Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Did ISIS Quote US President?


When Muslim terrorists released a video of their mass execution of Coptic Christians, Egypt responded with bombs, the pope condemned the destruction of life and President Obama went golfing.  This is something not lost upon the enemies of freedom.  
 The language of the murderous video is specific.  In spite of downplay, or ignoring by main-stream media, the still free internet is where information, especially in the form of video, can still be accessed.  
The ISIS killers, in their video release of details of their beheading of 21 Coptic Christians dressed in orange prison jumpsuits, referenced the language President Obama used just a week ago in his remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast.
The ISIS killers described their victims as “crusaders” after the President used a diversion tactic in language.   Rather than address Islamic violence, he said:
 “Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. And in our home country, slavery, and Jim Crow, all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”
There are no news reports of Christians or Jews strapping themselves with bombs and killing civilians in the name of their Deity, but there has been a steady stream of videos, not shown by mainstream media, showing Muslim violence, particularly against women.  There are both reports and video that indicates execution for "apostasy from Islam", or propagating the education of women.  The New York Times blamed American troops for "inciting" Afghani men by advocating women' rights and attempting to report the pedophilia of the Muslim men (they were forbidden to speak to journalists) who kept "boy slaves" in their caves.  The New York Times referenced this as "cultural" issue rather than directly calling it  pedophilia.  

After the latest Muslim violence in the news, the Prime Minister of Israel has made a call for all Jews in France to leave and immigrate to Israel.  France has towns where Sharia law is imposed and French citizens do not enter.  

The Obama Administration announced today that it was allowing a large immigration from Syria.  Critics said that this is to import ISIS since the federal government does not have the resources to do proper background checks, while still others say that jobs must go to US citizens first.  

But what of the President's language?  What did he employ to make the change?

a.  Context Changed. 
b.  Introduction of new topics  
c.  Introduction of deliberately emotional words

It is a clever form of propaganda, oft used in newsreels by Josef Goebbels in the 1930's until 1945 in Germany.  

It has been used ever since.  

Parents of teenagers know how quickly a guilty party will attempt to 'water down' and 'share guilt' by diversionary language.  

Investigators know how quickly a guilty subject will introduce another issue.

Politicians are known for introduction of incendiary language to elicit an emotional reaction.  This is often parodied by "Yes, but who will save the children?" in comedy.  

When President Obama was addressing the recent spate of Muslim violence, he introduced a different religion and introduced  the emotionally charged language of slavery.  In essence, he took the focus off the current murderous streaks of Islam, and turned the attention towards Christianity.  The pool of guilt is therefore widened, and the unveiled appeal towards one race, unmistakable. 

It was clever, in contrast to the deliberate blunt display  of former President George W. Bush's 911 statement that "terrorists hijacked a peaceful religion" while knowing the teaching of the Koran is "order" by coercion.  


Anonymous said...

Political correctness has gone too far, AND it's not even expected for political correctness to be equal for all groups, nationalities, colors, religions, etc.; it's ok to not be pc for certain groups. This is what is being pushed by politicians (who I won't name), and in turn, being pushed by the media, and unfortunately a lot of people are buying it. This is actually far worse than the simple pc that has been pushed though. Americans, and actually all people, should be made aware of what is really going on with this "religion", people should become aware themselves - do some research, not just watch a few minutes of pc news.

What's really disheartening is when "moderate muslims" are given the opportunity to speak out on news shows, and they flat out refuse to. I used to think there were moderates (and maybe and hopefully there really are), and that GWB was correct, because after all, that's what has always been pushed. I'm slowly but surely losing that hope. I've seen "moderate" women asked point blank if they disagree with the way they (women) are treated, and they can't or won't speak against the "religion". I call it a "religion" now, because I don't believe any true, decent, and good religion would teach such horrible things. I don't think it's a religion, I think it's more of a cult. Any true religion is ok in my book. Not a hate teaching cult.

I may very well be wrong, but that's how my thinking on this has evolved.

BallBounces said...

Western politicians' unwillingness to use honest language regarding the threat of militant Islam indicates an unwillingness to differentiate between "us" and "them". This amounts to a cultural death-wish.

tania cadogan said...

It is nazism in a different name.
Nazis killed millions of Jews, gypsies,disabled and homomsexuals, people they classed as undesirables in their effort to create a 'perfect' aryan race.

Muslims are now doing the same wit anyone none muslim, muslims of a different sect, gays and anyone they decide is an undesirable.

We ignored nazis and saw what happened, we ignore islam and the same will happen.

We used passifying language in relation to Germany, we are using pacifying language in relation to islam.

Isis is the new nazism, if we do nothing there will be slaughter on a massive scale, we ignore it at our own peril.

It is time we ceased all immigration from any muslim country, every illegal immigrant to be deported back to their home country or another muslim country if they refuse to reveal their nationality.

Islam is not a peaceful religion, no matter what muslims tell us.
Read the koran and it makes it clear that it is a militant religion.
There is no peace offered tp neighbors, instead it is commanded you convert the infidel or kill them.
It is a religion you can never leave as ifyou try, you will be killed.
It is a religion that advocates abusing women and treating them as 3rd class citizens, it treats women as property, chattels to be treated as their owner wishes.
it is a religion that advocates paedophilia by allowing marriage between prepubescent girls and many many years older.

We hear it said that islam is a peaceful religion, that isis isn't islamic, that they are terrorists only.

Isis are islamic, they are following the koran exactly as it is written.
Everything they do is written in the koran, they show us what the true muslim is and what they will do.

WE can't reason with them, we cannot come to a peaceful deal with them, they will not come to a compromise, it is convert to our version of islam or die, this applies even to muslims of a different sect.

Islam is a religion based on a paedophile who liked to cross-dress (apparantly he got his best ideas when dressed in his wife's clothes)

Muslims want to convert the whole world at the point of a sword.
Isis is doing their best to achieve that.

They want to return to what they perceive to be their high point as a civilisation, somewhere back in the 7th century.

World war lll isn't going to be between countries per se like the last two wars, it will be every religion against islam.

Muslims bring up the cruelty christians brought to the crusades yet make no mention of their own cruelties.
They reference the inquisition yet make no mention of their own ongoing cruelties to those deeed to be apostate, of a different sect or simply being born a female.

Obama is leaking his own religious beliefs, he is becoming more and more open that he is not a christian with his words condemning christianity.

I wonder if this is because he is coming to he end of his term in office and he has nothing to lose?
Is this why his past is sat on, hidden?

Will it turn out that he wasn't born in America?
He was never eligible to be president.
Will he say screw America and bring in a raft of measures that will turn America into a haven for illegal immigrants, will be ruled by muslims and sharia law will be implemented?

Will he attempt to try and have laws changed regarding who can qualify to be president?

Will laws change once he is out of office restricting who can be president?
Will it be a requirement that the background to the president be open and clear, their birth, medical, education, work, financial, family, criminal even to parking tickets and juvenile history and religion including what specific group and any conversions be open to public scrutiny?

Will laws be brought in to limit the powers a president can have?

When he leaves office, will the next incumbant have to undo the damage done by him regarding immigration and such?
Will they be able to deport all the illegals obama let in?

Is obamas plan to destabilise and weaken America in order for islam to take over?

tania cadogan said...

off topic

PHOENIX – A Phoenix woman who left her two young sons alone in a hot car while she went for a job interview is scheduled to stand trial on March 31.

A March 24 final pretrial conference also was set Tuesday for 35-year-old Shanesha Taylor, who attracted sympathy from around the nation with a tear-stained mug shot.

Maricopa County prosecutors reinstated felony child abuse charges against Taylor after she missed two deadlines to fund a trust for her children.

She was ordered to set up the trust after receiving more than $114,000 in donations following her arrest and tearful mug shot that went viral. Scottsdale police arrested Taylor after someone reported hearing a child crying inside a car at an office complex parking lot on March 20, 2014.
Taylor told authorities she left the children in the car because she couldn't find day care.


Shanesha Taylor received donations of more than $114,000 after claiming that she had no option but to leave her two little boys in a sweltering car
One of her biggest supporters Reverend Jarrett Maupin has accused her of refusing to work and spending $6,000 on her children's father's rap album
Part of a deal with prosecutors to avoid charges included Taylor putting some of the $114,000 raised into a trust for her children - but she didn't
When she failed to do so, prosecutors reinstated charges against her
In a response to Paupin's claims, Taylor said, ‘I haven't spoken to [Maupin] since July 21. He has not been part of my defense team. Anything he says is libel or slander.’
She struck a deal with prosecutors in July that allowed her to avoid prosecution if she fulfilled a number of requirements, such as setting up the trust funds, taking parenting classes and completing a substance-abuse treatment program.
Prosecutors backed out of the deal after they say Ms Taylor failed to put $60,000 in the trusts. Still, they gave her another chance by lowering the amount to $40,000 but again she refused to pay
She has repeatedly refused to say how much of the donated money remains, but has previously claimed it is well over $60,000. She said she didn't fund the trusts because her children will not get the money if they choose not to attend college
Prosecutors say the mother of three has spent about $4,100 per month, including more than $1,000 in non-essential items such as cable TV, clothing and dining.

Peter Hyatt said...


an astute answer.


Peter Hyatt said...

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

― Marcus Tullius Cicero

Peter Hyatt said...


Peter Hyatt said...

This morning, I learned that Muslims were part of the founding fathers of our nation, from our President!

Those pesky outdated history books!


PS: I also learned:

"Islam is a peaceful religion" from him and that those killed that were Coptic Christians and nations of "the cross", were not killed because of their religion. It was just a coincidence.

What's next?

Hitler didn't target Jews directly? It was just a big misunderstanding?

Anonymous said...

Thanks for laying out very plainly and clearly what was so wrong about what he said, and so sneaky. I knew it was wrong, and it made me sick, but I could never have put my finger on it like you did.