Friday, February 12, 2016

Dhimmitude and Propaganda: Deception on Television

"Mein Jihad"

The President of the United States spoke at a mosque connected with terrorism.  He used tacqia, or the Islamic allowance for deception, to further the cause of Islam when he spoke about the Ramadan dinner with Muslims at the White House.  It is true, Islamic dignitaries were there, it was Ramadan, and they had dinner, but what he left out was:

*The dinner had intention to negotiate for the release of Americans taken hostage for slavery by Islamic barbary coast pirates
*To further learn the koran to study the enemy
*the Islamics demanded kaffir (infidel) women given to them for sex
*the Islamics demanded no wine be served.  

This led to the US Marine invasion of which they still sing, and the beginning of the US war against the world's most violent ideology.

"From the halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli..."

The outright lie was Muslim "contribution" to the founding of America, unless the bravery of the Marines in the Tripolotan War" is their contribution.

Angela Merkel and Barak Obama said that "war refugees" from Syria needed help.  Since no Islamic country will take them, Germany said she would.  They were "women and children" fleeing war and that they would "assimilate into European culture."

The result is Europe awash in violence; sexual violence specifically, and "no go zones", which are not dangerous areas to which Europeans enter at their own risk; they are entire communities in which European law has no place, and Sharia rules.  These are areas all but ceded to Islamic supremacists, except that they are supported by European money, with welfare running up to 90% in most areas, with 100% unemployment by Islamic females.

Stand down orders are the norm, and Germany turns on its own citizens to punish them for Islamic rape, from refusing to arrest rapists, to blaming the victims, and on to threatening anyone who criticizes Islam, enforcing Sharia blasphemy law.  This is the status of the Dhimmi, one who is permitted to live by the supremacist Muslim, as long as he is subservient and pays the Muslim (jizrah).

From the removal of "Islam" from "Islamic terror" records, to the erasing of names on the watch list, to the promotion of Muslims in high security places, and the denigration of Christians in the military and in society, Obama has faithfully promoted Islamic dominance as he works with the terrorist designated "CAIR" organization, including Common Core Curriculum's promotion of Islam in the schools.

Our children will be the ones who must deal with nuclear Iran, thanks to the treason of Barak Obama.   The photo of our crying soldier will be the photograph shown to our children regarding Islamic supremacy, thanks to this high handed treason.  

Obama is not alone.  

Merkel also practiced the Islamic lie.  She told Germans that the migrants would assimilate into European culture while working with Facebook and Google to promote Sharia blasphemy laws, destroying free speech.

Here is a German propaganda video called, "Mein Jihad."

It is a shocking example of Josef Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda resurrected by Merkel, as she supplants the German nationals with Islamic males, 70% to 90%, including ISIS and other Islamic supremacist fighters, with severe and advanced weapons, while seeking to disarm citizenry.  In 40 years, there has been no assimilation, and she has admitted the failure of "multi culturalism", as she has embraced Islamic supremacy.



34 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why? Why are Merkel and Obama doing this?

Peter Hyatt said...

Obama;

he brought "change" and Marxist/Islamic ideology to America. The dumbing down of our citizens began with children. The no borders was to betray black America in their unemployment crisis.
The stirring up of hatred is to begin a revolution.

He knows that nature abhors a vacuum and Islam's extreme "black and white" and coerce affect will cause the morally ambivalent to quickly bow.

A nation that cannot discern between a man and a woman will not be able to stand before Islamic contagion. Homosexuals and feminists both defend an ideology that seeks their destruction. We are self loathing and not far behind Europe.

We bow before Islamic ideology and quake at every air port. It is Islam to thank for the long delays, the intrusive body searches and the fear.

Muslims demand and incessantly complain and they threaten.

They have the Common Core now and 7 minus 3 does not equal 4 because that would be logical and a revolution means they must kill free speech and dumb down america.

This is why our colleges are full of those who identify as male, but who run to "safe places" to weep over someone labeling them or calling them a "delicate snowflake."

Obama has made it fashionable to tyrannize those who disagree and the left has surrendered reason and logic. Bruce Jenner is symbolic of this hatred of good, the hatred of right, and the hatred of logic. Islam is a contagion that is powerful and turns nations into rubble, as it turns hearts into stone. Submit or fight, is the only reaction. Ignoring them is not a luxury we are afforded.

Personally, I blame the Christian church. They went from compromise to compromise, and pandered to whatever "felt" good, of which society followed, until the church lost most of its influence over life itself. Today, they are often part of the money making schemes to import Islamic "refugees", that is, men of fighting age, into America. The money they earn allows them to afford armed borders and private schools, while endangering the rest of us.

Europe's rape is soon to be ours.

As to Merkel's motive, perhaps another can speak to this, as I have given enough for now.

Peter

Anonymous said...

Goebbels twinning exists today. For this reason license plates are produced in Paris,.Texas. Period.
The black and white analogy is good reason to help gays by robbing them...works for those seeking equal rights. ( I left the owners manual in the glove box and there is no reason to enter through the rear))
The gestapo is established for the sole purpose of promoting those who have been in the military or have worked in/on a police force or are being paid for their criminality.

Anonymous said...

BTW...because I don't like morons is no indication of homosexuality.

Anonymous said...

Helping others...yes. I recall a woman who barred her door with a sofa to prevent assistance only to fire off a 12 gauge as he entered with a knife to help.

maudes harold said...

Bill Ayers, of the 60's counter-culture group The Weather Underground, has his fingers all over the "re-education" of our youth. When blowing up buildings didn't work, he went into education to subvert. A linguist concluded that Ayers wrote one of Obama's books. Sorry but I've forgotten if it was "Dreams of My Father" or not and cannot remember the name of the linguist at the moment.

For anyone interested in part of what seems to be happening here, check out the Cloward-Piven Strategy created at Bill and Obama's alma mater--Columbia. Just a quick overview from Wiki:

"The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty"


My 14 year old niece's fall concert choir in a public school in LA was named "Revolution." Their school musical this year is "In the Heights" about immigration. While there is nothing wrong with this, in and of itself, taken with the Common Core ridiculousness, and the rest of what is happening in education, and what I consider Creeping Sharia, it scares the crap out of me for these kids.

Anonymous said...

OT - Texas Teen Feminist...

Part I - I thought this one would be fun to break down and analyze. It's sooooo easy to see the deception and sensitivity dripping from these interview answers...

What made you post the "Walmart underwear vibes" selfies?
I was really just feeling cute and was loving my body shape. I know I've got body hair and I know I usually get hate for this stuff, but the photos were among the least provocative I've posted. So the reason really was: 'I'm feelin' myself.'

Did you have any idea when you posted them how controversial they would be?
No way. When I checked the activity on it and saw that after fighting all those absurd men it was hitting 1,000+ faves, I screamed. I haven't stop screaming, none of this was planned.

There has been a huge, global reaction online. How has it differed across genders, cultures or other groups?
Oh God. I mean, the hate was usually from men, and sadly men of color. But I'm used to hate from men in my community; like anyone from the Southeast Asian diaspora, I'm used to that. But men from any other community commenting shocked me; it was a breadth of men who were commenting absurd things, and that made it even more crazy. Any woman who commented [negatively] was generally of western origin. There were some brown girls here and there, but it was predominantly women who have just never had the genetic issue, so it must have shocked them? I can't think of another explanation besides the beauty industry being geared towards western standards. Anyone who accepts those standards assumed I'm gross. The majority of my support came from brown girls who saw me and related, which is amazing. I have never been supported in such a way. The outpouring of love was beyond my capacity to grasp, if I'm being honest. Like, here are these girls, girls just like me, idolizing me. It made all the hate worth it.

-KC

Anonymous said...

Part II

Your family didn't take your new found social media fame too well, but you said you convinced your mom that you were empowering women --what did you say?
[My mom] had an emotional reaction at first, screaming in Hindi that I took the family honor away. Then I just sat down and was like, "We're talking like adults." I explained: firstly, I'm more clothed than I would be on the beach; secondly, this is all to help women like me and her. She got it, and we're fine. Dad... doesn't know. And that's cool. Like, dads are dads and they often live in ignorance about daughters. I think he wouldn't care, though. I was scared that if he did know, his reaction would be more emotional and he would try to ship me back home. The thing about parents -- brown parents in particular -- is that the switch-up is polar: one second they can be fine with you and the next they're literally threatening to move you back to Mumbai. So I just didn't know how that would have gone. It never came to that. So I guess everything is fine. They are my parents after all.

Why do you think body hair is such a contentious point in the drive for body positivity, even amongst feminists?
Rhetorically speaking, I feel hair and hair growth function as incredible creative material. It's a topic that can be understood and translated beyond linguistic barriers. There is so much you can do with the 'idea' of hair in a literary sense, and that's what makes it an amazing rallying cry. My 7th grade English teacher told me, "The winner of the argument is the one who defines the terms," and I live by that. So when people started defining hair as gross, I redefined the terms for myself: I am not hairy, I see myself as a garden, as a forest, as the geography of my homeland. What those men see as appalling, I redefined to be a garden so beautiful Epicurus dare enter it -- something to put Eden and Babylon to shame. Because of this, their comments really do mean nothing.

You've been vocal about white culture's love (appropriation) of brown culture, but not brown bodies. What needs to change?
When you come at my body hair and call me Chewbacca -- you aren't just making fun of me. You're making fun of your eyebrow lady, the woman you hire to do your henna, the women who stitch your Forever 21 tunics, your Uber driver, the dude who's homework you copy, the man who makes the chicken tikka at your favourite Indian restaurant, your doctor, the engineer who built the highway you take to work. When you make fun of me, you make fun of ALL of us. You invalidate ALL of us. You invalidate people from the Arabian Peninsula to Myanmar -- and that is repulsive.

SOURCE: http://i-d.vice.com/en_us/article/meet-the-texas-teen-feminist-whose-body-hair-set-twitter-on-fire?utm_source=idfbus

-KC

Anonymous said...

Peter:

You can't just say, the Islamics demanded kaffir (infidel) women given to them for sex, without having a link or two to back it up. Maybe it was a previous blog post of yours that I missed, but you need to do a reference, else people will not believe what you are posting. I trust you, and share some of your posts with friends, but please provide some backup to your statements.

maudes harold said...


Anon @ 1:19

Here's a good start

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/2015/12/belief-articulation-and-action-part-3.html

Saint Theresa said...

I agree. As much as I trust Peter I need sources. Please link them.

tania cadogan said...

Why is no one asking why other islamic countries, where the so called refugees would fit right in, not accepting said refugees?

Peter Hyatt said...

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261790/muslim-mans-sexual-rights-over-non-muslim-women-raymond-ibrahim

Peter Hyatt said...

Where do I begin?

There are a multitude of links for you. Perhaps google?

Islam attitude towards women.

There are even Muslim women who have written on this, and have given videos.

Bat Ye'or lived through it and is a respected and world renown historian. She is a good reference. I will post a few...

Peter Hyatt said...

The psychology of Islam and rape: http://10news.dk/?p=589

Peter Hyatt said...

Islamic pyschology and its impact on women:

http://10news.dk/?p=445



Peter Hyatt said...

http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/02/was-what-happened-in-cologne-a-pogrom/

Cologne

Peter Hyatt said...

even reading propaganda, through the lens of S/A, will instruct you:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/cologne-attacks-trigger-raw-debate-on-immigration-in-germany-a-1071175.html


jihadwatch.org Isalm 101

See the koran verses on "possession of right hand" (rape of women captives in war as reward)

"woman testimony one half the value of man"

and on and on it goes...

Peter Hyatt said...

Quran

Quran (4:11) - (Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females" (see also verse 4:176). In Islam, sexism is mathematically established.
Quran (2:282) - (Court testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women." Muslim apologists offer creative explanations to explain why Allah felt that a man's testimony in court should be valued twice as highly as a woman's, but studies consistently show that women are actually less likely to tell lies than men, meaning that they make more reliable witnesses.

Quran (2:228) - "and the men are a degree above them [women]"

Quran (5:6) - "And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it" Men are to rub dirt on their hands, if there is no water to purify them, following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking hands).

Quran (24:31) - Women are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the eye. (To be fair, men are told to do the same thing in the prior verse).

Quran (2:223) - "Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will..." A man has dominion over his wives' bodies as he does his land. This verse is overtly sexual. There is some dispute as to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse. If this is what Muhammad meant, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).

Quran (4:3) - (Wife-to-husband ratio) "Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four" Inequality by numbers.

Quran (53:27) - "Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names." Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.

Quran (4:24) and Quran (33:50) - A man is permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand possesses).
Hadith and Sira

Peter Hyatt said...

Bukhari (6:301) - "[Muhammad] said, 'Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?' They replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is the deficiency in her intelligence.'"

Bukhari (6:301) - continued - "[Muhammad said] 'Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?' The women replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is the deficiency in her religion.'" Allah has made women deficient in the practice of their religion as well, by giving them menstrual cycles.

Bukhari (2:29) - Women comprise the majority of Hell's occupants. This is important because the only women in heaven mentioned explicitly by Muhammad are the virgins who serve the sexual desires of men. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).

Bukhari (62:81) - "The Prophet said: "'The stipulations most entitled to be abided by are those with which you are given the right to enjoy the (women's) private parts (i.e. the stipulations of the marriage contract).'" In other words, the most important thing a woman brings to marriage is between her legs.

Bukhari (62:58) - A woman presents herself in marriage to Muhammad, but he does not find her attractive, so he "donates" her on the spot to another man.

Muslim (4:1039) - "A'isha said [to Muhammad]: 'You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses'" These are the words of Muhammad's favorite wife, complaining of the role assigned to women under Islam.

Abu Dawud (2:704) - "...the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of over a stone's throw."

Abu Dawud (2155) - Women are compared to slaves and camels with regard to the "evil" in them.

Ishaq 593 - "As for Ali, he said, 'Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.'" Ali was raised as a son by Muhammad. He was also the 4th caliph. This comment was made in Muhammad's presence without a word of rebuke from him.

Ishaq 593 - "From the captives of Hunayn, Allah's Messenger gave [his son-in-law] Ali a slave girl called Baytab and he gave [future Caliph] Uthman a slave girl called Zaynab and [future Caliph] Umar another." - Even in this world, Muhammad treated women like party favors, handing out enslaved women to his cronies for sex.

Ibn Ishaq (693) - "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." Muhammad traded captured women for horses.

Al-Tirmidhi 3272 - "When Allah's Messenger was asked which woman was best he replied, 'The one who pleases (her husband) when he looks at her, obeys him when he gives a command, and does not go against his wishes regarding her person or property by doing anything of which he disapproves'."

Tabari VIII:117 - The fate of more captured farm wives, whom the Muslims distributed amongst themselves as sex slaves: "Dihyah had asked the Messenger for Safiyah when the Prophet chose her for himself... the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims."

Tabari IX:137 - "Allah granted Rayhana of the Qurayza to Muhammad as booty."

Ishaq 969 - "Men were to lay injunctions on women lightly, for they were prisoners of men and had no control over their persons." - This same text also justifies beating women for flirting.

Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 - "Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for themselves." From Muhammad's 'Farewell Sermon'.

Peter Hyatt said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peter Hyatt said...

Anonymous said...
Peter:

You can't just say, the Islamics demanded kaffir (infidel) women given to them for sex, without having a link or two to back it up. Maybe it was a previous blog post of yours that I missed, but you need to do a reference, else people will not believe what you are posting. I trust you, and share some of your posts with friends, but please provide some backup to your statements.

February 12, 2016 at 1:19 PM Delete



I have only pulled out a few. Do you need more on the White House, Thomas Jefferson, the slave trade, or the barbary pirates? Or, just the ideology behind it?

I love anonymous assertions.

Peter Hyatt said...

Here are some marvelous history lessons you can listen to for yourself, instead of reading:

http://auburnavenuemedia.libsyn.com/history-of-the-church-the-myth-of-islamic-cultural-supremecy


The series on Islam is very helpful.

do you need the rape statistics in europe too?

Peter Hyatt said...

Rape of kaffir

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape

Peter Hyatt said...

500% increase in rape


http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/175434/1-4-swedish-women-will-be-raped-sexual-assaults-daniel-greenfield

ima.grandma said...

He who knows not and knows not he knows not: he is a fool - shun him. 
He who knows not and knows he knows not: he is simple - teach him. 
He who knows and knows not he knows: he is asleep - wake him. 
He who knows and knows he knows: he is wise - follow him.

I appreciate the efforts by Mr. Peter Hyatt to create awareness and freely share knowledge. This interactive session enhances the quality of the message and creates successful discourse.

Saint Theresa said...

Peter I am not asking for rape statistics, I know what's going on. I'm asking for the link to the quote below. I would like to see a source on the White House providing women for sex for the Muslims guests.
"It is true, Islamic dignitaries were there, it was Ramadan, and they had dinner, but what he left out was:
*The dinner had intention to negotiate for the release of Americans taken hostage for slavery by Islamic barbary coast pirates
*To further learn the koran to study the enemy
*the Islamics demanded kaffir (infidel) women given to them for sex
*the Islamics demanded no wine be served. "

Thank you

Yes. said...

^^^^ St Muslim^^^^

Saint Theresa said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Yes. said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Peter Hyatt said...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/10/watch-heartbreaking-account-of-life-in-migrant-terror-calais/

The historical account of the Ramadan dinner is already given link. The historical account of Muslims demanding sex and no wine is in "myths" link. Listen to the audio.
This is of Calais for doubters of no go zones.

Peter Hyatt said...

Did you bother to follow the links?

Anonymous said...

Ask st Muskim with her faux trust tof Peter to look up why marines are called leathernecks and get off her lazy butt and read.

Anonymous said...

@Peter,
Obama did not bring Marxist ideology to America; it's been here for decades.Children are dumbed down not because of Common Core but because of lack of interest. It is difficult to learn in an environment intent on fighting for a political cause. The need to be forced into a group starts at school and lessens values.

The Christian church may be to blamed, but let's face it-the church is comprised of people subjected to outside influences and is fluid. Their concern centers on copyrights and property rights and little on wielding control over their off-spring.Their "charity" organizations speak of their import/export causes.

Fortunately, the Muslims are tanked up on drugs prior to attacks, too. Spotting them should be easy enough.