Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Tacquia, Progression and Slavery



The vast majority of Muslims are not violent.

The ideology is 100% violent.

Discernment of deception is critical today, perhaps more than ever in our history. 

Yesterday, CAIR said San Bernadino was the fault of Americans.  This is an example of Tacquia being used against the U.S. and is part of an overall pattern that history, itself, outlines.  

Historically a pattern is followed, using "tacquia" or, the religious blessing upon lying to advance Islamic supremacy where in small minority, they become very vocal in complaints.  This is done to bully the populace into yielding to their demands, which, once satisfied initially, are reintroduced in new topics. 

The complaints and violence increase exponentially as the population percentage increases, until Islamic slavery is established.  

It begins with very small minorities.  

 "Hurt feelings" or "sensitivities" leads to various volunteering of surrendered rights of others, but never of Muslims.  Christmas pageants canceled, holocaust teaching exemptions, and de facto enforcement of Sharia blasphemy laws come from volunteer "Dhimmi"; those who willingly yield, "to keep the peace", of whom the Islamic supremacist views as a tool, not an ally, to later be disposed.

Yesterday, CAIR blamed Americans for the California murders instead of Islam.  

The former head of the FBI said Moderate Muslims have "done less than nothing" since 9/11 to stop the violence.  He said the "moderate Muslim mosque" refuses to cooperate.  They all need not to carry out Jihad; they only need one or two disenfranchised but devout members.  


The enslavement percentage of the population study, though the current percentages are increased: 


At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 4%
Germany — Muslim 5%
United Kingdom — Muslim 3.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).

France — Muslim 9%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 7%
Switzerland — Muslim 6.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 6.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%


In Finland, 80% of male Muslims in the country for 4 years do not have a job.  95% of female Muslims in the country for 4 years do not have a job.  The "Jizrah" may be the explanation as it is not yet demanded, but offered by the host country.  

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:



Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

These are all nations awash in violence.  There is no peace in any supremacist ideology due to the inequalities of life.  

The above is a man now arrested for threatening to blow up a British official.

Recall the woman terrorist who yelled, "help me" or "trust me!" before exploding a hand grenade in Paris.  

Across the world, mosques are refusing to cooperate with law enforcement as they are led face to face with the question, "Is the koran the word of allah?"  and "Is Mohammad the perfect man to be exampled?"

These two questions are loaded.

The koran calls for death for those who criticize it, ensuring no reformation can take place.

The ideology espouses both violent coercion within a context of sexual violence, with Mohammad, a murderer and pedophile upheld as perfection to be exampled.

It is the ideology, not the person, that must be confronted, knowing the principle of tacquia, or religious deception to be used against kaffir.


It stated: 'I am Muslim, I am labelled a terrorist, I trust you, do you trust me enough for a hug?'

But the 23-year-old, of Willesden Green, north London, calls himself Muhammad Mujahid Islam online, wrote on Facebook: 'I'm going to smash her windows then drop a bomb on her house while she's tucked up in bed. You dirty f****** pig-s******* s***.'



33 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, maybe the FBI should realize Californians have done less that the Muslims as far as derailing violence.

Whenever they get one of the stalkers letting out people's dogs then corralling some morons to torch states the "riddle me this" always points to Henry Ford and the Dot ters.

Perhaps they should review their federal, state, and local police hiring requirements.

Anonymous said...

I saw a news clip last night about an incident that happened in Philadelphia. Apparently, someone had thrown a roasted pigs head at a mosque in the city. There was a press conference about it! There was a city official behind the microphone talking about how terrible the whole thing was and Muslim religious leaders behind him nodding their heads in agreement. I felt incredulous. Where are these outraged people when MUSLIMS are committing horrendous atrocities against people! Where's the outrage then? It's beyond ridiculous. We look like idiots.

Peter Hyatt said...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/isis-show-tanks-devastating-hi-6981636

The JV has our weapons.


The pig incident:

do not be surprised if police uncover that it was a Muslim who put it there.

The rage in Europe was a Muslim taxi driver attacked and everyone was screaming Islamophobia.

Eventually his attacker was caught.

Fellow muslim.

Anonymous; The "outrage" over 'hurt words' while ignoring murder is not new. It is the historic strategy that Bat Ye'or so well chronicled.

In country after country, the religion (not race) produces this same deceptive dichotomy.

Peter

maudes harold said...

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/german-chancellor-angela-merkel-named-person-time-130505430--finance.html


then you have:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/08/world/germany-saudi-extremism/index.html

"Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel told the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag Sunday that it should be made clear to the kingdom that "the time for looking the other way has passed. Wahhabi mosques are being funded by Saudi Arabia all over the world. Many dangerous Islamists come from these communities in Germany," Gabriel said."


My guess is he won't be re-relected.

Lemon said...

Pew: Muslims 'fastest-growing religious group in the world,' 70% Democrat

snipped:
"Pew also found that Muslim immigrants prefer more government services and that 70 percent lean Democratic. Just 11 percent identify with Republicans."

Link: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-muslims-fastest-growing-religious-group-in-the-world-70-democrat/article/2577951

Apple said...

OT:
WOW.
http://time.com/

Anonymous said...

It say there's been 6 replies to this article but I can only see 2. Why might that be?

Anonymous said...

Never mind, I see them now!

Anonymous said...

I'm not surprised Muslims lean democrat. Any and all people who feel disenfranchised tend to lean to the political party that makes promises of more handouts rather than long-term solutions. Already, immigrants in Europe are making incredible demands of liberal governments and they appear only too happy to oblige.

Anonymous said...

Oh! Of course, that makes sense and I never even considered it; I'll bet you're right and a Muslim is responsible for the pig incident.
There seems to be a lot of fake crimes and incidences in the news of late. It's frustrating, especially I'm sure to real victims.

Anonymous said...


Everything muslim in your initial paragraphs precisely describe bho.

Anonymous said...

Peter,

What is your point? You continue to emphasize how a Muslim is bad by very virtue of being Muslim. Post after post how Muslims are to be feared, all off them. They are dominating the world and devouring everything good. All of them, it is in their DNA.

What is your point? Are you proposing non-Muslim's round them all up and incarcerate them? Execute them? Force them through deprogramming and convert them to Christianity? Maybe sterilize them? Exactly, WHAT IS YOUR POINT?

Suzanne

Anonymous said...

Oh, for the love of gawd Suzanne or ZSuzanne. He's just gone off the deep end and is getting more conspiratorial in comments and leaning more toward political religion.

He posted data, not a plan.

Juliet said...

Peter, how can the non-violent Muslim, which constitute the majority 'win' anyone's trust or ever be viewed favourably and without suspicion when this, presumably, is to be routinely assumed:

'It is the ideology, not the person, that must be confronted, knowing the principle of tacquia, or religious deception to be used against kaffir.'

If Islam is an ideology, how can it be confronted? Only people can be confronted. It seems at least a bit like saying that because an 'ideology' exists and arises from the religion, that all Muslims therefore also embrace the ideology and should be expected to be willing to lie, so nothing a Muslim says to a non-Muslim on any serious issue should be taken on face value or believed, and that their acts and stated intentions may not be a true reflection of motive, or of what is going on. Yet only a minority embrace the 'ideology' rather than the religion - the religion, however, gives rise to the 'ideology', and it is that which is embraced by the radicalised and the extremists. The majority are either not particularly religious, or are devout, yet without being 'radicalised' or extremist, or (as with Christians and the Bible), are intelligent and discerning enough to know which parts of the Koran to 'skip over'. I believe that to be the case, but then I am to be persuaded that Muslims in general are of inferior intelligence and moral capacity because they are so inbred - also, as their prophet was a paedophile it is to believed that so are many of them (paedophilia was long culturally accepted - plus Mary is thought to have been only around the age of twelve when she became pregnant). All this seems to say, however anyone puts it, that some people (Muslims) are not quite as human, valuable, or capable of making good choices as the rest of us, plus they are all potential liars. How can any Muslim 'win' anyone's trust or respect in the face of all that? How can they tolerate the increasingly widespread propagation of such a negative view of themselves, and not find it an affront?

For all those Muslims who strive to live quiet peaceful lives, wishing the best for their children, fleeing the horrors we have instigated in their homelands, It puts me in mind of this:

'through honor and dishonor, through slander and praise. We are treated as impostors, and yet are true'

http://biblehub.com/2_corinthians/6-8.htm


---


'I am Muslim, I am labelled a terrorist, I trust you, do you trust me enough for a hug?'

Not really: I'm not labelling you a terrorist, or into what looks to me like an attempt at emotional blackmail and manipulation. Good try, though. :) it's a bit like a Facebook meme - 'I know who will repost this and show me who cares' - adolescent in its neediness, or annoying in it's control-freakery, depending on who you are. I might care but I won't repost it, or hug you, just because you're trying to make me do that.

I like the 'Not In My Name' posts which have been appearing since the Paris massacres, and I think kudos to the Muslims who have been posting that on their social media, especially to those who might be putting themselves at risk in so doing. I don't think it's right for anyone to encourage disregard for their voices by default referral to 'Taqiyya', or to forget that 'man's inhumanity to man' also includes our own. If you know the sheer frustration, helplessness and distress of being falsely accused in anything, which surely most people know or have known - well, what must it be like to be someone who thinks that they are routinely regarded with suspicion, and who would be willingly deceptive, on account of who they are - nothing personal, though. How does that work?

Juliet said...

Yes, I know, I know - I do know - that referring to people as non-Muslim IS to embrace a voluntary form of dhimmism. I noticed myself doing that a while back. I think it's just for convenience, I don't know when or how it became convenient to regard others, or myself, as a non-Muslim. I'm okay with it, but only sort-of, now that I've begun to think about it. I'm not a non-Muslim any more than I am a non-Hindu or a non-Scientologist, though I'm also not those either. At least there would be no reason to casually categorise myself as such. I also don't like to go round advertising myself as a Christian, though I am one: see Nutters.

Peter Hyatt said...

Suzzane
this is my point


This is an ideology that is criminal.

In each country where the ideolgy spreads, there is death. Lots of death. More deaths by this ideology than Hitler and Stalin combined.

I do not ask you to fear Muslims. I ask you to consider how dangerous this ideology is.

If this continues, you will not need me to convince you.

Since last week, more than 400 more people have been murdered in obedience to the Koran. If this does not frighten you, it is your business.

The sleepy indifference to the deaths of others is what drives this contagion.

As one person put it, "gas prices are low" so what does he care?

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

Juliet,

the Muslims who intend no harm on others can come out and boldly state that the Koran is not to be taken literally and it is not Allah's word.

Of the billion, studies show up to half support Sharia.

Do you know what this will mean for you if it is accepted?

History shows that tolerance towards tyranny leads to more tyranny which leads to death.

The Koran and the US Constitution are not compatible.

It will take many more deaths for people to wake up to the danger.

two weeks ago, the deaths were down to 178.

This week, it was more than 400.

More deaths will have to come to the US for you to listen to what the FBI has said: "Moderate Muslims have done less than nothing since 9/11 to stop the terror."

They are quietly supporting the hell that is growing through Europe.

There are not hundreds of Islamic no go zones in Europe. There are thousands and this ideology that demands Sharia IS NOT BEING DENIED by US moderate muslims and we will have our own no go zones soon enough.

One of the reasons I posted this was to gauge reaction....the sleepiness and pollyanna mentality that most people have...what I had before 9/11.

As we tolerate brutality and the hate of life itself taught in the Koran, tyranny will increase.

Peter

Anonymous said...

The former head of the FBI said Moderate Muslims have "done less than nothing" since 9/11 to stop the violence. He said the "moderate Muslim mosque" refuses to cooperate."


Since when is any church subjected to becoming the law enforcement in their area? Are they not allowed to worship?

The FBI did less than nothing prior to 9/11!

Is this the same guy that made the"B" rated movie comment when the Iranian/Mexican moronic crap surfaced in the country of Texas? If so, then who does he really think is responsible for 9/11?

Peter Hyatt said...

Anonymous: target the source, rather than the message?

Our police have asked Mosques to report those who speak of Jihad, and they have, state by state, refused to cooperate. IF this is your "freedom" of religion, you can keep it.

Here is an article that says kids are starting to wake up:


http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/millennials_waking_up_to_the_threat_of_terrorism.html

teaching children to hate...340 million support Sharia

I understand the attitude. Prior to 9/11, even the reports of deaths in the middle east seemed so far away.

This is an ideology that will eventually be taken seriously. When we see American gay men thrown from buildings, and women raped for not wearing a veil, we will regret having not taken an honest look at the basic teachings of the Koran, and the life of Mohammad.


I wonder if people know why Barak Obama says "ISIL" instead of "ISIS."

Juliet said...

Peter - I hope the 'Not In My Name' is a sign that moderate Muslims are beginning to wake up to the need to disassociate themselves from the extremists, because doing nothing can seem like assent, I am more inclined to think Muslims mostly remain quiet out of fear of repercussions, not because they quietly support what is going on. Who would not be afraid - who might be the enemy amongst them? It takes courage to stand up, and to say 'Not In My Name'. I have seen reports of Muslim leaders speaking against the terrorists - these are not widely reported, maybe because nobody wants to hear good news about Muslims - certainly it is a minimal response, given the number of Muslims.

Here, in my tiny corner of the U.K., it was the Muslim youth who set up a candle-lit peace vigil in the high street, a couple of days following the Paris massacres - they invited the churches; it was 'Not in my Name' - they were horrified, anxious, sincere, and afraid of how some people now view them as 'terrorists'. It is a frightening time for the majority of Muslims who are desirous of peace, and of good lives in prospering nations - who don't want ISIS, a new Caliphate, or the extremes of Sharia, any more than do we. That's why they live here - they don't want that, it is incompatible with the modern mind, and with the values of Western nations. Still, as you say, moderate Muslims need to speak up - if they can - the question, which you rightly pose, is can they? We wait, and hope.

IMO, there should be swift consequences attendant upon the mosques and families of known terrorists - closure, deportation. End of. Killing people is wrong. There are no seventy-two virgins - it was an unfortunate typo. Outlawing of archaic discriminatory parallel legal systems, and that right early. Just grow up, world, and let people live. If life was that easy...

Peter Hyatt said...

Juliet,

In Sweden, there is a holocaust museum.

It is empty, day by day.

It is run by the government and they only hired Muslims. They refused to hire Jews. Jews will not go to it out of fear and they have some days with no tourists while other days, only 1 or 2. It is considered state sponsered tacyia. (auto spell check keeps doing this)

I have been reading a lot of your country's social services, particularly child protective and "care" (what we call state custody) as I am trying to learn more.

The Muslims who want peace must address the koranic teaching. This is where the problem is: they won't. They cannot say that leaving Islam and the death penalty is not okay, because they, themselves will be targeted.

As you and I converse, we are playing into tacquva. In that, we are talking about Muslims who are against terror. this is a tangent.

We should be talking about the ideology.

There were many Nazis who did not want the actually killing of Jews, but we knew that "de-nazification" meant attacking the ideology.

The koran is specific about how Islam is to spread and those who are raised Muslim but are against it live in fear.

It is not good muslims killing 300 per week, but the actual ideology.

Arguing about good muslims does not change the ideology but plays into the "deception by tangent" technique.

From the Daily Mail yesterday...actual towns and areas named. This is not England and it is what is called "creeping Sharia" where, little by little, Sharia is accepted due to tolerance, protests and "offenses." Creeping Sharia starts with freedom to criticize (cartoons) and in Germany, it is to face consequences, including jail, to criticize Islam. This is seen in the Islamic hizrah that Merkel is undertaking.

It is the world's largest criminal ideology.

The Daily Mail reports that a policeman said that he and his colleagues are fearful they will be targets of terror attacks and that they’ve received “dire warning” from their superiors not to wear their uniforms, “even in their cars”.

But they are not the only two reporting on the collapse of police authority in certain regions of the country. The Daily Mail reports on another police officer who said “there are Muslim areas of Preston that, if we wish to patrol, we have to contact local Muslim community leaders to get their permission.”

Another police officer stated that if an officer “were attacked in one of these neighborhoods, it would be written off, noting “even if one of us did get killed or dragged off in a van, it would just be reported as a ‘one-off incident’ and no reason to change the ‘British style of policing.’”

Another officer who resigned this year said he resigned because he couldn’t take the climate anymore and confirmed what several officers spoke of regarding the directive not to wear their uniform while on duty for fear of being attacked. The order came from Scotland Yard and has been rationalized not as a policy founded on fear but as one based on risk reduction or “damage limitation.”


Susan said...

Peter I urge you to read this:

Muslims are really angry about Donald Trump. (Your wrote about him years ago!) I know you are not a big fan of his but Jimmy Carter did the same thing during the Iran Hostage Crisis. This is not about Trump, I could care less but where is the anger over be-headings? Your numbers are too small. They are only official. How much does not get reported, Peter, especially in the Middle East? Those Syrian "rebels" are not our allies. They are Islamists fighting ISIS (I know why he says ISIL, because Levant. Levant makes Israel an occupying government on sacred Muslim land and it is an insult to the Jews. People do know this stuff). Please read this. I know you like the blog: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/which_do_muslims_find_more_offensive_a_travel_ban_or_having_their_heads_cut_off.html

Susan said...




http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/which_do_muslims_find_more_offensive_a_travel_ban_or_having_their_heads_cut_off.html

Susan said...

Which do Muslims find more offensive: a travel ban, or having their heads cut off? I ask this question because we are told that Muslims worldwide are so offended by Donald Trump's proposal of a temporary ban on Muslims entering the U.S. But where is the outrage over ISIS beheading Muslims? Where is the outrage over mass executions, repression of women, and homosexuals being dropped from tall towers?

Where are the marches in Pakistan against ISIS? Where are the sermons in Malaysia preaching against this "un-Islamic" religion? Where are the imams who should be on TV denouncing this evil group?
They are nowhere to be found.

The only ones who appear in the media are those who say they are so, so angry with Donald Trump for wanting to temporarily ban them from entering the United States, which affects about 0.000000001% of the global Muslim population.

I wonder: if Donald Trump called for some Muslims to be beheaded, like ISIS does, do you think Muslims would be upset? If Donald Trump called for Muslims to be lit on fire, or drowned inside cages, or packed into a car and blown up with an RPG, or crushed under tanks, do you think we'd see the same level of apathy that Muslims show towards ISIS?


Juliet said...

Peter - thank you, I will think about and look up some of what you say. In fact, I was looking for info on the Museum you mentioned - (the Jewish Museum in Stockholm?) when I found this letter, which is interesting, but perhaps not quite true? It's an aside rather than an attempt to distract (honestly - plus it's interesting) - so I stopped to post it. I can't find info so far about the museum hiring only Muslims, and Jews not visiting..I visited the website and see it is a small, difficult to find building with short opening hours, if that is the right museum, and good reviews on the one page of trip advisor I was able to view. I'll keep looking, as I haven't had much of a google yet. The letter:

http://mosaicmagazine.com/response/2013/08/how-to-survive-as-a-jew-in-sweden/

Anonymous said...

I think that it is is Muslims best interest to put the brakes on Muslim immigration until he terrorism stops because Muslims are targeted too, you know, they leave Islam and they have the death penalty too.
This is about the "engineers" and "doctors", and not about the "women and orphans" that jive talkin' president said:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/09/future-doctors-engineers-65-per-cent-syrian-refugees-cant-even-read-write-claims-academic/

elf said...

How can they have done less than nothing?

Anonymous said...

You all will probably have a field day analysising this :) I am so disturbed about the encroaching Muslim problem. I am alarmed by the bleeding hearts who are defending then. What is so hard to understand that they are the greedy selfish bullies of the world. The system is set up to cater to the men who are infantile They are makes nit men. In their culture they are abusive to the women, the women are abusive to the children, servants , the children to each other and animals. They can't get along with each other when they are all Muslims Bullies are like blackmaikers, once you give in you can count on it going on until you do put a stop to it. What is Brittan thinking? Who gives a flip what offends the Muslims, believe me I have been called much worse that racist. If that's the best they call call us then I need to let them know sone of the creative terms I've heard people call them. They would have reason to be offended. Their behavior is appalling They have bred themselves into poverty and now we are expected to take care of them. They have inner married for centuries and have many special needs children The care of the children alone is putting a hugh strain on the countries of Europe. (Google it). So no I don't feel obligated to welcome them in. The taking won't stop until they do as they have said time and time again. I feel sorry for the suffering the children are going through but unfortunately they are the next generation of the same. Btw ck out 'Occupy Democrats' fb. Bowing n scraping galore

Anonymous said...

Yup I already see some things you can get me on. Lol. Btw Peter what do you think of the latest influx of children and minors arriving in Texas the last few days from South American countries? I find it very strange. I don't think I could send my children off like that. I hope they are not being torn from their families for whatever purpose.

YoMa said...

"The ideology is 100% violent" is a testable claim.

There are Koranic verses that promote peace and nonviolence.

There are Muslims who adhere to the "nice" parts of their holy book and ignore the violent ones.

While there is violent Islamic ideology and violent Muslims who follow it, it is untrue to say it is "100% violent". That is a mathematical claim that can be disproved.

Peter Hyatt said...

YoMa said...
"The ideology is 100% violent" is a testable claim.

There are Koranic verses that promote peace and nonviolence.

There are Muslims who adhere to the "nice" parts of their holy book and ignore the violent ones.

While there is violent Islamic ideology and violent Muslims who follow it, it is untrue to say it is "100% violent". That is a mathematical claim that can be disproved.
December 15, 2015 at 4:09 AM

There are many peaceful verses in the Koran.

What do Islamic scholars make of them?

Islamic scholars tell us that these were the "early" verses and Allah, being "God", has the right to change his mind, which he did and these are trumped by the latter verses.

This is an ideology that has produced violence, not sporadic, but consistent blood shed for 1400 years; every generation. It is carried out by some, with the support of most, and it is in obedience to the teaching.


Hitlerism or Stalinism also had "peaceful" portions in both, especially to certain groups.

Islamicism supremacy has accomplished what Hitler and Stalin never could: it spreads like a contagion without a single personality leading it.

Nothing in the world has ever accomplished this level of violence outside of a single tyrant.

Peter

YoMa said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peter Hyatt said...

I was asked about the article I referenced with the Holocaust museum that is vacant and the only employees are Muslims.

I have not forgotten ---I will locate it!

Peter