Thursday, November 5, 2015

Sweden: Rape Capital of the West



I have worked with rape victims for more than 25 years, and developed an entire syllabus on the language of women rape victims from the many interviews, interventions, and research, in Statement Analysis.  This select section of Statement Analysis shows how:

*Victims of childhood sexual abuse that pre-dates speech are almost incapable of articulation, which is key to processing and minimizing impact in the quest for some relief from the life long suffering.  Where there are no words to use, the body still suffers.  

*How early childhood sexual abuse, specifically during brain and language development, will impact language;

*How disassociation in various degrees can appear as 'deception' in language, due to passivity, including Dissociative Identity Disorder, whether diagnosed or not; 

*How post trauma stress impacts language of rape victims as well as male and female adults victims of childhood sexual abuse; 

*How to listen for linguistic indications of sexual assault, expanding upon the basics of Statement Analysis, to learn the language of both perpetrator and victim. 

*How pronouns alone, although reliable, should still be viewed along with social introductions and post-event nouns, in the language of victims.  This was done, specifically, with one of the alleged victims of Bill Cosby and concluded, "veracity indicated" as it followed the language, even though the victim was drugged.  Statement Analysis can still get to the truth even when the victim struggles to remember.  

How to discern false claims is something well established in most schools of analysis and is standard.  It is the victims' language that the data is building and principle established.  

It is, therefore, provocative to learn how women in Sweden are being raped at Western civilization's highest rate, and how politicians and media have conspired to continue to keep women and young girls in constant danger.  Please see article on statistics HERE

They have minimized, down-played and actually changed statistics to keep the Islamic supremacist's Koranic prescription for rape of "kaffir" from Swedish men who have become incapable of protecting their wives and daughters from this life sentence of suffering. 

The soft sentences, including some who have been given probation for gang rape, along with the silencing of the media, who are complicit in these crimes, comes at a cost:

These girls and women will suffer, and we will wonder if the truth had been told, how many would have been spared.  


Here is Pat Condell who has addressed this criminal madness.  It is short, but upsetting and should be viewed by all of us who care about justice:


21 comments:

Nic said...

Amen.

Being Canadian with a newly elected "hot" PM (PMILF according to social media/Cdn loony left media) and his proposed "open door policy", I am afraid for my kids. This really defines the path that the CBC (kneepads) and CTV ("because you want to know"/(enquiring minds need to know!)) are heading down. They have been doing nothing but effing with the loony left's collective heads for the past eight years. Now it's more of the same, but worse.

God help us. Seriously.

lynda said...

I have some problems with Pat Condell and in some of the things he has stated over the years which I feel have crossed the line into hate speech but its a free country. Link is an interesting article from the BBC regarding Sweden and rape statistics, take note that this was written in 2012...not presently.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19592372

Lemon said...

OT
JonBenet Ramsey's father reveals how he protected his young son from allegations he committed Christmas day murder of his beauty pageant sister - and says he still believes the killer will be found

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3305394/JonBenet-Ramsey-s-father-reveals-protected-young-son-allegations-committed-Christmas-day-murder-beauty-pageant-sister-says-believes-killer-found.html

Red Velvette said...

OT question:

When the mother of a missing child continually refers to the missing child as her Son, rather than by his name, what does that mean? I do know that avoiding the name is suspicious behavior, but I've never seen someone capitalize the word son before. (continually) This is a made up example: "When we put my Son to bed, he usually fell right to sleep."

I feel that it's either an affectation in an attempt to show how much she cares for her child, or it's some sort of ideation, in that she is thinking of him as a god or a higher spirit. Has anyone seen this before, and what are your thoughts?

John mcgowan said...

OT:

New York Kayak Murder Case: A Timeline of Events in This Mysterious Death on the Hudson

NY Kayak murder suspect: " I didn't kill him"

It must be pointed out that this are only an excerpt from tonight's show. Also includes an excerpt from her 911 call.

Angelika Graswald, a 35-year-old Latvian native, has been charged with murder and is being held in the Orange County Jail in New York on a $9 million bond for allegedly killing her fiancé, 46-year-old Vince Viafore while kayaking on the Hudson River on April 19. Prosecutors allege she intentionally removed a drain plug from Viafore's kayak. Her defense team, along with numerous kayaking experts ABC News' "20/20" spoke with, argue that the drain plug being removed would not cause someone to die. Graswald maintains this was a tragic accident.



http://abcnews.go.com/US/york-kayak-murder-case-timeline-events-mysterious-death/story?id=34973210

Peter Hyatt said...

Ms. Lemon and others:

if you can post some of the news links related to this, please do.

I hope readers here will take an active interest in this story and begin to understand the ideology behind what is truly "hatred of women."

Anytime someone disagrees with a female politician the word "misogynist" is used to silence them.

This inappropriate misuse of the word is damaging and dangerous to women. When the genuine misogyny raises its ugly head, in pathological means of destruction,

it is missed because the word is in need of rehabilitation. The alarm is not heard.

Creeping Sharia comes from town meetings where yelling and threats cause school boards, principals, townships, politicians to back down to Islamic supremacy demands when the same officials should be asking very publicly:

"Do you believe a woman to be one-half the value of a man?"

"Do you believe a husband should be permitted to use physical force to correct his wife?"

I write these knowing the koranic teaching on deception to further the cause of Islam. Yet, will the person addressed PUBLICLY DISAGREE with the Koran?

This is why so many Muslims, themselves, are victims of violence. They are "secular" Muslims to which devotees, or the "faithful" will target as betrayers.

We owe this much to our country, to our wives and daughters to put a stop to Sharia.

We can ask, publicly:

"Is Sharia good for America?" and listen to the answer.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

“Sentencing them at Preston Crown Court Sessions House, Recorder Julian Shaw told them: ‘There is no place for any religious or honour based violence. It’s abhorrent, it’s against your religion, it’s unlawful.” Did Julian Shaw study Islam? He seems to know all about it, but it is unlikely that he is aware of these facts:

Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. In this case, of course, the victim was the murderer’s wife, a victim to the culture of violence and intimidation that such laws help create.

The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now. Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but “the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’” And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.”


from jihadwatch.org on light sentences for "honor killing" of women.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

BBC this morning--


Islamic Sharia councils are discouraging women from going to the police in cases of domestic violence, a barrister has told the BBC.

Charlotte Proudman said that women are being left in “very vulnerable situations where they’re open to further abuse and domestic violence”.

The barrister’s comments came in a BBC East Midlands programme which also heard from a Muslim woman who said a Sharia council took the side of her violent husband.

Discrimination

The House of Lords debated a Bill which seeks to restrain the operation of Sharia councils in England and Wales last month.

Tabled by Baroness Cox – a Patron of The Christian Institute – the Bill seeks to challenge the suffering caused by “religiously-sanctioned gender discrimination” and the development of a quasi-legal system.

Speaking to the BBC, one unnamed woman said she had been in a violent relationship for over a decade – since she was married at 16.

Abuse

She approached a Sharia council but they said she and her abusive husband should meet face-to-face to discuss reconciliation.

“I felt they were taking his side”, the woman told the BBC in a statement.

Charlotte Proudman said that Sharia councils are “operating a parallel legal system”, explaining that they are ruling on family law issues which are reserved for UK courts.

Beaten

The programme also heard from Amra Bone, the first woman in Britain to sit on a Sharia council. She said the councils were set up to help resolve problems in the Muslim community.

However, in a separate article for the Sunday Express, Baroness Cox wrote of the distressing situations of some Muslim women in Britain.

She said one woman told her: “My husband beat me so badly I had to go to hospital. But my family would not allow me to seek help from the police because this would bring ‘shame’ on the family. The imam sent me back to my abusive husband.”

Juliet said...

I'm confused by which case the victim was the murderer's wife - the Preston case involved three men beating up a boyfriend of one of the attacker's sisters, and none of them went to prison for the cowardly attack. They disapproved of the boyfriend, therefore it was an 'honour' attack. I wish everyone would stop referring to 'honour' killings and attacks as there is nothing honourable about them.

Sharia courts/councils are an affront - a powerful means of bypassing civil law and denying Muslim women their real rights, as enshrined by law. For many, they are not an alternative, as presented, but the only option, as the pressure to avoid the civil courts can be great - women are trapped by religious law when their access to the law of the land is obstructed by family and community pressure - they might as well live in Saudi Arabia. Shari is a perversion of justice when it is set alongside the ordinary law courts of any country - there should be one law for all, to ensure civil disputes are settled fairly, and for the proper settling of custody disputes.

I don't care for the Pat Condell approach - I agree with Lynda.

Peter Hyatt said...

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/06/19/syria-islamic-state-isis-savages-release-uncensored-video-of-beheading-of-a-sunni-shepherd-warning-very-graphic/

How calloused must they be to do this in obedience to the Koran?

elf said...

I don't understand why they hate women so much :(

Elizabeth Norway said...

I am Norwegian, and I visit Sweden several times a year. The country is totally lost. Everything is hidden from the public. If a criminal is depicted in any media, he or she will be blurred out. Not their faces only, but also their skin. In order to hide their colour.

There is a discussion going on in Sweden now, that light coloured bandages is racist..

This kind of behaviour from the media, is what makes the right wing rising and living well in Sweden.

Sverigedemokraterna is right wing, and now the biggest political party in Sweden.
But they are not invited to any events from mainstream media, and is boycotted by the pathetic tv stations.

Peter Hyatt said...

Elizabeth,

using Google chrome, the translations are rough but I am reading average anonymous comments from Sweden.

As a whole: they agree with you.

They say that they will say one thing in public, but another thing at home.

The government has passed a law making it illegal to criticize the government on immigration.

They say the consequences are that if you complain about the rape, home invasions, car jacking, muslim protests, muslims destroying the schools, muslims refusing to use indoor toilets (this is bigger than I thought), they will be labeled "racist" and "xenophobe" and fear for their jobs.

Democracy is gone there.

They show that MSM and the truth are two different things.

Thank you,

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

Elf,

It is the ideology that is both taught, and exampled, with violence,that becomes deeply embedded into the mind of the little boy.

Those who witness violence against women are prone to it, but consider these boys;

1. The witness violence
2. They are taught that it is necessary in a family
3. Their mothers accept it
4. Their sisters accept it
5. It is a religious, or sacred belief to them.

This is a powerful ideology.

It is bad enough just to grow up in a D/V home, but to be told that his will get you to heaven...the ideology is powerful.

http://analysistomorrow.blogspot.com/2015/11/understanding-islamic-rape.html

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

Lemon,

interesting that John Ramsey AND media both avoided mentioning the Grand Jury indictment.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

As I continue to catch up on comments:

I do not believe Sweden's rape statistics any more than I believe Germany, even AFTER Germany admitted withholding information.

For example: Germany announced 800,000 migrants for 2015. Then the document was released. Merkel admitted that it was 1.5 million. MSM is STILL quoting 800,000 regularly. I do not believe 1.5 million to be truthful, either. Some of her statements have caused writers to question her sanity. I think she is sane, but so prideful that instead of admitting her error, she has done what so many do: back up the truck and load on some more.

Regarding Sweden's rape statistics and the MSM complicity in deception:

Ingrid's articles are pointed and here is one that is most quoted, and one in which I have not found refutation. She has quite a reputation.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape

lynda said...

Peter...I have spent the last 2 days on and off doing as much research as I can regarding this topic. After reading your response, I am incorporating your new information into my research also. I feel like you can't intelligently even engage in a conversation regarding a subject if you don't know, and don't have a solid base for your opinion on the subject, and that is where I find myself. Today, I am speaking to some Muslim friends of mine and grilling them about all sorts of things! lol

One thing I find interesting about the youtube video you posted is his use of the term "Third World" almost constantly. Judging by what I am guessing his age is, I am prone to think that he is using the term "Third World" as it was used during the Cold War as not being in line with "First World" United States and its non-communist allies, nor "Second World" Communist Bloc. Then the more he repeats it, the more you feel as if he uses the word POST cold war which most people associate with underdeveloped, and poor. He weilds the word to many times to not think he is trying to persuade people that Muslims are inferior to "westerners" just because they come from African nations. There is a negative connotation to the term "Third World" and I find its use in modern day society, archaic and inappropriate. After all, there are parts of "Third World" in the US and in Britain. Particularly the US when we consider the number of "working poor", no healthcare, lacking food, etc. I feel he uses the word to inflame the listener. I didn't like it, it turned me off from his message. JMO.

I will report back my "investigations" but I do appreciate you taking the time to explain things more thouroughly for me Peter, and give me new things to think and learn about to form an educated opinion.

Peter Hyatt said...

Interesting. I am working on an article on tacquya (spelling) or the "permission" to lie and what questions to ask.

The more you know, the better prepared.

If you ask about jihad, remember: to further the cause of Islam, they are given permission to lie. Therefore, be prepared. For example, "Jihad means struggle and we are struggling against our personal failures in life."

What they are most uncomfortable doing is criticizing the Koran. It is to have the death penalty.

The "mercy verses" in the Koran conflict with the vicious ones. They explain it this way: Allah is God and can change his mind; therefore, the latter versus trump the early ones. (the early ones call for mercy).

You must stay away from verses where "interpretation" can "explain away" things in the deception prescribed.

Q. What does the Koran teach about the value of women?

Q. Can the Koran be wrong?

Q. Does the Koran prohibit all lying?

I have found that even the most 'moderate' or non-practicing Muslim will become animated if I mention a Jew.

Although this is for K, it is useful for learning:

http://10news.dk/?p=526


I also recommend Robert Spencer's "Islam 101" material. http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam-101

Regarding lying: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm

as to Mohammad's sex life according to scholars, this is not easy reading but explains the criminal sex assaults from a psychological point:

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/025-Muhammads-sex-life.htm

Keep in mind: Muslims are, in Islamic lands, the first to whom violence is targeted: the "secular" Muslim, the poet, the artist, the uncovered woman, the homosexual, the one who condemns jihad, etc.

This is a lesser covered area simply because we are not an Islamic country.

It will be interesting to read your comments.

Peter




Anonymous said...

Question:
Are Muslims permitted to lie?

Summary Answer:
Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."

There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

The Qur'an:
Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves" against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim may appear friendly to non-Muslims, though they should not feel that way..

Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.



From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'" The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).

Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."

Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

Peter Hyatt said...

Anonymous, Thank you---that is from the link I provided, but is not complete. There is quotes missing from Islamic law and more about lying to one another to settle emotions.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham.pdf

Please read this if you are capable.

The brutality is astounding but the breadth is so extreme that it must come from an ideology of perversion where "heaven" is to humiliate scores of virgins.

The violence met with sex is almost incredulous but it is real and it has a source.
Police?


Two men admitted to police having intercourse with 11 year old girl. They were let go with a warning.