Friday, June 17, 2016

Jeffrey T. Brown Article

Readers here know that the blog concentrates on discerning deception.  Our examples are mostly criminal but where speech is involved, any area is open for analysis.  This includes both politicians and the propaganda techniques used by corporate media.  

I have been covering the "Tacquia" of Barak Obama, concentrating on the dramatic change in his second term.  "Tacquia" is the Islamic doctrine of deception.  It is very appealing to be told you have 'religious permission' to practice deception.  It is a challenge to take 'cleverness' to an entirely new level. We have seen him, for example, directly lie about various policies and his animosity towards success is plain, but it is in his defense of Islamic doctrine that he uses clever, decades long habits to deceive.  Often he uses the 'red herring'; that is, the tangent sent off to follow, particularly when combined with emotion.  Hence, in the Orlando Islamic massacre, he affirmed victim status, not of Islam, but of (1) 2nd Amendment (2) Christians  (3) Republicans,  (4) guns, and so on, as if Islamic terrorists will be stymied because they cannot register their weapons.  He blamed Donald Trump and said that if he "names" the enemy of "radical Islam" it will make them angry and attack us. 

This was one of the most cowardly statements he's ever made as he attempts to persuade America to submit to sharia blasphemy law, which is why this criminal ideology can never undergo reformation:  it calls for death for anyone who criticizes it.  

Divide and Conquer 

By creating victim status, he must have a villain who is "victimizing" the smaller group.  This is where he has divided the nation more than any other way.  Shakespeare is disparaged in college as a "white man" with no retort of racism.  

Yet, sheep fall in line without discernment.   As nation after nation fell to Islam, historically, as they began in a small minority and began the incessant complaints, eventually, the virus spread, due to fear, and took over a nation.  

Obama is clever.  He condemned the notion of letting people into our county based upon religion as he has brought in, at last count, 99% Muslims, 1% Christian, from Syria, while tearing down with threats of arrests of law enforcement officials, our borders, as terrorists enter.  He knew all the details of the Orlando Islamic terrorists when he gave his speech; hence "deception indicated" was easily rendered.  He emboldened those who despise America to blame Christians and "right wing extremists", while the body count of Islamic murder continues.  

Ramadan?  He took a military strategic move by our government in history before the Tripolitan War, and turned it into a gracious acceptance of Islam by the White House.  Corporate media refuses to question him, lest they be persona non grata at the White House.  


He has not only scrubbed the terrorist lists, but has planted Islamic supremacists at every level of government, sometimes as an "advisory board" and has ordered the removal of Islam from training manuals, including the large volume of work done by Robert Spencer.  If prior administrations had oil and campaign donations as their motive, Obama has ideology as his.  His fear of having Islam rejected is driving him to target Trump well before the election. 

His insecurity came to the surface answering criticism as to why he won't name the enemy and media did its best to down play it.  


As the single greatest historical enslaver of Africans, Obama praises Islam as standing for "racial equality."  See the list of 20 quotes of Obama, including many that should have enraged some of the victim groups he has created.  The history lies may be his greatest. 

As one humorous post said,

"John F. Kennedy put a man on the moon.  Barak Hussein Obama put a man in the woman's bathroom."  

In Europe, main stream or corporate (state funded) media will use crass obvious methods, including photoshopping terrorists to appear white, rather than Islamic, and censoring news, as they are slowly taken over by this ideological virus.  Obama, on the other hand, is clever; using the best Hollywood writers to tell us that the world will be safer with a nuclear Iran, even as they chant, "Death to America; Death to Israel."  

Islam is a criminal ideology, oppressive and opposed to freedom, with a religious component.  

America elected an Islamic president and has paid dearly. 

Here is the article by Jeffrey T. Brown, found at American Thinker

"We all know that Barack Obama was nominally a lawyer at some point in his past – not a good one, by anyone's account, but he was one.  Assume for the moment that Barack Obama had as his client The Muslim Brotherhood, or CAIR, or Hamas, or any one of dozens of organizations dedicated to taking down the United States.  

Could he possibly have done a more effective job of hiding his client's actions or intentions while they went about conducting criminal operations unmolested as he has for seven years? 

 Could he have been more successful at misdirecting and obfuscating and lying about their intentions and deeds than he has already been?

Though not every lawyer shares a client's philosophy, the zeal with which an attorney does his job can sometimes be proportionate to his identity with the client's goals and objectives.  The president certainly is a zealous fellow when it comes to radical Islam.
We know he won't call it "radical Islam," claiming that that is a distraction or a talking point.  Perhaps the real reason is that he doesn't believe that what the Islamists he supports are doing is radical at all.  Maybe the actual issue is that he believes in and supports their efforts to infiltrate and subvert the United States.  That would explain an awful lot, wouldn't it?

For seven years, we have heard how the president "doesn't get it" and is in over his head, is naive, and countless other excuses.  None of this has ever been the problem.  He gets it.  He simply gets it with regard to his own agenda, his own end game.

It's the American people who continue not to get it.  The president is in bed with the enemy.  It is ironic that so many of those who are angry that the president won't say "radical Islam" themselves won't openly say that he is and always has been the patron of radical Islamists, and he protects them for that reason.  Until we admit this, and see him for what he is and what he has been doing consistently and with determination, we enable him to succeed.

The president points to his limited efforts to eradicate certain violent Muslims through drone strikes and minimal military operations, as if this proves he is "one of us" and is working to protect the United States.  Muslims attack other Muslims all the time, but they are all still Muslims.  If the president chooses to assist certain factions he favors against certain others, this is hardly being done to protect the United States.  If that were his objective, he wouldn't be freeing a significant number of homicidal Muslims as well, who are back on the job killing Americans.  He is barely lifting a finger militarily or internationally, regardless of what he says.

However, he is moving heaven and earth domestically, where the actual invasion and conquest is actively going on.  People who recognize that we have seen increasing levels of terroristic violence across the country committed in the name of Islam by its perpetrators want the president to name the threat for the simple reason that his failure to do so, when viewed with all the other things he has done to protect and promote Islamists to weaken our military, our national government, and our security, tells them that he is in league with them and that he will not betray them while he repeatedly betrays us.  He refuses to identify them because he is their strongest supporter and their most steadfast protector.  His unwillingness to admit that there is any Islamic component at all to the terror, even when the terrorists say it happily, tells us that he is willfully misdirecting us from the truth, even when that ensures that more Americans will die.

Throughout this week, we have seen news reports of FBI analysts, whose work was to connect the dots, having their files erased of all Muslim suspects who were actively plotting against us.  We have heard of how the FBI's hands were tied, and the new rules required that they drop their surveillance of Muslim suspects against whom concrete evidence had not yet been found and how those suspects went on to commit mass murder, including this week in Orlando.  We have heard how employers and neighbors of Muslims who engaged in terrorism here were afraid of saying anything against the terrorists because they were Muslim, including both Orlando and San Bernardino.  Our government has vowed to punish those who express legitimate fears about Muslims behaving suspiciously, which the government deems Islamophobia rather than domestic or national security.  That is, our government has vowed to punish Americans who have the audacity to object to their own destruction.  How would any of this be different if we had an openly Muslim president and a pro-Muslim, pro-sharia government?

None of this is new, and it continues to be the policy of this administration right up to the last couple of days, when the Department of Homeland Security has come out with new prohibitions on words that might offend those who most want to destroy this country.  Words like "jihad" and "sharia" are banned by government fascists who control speech and thought.  There was a simultaneous story this week about a 25-year-old Syrian immigrant, Laila Alawa, who is one of 15  members of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism and who is rabidly anti-American and an anti-white racist.  She seems fine with Islamic violent extremism, declaring that 9/11 changed the world for good.  It is the committee on which she serves that advocated censoring those words that might offend Muslims. 

Those who work within this administration to harm the United States in the name of Islam have been serving at the president's pleasure, or with his blessing.  If that were not true, he would purge the government of all such anti-American and pro-Islamist enemies of the country.  He doesn't.  Their numbers grow steadily.  This is his administration.  These are his surrogates.  They are the vehicle by which his policies, his goals, and his beliefs are being put into effect.  He is one of them.  There is no other explanation for them populating our government at every level, but particularly the highest ones.  Those who most vehemently represent the president's views are rewarded with the opportunity to destroy this country from within, along with complete immunity from punishment or retribution for expressing their desire to do just that.
Naturally, an armed citizenry is a substantial obstacle to our overthrow.  It is for this president and his party members a rather happy coincidence, therefore, that we have just experienced both an Islamic victory on our soil, about which the president has vowed to do absolutely nothing, and the use of a gun, about which the president has vowed to do everything in his power.  It is at times like this that his priorities and goals converge and are laid open to be seen unmistakably.  Americans must pay the price for what was done to them.  It is our rights, but not those of the invaders and traitors, that must be slashed. 
It's time we admit the obvious.  Radical Islam isn't radical to this president.  It's simply a means to an end.  Our end."

end of article


#1 “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam”
#2 “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer”
#3 “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country.”
#4 “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”
#6 “Islam has always been part of America”
#8 “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”
#9 “America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”
#10 “I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
#11 “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.”
#12 “So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed”
#13 “In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.”
#14 “Throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”
#15 “Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality
#16 “The Holy Koran tells us, ‘O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.’”
#17 “I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month.”
#18 “We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim immigrants – farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and build our cities, the Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest skyscrapers and who helped unlock the secrets of our universe.”
#19 “That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

#20 “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”


Anonymous said...

I just want one example of Islamic tolerance.

Tania Cadogan said...

It really couldn't be more blatant where his priorities lie, who he is and what his beliefs and intentions are.
Why is America ignoring all the warning signs?

If this had been said by a muslim terrorist prior to him commencing some atrocity, people would be up in arms demanding to know why he had not been arrested and prosecuted.
Should said terrorist people would be up in arms demanding to know why nothing was done given he was openly telling the world what he was going to do and why.
Heck in some countries he would have been arrested as an enemy of the state.

I would not be surprised if obama goes out with a final bang, he creates a law which effectively puts islam over and above America.
it may not be a physical attack as we have so often seen with mass shootings, after all why get his hands dirty when as potus he can write an atrocity down in legalese and America will accept it and obey.

However, i could even see obama ordering an attack on a region which would be high in non muslims in some guise and if needs be claiming it was an accident or even blaming others for doing it wrong or not listening to what he meant.
Think Benghazi on a bigger scale.

Will America wake up and see all the damage done to itself by an islamic potus and bring in laws to prevent it happening ever again?

Will America wake up and see what harm has been done to it by its own leader and revoke/change all laws that obama brought in?

Will liberals and democrats see the damage done and realize they are complicit in the destruction of America and change their ways, to do what is right for the country, admit their mistakes and apologize or will they carry on as now and continue the ongoing damage?

Will there be a civil war in America as its citizens rebel against its government?
Will there be a civil war between American citizens and islamic citizens?
The former fighting to defend and protect their country and the latter intent on taking it down and creating an islamic caliphate?

Why can't or won't people see that the strongest free nation in the world is on the slippery slope to being the strongest islamic nation in the world, amply armed with nuclear weapons who has the means and the opportunity to force other nations to convert or else?

How bad does it have to get before American allies realize they cannot trust their own ally and perhaps even ending up going to war with it to protect the rest of the world?

Wild scenario?
It will never happen?
The American people wouldn't stand for it?

The American people are already allowing it to happen, some even to encouraging it.

Will obama be the first American president to be charged with treason?
Will obama be the first American president to be charged with crimes against humanity as in allowing non muslim citizens to be slaughtered by muslims?

Anonymous said...

The WMD's in Iraq lie started this mess. Watch Bush/Blair, posted on youtube, address the Iraqi people prior to the shock & awe. Petroleum is a curse. Its the root of global military violence.

Anonymous said...

"The WMD's in Iraq lie started this mess. Watch Bush/Blair, posted on youtube, address the Iraqi people prior to the shock & awe. Petroleum is a curse. Its the root of global military violence."

Bush/Blair and Petroleum are responsible for who Obama is and what he does? LoL

Anonymous said...

There are still many people who believe Obama is a great president. They have their hands out and he is giving them money in some form or another. It's a big problem in this country. No one wants to work. Hillary will probably have the same people voting for her to continue the graft. Donald pig is disgusting, but the lesser of 2 evils imo.

Anonymous said...

Petro is the reason we have to deal with them and placate them. It's all about the money

Anonymous said...

Correct. Placate. We're already at war w/Russia inside Syria. For access and control of petroleum. Perhaps this mess cannot be stopped by anyone. If nuclear weapons are used & ruin everything: the flag waving sillies,those who work & those that dont work, everything ruined.

Anonymous said...

Germany convicts 94 yr old former Auschwitz guard. Five yrs prison.. While the current German admistration is currently destroying the nation.

Nic said...

"Anonymous said:
There are still many people who believe Obama is a great president. They have their hands out and he is giving them money in some form or another. It's a big problem in this country."

Not just the US, Canada, too. These days voting is about shopping for the deals. There is no "common good", it's just 'me, me, me...'

Nic said...

It's interesting listening to people talk about Donald Trump (be they American or Canadian or...). Every American is raised to believe they can be President of the United States. Every American. Except Donald Trump. It makes me laugh.

Now the position has become a tentpole for Employment Equity, character be damned.

Anonymous said...

Published on Jun 17, 2016
It's not Islam, bro!

Brooklyn NY Native interviews random people on the street
- they do not believe Islam was of involvement: Orlando Shooting

How dare you .... blame Islam, the blame is Guns, Republicans 2 mins of sheep on bliss / ignorance

Brains washed rinsed repeat - copy paste - no need of investigation here

8 years later said...

February 2015

the Panel of experts " debate" what " He meant to say" about Jesus
err Islam, err .. putting a bow on Obama's Gaffe,
or he said what he said, and meant it? The Media constant on holding
Obama's hand, after he has spoken ..on what he knows nothing about, cough

Maher's ego run amuck, he sympathizer of Obama, Maher is his keeper
depending on who's sitting next to him, Ratings Matter $$$$

People outside of the US watching Bill Maher, no wonder they hate US

Bill Maher and his panel made up of The Blaze's Amy Holmes, The Weekly Standard's John McCormack and spiritual author Marianne Williamson react to President Obama's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast earlier this week.

Katprint said...

In my mind, violent radical muslims are essentially equivalent to violent radical christians. In the US, christian violence is primarily limited to bombing abortion clinics and assassinating abortion providers although several christian organizations like the Westboro Baptist Church engage in extensive non-violent harassment. In foreign countries like the Central African Republic, christian rebels frequently kidnap "witches" and then burn them alive and/or bury them alive. C.A.R. christian extremists have also massacred muslims, for example in 2014 when "Christian militiamen killed at least 70 people in the remote southwest of Central African Republic, at one point ordering a group of Muslims to lie on the ground and shooting them one by one, witnesses said Monday."

My point is, no religion holds a monopoly on violent extremism.

Jon The Layman said...

"IN MY MIND, violent radical muslims are ESSENTIALLY equivalent to violent radical Christians"

Qualifying your sentence by saying "in my mind" makes your next statement appear weak and subjective.

Drawing the false equivalence between Muslim & Christian violence as "essentially" equivalent weakens your statement even further with an unnecessary word which is used to try to persuade the reader rather than report something that is objectively true.

Your examples are of course highly biased and these types of arguments are representative of how Muslim/Islamic apologists will argue their case for their religion, which is to point out how bad all the other religions are without actually defending what their own religion's doctrines explicitly teach in regards to violence against infidels. Just like a child saying "everyone else was doing it" when they get in trouble for something they did.

Taking into account ALL the information regarding Muslim terrorism, one can only objectively state that Muslims are significantly overrepresented by their world wide population proportion and is, based on statistical fact much more violent than any other religion.


Katprint said...

WTF Jon? Of course my opinion is subjective.

Your analysis of my statement is flawed. You did not consider the context: My statement was made in response to the assertion that violent radical muslims are worse that other violent religious extremists. The "expected" would be an acknowledgement that other people (for example, the author of the assertion that I disagreed with) with have other thoughts in their minds.

Whether someone's statement is factually "weak" is not anything that can be resolved by statement analysis. Your ad hominem attack implying that I am "biased" and an "apologist" is a classic logical fallacy. It doesn't matter if I am the most biased apologist in the world, if my facts are correct. You claim that your own opinion "tak[es] into account ALL of the information regarding Muslim terrorism" and is therefore a matter of objective fact yet you don't provide a single cite to your factual sources.

In reality, "taking into account ALL of the information" concerning religious violence throughout history, a clear pattern emerges of religion being twisted into a political weapon to obtain wealth and power. The patron gods and goddesses of the Greek city-states, of the Assyrians, of the Romans, of the Egyptians, and of every ancient civilization discovered thus far were used to justify why it was morally OK for the conquering group (favored by the gods) to subjugate the conquered group (infidels who worshipped the wrong god.) The Crusades were similarly justified by the non-Christianity of the victims. The various persecutions of the Jews in Russia, across Europe and in the Middle East were financially and politically motivated. Even Buddhist monks who officially eschew violence as a fundamental tenet of their religion have occasionally engaged in political religious violence (for example, in Thailand, Myanmar, India, Sri Lanka, and Japan.) There is always some rationalization why murdering (or beating, setting on fire, cutting off hands, raping, looting, insert other act of violence here) is generally wrong but that this particular situation is different.

Statement Analysis Blog said...

Katprint said...
In my mind, violent radical muslims are essentially equivalent to violent radical christians. In the US, christian violence is primarily limited to bombing abortion clinics and assassinating abortion providers although several christian organizations like the Westboro Baptist Church engage in extensive non-violent harassment.

Katprint, This is probably the worst stretch I've seen in a long time.

Let's look at statistics.

Number of dead killed thus far Ramadan 2016 by Islam: 900+

Number of attacks by Christians: 0

Number of attacks by all other religions besides Islam: 0

Number of dead by Christians: 0

This is just Ramadan 2016, and the "17th" is coming June 23, so expect more dead.

There are, on average, about 1,200 dead EVERY month of every year in obedience to the Koran. If someone kills in the name of Christianity, they must go against its teachings to do so.

You are retailing propaganda and tacquia from Obama, who has sought to include "radical right" and "Christians" in terror manuals, while scrubbing them free of Islam.

Any psycho can kill, but no religion prescribes conquest via coercion and murder except Islam.

As to the Westboro "Baptist Church", have you ever seen such a tiny group of people get so much publicity?

Please use the basic population numbers of the United States to do so. There are more psychopathic killings from deranged individuals in our population that kill from hearing voices, than the number of dead from "Christians" that you seek to cite.

WBC is a bizarre, fringe publicity seeking group that would not get any press had it not been for "Christophobic" media. They, too, play into Obama;s Islamic agenda, as each time someone kills in obedience to the Koran, he lectures Christians. His hatred is unconcealed and he is unable to contain it.

Islam not only holds a monopoly, but is the ONLY religion that prescribes VIOLENT CONQUEST. By seeking to add other religions to this, you continue to act as a voice for Islamic tacquia.

In statement analysis, we call it tangent.

You perpetuate myths and deception at a blog dedicated to truth. The next time you are at the mall and you see someone run to the food court yelling "What Would Jesus Do?" loaded with bombs, let me know.

This is not the place for propagating Islamic supremacist lies. It is rare, so it caught my attention.


Statement Analysis Blog said...

Nic said...
"Anonymous said:
There are still many people who believe Obama is a great president. They have their hands out and he is giving them money in some form or another. It's a big problem in this country."

Not just the US, Canada, too. These days voting is about shopping for the deals. There is no "common good", it's just 'me, me, me...'

June 18, 2016 at 7:40 AM Delete


It is interesting for me: all the people I know who voted for Obama have expressed disgust, shame, disappointment, etc. I have offered comfort to more than a few reminding them that what we most thought was just 'talk' was not, and that he is good at Islami's taquia.

The only people proud of Obama that I know of are in media and stay the narrative. My democratic friends who believe that the government was to care for the people have renounced their party's affiliation.

My republican friends who believe the we, the people, are responsible to help others, have renounced their party, too, saying it is all but indiscernible today from bowing to the sharia president, Iran, hating white people,

condemning successful people (unless in sports or entertainment) and bristle over what obamas-care has done to business. There are various names for it but over all:

They hate what he has done to us all. My democrat friends long for the days where they could make fun of Bill Clinton but not think he would destroy the country.

The Republicans long for a leader like Ronald Reagan.

Everyone, across the board, is sick of Islam, multiculturalism, sensitivity training, special snowflakes, but mostly:

they express to me in strong terms (sometimes fear) that freedom of speech is gone and the older ones show the most fear.

More people like Putin than obama. I believe he should be tried with treason.

I regret each report where a lefty "refugee" welcomer is raped or their children assaulted, but as they ignore ideology, their "religion" has its own "gods" and these gods are demanding, tyrannical, and ultimately lead to suicide.

Statement Analysis Blog said...

The retailing of the lie about "all religions have violence" is something that Marx and Islam championed:

"Guilt by association"

The NY Times quoted the book of Romans as saying Christians are to kill homosexuals.
How's that for some intelligent reporting?