kimberly Kay Bowman"
"Bob Enyart Child Abuse" (click images too)

X-Pose the TRUTH:
www.GenerationXpose.com
www.BobEnyartMurderedJonBenetRamsey.com
 www.KimberlyKayBowmanXposed.blogspot.com 

Dani Kekoa said...

Serial Child Killers in CO: When History Repeats Itself, Will We Notice?  Watch new video by Chess Versus Checkers here => http://youtu.be/MTuRTPtPetw 

Who Murdered JonBenet Ramsey, Jessica Ridgeway & Dylan Redwine? Ask "Pastor" Bob Enyart, He Knows -- Call Bob Enyart LIES at 1-800-8-ENYART & tell him to turn himself into the FBI or MORE KIDS WILL DIE.

"VICTORY, S.B.T.C" = *Strangle Bind Torture Children* & Shadowgov Breaks The Case

Psalm 118:27 "Bind the sacrifice with cords to the horns of the altar."

"When the suspect's background, post-murder behavior, and physical evidence are put together, the identity of this monster will be clear to someonewho knows him."
~ The Ramseys

....AND WE KNOW EXACTLY WHO THAT MONSTER IS = *R*O*B*E*R*T *A*D*O*L*P*H *E*N*Y*A*R*T = *6*6*6* = *DAXIS* = *SON of SATAN* waiting for the "Small Foreign Faction" DNA Secrets to be Revealed & Justice to be served to the "Group of Individuals" responsible for this notorious crime and many more crimes against children.

THE WORLD'S MOST EVIL SERIAL CHILD- KILLER is ShadowGov Founder: "Pastor" Bob Adolph Enyart of Denver Bible Cult in Arvada, CO 
DOB: 1-10-59 | FBI# - 678532LA7 | CO License# - CO368941 | SSN# 152-60-4382

*Google: "Bob Enyart JonBenet Ransom Note"
"Bob Enyart Jessica Ridgeway"
"Bob Enyart Austin Reed Sigg"
"Bob Enyart Dylan Redwine"
"Bob Enyart Kimberly Kay Bowman"
"Bob Enyart Child Abuse" (click images too)

X-Pose the TRUTH:
www.GenerationXpose.com
www.BobEnyartMurderedJonBenetRamsey.com
 www.KimberlyKayBowmanXposed.blogspot.com