Friday, July 8, 2016

William Johnson Statement

Justice denied strengthens the resolve of criminal activity.

Update:  Another police officer shot by black male as police officers everywhere are now targeted and taking precautionary measures for safety.  

In the city of Ballwin, Missouri, on a traffic stop, the unnamed officer was shot and transported to hospital.  His condition is unknown.  He was walking back to his patrol car after issuing ticket and was shot.  

The following statement is from William Johnson, Executive Director of the National Association of Police Organizations. 

I think [Obama's) continued appeasements at the federal level with the Department of Justice, their appeasement of violent criminals, their refusal to condemn movements like Black Lives Matter, actively calling for the death of police officers, that type of thing, all the while blaming police for the problems in this country has led directly to the climate that has made Dallas possible.”


145 comments:

Anonymous said...

I just heard the police officer died - my heart is breaking. I expect nothing from this radical leftist MUSLIM president to heal the divide and give comfort to the grieving families; I'm sure the only reason he made the comments on the shooting this morning was he was told he had to and he still injected politics in it; he didn't even have the decency to say that he thoughts were for the families of fallen and injured officers - no he had to go on a gun rant; January 2017 can't come soon enough

Ode said...

Obama is an Activist, he is not Potus material.
He should have kept his Acorn position.
Obama is in Poland
He quoted in their press of the Dallas shootings.

Taken from Fairfield Citizen AP Warsaw
http://www.fairfieldcitizenonline.com/news/texas/article/Obama-says-America-is-horrified-over-Dallas-attack-8347420.php

July 8 2016

The Dallas shooting forced the White House to consider whether Obama would continue his travels as planned. Obama is slated to attend meetings in Warsaw Saturday before heading on to Spain, where his itinerary includes cultural stops and meetings with Spanish leaders. He's not due back in Washington until Monday.

In his initial comments on racial bias in policing, Obama proved to be grimly attuned to the potential for violence directed at police and criticism that the protesters were hostile toward law enforcement.

There's no contradiction between supporting law enforcement and working to see that biases in the justice system are rooted out, Obama said.

"So when people say 'Black Lives Matter,' that doesn't mean blue lives don't matter," he said, referring to police.

"It just means all lives matter but right now, the big concern is the fact that the data shows black folks are more vulnerable to these kinds of incidents."

Obama expressed his gratitude to police officers and noted he had grieved with families of fallen officers. He reiterated that message Friday morning.

"Today is a wrenching reminder of the sacrifices that they make for us," Obama said.

"Today our focus is on the victims and their families. They are heartbroken.
The entire city of Dallas is grieving. Police across America, which is a tight-knit family, feels this loss to their core."

the Polarity - O continues the bait and victim " placard" of black Folk

As another officer (now fatality) is shot in another state this afternoon.
This will continue all weekend and then some..it's hot, it's dicey with the many ill informed that have nothing to lose. The AC will feel good once arrested unless they go out in a body bag, attempting taking another officer.

They are not scared, their lefty to the highest level activist has spoken.

WM.Johnson: “I think [Obama's) continued appeasements at the federal level with the Department of Justice, their appeasement of violent criminals, their refusal to condemn movements like Black Lives Matter, actively calling for the death of police officers, that type of thing, all the while blaming police for the problems in this country has led directly to the climate that has made Dallas possible.”

Anonymous said...

just in - another shooting in Tennessee - black man shooting at white cops because he was angry about what's going on;

I'm surprised Obama's even considering cutting his trip short, maybe he can get a golf came in on his way back; I'll never forget the picture of him in a golf shirt and then laughing on the golf course a few minutes later after making a few perfunctory remarks after James Foley was beheaded.

He's right when he reprimanded the Republicans telling them it was time to get to the back to the bus - Elections have consequences and we are paying for the mistake of electing him not just once, but twice

Nic said...

"It just means all lives matter but right now, the big concern is the fact that the data shows black folks are more vulnerable to these kinds of incidents."

Nic said...

Republicans telling them it was time to get to the back to the bus

Seriously? Wow. Segregate much. Could you imagine if Trump told Obama to get to the back of the bus? Amazing.

Anonymous said...

Blogger Nic said...
Republicans telling them it was time to get to the back to the bus

Seriously? Wow. Segregate much. Could you imagine if Trump told Obama to get to the back of the bus? Amazing.

July 8, 2016 at 6:05 PM


yup, our wonderful divider-in-chief's version of working with the other side is "I won so do what I say or sit down and shut up" and everyone lets him get away with it because they don't want to be called racist. I just saw pictures in the Daily Mail of him joking and laughing with David Cameron in Poland while posing for pictures; I'm surprised he was able to feign outrage for as long as he did;

and the fact that there's more and more reports across the nation of cops being shot at is truly frightening - God help us get through this

Anonymous said...

bho enjoys traveling like a visiting potentate, just like his wife.
No wonder he is always somewhere else when the black panther type affiliates
he attracts act out on his direction by example.

My opinion is that blm/black panthers, music people who rant against cops,
those groups and individuals should all be regarded as having given up their right
of protection by our finest. It would appear they are baiting for the killers.

bho remains a community organizer who has not been able to understand and grow into the presidency.
Sadly, this godawful racial discord is his legacy.
And that will pale in comparison to the muslim promotion and enabling he continues to do here and abroad.

No more.

No more.

Anonymous said...

Off topic: More fake hate? In MA, a transgender man is claiming that a toe truck driver said "what are you a he/she?" and then spit on him. The transgender man says he would rather have been punched because that's what you do to men is punch them and that spitting on him was the lowest of the low. He claims to have been extremely shaken by the encounter, claiming that he had had a wonderful experience with a state trooper who pulled him over previously and he claims that the state trooper had said said to him, upon seeing his driver's license and that he was a female who was changing into a man "Good luck with your journey! [changing into a man]. The toe truck driver has been fired.

Anonymous said...

9:39, why is it you do not believe the transgender person? You use the verb "claim" four times. I am curious if the news story used that verb or if this is your version. Would you share the source, please? Meanwhile, I will Google "TOW" truck driver and transgender, MA.'

Anonymous said...

Go ahead and google those terms and you will find all the info.

Why do I not believe the transgender man?

1) Smiling while saying it is the hardest thing he's ever been through in his life.

2) Saying he would have preferred to have been punched because that's what you do to a man is punch them?!
If he had been genuinely spit on in his face, and he claims it went into his nose, eyes and mouth, the insult of it would have been enough that he would not be saying he wished he had been punched.

3) He is lying about saying a state trooper who pulled him over "wished him good luck on his journey (with changing his sex)".

4) He claims that the tow truck driver had an unidentified passenger with him who he theorizes he must have picked up to drive there with him when the tow truck driver found out that his name didn't match his paperwork; however the unidentified passenger did not interact with nor insult the transgender man in any way.

I believe that that is what bothered the transgender man...that the tow truck driver had a passenger with him and he felt offended by that like maybe the driver had picked up a friend to go with him to towing job so they could make fun of the transgender man together. And I believe he made the story up when he became paranoid the 2 were looking down on him.

Katprint said...

Anonymous 10:16 -- The reason that the "claims" are not necessarily believed is because so many turn out to be completely false. However, this particular case seems legitimate. There are independent witnesses. According to http://www.telegram.com/article/20160624/NEWS/160629512 the transgendered person called the police. There is a police report. AAA has records of the incident. The tow truck driver's employer fired him after the incident; although the tow truck driver denied the spitting/namecalling incident occurred, he couldn't deny that he didn't tow the car as he was assigned to.

Anonymous 9:39 -- Toe = a digit on your foot. Tow = to pull a vehicle or boat along with a rope, chain, or tow bar.

Anonymous said...

There are no independent witnesses. So what if he called police and police wrote a report and AAA fired him?
He didn't tow the car as he was assigned to because the transgendered man insisted that the alleged spitter call another driver previous to the alleged spitting.

AT the end of the T&G lengthy front-page story that they wrote today, if you've read it, did you notice how at the end of the story the writer sneaks in the detail that the transgender man's girlfriend met him through a dating site and that she was attracted to him because of his HONESTY due to the fact he had supposedly written in his profile he was in the midst of transitioning from female to male. So, the girlfriend felt the need to say that, even though nowhere in the story, or in any of the stories that have been run about this incident, was his honesty called into question.

ps. So sorry for confusing "toe" and "tow"...I am sick and have a fever of 100 degrees.

Anonymous said...

After watching the FB video linked to the T&G story, I'll tell you what else i think he is lying about. I don't think he is a transgender man. I think he is a biological man. His hands and his chest are huge. you can see it in the pictures. He also says "clearly" he is transgender. Um, no, it's not clear at all. He looks like a bio man.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 10:16 here....
Thanks for the replies. I found the story and watched the video.

My main interest was, and is, what causes one to take issue with a story like this in the first place? Is it the actual circumstances, statement or body language analysis, etc., or....something else? Raw information, as presented by the writer/editor and the subject himself, is always then filtered by a reader/viewer's own mindset, beliefs, experiences and values. And I see that in this case. An good example, just as Katprint states, is some of these stories turn out to be false. Agreed, because the poster's first words are: "Another fake....". But this raises a question: do the words "Another fake..." refer to a comparison against previous stories later proven false, or could it be something else, such as a long-held belief in place that colors (or blinds) the poster's opinion? Regarding the laundry list of "Why do I not believe the transgender man," it seems there is more behind the words than reason or actual experience... a root cause, if you will. Nutshell, I wonder if the poster didn't want to believe the subject from the get-go, rather sought to reinforce his own way of thinking. This is where deeply-seated beliefs come into play. We all have bias/prejudice/filters/blinders of some variety and extent, and that is often the crux of our arguments and war with one another. Year-after-year, generation-after-generation. Heartbreaking that we cannot find a way through that.

John mcgowan said...

Confirmed – Philando Castile Was an Armed Robbery Suspect – False Media Narrative Now Driving Cop Killings…

The Falcon Heights, Minnesota police shooting of Philando Castile is based around an entirely false narrative. Castile and Ms. Diamond Reynolds (Facebook video uploader) were pulled over by police because Castile matched a BOLO Alert for an armed robbery suspect from four days prior.

Unfortunately, the false statements in the video – which have gone viral, and are being pushed by the mainstream media – have created a backlash against police officers.

Read More:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/07/08/confirmed-philando-castile-was-an-armed-robbery-suspect-false-media-narrative-now-driving-cop-killings/

Anon said...

Anon, his story is bull. Watch the fb video where the transgender man himself states he challenged the tow truck driver to a physical fight by saying "Get out of the truck!" The tow truck driver's offense at that point was that he had allegedly said to the transgender man "You aint no Jocelyn".
The "guy" is lying about what gender he is so is it any wonder that he lies about other things?
I dont believe his story.
Notice in fb video he also states "Ive let this marinate for a couple days, I mean not for a couple days...it happened last night."
What does that mean? If he was assaulted by having someone spit in his face the night before how could he possibly forget when it happened?
I believe, if anything, he was the aggressor.

Hey Jude said...

Not Confirmed - that he was the armed robber.

That's such a suggestive header - as if Philando Castile, personally, were being sought in connection with an armed robbery rather than that he was pulled over because the officer wondered if hemight be the guy they were looking for. As he had no criminal record, it is hasty that the author is so ready to imply he was the armed robber. It would be better to wait for that to be proven or disproven - though I get they want to make known that all was not as presented, and the officer approached the car with an armed robber in mind, rather than a broken tail-light - then (if it is a gun) saw the gun, or shot Castile because he believed he was reaching for his gun.

trustmeigetit said...

Ok Peter..or Tania or one of the other good ones...

Trumps response to allegations of rape.

Now, I don't know what was asked or if these were his words for sure. But thoughts


For his part, Trump asserted that the charges were“not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated,” adding that “There is absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period."


Child Advocate said...

Thank you, Hey Jude.

TCTH is once again misleading.

Child Advocate said...

Thank you, Hey Jude.

TCTH is once again misleading.

Fm25 said...

Agree hey Jude, the article is very misleading-
"The Falcon Heights, Minnesota police shooting of Philando Castile is based around an entirely false narrative. Castile and Ms. Diamond Reynolds (Facebook video uploader) were pulled over by police because Castile matched a BOLO Alert for an armed robbery suspect from four days prior."
I don't know if this was a justified shooting or not, we don't have enough info at this point. The actions of the victims girlfriend do not sit well with me and I look forward to reading peter's analysis. That being said, this article claiming the outrage is based upon an "entirely false narrative" is part of the problem. There is no evidence that the victim was in any way involved in a robbery from 4 days earlier. At this point this only confirmed wrongdoing was driving with a broken tail light. The officer notes resemblance to the armed robbery suspect bc the victim had a wide nose.

Saint Theresa said...

Your hate is showing.

Hey Jude said...

Fm25 - ' The officer notes resemblance to the armed robbery suspect bc the victim had a wide nose.'. = 'bc the victim was black'.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 10:16/11:08 here....

Re: Poster Anonymous 9:39/10:58/11:26/12:01AM/1:00PM

This poster's responses answer my questions, at least regarding his/her opinions of the transgender man story. As his/her zeal proliferates with each post, so does the circle widen of things he/she doesn't believe to be true: First, the account of what happened, second that the man is in-fact a transgender-male, and finally(?), he/she now says he was the aggressor? IOW, it just gets bigger and bigger and bigger. The poster now says this man is an outright liar. Why, exactly? What's next?

I've read several versions of the story, but so-far haven't seen evidence that anyone else doubts the account of what happened, let alone the man's transgender journey and name-change. Not even, apparently, the towing company owner, who likely knew the driver well enough to sort through the allegations vs the denial and decided to terminate him on-the-spot.

*bias/prejudice/filters/blinders* make ascertaining the truth difficult



Anonymous said...

What kind of mentality thinks its cool to walk around in public while pants are below but? Apparently oblivious to the appearance of gross idiocy. Its a visual statement of mentality.

Anonymous said...

Huh? Is this relevant to one of the topics being discussed?


btw it's *butt

Anonymous said...

Anon 7:34,

My "judgement" that the transgender man is lying does not come from bias. It comes from reading the lengthy account/interview run by the T&G yesterday combined with watching his FB video. I could have a field day picking out the many points of deception in the video, but it is too lengthy to transcribe.

First, in the FB video, HE HIMSELF states that he was the aggressor (as far as physical aggression). He states that after the tow truck driver said to him "You ain't no Jocelyn" that he then walked up to the tow truck and said "Get out of the truck!" and he implies that that was so he could fight the tow truck driver. He also states in the interview that he would have rather been punched than spit on "bc that's what men do to other men", which further illustrates he wanted a fist fight with the tow truck driver (that he didn't get! Because the tow truck driver did not get out of the truck when he commanded him to!). One neednt perform SA on those statements. He comes right out and says that he was the aggressor by describing his actions!

Further, the transgender man states that it was the worst thing that has ever happened to him in his life YET can't remember WHEN it happened! (He also smiles in the video I watched while he says it.) First he says it happened a few days before, then says "I mean it happened last night". He also states he wished he had been punched! Really?! What an insult to people who actually have been spit on due to some type of prejudice to say that he also wished he'd been punched?!

And yes, there are linguistic indicators that he is not being honest about something regarding his sex change "journey".
First he says he is "clearly" transgender, then corrects himself saying that it may not be clear that he is transgendered.

He also states that AAA told him that that was OK he had not renewed his card, to just show the driver his license, then he says that he puts paperwork and legal documents (and what were they and what did they say? He is not specific saying "I had my namechange document or I had my new driver's license with changed sex/name on it, etc) in his car, then says "um, not IN my car I put them on his truck" (later he will say that the tow truck driver knocked his nondescript paperwork and legal documents off the truck). He is not honest about whatever this paperwork and legal documents are. (meaning, he may not have had his sex or name changed legally, he does not tell us what he presented paperwork-wise to the tow truck operator, he does not even talk about showing any paperwork to the tow truck operator) He is not honest about where he placed the documents.

The girlfriend's random statement that she picked him on a dating website due to his HONESTY bc he had stated in his profile that he was in the process of transitioning from female to male is also suspect, because it did not in any way relate to the story and it shows a need to convince on the part of the girlfriend that he is actually an honest person, and specifically honest about him being in the process of transitioning. Why the need to convince he is honest about transitioning?

IN the lengthy interview the transgender man also states that his girlfriend's teenage son is going to legally change his name to the transgender man's full name--meaning he wants to change his first and last name to the transgender man's first and last name. Who would even let a teenager do that? Change their first and last name to a woman who has turned into a man's name and who is not even their bio father or stepfather?

He is a liar and he is lying about the incident as well as something to do with his own "transition"--be it the actual gender that he is/was or what type of legal changes he has actually made to his name/gender.

Anonymous said...

Duh. You can spell. Congrats!! Vitally relevant.

Anonymous said...

Look at the FB pictures--the one where he is with a group of men and they are all wearing ties drinking beers, and tell me that HIS HANDS are the hands of a woman. Tell me those are the hands of someone born biologically a woman. Even his fingernails are wide and square like a man's.

Anonymous said...

RE: Black Lives Matter. The movement is absolute b&llshit. Black men are responsible for the black community's problems. They are the violent ones shooting and killing other blacks, including kids in the drive-by gang shootings. They treat their kids like garbage--they do not take care of them, they do not feed them, they do not guide them. Yes, there are racist police who engage in police brutality. Guess what? If black men didn't abandon their kids and model gangbanger violence, their kids would not have to deal with the police as teenagers/young men, because they would not go down that path. Guess what black men! Shut the hell up and start feeding your kids! You treat your kids worse than animals, in fact I'm sure there are many pit bulls being well-cared for by black men, yet they treat their own kids like animals. I don't even want to hear it. These protests over thugs who have run-ins with the law. Time for black men to start respecting their own woman and kids and taking care of them and time for black men to stop gang banging. Trust me, white people do not care, because you do not care about your own families or your own communities!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yet you're complaining about white people?!?!

Anonymous said...

RE Black Lives Matter: Oh yes, poor thug! Poor thug! What about the little kid that gets shot by the thug's stray bullet? What about all the black people black people shoot? What about the 10 kids they will father and treat worse than animals providing a pack of diapers for each if they're feeling generous. Where are the protests against these idiots? These black male idiots who treat their kids 100 times worse than most people treat their animals?

Anonymous said...

If blm prioritized justice, then they'd demand National Guard deployment in chicago to stop the daily urban warfare occuring. But that wouldnt look good, would it. 24/7 patrols to stop the violence. That's whats necessary to end the urban warfare. When they turn on the National Guard, the thugs will be disarmed and removed. The professional apologists don't care about law & order or peace in the neighborhood. Occupy Chicago via National Guard. Let the decent & peaceful live in peace.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 10:16/11:08/7:34 here....

Re: Poster Anonymous 9:39/10:58/11:26/12:01AM/1:00PM/8:18PM/8:45PM (and my guess 7:50 PM as well)......

I realized I hadn't seen/heard some of the details to which the poster keeps referring. I took a second look and found the FB video referenced. (I'd previously viewed two other videos and three news pieces about the man and the incident.) Jameson, the transgender man, doesn't present himself quite as well in his FB Live post as in the other two videos. In his FB Live, he rambles extemporaneously, and seems somewhat preoccupied and indecisive (plus he's wearing sunglasses), so I see how easy it might be to poke holes. In viewing all three videos and four stories, though, my overall impression is that the incident happened as stated and that it has affected him emotionally.

As I mentioned before, these things get bigger and bigger and bigger (and more emotional). I wondered out loud what might be next, and why yes, now it's the paperwork, the girlfriend, the teenage son, the legality of the name change, his hands!, his fingernails!!, AND, if the "pants-post" at 7:50 PM is also from this poster....the poor guy's mentality.

Some have a need to confirm and affirm their bias.

*bias/prejudice/filters/blinders* make ascertaining the truth difficult, and the lens just gets foggier and foggier.

Anonymous said...

Jameson stated that he was the aggressor. He demanded the tow truck driver get out of the truck (because Jameson said "if he talks like a man he should act like a man)" in order to fight him. The tow truck driver did not get out of the truck. RAther, Jameson claims he spit in his face and then drove off. So what if he did? Jameson looks like a giant man and he was telling the guy to get out of the truck in order to fight him. Jameson himself is upset the tow truck driver didn't punch him. He spit in his face and drove off? I don't believe it, but even if he had, this obnoxious male claiming to be a female- turning- into- a- male (and no I don't believe he was ever female--I don't care how much testosterone he has injected into him it doesn't cause a female to grow giant hands and giant masculine muscles between the shoulder and neck--whatever that muscle is called) was demanding that the tow truck driver get out of the truck to fight him! Does this sound like someone who was intimidated by the tow truck driver's alleged questioning of what gender he was?

If this is the worst thing that has ever happened to Jameson in his life, he has had a VERY good life, in fact he has led a charmed life, and for him to get front page stories getting tons of sympathy for a situation where he was the physical aggressor demanding a fight is sickening at best. He is an attention wh&re.

I could care less who wants to be male/female, male lying about being a female changing into a man, whatever, that's his/her business but...they need to refrain from being physically aggressive towards anyone who questions or doesn't understand why a giant man is named Jocelyn.

Anonymous said...

President Obama has enabled the haters of law and order to vent their rage on cops. What happened in Dallas was a hate crime against people who don't agree with criminals and criminal behavior.

The war on the police continues. President Obama is a dismal failure as a man of peace and has caused an increase of %40 more deaths of police officers than last year. He has the blood of good men on his hands. He condones murder.

Anonymous said...

@10:10,

They should send in the National Guard. I am literally sickened by the b&llshit black lives matter movement, pouring out sympathy for these thugs, while the little black kids who get shot by these same thugs get NO SYMPATHY. The abandoned black kids who go to bed hungry each night because their fathers are worthless and out on the streets gang banging get NO SYMPATHY.
I have no sympathy whatsoever for these thugs. They treat their kids worse than slave owners ever treated their slaves. Didn't slave owners feed their slaves? OK, so the slave owners were more respectful than black men are who literally leave their children to the trauma of hunger and poverty. That may sound like a racist statement but it's not. Slave owners were horrible people but the reality is that the majority of black men are even more horrible and to their own children!
Any tax money saved from incarcerating one less thug should be given to the starving children of these men who these men do not feed or clothe.

Anonymous said...

It's all whitey's fault right?! I've lived in the inner city and I have given black kids my kid's clothes that he had grown out of--full wardrobes of clothes, winter jackets, pants, shirts, shoes everything I had to give. I've given little black kids food! Guess what! Their father gave them nothing! Guess what! I'm white!!!!! And I'm the enemy! I care more about your kids than you do you worthless thugs!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 10:16/11:08/7:34/10:14 here


.......and foggier. After the edge of comprehension comes the cliff.

I hope the poster's fever returns to normal soon.

--Anonymous 10:16----10:14 OUT







Anonymous said...

Oh, you love me ^^^^^^^

Anonymous said...

The protesters appear healthy, well fed well clothed, cell phones. No appearance of poverty. Surely so many energetic concerned people can demand safe neighborhoods and schools. Raise your voices against criminality on the streets, in the schools,on the bus, in the parks, in the malls. Demand accountability. Demand safe passage to & from school for your young ones. Until then, don't shut down political rallys. Dont block traffic on our roads. Don't block shoppers from entering stores during holiday. Demand the removal of the career criminals plaguing the neighborhood instead of college presidents over contrived charges. Demand justice.

Anonymous said...

Anon said

"Demand the removal of the career criminals plaguing the neighborhood instead of college presidents over contrived charges."

Absolutely, I agree! It boggles the mind why people are rioting in defense of career criminals who pull guns on cops.

Even someone who has 70 driving violations...(I haven't read much about that situation) why is that person driving? I don't want that person driving on the streets with my son. That is someone who abuses the roads and abuses their right to drive over and over and over. I'm not losing one minute of sleep over someone who would have probably committed vehicular homicide or at best vehicular injury.

Anonymous said...

OK, I just watched the girlfriend's video. What the hell? She is totally calm! Now apparently the guy told the cop he has a license to carry and then reached into his pocket?! Im sorry if I was flippant about it,as I had not seen the video, but for God's sakes, if you are someone who gets pulled over constantly for driving violations it might be a good idea not to carry a gun and then reach into one's pocket after telling the cop that one is armed?!

Anonymous said...

Here is the real story of Castille, the man who was shot by cops. He actually was the armed robbery suspect and there was a gun sitting on his thigh when the officer shot him

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/07/08/confirmed-philando-castile-was-an-armed-robbery-suspect-false-media-narrative-now-driving-cop-killings/

Anonymous said...

Can one imagine what it must be like experiencing a violent crime against self or a friend/ relative and learning that the defendant has a Long History of Criminality. Something is wrong in US criminal justice system. Very wrong.

Jenny said...

I live in Ballwin, MO. It's an amazing, safe and friendly town. This criminal came here and ambushed our police officer! He was shot 3 times from behind. He is alive, but in critical condition at a local hospital. I heard reports that he was shot in the neck, but some say back. I'm afraid he will be paralyzed :(

I'm praying this evil violence will end. Unfortunately with the current administration, it doesn't seem like it will be anytime soon.

John mcgowan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
John mcgowan said...

Newly released video DESTROYS liberal narrative on Alton Sterling shooting

Written by Matt Palumbo on July 9, 2016

We noted in our first piece on the Alton Sterling shooting that while he appeared to reach for a firearm in his pocket, it was still disputable. Only one video was available at the time, and it wasn’t of the best quality. A second video has surfaced, and it does "appear" to validate the police narrative on the shooting.

The video, courtesy of USA Today, is posted below:
http://www.allenbwest.com/matt-palumbo/newly-released-video-destroys-liberal-narrative-on-alton-sterling-shooting

Child Advocate said...

Wow! There are a bunch of racist fools on here. I suspected it, this proves it. This blog is no longer about truth. Now I wonder if I was the fool. Was it ever.

Fm25 said...

Anon at 12:19 am
That is a very misleading statement. Yes, the officer suspected he was involved in an armed robbery 4 days prior- according to the police office because he had a wide nose. The article does not say he was the armed robber although the author attempts to convey that he was. There is no evidence that he was involved in the robbery. The only offense he was guilty of was driving with a broken taillight. I have no idea if this was a justified shooting, but we have a real problem when articles like this are being passed on as fact. Talk about creating a false narrative!

Anonymous said...

Racist? Really? You couldn't pay me enough to pick up a sign and protest in a Black Lives Movement in defense of these thugs. These black thugs don't give a sh&t about racism. They leave their kids to deal with racism completely alone and make sure they dump the added trauma of hunger and poverty onto them. If the world is so racist, wouldn't these "Dads" want to help their children deal with racism by protecting and guiding them, making sure they do their homework, etc and making sure they don't go to bed hungry or walk around with no winter jacket? Of course not!

Yet they want me to "unify" with them by protesting for their thug &asses. They don't g&ve a shit about their own kids. They treat their beautiful children worse than animals. All of these cases are built on false narratives. Castille had a gun on his thigh as well as he matched the picture of the suspect from the armed robbery. He was not shot because he was black; he was shot because the officer had good reason to fear for his life. It is black men who are killing other black men as well as little kids when stray bullets hit them. This movement makes me sick; it is a movement defending thugs, it has nothing to do with establishing racial equality. NOthing white people can do will matter, because the majority of black men will continue abandoning their children causing their lives to be hell. I'm white...do you want me to raise your kids for you?

Anonymous said...

Fm25,

There was a gun on his lap. He also claimed he had a permit to carry, and he did not. He also had like 45 traffic citations so evidently he should have been experienced at being pulled over by that point and should have fully realized that it would not be a good idea to have a gun on his lap. What was the cop supposed to do when the guy had a gun on his lap? The shooting had NOTHING to do with color, that is the point.

Child Advocate said...

Raise my kids? They're already adults.

There is no group of people that is all bad, no group of people that is all good.

I am Native American. I'm not black.

Anonymous said...

He does look exactly like the suspect, and you see the girlfriend is holding a pack of Newports which was the brand of cig carton stolen in the robbery (along with cash). She is holding a pack of Newports 2 or 3 days after the robbery. Look at the picture. What are the odds of that?

Anonymous said...

These thugs want to be coddled...they feel if they have a gun on their lap the officer shouldn't be afraid, he should pat them on the head and bring them to a luxury spa to get a massage. Hey idiot! Don't put a gun on your lap when you get pulled over for your 50th driving violation!

And then dozens of cops get shot in retaliation from these Thugs Lives Matter nuts. NOw more children with no fathers just what the thugs love to do to their own children. I say start incarcerating all these deadbeat Dads including the white ones and they can work in jail and every cent can go to their children. That way the next generation will be much less traumatized by hunger and poverty, these thugs will be behind bars not modeling their gangbanger behavior for their children, and I will bet then with the next generation, things will be much better for them.

Bad Juju said...

Anon @12:37, Newports are extremely popular among black smokers.

http://niketalk.com/t/565568/black-people-why-do-we-like-newports-so-much

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=newport

Just an FYI.

Anonymous said...

Go listen to black pop culture music. It's right there in the music. Please pity me, I have 10 children by 4 women but that shouldn't put a damper on my thugging, smoking pot all day and impregnating more women and abandoning those children. Additionally, it's right there in the music that poor them they are carrying guns but the cops keep harassing them. Poor poor little thugs.

Castille had a gun on his lap. The officer acted in self-defense out of legitimate concern for his life. Then dozens of officers get shot for that. Absolutely pathetic. And then the liberal media tries to guilt white people for not supporting the Thugs Lives Matter movement. I don't feel guilty!!!! I don't support your movement! Your movement is absolute bull.

Anonymous said...

Bad Juju,

Castille had a gun on his lap! If I were the cop I would have been terrified regardless of color! Additionally he had been pulled over and cited 45 times!!! Guess what! Most people do not encounter such problems because A) They don't get pulled over 45 times and B) if they do get pulled over they do not have a gun on their lap!!!
Very simple!

Bad Juju said...

Um, I was addressing the comment that the girlfriend was smoking the same brand of cigarettes stolen days before in a robbery. Lots of black folks smoke Newports, so the fact that the girlfriend was seen on camera with Newports is not an indication, imo, that she was smoking the stolen Newports.

So I'm not sure what you're SCREAMING AT ME ABOUT!!!! I didn't mention anything about a gun or whether the cop was scared!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

The other anonymous must be a gun control freak. Possessing firearms gets you the death penalty. "Sitting in his lap" is passive and non-threatening. He admittedly wasn't pointing it at police, keeping it a secret from police, so merely possessing the gun was wrong in anonymous' eyes. If police have no respect for the 2nd amendment, they have no business trying to uphold the laws of our land.

Anonymous said...

Anon said

"Sitting in his lap" is passive and non-threatening.

Really?!?! It would have taken a millisecond for him or the girlfriend to pick the gun up and shoot the officer. The officer had every right to shoot him.

Guess what? If I get pulled over I can guarantee you I will NEVER have a gun sitting in my lap! So I don't have to worry about being shot! It's so very simple!

Cry me a river! Boo hoo hoo hoo!
Feel bad for thugs because a cop acts in self-defense.
Feel so bad for thugs because they got a woman asking them to feed their kids.

Oh my God! I feel so bad for you!
I feel so bad for you I would love to change your movement to be called "Your Black Kids' Lives Matter Why don't You shut the Hell Up and Go Feed Them".

If not, give them to me and I'll feed them OK? Whitey will feed them because you have no balls to act like men and take care of your kids and you want my sympathy?!?! Hell no, but I'll give your kids a meal, and hopefully your asses will get locked up and you can make license plates and give the money you earn to your hungry kids!

Fm25 said...

Anon at 12:35 pm, my comment was only about the article that's been linked to support a narrative that the victim was the suspect in an armed robbery. I will wait until there are more facts before forming an opinion on whether or not it was a justified shooting. There is a lot of conflicting information coming from both sides. I do feel that the author of the article was deceptive and that weakens his argument.

Anonymous said...

I disagree. WAit till Peter analyzes the girlfriend too. She is manipulating verbally what went on and she is calm as a cucumber and much more concerned about her facebook audience than either her boyfriend, daughter, or the cop.

I wouldn't even be surprised if she did or said something that helped set the situation up so he would be shot.

She is not being honest about the events that led up to the shooting.

The officer appears terrified even after the man has been rendered nearly dead, and keeps the gun pointing into the car. He is scared she will pick up the gun, and I would be too because she appears to be sociopathic, remaining calm as a cucumber as her boyfriend was shot sitting right next to her and is dying.

I would not trust her as far as I could throw her.
You have no idea what she may have said to the cop to get him shot...like "oh my God officer he's reaching into his pocket!"

She is deceptive.

Anonymous said...

Funny. As. Hell. Ironic considering the murdered man fed children for a living. But hey why pass up an opportunity to bring up welfare.

Where it is against the law to have a gun in your lap??? If you hate the second amendment, work to overturn it. Or start mouthing off about which Americans are real and which ones you don't want protected by the constitution. Or get yourself a time machine and move back to South Africa.

You're probably one of those fat rural whiteys that sits at your keyboard in the whitest state's whitest county and only know blacks from TV but you're soooo victimized by them!!! Cry me a river.

"millisecond"

Your hyperbole makes you a buffoon. Your word choice gives your identity away. Your rants prove your biases render you incompetent to analyze squat; all you're doing here is propagating ignorance.

Anonymous said...

Did he feed his own kids? Did he??????

The second amendment doesn't provide for people to have guns in their laps during a traffic stop. Duh! And you don't know what happened before the girlfriend started filming. The officer was terrified.

I never said I was victimized by blacks! NOt once!
Black men victimize their own children. They treat their children worse than I have ever treated an animal so I have every right to speak out about it. As long as they treat their children like garbage, that tells me all I need to know about them, and they get no sympathy from me.

Racism? If there is so much racism, wouldn't the Black Dads want to protect their children, guide their children, and here's a novel idea, how about feed them! Wow! Isn't that amazing?!?! Your kids need to eat food! Until they start feeding their kids, I don't want to hear one word about how tough they have it gangbanging or how they get treated by an officer at a traffic stop when they place a gun in their lap. Black men (the majority) treat their kids worse than whites ever have.

And let me tell you, it does not change with economic status. I have a relative who married a black guy who is a published author and college professor and he abandoned her and the child, does not pay child support, so that he could "recover from being Black". I kid you not!!!! What a f&ckin joke! And so his mulatto child gets to navigate through racism on his own without Daddy even paying for food, because he needed to go "recover from being black". What a friggin joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!

These whining men are pathetic. NO masculine instincts at all to provide for or protect their children. It is blacks who are telling us this.

From 50 Cents "Love It or Leave It"

"I was confused growing up in the cold cold world
Daddy ain't around, probably out committing felonies"


Go tell 50 Cent he's racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Did you watch the video on the link I put up of Castille and his girlfriend smoking a blunt in a closed car with the 4 year old daughter (of the girlfriend, not sure if he is the father?) in the back seat...it looks like they have it burning for at least 15 min in a closed car.

So that's great fathering huh! Model drug use right in front of a 4 year old. Make sure she gets a contact high. Gee I wonder how long till they're giving her hits of it? Maybe they'll wait till she starts kindergarten?

Saint Theresa said...

Omg.
Concerning your first sentence, what does it matter?! Seriously who cares what the protesters look like, wear and what protesters own ??

Don't be ridiculous. You're smarter than I hope.


This whole thread is bringing the worst out of people. Its a microcosm of America and the racisl tension is thick. It's so very obvious that racism has morphed and changed into a stealthy black agent with ninja like skills. It's sneaky. And it is being used to cause division and it has been designed to make chaos ...so we will then be more controlable The police will be militarized and our rights will be ripped out from under our stupid feet.

Think about love and understanding. Think walking in others shoes realistically. If possible.
Stop blaming each other and lift each other up. If someone sounds stupid educate them. And let yourself be educated. It doesn't mean you always have to be right to learn.

Anonymous said...

Long...Criminal...Histories....Cops arrest them, judges release them. Police safety in jeopardy arresting, public safety in jeopardy when released. Criminal justice Banana Republic Racket

Anonymous said...

Theresa you wrote

"Think about love and understanding. Think walking in others shoes realistically. If possible.
Stop blaming each other and lift each other up. If someone sounds stupid educate them. And let yourself be educated. It doesn't mean you always have to be right to learn."

You know who the real racists are? The white folk who really don't give a sh&t about blacks and they just mouth the right words to sound like they are loving and understanding.

I will say it again: It is blacks who are telling us the way black men act. Until these black men start feeding their kids, they are the racists!!!!!!!!!! They look at their kids as worthless. They don't even think the kids are worth being fed! Do you know anyone who doesn't feed an animal? They would be arrested right?! So why am I racist for pointing out what black men do to their own children?

Have you ever gone to bed hungry? Do you realize how tough and spirit-killing hunger is? Why am I giving little black kids winter jackets so they don't succumb to pneumonia because they're father is out doing drugs????

Let's listen to what "The Game", another black rapper (go call him racist!) has to say about his father and how much his father cared about him (an it sounds like he was buying him food too right?!)

"I needed my father/
But he needed a needle"

Oh I'm sorry, am I racist to say that what The Game says about his father means his father is a horrible father?!?!?

Saint Theresa said...

Please tell me you aren't this petty and quick to judge in real life..are you?

Saint Theresa said...

Anon 2:41pm

Yeah, while i agree with you, I believe you can make your point without lowering yourself and feeding into the hate and racism.

The anon above you is angry about black people "complaining" and "crying" about how they keep getting shot by cops. The nerve of those wide nose people. Must have been a bunch of black males getting pulled over for that robbery the day castille was murdered.


Saint Theresa said...

Anon 3:34pm

You do realize there are plenty of poor young white males who act and abuse their family and kids the same way you describe rappers "boasting" about it. Don't be fooled into believing how the music industry and Hollywood portray black Americans. It's not reality.

There are class issues in America that are being over shadowed by a bunch of other issues that are the causes of them. Poor white and black men and women abuse and take up tax payer money and space.

Saint Theresa said...

You were personally effected by your black family member. So you label all black men as animals who don't feed their kids.

And you're not racist?

Okay.

Anonymous said...

It's petty to hold a human being accountable for treating their kids worse than animals, for letting their kids go to bed hungry and and walk around with no winter jackets? If I consider that petty than I would be racist, because it would mean that I feel that their kids should be treated like garbage, which is exactly how they are treated by the majority of black men.

The guy who got shot had a gun in his lap and we don't know what transpired before the shooting. The cop was terrified due to the presence of the gun and whatever occurred before the girlfriend started filming. If I ever got pulled over and had a gun in my lap, I would expect to get shot and I am white.

If he in fact was not the burglary suspect, he certainly did look like him, not just because he was black but because of his hair, facial features, etc. And guess what? He would not have been suspected as being the suspect if another black man didn't rob a convenience store at gunpoint!!! So does the black thug who robbed the store need to take any blame for the resulting "confusion" (if in fact the shot man wasn't the robber?) No of course not! Just like black men need take no responsibility for anything no matter how sociopathic the behavior. Letting your kids starve means you're lower than dirt in my eyes, because I actually care about the starving kids. Smoking a blunt in a closed car with a 4 year old, I suppose I am racist to say that is horrible fathering too right? Because that doesn't show respect for me to expect black men to act like decent people? I should say "oh you're black so you no better should be expected from you than to do drugs in front of your kids and force your 4 year old to also do drugs by getting a contact high"? Let me tell you, that latter attitude would be the racist one. I expect black men to act like decent intelligent responsible people and to be good fathers. If that's racist, then I am racist.

Anonymous said...

Yes white men do it also as I pointed out, but it is endemic in the black population for men to treat their kids as if eating were a luxury and noone is allowed to criticize it without being labelled racist. Doing drugs in the car with your kids is wrong. That kid has no chance. The kid is being forced to do drugs before they have even learned their A.B,C.s. That is disgusting and black people need to stop tolerating this crap.

Anonymous said...

I was almost raped by a black co-worker. After I successfully fought him off he said I was racist. For not letting him rape me? Color me racist then.

Anonymous said...

The cop was terrified due to the presence of the gun

Maybe he should work in a country where citizens aren't allowed to bear arms.

Anonymous said...

In the police audio, the officer who says he's going to pull them over says “The driver looks more like one of our suspects, just ‘cause of the wide set nose.”

Reynolds, a female, was the one driving the car, not Castile.

Anonymous said...

The day blm women interrupted Bernie Sanders campaign speech on stage was an eye opener. He's on your side & you made him look like foolish. He shouldnt have acquiesced to their obnoxious disrespectful,ignorant behavior. How many supporters withdrew from his candidacy having witnessed that?

Anonymous said...

"Two male suspects armed with handguns took cash from the register and cartons of Newport cigarettes,” said the WCCO report."

Anonymous said...

Sanders implied Southern states, which Clinton won and are heavily black, shouldn't count as much as the northern white states he won. He's hardly "on their side" more than any other politician.

Anonymous said...

Welfare and other social "safety net" spending rose under both Bushes. The only modern President that curbed welfare spending was named Clinton.

Anonymous said...

No, Castille WAS driving the car. The woman's video just makes it look like he was in the passenger seat. Maybe he shouldn't have had a gun in his lap.

The video that the woman took and posted on facebook for the world to see of the 2 of them giving their 4 year old a contact high...am I not allowed to criticize that either because they are black? Like...oh isn't that cute? They can't help blowing pot smoke in their toddler's face because they are black?

How about we show the sniper sympathy too? It seems like Obama didn't condemn the moving sniper's actions, did he? So, I guess it's racist to say he is a bad boy for becoming of moving sniper and shooting 17 cops?

Anonymous said...

That's not even to mention how horrendously black men treat black women. I have absolutely no respect for men who abuse women...you treat your women and kids like shit don't expect me to feel sorry for you when the cops bust you for thugging. Racist? These words are coming from black people informing us of how black men treat their women. In the words of 2 Pac, he asks in one of his songs:

"I wonder why we take from our women. Why we rape our women, do we hate our women?"

So, if 2 Pac can wonder it, can I also? Or is that racist?

Black men treat women like absolute garbage. If a man acts like a man, I will respect him. Otherwise, take your sociopathic woman and child abusing ass somewhere else to whine about how hard life is for you. Poor friggin you. You use women, talk about them like they're shit, treat your kids like shit, don't feed them and then expect to be pitied? That's a joke and the sooner these thugs realize that noone cares about their pathetic hypocritical whining the better because maybe they will actually be forced to act like men instead of sociopathic derelicts. Any man abusing women or kids can go to hell because they are scum and they are cowards, and of course, they whine like the emasculated derelicts they are.

Hey Jude said...

Anon above - if you're saying that about all black men, or black men in general, yes, that is racist. You could substitute 'white' for black and it would still be racist, but against white men. What you write is negative cultural stereotyping. If your argument was that some men are sexist and also do not provide for their children, or set a good example, that would be more reasonable, but that wouldn't be anything like what you want to say. What you say is true of some, but it becomes lies and nonsense when applied to all.

Anonymous said...

Here is a wonderful video made by a black woman condemning the black lives matter movement:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnZb4FgJqUQ

There are many videos made by black men also condemning the movement.

Anonymous said...

MOST BLACK MEN TREAT THEIR KIDS WORSE THAN ANIMALS. MOST, NOT ALL, MOST. They don't feed them. They abandon them. They don't clothe them. That is a statistical fact. If people treat animals that way they go to jail. But I a wrong to speak out angrily against people treating human children that way. Great I'm racist then. I don't care, because it pisses me off too much.

Anonymous said...

It is their fault if it becomes a generalization. If 10 out of 100 black males feed their kids, while 90 our of 100 don't, that is not my fault that it then statistically will become a reasonable generalization to make. Black leaders don't speak out against it. Jesse Jackson is a moron.

I will not give pity to black males, the majority of whom treat their own kids worse than I would ever treat an animal. If they don't like that. Boo hoo. Go write a song about it, in between writing songs talking about their women where they degrade them to a level beneath animals like they are sociopathic rapists and write other songs complaining about being pressured to feed their kids.

Anonymous said...

Refer to them not as gangstas or thugs, but as criminals. They admire the gansta/ thug persona. And police take that persona seriously. Emulating that foolish, evil persona is ruining their lives.

Saint Theresa said...

Wow. Just unbelievable.

Anonymous said...

Is it unbelievable? Because I really havent scratched the surface.
I forgot to mention that the latest word coming out of the black community is that large numbers of black men are on the down-low, having unprotected sex with men and therefore giving their women (or as they refer to them "hoes") and unborn babies AIDS! I guess their women and kids werent suffering enough, so now they are dying of AIDS WHILE THEIR KIDS STARVE. Im racist? Like I said, if people treat animals the way most black men treat their kids they go to jail. That's a fact.

Anonymous said...

Anon 8:03, I agree, good point and they should be referred to as criminals.

Hey Jude said...

I'm astounded, and (still?) glad I'm not your dog.

Anonymous said...

They even refer to one another as
'dog'.

Bad Juju said...

Anonymous said...

The video that the woman took and posted on facebook for the world to see of the 2 of them giving their 4 year old a contact high...am I not allowed to criticize that either because they are black? Like...oh isn't that cute? They can't help blowing pot smoke in their toddler's face because they are black?



FACT: It is terrible that they smoked pot with the little one in the car.

FACT: You are incredibly racist.

The two are not mutually exclusive.




Have you read Peter's recent post on "The Psychology Behind 'The Sermon' in Denials"?

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-psychology-behind-sermon-in-denials.html

Perhaps you should before you do any further ranting and "sermonizing" about how UN-racist you are because you give clothes to little black boys who, according to you, have a 90 percent chance of growing up to be big pieces of sh*t.

Just a friendly suggestion <3

Anonymous said...

Bad Juju:

Oh no, I never sermonized about not being racist, nor did I ever use the anecdote that I gave little black kids clothes when I lived in the inner city as evidence I wasn't racist. I don't feel I am racist but
If what I am saying makes me racist in your opinion, I could care less. (Is that sermonizing?)

What is racist about pointing out the truth? The majority of black men don't take care of their kids!!!!!!!!! Look up the statistic!

Do you want me to bullshit? Oh, they're not all like that. Oh black kids aren't worth anything so we just won't mention that multitudes of them go to bed hungry because they are abandoned by their fathers. That's not a "nice" thing to say so I won't say it. I'll just parrot the liberal white person refrain "They're not all like that. You can;t make generalizations. In fact you shouldn't anything not "nice"." Do you like me now? Funny thing is, I don't care less if you like me.

OK: I'll say what you "non-racist" whites want.

It is my fault as a white that the majority of black men treat their kids worse than I would treat an animal. If they don't ever buy them food, that is my fault. Christ it is my fault too if they have unprotected sex with men, and then give their woman AIDS because I should be there handing them a condom. Next time I'll show up and hand them a condom. If they treat their women worse than I would ever treawt an animal that's my fault. If blacks commit 93% of violence and murders towards other blacks that's my fault. If little black kids get hit by stray bullets in drive-bys, that's my fault too.

What exactly DO they need to take responsibility for? Nothing? OK. Have it your way!!!!

Anonymous said...

Bad Juju and others,

There is nothing more hateful than lying to people and condoning their evil actions. Your mask of tolerance is nothing more than disguised racism. You don't respect blacks as people so you refuse to tell them the truth.

Let's say that there is never another episode of police brutality or police defending themselves against armed black criminals.

What does the black community to look forward to once the supposed "problem" has stopped?


children starving
Children abandoned
children with no guidance, support or love from fathers
children with no winter jackets
women being severely abused and used and treated like animals
disease including AIDS being spread due to deception by black men
continued black on black violence and murder (only probably it will increase even more because now cops will be afraid to respond or intervene)
drug use
Alcoholism
education not being valued or supported by parents

Sounds like it will be a paradise doesn't it once "police brutality" or "police acting in self-defense gets eliminated!!!

Fm25 said...

Ramsey sheriff dept states:
"Mr. Castile never applied for a permit to carry with our office. Therefore we did not issue his permit."
-
Based on this The gateway pundit reports:
"First of all – Castile did not have a permit to carry according to local police."
-
The reporting again is very misleading. castille does in fact have a concealed weapons permit from another county.


Fm25 said...

Matt Finn at FOX News reported:
"Officer Yanez ultimately told Castile “do not move” and that he failed to comply with that order and that there was apparently a visible gun. "
Not a direct quote but based on use of the word ultimately, a conflicting order may have been given first. This does not address the girlfriends claims that the officer told him to get his license and registration.

Anonymous said...

Here is a black Pastor talking about the Black Lives Matter movement as well as the pathetic state of the black community, saying much the same things I have said here although I am white:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i6WgKA8zf4

Anonymous said...

Fm25,

He had a gun on his lap. Enough said.

Anonymous said...

We all better pray. And become moral. Upright. Get rid of the filth in our lives. Hopefully God's Spirit will displace the evil spirit inside. There's alot of pollution to purge. More than ever before.

Anonymous said...

Anon 10:41,

Yeah, it's all a joke to you, because you are your own god. You decide what is right and wrong or parrot liberal "tolerance". You do not know right from wrong. You are spiritually sick.

Anonymous said...

10:41 You probably love filth in your life. I don't doubt that for a second. And you mock other people for seeking God. You're a disgusting person.

Child Advocate said...

I'm spiritually healthy. I believe Jesus Christ is my Savior. I believe in God's word. I try to follow Jesus's commandment to love each other as have loved you. I believe when we're told, judge not, lest you be judged, is God's way of telling us he'll take care of it. I fail sometimes and I pray for forgiveness. My spirituality is fine.

Please cite a source for the gun being in his lap. I haven't been able to find that as a fact on any reputable site. Please cite your source.

I don't think anyone has enough facts to come to any conclusions.

Fm25 said...

The officers attorney hasn't commented on how the gun was displayed. Fox News is reporting that certainfreeze frames of the FB video that MIGHT indicate a gun in castile's lap.

Anonymous said...

Child Advocate, You are so full of it. I know who I'm talking to...one of the most selfish and debased people ever.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

As someone who's been driving for a long time, raised in household with numerous guns (all securely stored), taught and trained to correctly handle and shoot said guns, I have to draw the line that openly displaying a gun on one's lap in a traffic stop situation is somehow even remotely "acceptable" in any form. For that to be purely innocent, one would have to document that it was Mr. Castile's established behavioral practice to regularly, and without exception, carry his gun upon his thigh each and every time he drove any vehicle. If that was indeed his practice, LE should be investigating his constant need to do so. Rather, if he did display a gun on his thigh as the officer approached the vehicle, it was threatening behavior on the part of Mr. Castile (as well as foolish and unnecessary escalation), particularly in light of the fact that this was not Mr. Castile's first traffic stop...rather his 32nd since 2002, according to court records.

As a matter of routine in my state (as in the majority of states), the responding officer would have been running the plates before he exited the vehicle. Upon approaching the driver's window, the officer asks for license and registration- the vehicle did have a broken tail light regardless, a ticketable offense- a reasonable and procedural request. With 32 verifiable traffic stops, Mr. Castile was well-versed in police traffic stop procedure when he displayed a gun on his thigh, within easy reach. The responding officer had no way to determine if Mr. Castile just wanted to play a game of chicken or not. It was Mr. Castile's decision to disregard the officer's "Do not move" order.


Secondly, while Mr. Castile may have been granted a permit to carry. However, as he was not transporting a pistol in a motor vehicle, contained in a closed and fastened case, gun box, or securely tied package, he was required to carry his permit on his person per Minnesota State law.

Moreover, any citizen with 32 verifiable traffic offenses clearly has an issue with authority that does not qualify them as a "role model" no matter how "nice" they are.

Finally, there are real life consequences for failing to obey laws...regardless of your race, ethnicity, cultural background, childhood experiences, excess or lack of money
or education. Your brain is still grey like everyone else's and you own your free will. One's race does not excuse arrogance, rebellion, and stupidity. If you put yourself in dangerous situations, you are likely not to survive, period...and no one should be surprised.

FYI: In the state of Minnesota: 624.714 CARRYING OF WEAPONS WITHOUT PERMIT; PENALTIES.

Subd. 1a. Permit required; penalty.

A person, other than a peace officer, as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1, who carries, holds, or possesses a pistol in a motor vehicle, snowmobile, or boat, or on or about the person's clothes or the person, or otherwise in possession or control in a public place, as defined in section 624.7181, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), without first having obtained a permit to carry the pistol is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

Subd. 1b.Display of permit; penalty.

(a) The holder of a permit to carry must have the permit card and a driver's license, state identification card, or other government-issued photo identification in immediate possession at all times when carrying a pistol and must display the permit card and identification document upon lawful demand by a peace officer, as defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1

Anonymous said...

Here's another statement made by William Johnson

legal to own guns, so it isn't enough to use deadly force against someone for possessing a firearm," says Johnson. "There has to be some sort of criminal use of it before police can take a law enforcement action."

Hey Jude said...

The guy was said to be reaching for his permit, which was in his pocket, when he was shot - so presumably he had it upon his person. Crazy to carry his gun in his lap, if he did.

Anonymous said...

12:06,

Well ya know what? People are human. If I was a cop and approached a car and the guy had a gun sitting in his lap, unholstered, I could theoretically see myself acting much the same way the police officer did due to fear. What are you going to do? All it takes is a second for the guy to pick up the gun and shoot? Are you going to take that chance? If someone did take that chance they are very brave. Criminals do not ask permission to shoot. They just shoot so the cop would have no warning.

Anonymous said...

There was NOT a gun on his lap. That's his belt showing from under his bloody t-shirt.

Kathead said...

New Spring founder ousted from church.

http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/32412397/official-statement-from-perry-noble-on-newspring-decision

Hey Jude said...

Transcripts re Perry Noble's leaving Newspring is on the last Blackburn thread - beware heavy trolling, anyone venturing in.

https://statement-analysis.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/amanda-blackburn-murder-part-four.html?commentPage=9

elf said...

Other races have wide noses also. Plus, the surveillance footage of the robbery showed that the suspect is a black male so your insinuation is a moot point.

Hey Jude said...

Oh, come - it's a euphemism for 'black guy' - he can't say he pulled him over because he was black - 'wide nosed' is another way of saying it.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Warning: If politically incorrect posts bother you, this is your chance to exercise your right to scroll and roll.

This is so reminiscent of World War II and American, acting on mob hysteria forcing Japanese/Asian people into relocation camps...never bothering to confirm if the people were actually perpetrating crimes or not...guilty because they were a certain thing.

Likewise, if the media, the President, and the Black Lives Mater activists are to be believed, all white officers are being presumed guilty of indiscriminately and randomly killing black men. Equally likewise, large numbers of Black people (as well as a substantial number of emotionally-driven white people) are failing to verify facts before rushing to judgement. For a persecuted people, the Black Lives Matter movement seems to have no issue whipping the masses into a frenzy that culminates in "killing whites", innocence notwithstanding. One would think with their history and familiarity with mob justice and lynchings, they would be the last people advocating (if indeed by their prolonged silence) violence against anyone. Has the black community learned nothing from the last 200 years? They don't want their sons/husbands/fathers/boyfriends/male friends killed, but it's alright to kill someone else's because of their color???

I'm not naive enough to think that there aren't racist officers anywhere in the U.S. and some killings aren't racial. Black men are disproportionately arrested though because a very large slice of black culture promotes the gang-banger wannabe lifestyle and behaviors. Factor in A significant portion of the black community has spent years nurturing and instilling a distrust and hatred for whites for the "sins of the fathers" against their people. Couple that unchecked anger with a powerless victim mentality, a healthy dose of "black attitude" (my black friend's term), no stable home life/parental support/positive role models, and it's a recipe for civil war. Yes, I said their people. In talking with long time Christian black friends, I've only recently been shocked to discover that while I have perceived us as one for 25 years, their perception of whites is "them" and "us". How does one respond to that? How does a society deal with that?

FYI: My family is composed of black of white, so I don't think in terms of color. I've differentiated here, for the sake of discussion. Human beings have 4,000 years of recorded history of killing each other other "tribal" differences. If we want a different result, all of us have to do things differently, black people included.

rob said...

http://www.thestate.com/living/religion/article88754767.html#1

Peter, didn't know if you had heard about the shake up at New Spring yesterday. I have to find a link to Perry's statement. More about what he is not doing wrong, than what he is doing wrong.

rob said...

http://ns.downloads.s3.amazonaws.com/newspring/editorial/Perry%20Noble%20Statement.pdf

Got it.

Anonymous said...

OT
Syrian refugee. Again.

http://www.fox25boston.com/news/syrian-man-accused-of-inappropriately-touching-girl-at-pool/395398131

Anonymous said...

Ive heard today a sensible statement from blm supporters. LE should be re-trained to shoot to wound rather than only shoot to kill. In the 1990's the parents of an autistic teenager called police because their son became agitated & angry. They couldnt get him to go inside their house. Police arrive and killed him infront of his parents in their front yard. Because he picked up a shovel & the officer felt threatened. Pitiful & disgraceful. Family is white. LE is white.

rob said...

Anon at 10:56, I know of the family/story you are speaking of. If the son was so easy to handle, not a threat, why did the family feel the need to call LE to handle it?

Anonymous said...

Was it stated in the post he was no threat? That he was easy to handle? He wasn't. Trained professionals could not subdue. Bar bouncers have better sense & training. Unarmed bar bouncers face worse threats than this teenager posed to LE and successfully subdue drunken angry, out of control adults. Without executing them in front of parents.

rjb said...

The idea of LEOS being trained to wound instead of aiming for center mass is ludicrous. An arm or leg is a much more difficult target to hit, particularly in a high-stress situation, and an armed suspect with a gun can still shoot and kill LEOs or nearby civilians with an arm or leg wound.

My husband is a police officer. His job is to protect and serve, and he risks his life everyone he puts on his uniform and goes to work. But it is not his job to make decisions that could potentially lead to his death or the deaths of others because it is more politically correct to wound an armed suspect than it is to shoot to kill.

In the words of Captain Malcom Reynolds, "Someone tries to kill you, you try to kill 'em right back."

anon said...

My best friend when I was very little was black. She saved my life during the Blizzard of 78 when a snow cave collapsed on me. I was upsidedown with no space between my mouth and the snow. We were 4 years old. We were playing in a giant drift of snow which had been blown up against the 6 story high apartments we lived in. I was trapped and could hardly breathe, my head completely encased in snow, mouth right up against snow. I was upsidedown with only my boots showing. She was pulling on them, pulling on them, she couldnt move me, I was trapped. We were locked out of the apartment complex as the doors locked automatically. It normally took us a good half hour to get back in, because we would have to just wait for a random person to enter. Then we would have to ask people how to find our apartment number as there were 100s of apartments and it was too confusing to remember. My father told me I would have died within 10-15 because of lack of oxygen. My best friend, who was only 4 years old and black somehow, some way that I will never know, managed.to somehow get into the apartment building rapidly, much quicker than we had ever been able to and up several floors, and down long hallways and found my mother. She got my mother down there, within 5 minutes who pulled me out, as I struggled to breathe and remembering all the days we would wait and wait for 30 min, 40 min to even get in the building and thinking it will take SO long for her to get help and the fear of death was in my stomach. I was 4 years old and 5 min away from death. Somehow, someway that I never found out, my life was saved by a 4 year who moved fast and managed to get into a locked building right away. My father told me she must have been banging and banging and banging as hard as she could on the door till someone, somehow heard to get in that quick. He told me when I was older, had she not done so, you would have been dead in 5 minutes due to lack of oxygen.
If not for a black little girl, I would have only had 4 years of life on this earth.
How stuipid we all are. Black, white...all of us, with less sense than pre-school age children.

tania cadogan said...

All those who say officers should not shoot or only shoot to wound, should be made to go through several use of force scenarios where they have a split second to decide, shoot/taser/not shoot.
Kill or be killed by the suspect in view or by an accomplice in everyday situations such as traffic stops.

It is amazing how many of them realize what can happen in a fraction of a second.
What seemed a normal traffic stop or a simple misdemeanor can suddenly become a fight for life.
A person who doesn't want to go back to jail, someone who hates the officers skin color or their gender, fear, panic a multitude of emotions can turn something simple to something fatal.

Once they go through what cops go through in training, the realize just how dangerous a job being a cop is.
It boils down to that final split second, will they do as asked or will they argue and fight?

Anonymous said...


bho will not let this crisis of his own stoking
go to waste right before national elections.
Expect the black panthers to be listening closely
to bho's washington and this will continue up
until the time we vote.
If we vote.

Anonymous said...

That blanket statement does not cannot cover all fatal encounters with LE. Domestic disputes ending fatally because a neighbor called LE due to an argument. An uncooperative drunken Spouse killed unnecessarily due to failure to comply. An unarmed homeowner in NYC killed at his doorstep reaching for wallet. 2 dozen shots fired. This is a training issue.

Anonymous said...

Soon cops wont answer calls to black neighborhoods and the criminals (thugs) can run the inner cities.
You think any good would have come from the gun sitting on Castille's lap. He would have shot someone eventually with it. One less armed criminal. The black people should be thanking the officer.

Anonymous said...

And now the 4 year old girl won't have as much pot smoke blown in her face and will have a much better chance of learning when she starts kindergarten. Good riddance to bad rubbish. I can't even believe people pity him...he had a gun in his lap duh!

show me said...

Is there one single legitimate source reporting that the gun was in his lap? A Conservative Treehouse blog post written by someone named "sundance" is not a legitimate source. The screen shot posted there does not prove that the object in his lap was, with certainty, a gun. It could have been his phone.

For "sundance" to claim he or she can tell the "gun" in his lap "appears to be the same type of gun used in the armed robbery" is poppycock. Look at the screen shot.

Maybe all that cussing and f-bombing the officer was doing in the video after the shooting was caused by the realization that he just killed someone reaching for a phone. Wouldn't be the first time it's happened.

Anonymous said...

No legitimate source.

Regardless, the gun was not pointed at the officer. If it had been the statement by the officer's lawyer would have said so. There was no imminent threat to the officer. He overreacted and killed a man. As the man Peter quoted for this entry said:

"it isn't enough to use deadly force against someone for possessing a firearm," says Johnson. "There has to be some sort of criminal use of it before police can take a law enforcement action."

Anonymous said...

Anon, the officer himself has said that he was reacting to the PRESENCE of the gun and this has not been disputed that a gun was present.

If you were that officer and the guy had that gun sitting in his lap, and the guy appears to be reaching for the gun, you wouldn't have shot him?

It's so strange because I really feel that if I had a gun in my lap and a cop came to my car window, I would assume there would be a likely chance the cop would shoot me. Why is that so hard for other people with gun's sitting in their laps to understand?

elf said...

The dude DID look like the robbery suspect though. The suspect in the surveillance footage was a black male.

Katprint said...

@elf

This link has photos of the robbery suspects and photos of Philando Castile. Seriously, he is a ringer for one of the robbery suspects and not just because he was an African-American. http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/philando-castile-armed-robber-robbery-suspect-photos-audio-video-watch-listen-see-gas-station-falcon-heights-jeronimo-yanez-police-shooting-see-photos/

Anonymous said...


We have how many more months of non-school, warm weather
before our national elections?
The real issue developing is that our country is/has
been taken over by those who hate it. Who were a
minority 7 1/2 years ago.
We still can change this by voting intelligently.
All of your lives depend on it.

rob said...

Anonymous said...
Was it stated in the post he was no threat? That he was easy to handle? He wasn't. Trained professionals could not subdue. Bar bouncers have better sense & training. Unarmed bar bouncers face worse threats than this teenager posed to LE and successfully subdue drunken angry, out of control adults. Without executing them in front of parents.

July 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM

You go into a bar and raise a shovel to a bouncer, see how that ends up.

Saint Theresa said...

You're the problem with this country. Disgusting.

Saint Theresa said...

Guns don't shoot themselves. If the gun isn't being held why the hell would the officer who is holding a gun be scared of a gun sitting anywhere ??? Which it wasn't. But I'll pretend it was.

Anonymous said...

No words for some of these comments.

The division this country has seen since Obama is appalling.

And still, the thing we fail to see is protests for abused children. Protests for rape victims.

Both of these cases, for all we know could have been escalated to that point. We don't know what occurred before. As usual, the videos only capture the final moments.


No one cares to wait for facts to come out. They just jump at the chance to be victims.

Yet no one seems to care when innocent children are killed. No one cares when one of our presidential candidates lies over and over.

We all need to care about what matters.

Not about skin color.

Anonymous said...

Unarmed bar security more than likely would successfully disarm and subdue.

Anonymous said...

Psychologic deficiencies pull that trigger 14 times as the suspect falls to the ground. Psychological deficiencies pull that trigger twice while 2 are ontop of a stuggling suspect. Two men cant cuff him. Psychological deficiencies pull that trigger 2X while teenager has fallen to the ground from the first 2 trigger pulls. Denying and excusing mis-use of deadly force jeopardizes all of us. Takes all of us to the thresh hold of tyranny and totalizationism.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Police brutality (unprovoked physical abuse/killing of an individual), regardless of skin color/nationality/religion/socioeconomic status/sexual orientation/mental capacity/physical disability, is never acceptable. Such poor excuses for human beings should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Some situations will require the use of force to subdue, restrain or otherwise stop a suspect or end a situation. It is ludicrous and dangerous to expect officers under fire in Dallas, protecting and defending a crowd of hundreds, to respond to a mobile suspect, with non-lethal methods of disarmament.

Physically attacking someone (with a weapon of any kind-fists, knife, stones, re-barb, pipe, gunfire, etc.) will always result in the other person responding physically. If someone were to walk up to your family member, unprovoked, and begin physically beating them, you would likely begin hitting the attacker/use any weapon at your disposal to stop the attack.

Provoking a person to fight and getting beaten (or killed) in return, does not make a person a victim...it makes him foolish.

A person is known by the company he keeps. If one does not want to be mistaken for a drug-dealer, gang member, or criminal, one should not be in the company of those people...nor imitate them in action/language/clothing style. No one will mistake you for a pig if you are a deer.

Hatred- fueled by anger, fanned by class envy, steeped in a victim mentality, nursing perceived oppression, manipulated emotionally with religious fervor, and ultimately desiring revenge for all the "wrongs"- gives birth to murder.

Anonymous said...

"Physically attacking someone (with a weapon of any kind-fists, knife, stones, re-barb, pipe, gunfire, etc.) will always result in the other person responding physically. "


Does that mean you're in favor of strict gun control? Of people not having guns? Wouldn't showing a weapon make the situation worse?

Anonymous said...

"One" of our presidential candidates lies? How about both of them.

People need to wake up and see both parties for what they are.

elf said...

I saw one still shot of the suspect and I agree the suspect and castile look very similar.