Saturday, September 17, 2016

Blackburn: Projection Pre Crime

Shortly before his wife was murdered in a home invasion in which no great theft took place, Davey Blackburn gave this performance.  




On November 10th, 2015, 3 men entered the home, beat, sexually assaulted and shot 3 times, pregnant Amanda Blackburn.  She languished for 2 days before death came.  The fatal shot was to the back of her head, execution style. 

This is not the general behavior of a home invasion robbery in which sudden and often violent interaction takes place for the purpose of theft; incapacitate the home owner enough to take that which was valued.  

Nor was this typical of sexual assault where the primary interest is rape.  

Nor did Amanda Blackburn pose enough resistance to warrant this elevation in violence ending in murder. 

Pre crime and post crime behavior and wording is critical to an overall understanding of the crime.  

Statement analysis of the statements made by Davey Blackburn following the murder showed:

a.  No fear of the then yet to be apprehended killers, nor concern for his son, his neighbors, and the public at large.  A vicious invasive murder produces profound fear, trauma, and concern that the killers, which appeared to the public as "senseless" (since no major theft took place) only increases the fear due to the seemingly random nature of the crime.  Nothing is as frightening as the unknown and with unknown motive, there is the incessant fear that the killers will return.  If it was known that much cash was in the house and this was a robbery, the trauma is lessened for survivors because the motive 'makes sense' in this limited criminal aspect.  Without sense, brutal rapist killers were on the loose.  

b.  An immediate and intense desire to profit from her death.  The language was commercial and shocked the public. Blackburn showed obsessive language about numbers in attendance, like his mentor, Perry Noble.  This unbridled ambition was evidenced within the specific number of attendees, online, to his 'service', while offering nothing about the victim.  The lack of empathy for Amanda was striking.  

c.  Extreme (given both the context and numerical analysis) distancing language from the victims (including the pre born child).  This lack of human empathy for the victims and immediate and consistent distancing from the victims also shocked the public. 
d.  Language of guilt, offering by himself, "for us, we have nothing to hide."  The use of the plural is something that parents of kindergartens recognize as a need to 'hide' or 'share guilt' among a crowd.  
e.  He claimed "Amanda died so the church would live", justifying her death, while claiming to have been alone, naked in the shower, with the Almighty, who spoke to him and gave him "history making" plans.  He qualified the history making plans by removing responsibility of failure from himself to the congregation.  If he does not make history, it would be their fault.  

This represented two elements within murders common of those who either commit the murder, or have guilty knowledge of the murder:  the need to justify the action, and the need to avoid responsibility.  These are not only found in such crimes, but are personality traits found within deviants.  In child homicides, for example, we often find such statements as
"she would not stop crying", shifting blame to the child.
"she was a teenager, you know..." with a subtle shifting of responsibility to hormonal behavior. 

On the day of the murder, Blackburn went to the gym, as he did regularly, at a specific time, returning home at a specific time, yet on this date, he spoke to his best friend (as was his pattern) but remained on the phone for 40 minutes longer than usual.  

This, alone, as a change from the norm, should be examined, but the additional element makes the deviation from the norm heightened:  on this occasion, he remained in the driveway on the phone call while Amanda bled out, with precious time lost. 

Projection and Pre Crime Behavior 

Before the crime, we look for any signals of projection, or even possible planning. 

What did Blackburn, himself, tell us?

1.  He told us that Amanda hindered his ambition.  He told us that he wanted to be out getting the numbers in, but she wanted him home with her.  

2.  He told us that when Amanda first became pregnant, it was the most stressful time in his life. 

3.  He told us that Amanda was incapable of satisfying his sexual needs.  He went as far as to publicly state (in a 'sermon') that Amanda wanted to go out to dinner, but he was incapable of having a conversation with her at dinner until they had sexual relations.  He reduced the victim (pre crime) to sexually reciprocal body parts.  

4.  His public videos show him correcting and embarrassing her.  This passive aggressive nature was in both word and body language.  The public displays of disrespect and humiliation were subtle and consistent. 

5.  Just before the murder, he gave a 'sermon' (with respect to readers of faith) where he waved about this gun as a choreographed prop.  

A man of unrestrained ambition  told the public what it was that stood in his way of success.  He told the public who it was who stood in his way of success.  

As one 30 year criminal investigator said, "no one gets this lucky."  

As soon as she was murdered, his words betrayed him.  His first announcement was a sales pitch for his business, and his second announcement  was his sales report; the number he obtained.  Then, in the media circuit, he continued to sell himself, referencing his upcoming book, while failing to speak about Amanda.  

He attended his father-in-law's church where he said he could not speak, but then could not stop himself from speaking and gave his speech about his naked shower meeting with Deity (something criminal psychologists and analysts recognize associated with sexual homicides and the need to cleans guilt) about his grandiose plans, fully unimpeded.

Had he been polygraphed, the course of the case might have dramatically shifted.  A defense attorney would have had all the videos removed immediately and would have silenced Blackburn.  

The narcissistic lack of human empathy shocked a nation, but it was specifically in his words that we see the removal of hinderance from his ambitious plans; not unlike powerful, ruthless politicians. 

Blackburn was immediately cleared by police and is judicially innocent of the murder of Amanda Blackburn, as his alibi of being at the gym at the time of her murder was sustained and the three males arrested.  It does not appear that Blackburn was asked to polygraph although the statistics are clear that when a pregnant woman is murdered, the husband/boyfriend is most often involved.  






1,945 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 1945   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

No anon at 7:38, it is you who doesn't understand. Have you ever used facebook? Bobcat would have known if it was the same profile she originally sent the message to, because it would have shown in her fb messages as a RESPONSE TO HER. If the person had made a new profile, it would not have. Do you get it now? Try it yourself. I'm right, you're wrong.

Really Meg said...

And bobcat will continue to try to drown out the proof of her lies, just like she did when it first happened. She was SO DESPERATE to change the subject.

Trudy said...

"There were some things that seemed out of place, but she was pregnant."

When I was pregnant, I often knocked over decorative ladders, spilled the contents of my purse on the floor, took off my panties, and pulled my shirt up. Oh, the number of times I smoked Swisher sweets and lay face down bleeding from the head, arm and back...I couldn't tell you.
Pregnancy is a crazy time. It's only natural that some things are going to be out of place.

Anonymous said...

Dolt @ 7:44

Two "friends" responded on June 12. They were solicited.

The message sender on June 14 was unsolicited.

Look again at the dates in the quotes above.

------------

Trudy,

Yes, pregnancy can be a HOT MESS!

Trudy said...

Davey is lying when he says he thought the carnage he walked into had anything to do with Amanda's pregnancy

Me2l said...

Well, did you notice where the bickering began?

Nic said...

"The manner in which you used "however" requires a semi-colon, comma combination."

This made me LOL. In all the things you complain about, you can't harp on me for my analysis, but you will harp about a semi-colon.

Classic.

Really Meg said...

"Bobcat said...
Dolt @ 7:44

Two "friends" responded on June 12. They were solicited.

The message sender on June 14 was unsolicited.

Look again at the dates in the quotes above."


LIAR. You would have said so to begin with if that were the case. You had no defense and offered none.

Me2l said...

The way you do? But that's different, right fool?

Me2l said...

Lol. NO

Anonymous said...

Still no denial from boobcat that she lied. She's so much like Davey!

Anonymous said...

"She's so much like Davey!"

My spouse is alive and well.

Anonymous said...

Bobcat's spouse spends a lot of time alone now that Davey entered the picture. Davey is the No. 1 man in Bobcat's life now.

Trudy said...

Lol Bobcat @ 8:25. You shouldn't feed the trolls and I shouldn't laugh, but that was funny.

Me2l said...

I didn't do that. You're lying, as usual.

Me2l said...

Only because of your harping on my typo.

Demon alcohol said...

Quit drinking.

Anonymous said...

Me2l
The most recent article says the whitehouse ADMITTED the payment to iran was RANSOM. Is this true? Did WH, Pres O, admit that?

Anonymous said...

So sad, and such a waste.

Anonymous said...

My comment at 9:02 was in regards to this depressing bullshit you are doing.

Anonymous said...

Someone please venture out from Safe Space and try to answer question. True/False? Whitehouse admitted ransom or did not admit ransom.

Trudy said...

Nic, I think poor old me21 has mistakenly identified you as the person who noted the irony in one of her comments. That's why she's being a dick about semicolons.

Anonymous said...

Are there none here? Perry Masons. No Det Columbos. No Kojacks. No Sherlocks. No Barettas.

Anonymous said...

No Nim Rockfords?.

Anonymous said...

Jim rockfords

Anonymous said...

It'll be quiet again on Wednesday evening. They'll all be busy with teen indoctrination activities.

Anonymous said...

None here..

Anonymous said...

Starting now, only the Bobcat may post comments and Q & A.

Trudy said...

"Every night THAT MY SCHEDULE ALLOWS me to tuck him into bed we sing about Jesus together, we read a Bible story, and we pray."

Who controls CD's schedule? I'll wager a guess that he, himself, controls it. He is using passive language to distance himself from, (and absolve himself for) abdicating his parental responsibility.

Lis said...

Levi Lusko? Perry Noble? Just guessing.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 7:45 PM, it's never quiet here thanks to the old biddies who are glued to this blog seven days a week.

Anonymous said...

Make that Anon at 9:45 PM, not 7:45.

Anonymous said...

I"m sending Khazir to speak w/them about their conduct.

Lis said...

From Amanda's Instagram Father's Day 2015:
"I hope and pray he grows up to be just like his daddy."


Only with a conscience and the ability to feel empathy...

Anonymous said...

Trudy,

You should know by now that CD is an important man-god, who has been tasked with fomenting a worldwide evangilution, based on Amanda's martyrdom.

His schedule is directed from above. Well, and from anyone who pays him to speak, or .....

Anonymous said...

Ok Bobcat. Its been 2 days. Need update. What have db's former school crew, neighbors, coworkers, friends have to say about knowing him?

dnd said...

Bobcat, I enjoy reading your posts and all the work and information you have put into this case, so I hope you ignore the people who are suddenly attacking you so vehemently.

I believe DB reads here and thinks of new things to say to cover his ass. Like changing his story about how he found Amanda. He is changing and adding to what he has said before, so that when the 911 call is released, he now has an excuse for why he reported it as an injury and not a crime. He is definitely going back and trying to "fix" and explain things that are being questioned by the public. As he does this, he is creating more suspicion. I can only hope, like many others, that the police, a journalist, or the family look into his behavior and begin investigating him. I pray for justice for this beautiful soul, Amanda. She was violently robbed of her life for no reason, and I believe she would want justice, because it wasn't only her life, but her child's as well. Watching the Q&A with her family, if they don't have suspicions, I think they do have a problem with some of the stupid things he says. They didn't look all that comfortable with some of the things he is saying. And I do think they have had to notice, that he doesn't publicly say he loves Amanda, and that he has forgotten she was carrying his second child. How hurtful it must be.

Anonymous said...

Bobcat.
Your report deadline has been extended to 6am. On my desk at 6am. Need to find out what stinks in Indy. Your help is appreciated. 6am.

Anonymous said...

Thanks dnd,

No worries. I'm all grown up so sticks, stones, words, you know... My message board thick-skin was well developed when these babies were still in elementary and middle school.

But this is not about me, at all. This is about Amanda - who happens to bear a resemblance to me (in my past), not only in her childbearing age(s), but also in her faith. Unfortunately, her marriage choice was very, very wrong.

Yes, DB is fixing and refining and trying to fill in every hole in the story. He is a champion of lying.

I'm working on a lengthy timeline right now. In the meantime, for those who haven't seen it: http://case-discussions.blogspot.com/2016/06/11102015-i-had-no-idea-daveys-evolving.html

Anonymous said...

Khazir has spoken with me2l and terms of agreement and understanding have been reached on ceasefire. Blog in peace.

Trudy said...

Lis said...
From Amanda's Instagram Father's Day 2015:
"I hope and pray he grows up to be just like his daddy."

Only with a conscience and the ability to feel empathy...

Yes. And a bit less murderish.

Anonymous said...

I feel extremely sad.

Anonymous said...

Oh wow. Now bobcat thinks she's Amanda! That explains a lot.

Trudy said...

I understand how you feel and I think I know why, but you might be in the wrong place, Anon @ 10:54pm. It's a bit like standing next to a roaring fire and saying " I feel extremely hot".

Here you go.

http://www.goodnet.org/articles/7-top-websites-to-make-you-happy

Take care.

Concerned said...

Peter, I thank you for keeping up the heat with SA on Davey and I thank
Bobcat, Nic, Bingo3, and so many others for continuing the
conversation in spite of the trolls who get some weird satisfaction
from round-the-clock bickering. If I felt that persecuted I would
find a better way to spend my time! I rarely come here any more
(because of them) but they seem to be ever-present when I read through
the comments.

Here's to the day Davey's lies are revealed to the world.
That day is coming, for sure, because nobody who talks as much
as he does can avoid spilling marbles. I just pray no one else has
to die first.

Trudy at 10:44
said "a bit less murderish". Amen!

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Quick Question- Does it make any sense that the CI says that Larry Taylor shot Amanda "somewhere in the upper body because she charged him and he didn't want her to scratch him"??? Being so fearful of a scratch that a gang member would pop off an upper body shot (automatically creating noise and upping the ante to be caught)? Like somehow an execution shot to the base of the skull, followed by leaving your cigar pack on the counter and strolling casually down the sidewalk in full view of neighbors taking out their trash/neighbors leaving for work/every home security camera on two different streets is any less incriminating??? The excuse given for the killing doesn't justify the response. Nor does the non-rape aspect given Larry Taylor's well-documented MO of attacking women he's "robbing", particularly given his previous tendencies and that he was left alone with Amanda by his cohorts.

This "home invasion/robbery" differed greatly from their usual, even the priors with a woman victim in the home in that: This was literally a stroll up the front sidewalk and walk in the front door with no attempt at stealth/concealment; Taylor was not left exclusively in any of the other residences; ATM cards were not stolen and immediately used to access accounts in a victim/hostage situation previously; fellow gang-members were not dispatched elsewhere by Taylor; female victims were not left exclusively alone with Taylor; and there were relatively few items taken from the Blackburn home compared to previous robberies (TV left intact right above the fireplace in the living room, Amanda's diamond not reported stolen, cell phone left, other electronics left-thinking cameras/IPad/Gaming consoles, credit cards left, Davey's gun left, the Blackburn's second vehicle left, no money reportedly taken-from Amanda's purse or otherwise, none of Amanda's jewelry reported stolen, etc.).

Why would Taylor necessarily need to depend on being picked back up in the cul-de-sac when he could have just stolen the Blackburn's second vehicle, called his cohorts on their cells, arranged to drop-off the goods, ditch the ride, and rendezvous? There was issue with stealing the first car that morning, Amanda wasn't going to call 911, and Taylor clearly had no qualms being seen leaving her house/the neighborhood. For someone so allegedly worried about a scratch connecting him to a "robbery", he certainly wasn't concerned about being visible.

Anonymous said...

^ ^ ^ ^

THIS !

Foolsfeedonfolly said...


Correction- 3rd Paragraph 2nd Sentence of my above post should have read:

There was no issue with stealing the first car that morning, Amanda wasn't going to call 911, and Taylor clearly had no qualms being seen leaving her house/the neighborhood.

Anonymous said...

BobcatSeptember 19, 2016 at 8:25 PM
"She's so much like Davey!"

My spouse is alive and well.




Not cool bobcat. Murder us no joke.

Bingo3 said...

Anon, Bobcat was not joking about the murder. She is quite serious about Justice for Amanda. Great posts by Nic, Concerned, Bobcat, Trudy and many Anons. Fools, excellent! The robbery at the Blackburns makes absolutely no sense! There is no way a petite, pregnant woman would charge. That did not happen. He was afraid of his face being scratched? Seriously?? GREAT explanation of what we all were thinking, fools!

I think Davey's latest blog was quite telling. He called the guy who recognized him and walked up to him at Starbucks as a "friendly". Interesting. There must be many "unfriendlies". In the last few services, he has spoken about the small sliver of peeps who are "trolling" him. Peter and the commenters here are not trolling him. Unless he gets on this page and scrolls down through the comments. If he does that, he is trolling himself. He is obviously getting heat from people when he is out in public. My thoughts on this are, DB, you should have stayed silent. You should have gone into hiding and grieved with your family like a normal person. You brought this on yourself. You smiled and talked numbers the day after you buried your wife. You issued a selfish, business promoting statement. You did a media blitz and spoke as you were a family spokesperson promoting a church movement. You have changed your story so much, our heads our spinning. You bought a new car within a month and a new house with a pool while still taking up donations going directly to yourself through your church. You brought this on yourself. Did you think you could act like this and everyone would continue to call you a hero? Many are just not that naive.

Hey Jude said...

I hope Davey has a fence round that pool.

Nic said...

Foolsfeedonfolly said:
Quick Question- Does it make any sense that the CI says that Larry Taylor shot Amanda "somewhere in the upper body because she charged him and he didn't want her to scratch him"???


She had one defensive wound: The shot she took to the lower left arm which traveled up to her biceps (imo, she had to have had her hand up in front of her in an attempt to plead with whomever not to shoot her/to block the shot). So, no, it doesn't make any sense. Much earlier in another thread I mentioned that I thought it was leakage. In the APC it is reported:

Dr. Cavanaugh [...] determined her cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head. The manner of death was ruled a homicide. Dr. Cavanaugh determined Blackburn had sustained a gunshot wound to the back of her head. She also had a gunshot wound to the lower left arm which traveled up to her biceps. She also had a through and through gunshot wound which entered and exited her upper back. The back wound was downward. Blackburn had scratches to her left cheek, a split lip and a lower tooth knocked out.Forensic Specialist Melissa Wilson recovered bullets from Blackburn’s head and left biceps. […]

Anonymous said...

"Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Correction- 3rd Paragraph 2nd Sentence of my above post should have read:

There was no issue with stealing the first car that morning, Amanda wasn't going to call 911, and Taylor clearly had no qualms being seen leaving her house/the neighborhood.

September 20, 2016 at 1:22 AM"



Then why was he covering his face with his hood?

Nic said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nic said...

Gordon 6567
Gordon 0147 (received call from 6567 at 4:36am)
Taylor 7125
Watson 0802 (Donae Mitchell found in possession after the fact) NOT IN PLAY after 4:30AM
number located at E. 56th St. and I-465; during the time of the burglaries and the homicide
Tower is located where the original burglary occurred at 5756 San Clemente

Unknown 3175 (6567 calls five times from the time of the initial burglary until after the successful ATM transaction)


Cell Phone Activity/Movement:

6567 (Gordon)

4:36AM *first burglary according to APC; 6567 calling 0147 -Gordon’s second listed phone
4:40AM cellphone records put 6567 with 0802 @ E. 56th St. and I-465, 0802 remains stationary according to phone records

(5:36AM second burglary, video depicting “a subject” who disabled the system)**

6:25AM 2812 Sunnyfield Court (Blackburn residence)
6:39AM tower near 6881N. Michigan Rd. immediately after failed ATM transaction. (Taylor called Gordon, handed to Watson and Watson/Taylor discussed numbers.) Watson attempted a transaction but did not work.
6:40 - 6:45 neighbour Tank Jones @ 2824 hears two gunshots and what sounded like a woman scream
6:54AM tower 1313 W. 85th St. location of second ATM transaction (CI Watson and Gordon were going to leave Taylor but he threatened to kill the woman if they left him)
7:10 +/- moves back to 2812 Sunnyfield Court

_________

7125 (Taylor)

6:38 to 7:10 2812 Sunnyfield Court; only communicates with 6567 which picks him up

*4:30AM Searsbrook @ 5756 San Clemente/first burglary said she woke up and noticed her phone missing, sliding glass door open and plants knocked over, laptop, purse and keys and car. Infinity alarm takes pic of three people, camera was disabled. She called 911 at 5:23

**Gordon and Taylor arrive separately to Sunnyfield. Gordon’s phone arrives at 6:25 and Taylor’s phone arrives at 6:28. Cell phone records do not report Gordon and Taylor’s whereabouts at the time of the second robbery at 5:36AM

To note:
Everyone’s day begins at 4:30
Taylor/Gordon/Watson leave Sunnyfield the same time DB leaves the gym

Anonymous said...

Nic, Thank you. Just not adding up. Is it?

Anonymous said...

This is totally out there but how tall is Larry Taylor? The guy in the grainy picture is tiny like Bull. Maybe they are both just very small men? Bull as you can see on his FB is a very small dude. Thanks again Nic for the outline.

Anonymous said...

I am so disappointed that this site has degenerated into name-calling, back-biting, petty in-fighting and accusations. The random attacks on other posters are surprising too, the hateful "Deception indicated! Dropped pronoun, wrong verb tense! I don't believe what you said really happened".

It was once an interesting site with insightful posts & comments on SA. I wish I'd had the confidence back then to create an account & post back in the days when people stayed on topic and friendly.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 12:33, I guess it answers "that" question. i.e., why did they leave Taylor behind? He had arrived after they had already left for the bank!

Gordon's phone pings at 6:25 on Sunnyfield, Taylor's at 6:28.

Gordon's phone then pings at 6:39am after the first transaction (which according to the receipt was at 6:36). According to Google Maps, Sunnyfield is 4.5 miles/10 minutes' drive from the first ATM attempt. (Eleven minutes between ping on Sunnyfield and ATM withdraw attempt.)

Per the CI (note order):
Watson drove to an ATM on Michigan Road, with Gordon in the car as well. Taylor called Gordon’s phone. Gordon handed the phone to Watson. Watson discussed numbers with Taylor and Watson attempted a transaction, but it did not work. Watson drove to another ATM on 86th St. Watson walked tot he ATM and withdrew money. Watson and Gordon were gong to leave Taylor but he threatened to kill the woman if the left him.

Coincidentally, Tank Jones supposedly hears two gunshots and what sounded like a woman scream within minutes after Gordon and Watson's departure and Taylor's arrival.

Anonymous said...

WH didnt admit ransom.

Nic said...

This is what I am finding odd. What 18/21/24 gangsta is into Tiffany pearl necklaces and pink sweaters? No other women's "treasures" were taken from the other robberies. Just TVs and computers. Who routes through a woman's sweater drawer and from everything to choose from, HE picks a pink sweater to mask his face, and what a coincidence HE picks one of Becker's favourite sweaters. .

Initially I thought one of the guys was shopping for a "sexy" date. But thinking more about it, guys like them don't think about Tiffany jewelry, let alone a string of pearls. jmo
____________

At 8:17AM, November 10th, 2015, Allison Becker called 911 to report a burglary of her home at 2830 Sunnyfield Court. … Becker’s interior video depicted a subject who disabled the system at 5:36AM. Entry was made to the residence by tearing through the patio screen window and unlocking the dead bolt to the patio door. Four televisions, a MacBook Pro, a Tiffany Pearl necklace, a pink woman’s sweater, an AT&T Uverse remote control, a bag of oranges, and bed sheets were taken from the home. DNA swabs were taken […] from the beer can and wine bottle. Alison Becker […] later confirmed the pink sweater belonged to her. She said it was one of her favourite sweaters when she saw a photograph of it.

Anonymous said...

Phones don't ping constantly, Nic. Taylor's phone pinging three minutes after Gordon's does not mean he arrived after them. And pings don't automatically happen upon arrival at a location. You don't know what you're talking about, troll.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...

I am so disappointed that this site has degenerated into name-calling, back-biting, petty in-fighting and accusations. The random attacks on other posters are surprising too, the hateful "Deception indicated! Dropped pronoun, wrong verb tense! I don't believe what you said really happened".

September 20, 2016 at 1:04 PM"



If Bobcat didn't want people to SA her statements, she should never have done it to others.

Don't dish it out if you can't take it, ladies.

Nic said...

And pings don't automatically happen upon arrival at a location

It would if he used the phone. ("I'm here where are you?") :0)

The APC says that Gordon's phone called 3175 five times from the time of the initial burglary until after the successful ATM transaction. What's to say that one of the five times was at 6:25? i.e., when they had Amanda's ATM card in hand and were heading to get "more money". :0)

My speculation and opinion based on the APC.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 2:17 said:
If Bobcat didn't want people to SA her statements, she should never have done it to others.

Don't dish it out if you can't take it, ladies.



So Anonymous at 2:17 is a man....

jmo

Anonymous said...

No, Nic, I'm a woman.

You're so bad at this, troll. JMO IMO IMHO MOO!!!!!

Nic said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jenny said...

Thanks, Nic!

Your speculations make sense. I've come to appreciate someone here making sense!

Nic said...

As reported in the Affidavit of Probable Cause for Amanda Blackburn:


November 10th

3:30 - Donae Mitchell says Gordon, Watson, Taylor leave her apartment

4:30 - Searsbrook wakes up and notices phone missing

4:36 - APC report says 5756 San Clemente burglary happens at this time

4:36 - 6567 (Gordon) calling 0147

4:40 - 6567 (Gordon) with 0802 (Donae Mitchell?) @ E. 56th St. and I-465

5:23 - Searsbrook (San Clemente) calls 911

5:36 - camera @ 2830 Sunnyfield disabled

6:00 - DB leaves for gym

6:25 - 6567 (Gordon) pings Sunnyfield Court

(?) - CI reports Taylor calls Gordon

6:36 - First ATM attempt - failed

6:38 - 7125 (Taylor) pings Sunnyfield Court

6:39 - Gordon pings tower near 6881 N. Michigan Rd.

6:40/45 - gunshots heard/what sounded like a woman scream by Tank Jones

6:54 - tower pings 1313 W. 85th St.

6:54 - Second ATM transaction

( ..) Townsel (2804) sees stranger at his driveway

7:05 - Knox sees a man walking north from her court in black

7:10 - cell phone moves back to 2812 Sunnyfield

7:10/ll - Huddleson sees Taylor picked-up in the Chrysler (verified by surveillance camera)

7:10 - Davey Blackburn leaves gym

7:30 - Davey Blackburn reports arriving home and sits in driveway to continue cell phone conversation

7:30 - 8:35 concerned citizen reports Sebring appearing at Rockwood Avenue

7:53 - Chase bank calls and leaves voicemail

8:17- Allison Becker called 911 (to report second burglary)

8:20 - Davey Blackburn says he enters house

8:22 - Davey Blackburn calls 911

8:30 - IFD 12 requests police department to respond for “a possible assault”

8:44 - officers arrive as Amanda is being “carted” from the home; officers “clear” the home, only other person found is Weston

9:0a - officer responded to hospital to investigate “nature” of Amanda’s injuries


November 11

7:55 - Amanda declared dead

10:28 - stolen Chrysler Sebring found


November 12

10:00 - Amanda’s autopsty

10:45 - search warrant obtained to search Sebring

1:04PM - subpoena results with photographs of ATM activities


November 17th

CODIS hit on pink sweater - Watson


November 19th

Taylor interviewed by LE


November 21st

LE interviewed a “cooperating individual”

Nic said...

Am I late on this? Watson's cell number is 0802. Donae Mitchell was found in possession of it by LE after the murder at her address.

E. 56th St. and I-465 is around the corner from Donae Mitchell's address.

DM's address and the first robbery are appx. a 6 minute walk from each other.

My point being, maybe that's why things are so "muddy" 4:36am and 4:40am.

Hey Jude said...

Nic, thanks for the timeline - you are upsetting someone at 1.58 - seems you might know what you are talking about. :)

Nic said...

Hey Jude, it does appear that way. :0) I'm just pulling information from the Probable Cause and being practical about my thoughts and opinions.

Note that according to Taylor's cell phone record, he was not at the first robbery. So anything the CI says about him being there is a lie. In fact, the stills taken from the first robbery says "three" -- but then references "two were definitely inside the residence and the third was either just inside or at the doorway to the apartment." So is the third figure a shadow or a person? Or a partial image? Could the third person have been the person who lived there? jmo

Donae Mitchell said they (Taylor, Gordon, Watson) left her place at 3:30, but according to the records, Taylor's phone doesn't even enter the "story" until 6:38am on Sunnyfield. So the CI's "story" about anything that Taylor supposedly did or said at the first two robberies, is a lie. (The second robbery being committed at 5:36.) He wasn't even there. Anything that that CI said about Taylor walking into the Blackburn residence (busting Amanda in the mouth)is a lie because according to his cell phone record, he didn't even arrive to Sunnyfield until Gordon and Watson had left with Amanda's debit card. So they either obtained it themselves by going into the Blackburn residence, or someone else emerged with the card for them. It wasn't Taylor.

Taylor is the fall guy. He was parachuted into the "story" and left there long enough to be seen by a rousing street/neighbourhood.

jmo

Nic said...

Note, too, based on what is reported by LE in the APC, Gordon and Watson are technically not at the second robbery, either. They (the phone) moves to Sunnyfield Court at 6:25 and then they leave (immediately) according to cell phone pings/google maps (time/distance) to get “more money”.
________

“The tower is located where the original burglary occurred at 5756 San Clemente."

Mobile records indicated 6567 was at the following locations on November 10th, 2015

At 4:40AM the phone was at E. 56th st. and I465. The burglary at 5756 San Clemente was at 4:36AM.

At 6:25AM the phone moved to a tower at 2812 Sunnyfield Court.

At 6:39AM, [it] moved to a tower near 6881 N. Michigan Road which was immediately after the failed ATM transaction.

At 6:54Am the phone moved near 1313 W. 86th St. which was the location of the successful ATM transaction..

The phone made five calls to 3175 from the time of the initial burglary until after the successful ATM transaction.

[Records show that phone 7125] was at 2812 Sunnyfield Court on November 10th, 2015 from 6:38AM to 7:15AM. The phone only communicates with 6567, which appears to move back toward the Sunnyfield address to pick up the person walking on Sunnyfield carrying 7125.

__________

Now I’m really curious. Who broke into 2830? :0)

jmo

Me2l said...

Hey Jude said...
Nic, thanks for the timeline - you are upsetting someone at 1.58 - seems you might know what you are talking about. :)
September 20, 2016 at 4:27 PM



Is that what it means when you and others get anywhere from upset to livid at a few who point out your inconsistencies? We're "upsetting" you, because we may know what we're talking about?

Anonymous said...

Me2I gets upset often

Anonymous said...

Nic said...

Note that according to Taylor's cell phone record, he was not at the first robbery.



Where are you getting that info? Where have you seen Taylor's full cell phone records?

The affidavit is explaining how police connected the dots and found the three perps: DNA hit leads to Watson. A snoop through Watson's friends leads to Gordon. Police get warrants for both their numbers. Phone records lead to Taylor's phone number. Warrant for Taylor's number reveals Taylor's phone at Blackburn home while the others where traveling to ATM.

They don't have to say in the affidavit that Taylor's phone records show he was at the other burglaries. Their primary concern would be the murder charges and showing probable cause for those charges. The burglaries are secondary.

They charged him with the burglaries, so the logical conclusion is they have proof his phone was there, too.

Me2l said...

Anonymous said...
Me2I gets upset often
September 20, 2016


That's projection, but you have it backwards. You get upset at me often. That's a more accurate statement.

Anonymous said...

The past few threads I've posted on, I've received "replies" where posters have either wrongly accused me of being another poster, or, have wrongly assumed/suggested I am part of whatever argument is going on amongst others. It is disappointing to be attacked in that way. I am sad that the type of people commenting on this once wonderful educational blog have changed so much.

Me2l said...

Well, join the crowd.

Opposing opinions are not well received here, and SA is used as a weapon on those who don't agree with the prevailing narrative.....it's always SA fail, however.

I will assume you're one who thinks opposing opinions mean disruption.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.

Anonymous said...

Me21
You are a nasty person. And your stuff doesn't add up.
I am anonymously posting because I don't want to get targeted by your endless drivel.

Me2l said...


Anonymous said...
Me21
You are a nasty person. And your stuff doesn't add up.
I am anonymously posting because I don't want to get targeted by your endless drivel.
September 20, 2016 at 7:03 PM



Aside from being a nasty person, yourself, you're also a hypocrite.

Be truthful. You're posting anonymously, because you want to be nasty to me without revealing your user name. And make no mistake about it, you are a nasty person who can't tolerate being questioned.



Anonymous said...

No, I don't want you to know my user name! Lol

Anonymous said...

Do you have a question?

Me2l said...

I know you don't.

I don't want to know it.

Anonymous said...

"I am sad that the type of people commenting on this once wonderful educational blog have changed so much."

You can thank Me2l for the unwelcome changes. She hasn't learned to disagree without being disagreeable.

Me2l said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Me2l said...

That's said from a skewed perspective. It doesn't matter how I disagree; it's a matter of just disagreeing, period. This bunch can't stand it....and it's not only from me. I've noticed that often.

For instance, you instigated a confrontation with me yet again. You do it often then whine about what a meany I am.

Sniveler

Anonymous said...

Ya think it might be time to get out of the house dude?! Wtf!

Me2l said...

Dude, I've been out of the house all day. You probably should take your own dude advice, dude.

Anonymous said...

Suuuure you have. Lol. Do you remember what outside looks like? There are birds and trees and sky. Did you see any birds today? Was it raining or sunny?

Bad Juju said...

Anonymous@7:44,

That's a giant load of BS.

The atmosphere at this blog changed dramatically right after Amanda's murder. I posted here anonymously for a couple of years with no problem; however, once this case started, folks were all over me, being rude as hell and accusing me of being Davey, etc. every time I opened my mouth. Choosing a user name helped a little bit, but my opinions still have not been well-tolerated by the regulars.

I've been ripped to shreds a number of times (when Me2l wasn't even around), and nobody ever gives a hoot. The righteous indignation about Me2l is so freaking ridiculous and phony.

I've said all this before. I'm not sure why I'm wasting my breath again.

Just stop the hypocritical, double-standard BS.

Me2l said...

It took me a while to understand that give and take of ideas while discussing is simply not tolerated.

I love the "you're Davey/Meg/Perry/etc" approach. So much for competent SA skills.

It's lockstep all the way.

Anonymous said...

Please hold all ranting.

Is it in any of the thugs prior MO's to tie up or duct tape a victim?

Amanda was RESTRAINED (or "Surrendered" as DB likes to say)

The CI stated that Jalen exited 2812 Sunnyfield, came to the car parked at 2830 Sunnyfield, and told Diano that there was a woman (Amanda Blackburn) inside and Larry busted her in the mouth with his gun. Diano and Jalen discussed leaving, but then Larry walked to the car and threw a couple of cards in the car.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/291143533/Affidavit-of-Probable-Cause-in-Amanda-Blackburn-Case

This was all after DB had "left" for the gym.

So...Amanda has been busted in the mouth, and all three thugs are chatting three houses away. Why didn't Amanda take this opportunity to call 911?

She couldn't. She was restrained.

Thoughts?

Anonymous said...

Off Topic: Oh my God! Angelina and Brad Pitt getting divorced! I am devastated!!!

Nic said...

They charged him with the burglaries, so the logical conclusion is they have proof his phone was there, too.

I agree that they don't have to reveal all in the APC, but I disagree about the "logical conclusion" your presuming. If Taylor was at the first robbery why not reveal so with his cell phone record? They're eluding to it (third person just out of the frame). He was charged with the crime, so why conceal/omit the fact his phone proves he was there? If Taylor (or Gordon or Watson,) was at the 2nd robbery, why conceal that fact, too? Why is it their phone "moves" to that location at 6:25 and Taylor appears at 6:38? From where did Taylor travel to get there? Gordon and Watson move from DM's vicinity to Sunnyfield.

The DNA hit on Watson (via the pink sweater), not Taylor. DNA swabs were taken at the second robbery but the APC does not reveal that anything hit on any of them. Just like LE initially suspected Amanda was raped, but no charges were laid... because there was no hit.

I'm just pointing out what LE put in the APC. If it isn't mentioned, it doesn't mean it was omitted and therefore the "logical conclusion" is that it happened. If the evidence incriminates them, then there is no reason for it not to appear. It only strengthens LE's case.

I will add that without the "CI's" hearsay, there isn't anything incriminating the three of them in Amanda's murder except Watson and Gordon being in possession of Amanda's debit card. They were in the neighbourhood before Taylor, so did they go in to the Blackburn residence or did someone else give them the card? Could there be a fourth (connected to the 2830 robbery and Blackburn residence?) It appears so.

The immediate neighbour (between the Blackburn's and the Tank Jones) had surveillance footage of that morning which LE took. It isn't mentioned in the APC. It will be interesting to see what it reveals come the hearing/s.

jmo

Anonymous said...

Or incapacitated / almost-fatally shot already?

There was duct tape on the floor beside Amanda according to the Affidavit - which is another reason why Davey's "I thought something had gone horrifically wrong with uh, the pregnancy" story and "had no idea someone had been in my house" stories are complete horse shit. Duct tape, furniture turned over, shirt pulled up, underwear off - how the hell does he think anyone is fooled by his ever changing stories?

I don't put the greatest amount of stock in Natasha Tank Jones saying she heard two gunshots and what sounded like a woman scream at 6:40-6:45am. If she did hear two gunshots (she told IMPD she did) and we know there were three gunshots and three bullets recovered, when was the third shot. Was it with silencer - when did it happen?

Anonymous said...

Oh my God how is this possible? I feel like my head is spinning! How can this be happening? Brad said he loved her and was proud of her and she said Brad is such a great Dad and we have special "me time" and they adopted all those kids and they had Shylo together and Angelina directed all those movies and Brad was a great family and what the f&ck is going on?!?!-

Anonymous said...

Off topic -
I, too, am sad because of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt splitting up. I hate it the most for their children because they were so thrilled that they were finally getting married and looked so happy and nice in that People magazine photo spread.

Me2l said...

This isn't responding to what I assume to be the main point of your post (restraining), but if this had been a hired hit, why would it be reported to the others that there was "a woman inside", as if they were surprised by that?

It doesn't exactly sound like a murder for hire.

Anonymous said...

Appearances can be deceiving - both Angelina and Brad AND Davey and Amanda, so it seems.

Nic said...

^^ What I mean is whatever is on the surveillance footage is not mentioned in the APC.

Anonymous said...

This is way more important than this stupid case! Have some respect for a friggin minute!

Anonymous said...

@Me2I - unless they were playing along with "the story", playing innocent?

Me2l said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Me2l said...

"The CI stated that Jalen exited 2812 Sunnyfield, came to the car parked at 2830 Sunnyfield, and told Diano that there was a woman (Amanda Blackburn) inside and Larry busted her in the mouth with his gun. Diano and Jalen discussed leaving, but then Larry walked to the car and threw a couple of cards in the car.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/291143533/Affidavit-of-Probable-Cause-in-Amanda-Blackburn-Case"


When I read that description, I get the distinct impression they were surprised by Amanda's presence, which would take the air out of the murder for hire theory.

Anonymous said...

I could always tell they were miserable together. Brad's full of himself and Angelina's cuckoo. Bad combo.

She needs someone whackier and not as "into himself",,,,,someone like Billy Bob. Brad needs a mirror...he's way in love with himself. Angelina needs "wild" guy. Brad needs lighthearted and someone who wont steal his thunder like Jennifer Aniston. Jmo. Brad's immature and kinda lame imo. Fake.

Anonymous said...

Brad is too serious.

Anonymous said...

Brad IS too serious...I wouldnt want him. Angelina is ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL...she needs someone whacky cause she's very uptight. There was no ying/yang balance in that couple imo imho imhho

Anonymous said...

Brad IS too serious...I wouldnt want him. Angelina is ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL...she needs someone whacky cause she's very uptight. There was no ying/yang balance in that couple imo imho imhho

Anonymous said...

There was no ying:yang. 2 uptight actors. Uptight+uptight= Uptight= 2 devastated actors and 6 sad kids. SHAME ON BOTH OF YOU!!!!

Anonymous said...

So uptight

1 Both thought they are God's gift
2 Thought they were saving the world
3 Directed serious movies
4 Lived in "snotty" Paris
5 Never ate/too skinny

Nic said...

@ Me21

From APC (CI's hearsay)
They decided they wanted more money. Larry Taylor walked to 2812 Sunnyfield Court and opened the unlocked front door. Taylor and Watson entered the front door. Gordon waited at the Chrysler Sebring, which was parked int he driveway at 2830 Sunnyfield Court. Watson later exited the house and came to the car. Watson said there was a woman inside and Taylor busted her in the mouth with his gun. They discussed leaving but then Taylor walked to the car and thew a couple of cards in the car.
[...]
Watson drove to an ATM on Michigan Road, with Gordon in the car as well. Taylor called Gordon’s phone. Gordon handed the phone to Watson. Watson discussed numbers with Taylor and Watson attempted a transaction, but it did not work. Watson drove to another ATM on 86th St. Watson walked tot he ATM and withdrew money. Watson and Gordon were gong to leave Taylor but he threatened to kill the woman if the left him.

________

Notice there is no mention of gunshots. i.e., the hearsay doesn't match what the neighbour said she supposedly heard, and the CI says he heard Taylor "threaten" to kill "the woman" if they left him.

IMO, *if* Taylor was in the house, (or Gordon or Watson,) this statement confirms what is known: Amanda was alive. Whoever the CI's informant is, they knew she was alive.

I have always believed that the three of them being on that cul de sac was about making Amanda's killing look random. IMO, none of them were dispatched to murder Amanda, imo they were dispatched with the intention to incriminate them/make it look like they did it.

Aside from DB's, Amanda's, and Weston's, family DNA in that house, what else would point to an intruder? An unknown's DNA. Did they find any? i.e., in the kitchen, on Amanda's wallet/contents. It'll be interesting to hear the evidence, won't it?


Anonymous said...

IMO, *if* Taylor was in the house, (or Gordon or Watson,) this statement confirms what is known: Amanda was alive. Whoever the CI's informant is, they knew she was alive.

I have always believed that the three of them being on that cul de sac was about making Amanda's killing look random. IMO, none of them were dispatched to murder Amanda, imo they were dispatched with the intention to incriminate them/make it look like they did it.



Taylor remarked that he did not want a speedy trial - could this be why?

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 9:25 said:
Or incapacitated / almost-fatally shot already?


Yes. That's what I'm thinking.

jmo

Anonymous said...

Here's an integrated timeline.

http://case-discussions.blogspot.com/2016/09/timeline-of-events-surrounding.html

There are still some holes to fill.

I'll update as needed, but not before tomorrow.

Anonymous said...

And Amanda doesn't seem like the type who would've "charged" at a burglar. Taylor supposedly shot her because she was charging at him and he wanted to avoid being scratched. Really?

We don't know where Weston was while all of this was going on (asleep in his crib after a decent dose of Zyrtec or Benadryl, perhaps) - but wherever Weston was, Amanda most likely would have run toward him to protect him- running away from an intruder - not charging toward the intruder which would escalate the situation?

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 9:55,

I assume the reason why Taylor didn't want to be fast tracked is because he knows there is nothing linking him to Amanda's murder.

Have Watson and Gordon been given the opportunity to plea, yet? I can't imagine they would want to be fast tracked, either.

Anonymous said...

All this has been discussed ad friggin nauseum.

Trudy said...

Good question, Bocat. The autopsy did not reveal any marks from restraints or duct tape residue, did it? Yet if all three of the perps were out of the house at the same time why didn't Amanda take the opportunity to lock the door and call 911? She must have been restrained.

BUT. If she was restrained after being hit in the mouth, how could she subsequently "charge" or "scratch" LT?

And If she was restrained, why was she, later, unrestrained? Why not leave her tied up?

It doesn't make sense. Perhaps the CI is a liar? Is the CI's account an attempt to place most of the blame on Taylor for the robbery and murder? Eg. According to the CI, Watson and Gordon "received" rather than actively stole the credit cards. According to the CI, Watson and Gordon were not present when Amanda was shot. According to the CI, Watson and Gordon actually tried to save Amanda's life, because they went back to get Taylor ONLY because Taylor threatened to kill her.

Bad Juju said...

I think Amanda was already shot and dying when Taylor was threatening to kill her if the other guys left him ... if indeed what Taylor told the CI - and what the CI told the police - is accurate. The shots heard by the witness coincide with shortly after failed ATM transaction. I think he killed her right after the phone call about the failed transaction. The other two might have known that.




Sometimes guilty murderers don't want a speedy trial because they need plenty of time to defend themselves against the ton of evidence against them.

If Taylor thought there was no evidence against him, he would have wanted to get the trial over with and get out of jail instead of rotting away there all this time.

Anonymous said...

It's a conundrum, but also nice to have all the "stories" side by side, in one place.

Is it just me, or did Davey's website just disappear?

Anonymous said...

Never mind. It's still there.

Anonymous said...

Oh my God what a deep discussion, a carousel
spinning around and around discussing
the same crap over and over!
Give it a rest.
Not one person has said one
NEW thing.
Wtf
This is stupid.

Go outside
And get some
Fresh air
Yes, there is a place
Called
Reality.

Try going there
Instead of Cyberreality
Give it a rest.

Bad Juju said...

To add to my comment above,the CI statement seems to try hard to make Gordon and Watson ... particularly Gordon ... appear blameless in her death. I'm not so sure they didn't know she was shot shortly after the failed transaction, but they took the "dead" woman's money anyway, essentially sealing the deal on them being guilty of a felony that involved a murder (which is why they're charged with murder). Gordon and Watson wouldn't want to admit to that part.

Trudy said...

A CI is just a fancy name for a snitch. A snitch is someone who gives information to LE in return for reduced charges or immunity. I wonder just how truthful/accurate a snitch is. Is it Alonzo Bull? Was he there? He appears, at the very least, to be an accessory after the fact, yet he has not been charged.

Nic said...

Bobcat, that is a lot of work you've done documenting Amanda's case. Thank you. I was looking everywhere for DB's statement that Taylor was the guy that " actually pulled the trigger on Amanda..." How would he know this unless he was there?


The only thing that stands out to me in your timeline is the way the cell phones move. For a long time I couldn't figure out why Taylor's phone "suddenly" appeared at Sunnyfield at 6:38. I was making the assumption that he was at the first (and second) robbery. But that's not what is documented in the APC. Also, LE documents Gordon's phone as "moving" from place to place. The phone doesn't move from DM's vicinity to Sunnyfield until 6:25. I tapped out the movements as reported and the discrepancy revealed between the third-party GPS timestamp said and what the CI reported being told is really interesting. Although, the way the APC is written up, it isn't easy to follow.

This is speculation on my part. The 3175 calls happen five times. Could they be the five "pins":

4:40 (after first burglary)
6:25 (in possession of Amanda's debit card)
6:39 failed ATM transaction
6:54 successful ATM transaction
7:10 departing Sunnyfield

Coincidentally, 7:10 is when DB reports "jumping" on the phone with his friend and leaves the gym "to shower" at home.
____________

Has LE ever requested DB's cell phone records, i..e, confirmed that DB was on the phone with KW from 7:10 to appx. 8:20? Would they be allowed to ask for it seeing as how LE "cleared" DB almost immediately?

jmo

Anonymous said...

I think Diano was the CI. He talked but then he stopped talking, and ended up being charged with murder after Larry and Jalen.

Anonymous said...

Nic, I don't know what LE has requested.

What I find more interesting is the time window between 4:30 and 6:00 where DB is sitting on his couch... And the coinciding huge time gap between Jacola waking up and calling 911.

Thanks for all of your added details as well! I'll fit ones that are discovered into the timeline asap.

Anonymous said...

Oh yes Bobcat (I mean Me2l) thank you for your hard work assembling all these facts and pretending to be Nic and many others. Youre so clever. NOT.

Anonymous said...

Bobcat (I mean Me2l) you wrote

"What I find more interesting is the time window between 4:30 and 6:00 where DB is sitting on his couch... And the coinciding huge time gap between Jacola waking up and calling 911."

What is interesting about that? Can you be more specific?

2 unrelated events: Davey sitting on his couch and Jacola waking up in a different house!

There is nothing interesting about that.
You seem like nothing but a BS artist at this point.

Really, before "Nic" chimes in and congratulates you for your "observation" plz answer the question. Wtf is interesting about that?

Trudy said...

Anon @ 11:10 pm. You are just weird. GTFO.

Bobcat and Nic, thank you for the timelines. They are a great help to me.

Nic said...

Yes, she wakes up at 4:30 and there are stills of strangers in her house. !! My screams would be waking up the apartment complex, but that's just me.

DB reports only spend some time on the bible he doesn't get into detail about how he used up the rest of the time.

LE hasn't reported on what was on the immediate neighbour's surveillance camera. That will be an interesting reveal.

Anonymous said...

Are they "Trudy"? Are they a "big help" to you? A big help with what?! Are you an FBI agent with all your case files spread out in front of you and Me2l (aka Bobcat's) timeline is going to help you solve the case. Trudy how are they a big help to you?

Nic said...

She wakes up at 4:30am, stills caught on Jacola's security at 4:36! Yikes! And she doesn't call 911 until 5:23AM.

Anonymous said...

Nic, Wtf does what you just said mean? What is the coherent message you want people to understand from what you just wrote?!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 10:06pm wrote
All this has been discussed ad friggin nauseous.

it shouldn't bother anyone who is innocent or isn't motivated to "protect" Davey if we discuss it until the cows come home. Why does it matter what we discuss. One can certainly feel free to NOT read this blog if they are weary of the discussion.

Anonymous said...

Nic, Wasnt Jacola being raped? Does that factor in to the amount of time she would take to call 911, or does your "special" detective unit have some inside info?

Anonymous said...

Anon 1127, Oh I am very weary of reading it, and you dont have to develop a cuckoo fantasy that I am Davey's minion, I just couldnt resist pointing out how ludicrous this "discussion" involving ONE hydra has become.

Nic said...

It's an appx. 25 min drive from DM's vicinity to Sunnyfield. Gordon and Watson ping at 6:25. So if these events are accurate, DB and Gordon and Watson head out at the same time.

That's three coincidental time stamps!

4:30, 6:00 and 7:10.

Wow, what are the odds?

Bad Juju said...

Trudy,

That "weird" anon is ABB et al. She's mentaly ill.




Nic,

Maybe she had drugs or other illegal possessions to get out of her apartment before she could call. Even just a little pot ... she wouldn't want to call police with something like that in the house. Maybe she didn't pay a parking ticket and was worried she might have a warrant. It could be a number of things.

Bobcat said...

Jacola was not raped.

Or very disturbed by the incident, apparently.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Jtg_A2-ogsM/V-H9ZGx8O2I/AAAAAAAAAj0/_qupsyJDNKYQEhyhOLDaQ3gO403JqRyLgCLcB/s1600/jacola.jpg

Would you like the transcripts? I've got them.

Trudy said...

Anon @ 11:16 You don't deserve an answer, you rude POS, but it isinteresting because: CD gets up at 4:30 am because it's his " long day", then proceeds to do jack shit for an hour and a half.

Jacola wakes up at 4:30 am, discovers she has been robbed and does jack shit about it for almost an hour. She was not sexually assaulted.

It is an anomaly. Therefore it is interesting. Nobody is even hypothesizing what it means, yet. Perhaps you'd like to suggest something? On second thoughts, just fuck off.

Anonymous said...

Bad Juju, Thats brilliant! About the parking ticket! Youre super smart!

Bad Juju said...

Suck it, ABB.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 11:28,

No.

4:40AM cellphone records put 6567 with 0802 @ E. 56th St. and I-465, 0802 remains stationary according to phone records

APC states 0802 was not present at any robberies or the murder.

Anonymous said...

Jacola REALLY does not seem disturbed at all. Yes please, I would like to see the transcripts ! I've seen nothing of her interviews or statements until now.

The screen caps speak volumes already. The conspiracy theorist in me would say that Jacola knows at least one of the three in custody, Donae and Alonzo, and maybe Natasha Tank Jones too.

53 minutes before calling 911 ! Creating a pattern of seemingly random burglaries. I agree with the poster who said their screams would've been heard throughout the apartment complex if they saw intruders on camera - mine too.

Anonymous said...

Trudy, You are a friggin cuckoo puff

Your "anomaly" is meaningless bc there is no connection between Davey and Jacola! Do you need a dictionary to understand what "anomaly" means because you dont understand.

Davey doing jack shit and Jacola's delay in calling are not anomalies and they are not connected to each other, so try again Trudy.

Nic said...

Bad Juju,

Jacola's 911 call (5:23) coincides with 2830's security camera being disabled (5:26). What the residences are suppose to have in common are Taylor, Gordon and Watson. But Gordon and Watson don't ping on Sunnyfield until 6:25; technically they are still in DM's vicinity until appx. 6:00AM (per Google maps time/distance).

It's like 2830 calling 911 literally minutes before DB does. Again, they are suppose to have Taylor, Gordon and Watson in common (per the charges) but Gordon and Watson didn't ping before 6:25 on Sunnyfield - 59 minutes later than when 2830 was being broken into.

Anonymous said...

No I wouldnt like to see the transcripts of anything cause the "detectives" here are nutjobs.

Conspiracy theories involving Jacola? Please dont share them!

You are a crazy HYDRA!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

So, what are you proposing "Nic"? How about you say it in plain English buddy instead of all those coordinates and crap?

Nic said...

The CI said Taylor wanted to kill Jacola because "he was seen on camera". It'll be interesting to see what the stills/video reveal. In the APC, LE say "two were definitely inside the residence and the third was either just inside or at the doorway to the apartment."

Trudy said...

Sigh. Nobody said they were connected, stupid.

Stop chasing your stumpy tail.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of "anomaly", or perhaps you don't think anomalies are interesting. You asked why it was interesting. Read my comment again.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 11:57,

Based on the cell phone records/phone movements presented in the APC, I'm proposing that there is a fourth accomplice.

Anonymous said...

No, you dont think there is a fourth accomplice. Youre just dragging the discussion out trying to make it last as long as possibly can. Why are you doing that?

Anonymous said...

If only
Someone
Would explain why
Davey's story has changed so much lately compared to what he said to Detective Perkins that very morning of November 10th, when his memory should have been the most fresh.

Nobody can explain why.

But this completely changing story (not just details being added or omitted) does not indicate fuzzy memories or being in a cloud or a fog, but trying to either obscure the truth or cover for what wasn't done that morning.

Great detail was given to Detective Perkins - detail indicating that Davey saw things in his house that didn't belong, that his wife had been assaulted, that there had been a disturbance in the living room while he was at the gym and talking on the phone on the driveway. He knew Weston and Mel didn't create the scene into which he walked that morning.

WHY WHY WHY has he been saying he had no idea someone was in his house? Why has he said his first thought was that something had gone wrong with Amanda's pregnancy?

This has been asked fifty times and not yet answered once.

Anonymous said...

Why have you asked it 50 times when you know noone here knows the answer. You have deliberately lengthened this discussion FAR beyond the natural point it would have stopped? Why have you done that?

Anonymous said...

Because within that answer lies the truth. The discussion could be ended immediately if Davey or someone close to him would answer why. We know he reads here.

Nic said...

The only thing DB said "should not be in their residence" regards to the crime scene, was the Swisher Sweet cigar package found on the kitchen counter.

It is interesting to note that the only thing DB references to "shouldn't be" in the house is the cigar package. It would be interesting to hear whether that is DB's language or LE's. Because if it was DB's, then we have to take him at his word. i.e., Anything and everyone else in the house that morning was suppose to be there.

Anonymous said...

Would anyone care to comment on why his story- his version of events, what he saw and what he thought had happened - would change so drastically from what he told Detective Perkins when they talked that morning?

Anonymous said...

No "Anon" that's not why youve lengthened the conversation. I know why you have though. Would you like me to tell you why?

Anonymous said...

Davey says he had NO IDEA someone had been in his house -

How can he say that even once, much less repeat it over and over- after walking in and finding everything scattered around and Amanda "in the condition she was in"?

Amanda didn't pull up her own shirt, take off her own underwear, shoot herself three times (once in the back of the head), put the Swisher Sweets package on the counter, throw earbuds and duct tape and credit cards and her wallet around. CLEARLY someone had been there.

WHY is he saying he had no idea?

Nic said...

Something else - what was (not) taken from the Blackburn residence (2812 Sunnyfield):

Collen Clark reviewed the recovered bank cards and there was not a Chase debit card among them. Clark also processed the burglary scene at 2830 Sunnyfield Court. The investigation also revealed that also taken from the residence was a Macbook Pro in a blue book bag with two books inside

So the only thing taken from the Blackburn residence was the debit card.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 12:19

Billy Jean Dunn did the exact same thing. My impression is, If they change their story, it's because they feel there is a need to change it. I can count on one hand how many video's I've listened to. So I can't say for sure his story has changed significantly or often. Do you see a correlation between what he says, analysis and then changes? From what I've read/heard, his story has been pretty consistent. It's his use of some words that have changed. i.e., gym clothes became gym bag.

Trudy said...

I'm not sure where you're going there, Nic. The blue book bag with the MacBook pro and two books inside, was taken from the residence. They have not been recovered.

Anonymous said...

THIS is a perfect example

One of your hydra heads wrote

Davey says he had NO IDEA someone had been in his house -

How can he say that even once, much less repeat it over and over- after walking in and finding everything scattered around and Amanda "in the condition she was in"?

Amanda didn't pull up her own shirt, take off her own underwear, shoot herself three times (once in the back of the head), put the Swisher Sweets package on the counter, throw earbuds and duct tape and credit cards and her wallet around. CLEARLY someone had been there.

WHY is he saying he had no idea?"

You are way too intelligent for this shit to even be keeping your attention...a question like that "Why did he say he has no idea?!" "Why did he tell Detective Perkins one thing and then blah blah blah?" To ask these things a hundred times like you're just stupefied and fascinated by them?! You are not! You are lengthening this discussion because this is your connection with me, and you dont want to stop talking to me.

Trudy said...

Maybe it was because Tuesday evenings used to be family night. Amanda was vigilant about keeping them sacred. She would never let us schedule anything on our calendar for Tuesday nights. After LONG DAYS pouring out to people on Sunday, pushing through the Monday spiritual hang-over coupled with a late-night leadership meeting, and writing all day Tuesdays, Tuesday nights were the first time in 3 days we were able to take a breath. To slow time down and just be a family."

Interesting. It sounds like Davey's long days were Sunday and Monday. Not Tuesday. Tuesday's he spends all day writing. Sounds pretty cruisey to me. Why get up at 4:30 if he just spends the whole day writing?

Question: Did CD have a late night leadership meeting on the Monday night? (9th Nov) How late is late? Did he see Amanda put Weston to bed at 8:00pm and then go out again?

Anonymous said...

Im SO glad we put our heads together guys! Look at all the pieces of this puzzle we have gathered.

Pop tarts
Lefthanded
Snorer
Long Day
Anomaly

We are close to cracking the case! Great work guys! Special thanks to Me2l!!!

Trudy said...

CD said he got up at 4:30 am BECAUSE it was his long day. According to his blog, however, he spent all day writing on Tuesdays. His reason for getting up @4:30am on the morning of Amanda's murder does not hold much water. The only things he did on his "long day" Tuesday's, were: read the Bible, go to the gym for a work out, chat onthe phone with KW, write, and relax with family. That's more like a day off than a long day.

So why does he give a (bogus) excuse for being up at 4:30am on the morning of his wife's murder?

Trudy said...

Anon @ 1:40

Did you already know that CD blogged that he spent ALL DAY on Tuesdays, just writing? Of course you didn't you loud mouthed troll.

SM. It's ok. Don't worry.

Nic said...

Trudy,

I took the information about the Macbook Pro from the Affidavit. That was a direct quote. The reference to the Macbook Pro follows mention of investigation of 2830 Sunnyfield Court. Does DB reference missing his computer? I always thought a computer was stolen from the Blackburn residence; but it appears in the APC it was the neighbour's whose was stolen.

From the Affidavit of Probable Cause for Amanda Blackburn:

Collen Clark reviewed the recovered bank cards and there was not a Chase debit card among them. Clark also processed the burglary scene at 2830 Sunnyfield Court. The investigation also revealed that also taken from the residence was a Macbook Pro in a blue book bag with two books inside.

Anonymous said...

Nic,

That is a conundrum. By the way it's written, it's hard to be sure which residence the Macbook Pro was taken from.

Anonymous said...

There is a U-Stor facility near 56th & Guion.

Does anyone know where Resonate keeps their stage equipment during the week?

Bingo3 said...

Thanks Nic for all of your hard work on the timeline. Very interesting. The time of the robberies on the cul de sac were immediately pegged by a judge on Fox News as suspicious. The long ride all the way to Sunnyfield to target only two houses (one that those involved seemed to know was going to be empty) was very suspect. Now we have a timeline that doesn't support the CI reports. Hmmmm.

mom2many said...

Count V clearly describes the laptop and books as the Blackburns'.

Anonymous said...

"Trudy said...

I'm not sure where you're going there, Nic. The blue book bag with the MacBook pro and two books inside, was taken from the residence. They have not been recovered.

September 21, 2016 at 12:36 AM"



How do you know they have not been recovered? Please provide a link. Thanks.

Nic said...

Video: Terry Curry, Marion County Prosecutor:
Today, charges of murder, and felony murder, and multiple counts of burglary, robbery, theft and other charges has been filed against Larry Taylor Jr., he is charged with the knowing or intentional killing of Amanda Blackburn as well as uh, two counts of felony murder. In addition, Jalen Watson has been charged with felony murder and likewise multiple counts of burglary, robbery, theft an-and other charges. The first significant break was a, um, a DNA CODIS hit, uh, that tied Mr. Watson to what was believed to be the, uh, sweater or t-shirt that covered the face of the individual who was utilizing the bank card of Amanda Blackburn.

Video: Rick Hite, Indianapolis Police Chief:
The detective worked tirelessly without sleep. Long hours. He put in a lot of time to make sure we bring justice. But not just in this case, there are other cases still pending. As we were talking about the, uh, th-the success of the prosecutor’s office, there have been 34 cases, murder cases they have brought forward. And there are several more in the hopper. We want people to understand, we are serious about bringing back the issue of peace and tranquility to our neighbourhoods.

_______

Serious enough to railroad three men in the Amanda Blackburn murder? Which is more important, the success of the prosecutor's office or prosecuting the right criminal? If the death penalty is on the table, LE should have at least worked to properly clear DB, rather than just accept the gym video and a cell phone conversation he said he had in the driveway as "indisputable evidence”.

"A murder conviction in Indiana holds a 45 to 60 year prison sentence - with some perpetrators getting life in prison or the death penalty."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3401143/Third-man-charged-murder-shooting-death-pastor-s-pregnant-wife-faces-lesser-counts-two-home-invasions.html#ixzz4Ktpjj2pB

I really hope defence goes for the glory and finish what IPD didn't even start in the first place.

Anon "I" said...

I've been thinking about Amanda. It's been said that some think that she was
possibly going to leave CD. For as conservatively religious that she was, I
don't believe she would have. I get the concern for Weston, but I feel she
would have looked for CD to change with abiding faith. She was probably naive
as to the cruel acts that CD used with her and life in general. She likely
was never instructed in what danger and deception might truly look like and
she was likely quite sheltered from wicked people. She might not have had
any possible concept of how manipulative and evil people can be and openly
trusted everyone. It's possible that she became aware of something that CD
was doing and was putting pressure on him to change.

I don't think of them as wound as tightly as the Duggars in religion, but the
attitude towards marriage might have been similar. The Duggar wife who is back
with her sister-molesting, prostitute-procuring/abusing, and general scum was
coerced into saving their marriage. It was likely never on her list of options
to leave him and take the children AWAY, FAR AWAY! There may not have been a
spoken agreement to stay with Davey (other that original vows), but it is quite
possible that Amanda understood marriage as non-negotiable even if the husband
is CD. She took that vow before God.... For better or worse. I'm not saying
that I think it is right, just that her concept of marriage might have been
brain-washed to stay no matter what....

Anon "I" said...


Serious enough to railroad three men in the Amanda Blackburn murder? Which is more important, the success of the prosecutor's office or prosecuting the right criminal?
**************************************************

It depends on who is doing the asking and who is doing the answering.

I wonder if Taylor was the fall guy because he crossed the wrong gang
member.

Anonymous said...

Jacola transcript 1:

http://wishtv.com/2015/11/23/woman-burglarized-by-blackburn-suspects-still-shaken/

Jacola Searsbrook: (calm) “Woke up, looking for my phone to make sure that I get to work on time, and noticed that it was missing, and then when I came upstairs I noticed that the patio door was open...”

Reporter: She thought it was just a bunch of kids causing trouble.

JS: “Now the danger that they were that ruthless, and you know, were contemplating taking my life never really, you know, crossed my mind at the beginning, but then once that thing started getting connect, connected to the other one, I knew I was just, you know, a breath away from being alive.”

Reporter: Searsbrook says she had no idea that one of the suspects had thought about killing her until she learned about the details in the Probable Cause”

JS: It could have been a different story. Those two may have not been able to convince them if I had woken up.

Anonymous said...

Jacola transcript 2:

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/victim-my-life-was-just-a-conversation

Jacola Searsbrook shows no emotion.

JS: I just feel blessed that I was able to make it, uh, you know, through the whole ordeal. I feel like I definitely am the lucky one.

Reporter: Jacola hasn’t slept through the night since sleeping through that burglary.

JS: It’s just, just a scary feeling, just a scary feeling, just to know that you could have, you know, just been, a inch away from your own, you know, having my life being here for my kid…”

JS: My loss is not as great as theirs ‘cause my items, my items can be replaced. His wife and his future, you know, his baby, that can’t be replaced.

JS: What has gotten our youth to this to point, to where they feel like there is. It’s so hopeless that they can give up and take somebody’s life, destroy lives, and then give up theirs

Anonymous said...

Jacola Transcript 3

Video no longer available
http://www.wthr.com/clip/12026517/other-burglary-victim-learns-details-of-blackburn-murder

First response to probable cause:
JS: That, that’s just chill…that’s very, that’s very, that’s very chilling.

Larry Taylor was lifted over her locked back fence and then entered her apartment through an unlocked patio door.

JS: By the grace, I didn’t wake up, ‘cause I don’t. It probably would of ended a little bit different.”

After learning that Gordon and Watson talked Taylor out of shooting her:

JS: That is, hah, that is very, very chilling. That is very chilling.

Reporter: Men are in your bedroom debating whether or not to kill you.

JS moves head side-to-side (NO) and smiles.

JS: That’s, that’s beyond words.

#freethethugs!! said...

They've got the wrong criminals!!! The thugs are innocent this time!!! They might've raped and robbed and killed other victims, but not Amanda!!!

#railroaded #impdiswrong #freelarryjo #freejalen #freediano

#bobcatisahero said...

Jacola will wish she hadn't survived the ordeal once bobcat gets through with her!! Tear her up, bobcat!!! I hope you go after the rape victim again, too!!! You're our hero!!

#jacolawasinonit #bobcatsolvedit

Anonymous said...

Give it a rest, #posters at 5:09pm and 5:15pm

Anonymous said...

It'll be quiet tonight. It's youth night at Resonate.

Anonymous said...

Lol the minions will be occupied, then

Anonymous said...

Would Peter do statement analysis on this Jacola Searsbrook statement/transcript ?

Anonymous said...

This may sound disrespectful
But was Weston and unborn baby definitely
His child? Was he conceived naturally?

I have a great sixth sense
And when I have seen Davey
Doing his sermons
I get a vibe like
He does not sleep
With women.

At all.

It also seems strange that
Amanda's friend
Wrote in her story on Daveys blog
That supposedly Weston was conceived down
The hall from them in a hotel
How could this be pinpointed so easily?
They are in their 20's?

I cannot picture Davey sleeping
With a woman
At all.
Ever.
So is he for sure Weston and
Unborn baby's father?

She may have had to go to a sperm bank
Or infertility type impregnation

Anonymous said...

I doubt he would waste his time, anon @7:45.

Anonymous said...

Alonzo is Weston's real father. You heard it here first! I analyzed all of Alonzo's fb posts, and that's my conclusion.

Anonymous said...

The affidavit says Davey isn't Weston's father. Maybe not exactly, but it doesn't say Davey IS Weston's father, so that means he isn't. I learned that from Nic's School of Affidavit Analysis.

Anonymous said...

Good job, Anonymous at 8:10 pm. I've heard that's a very exclusive academy, and its founder trained for six whole months by reading this blog. She's well-known as one of the top analysts in her imagination.

Anonymous said...

I need to amend what I wrote:
They were probably his kids
But like I said I get a vibe off
Him like he never sleeps with a woman
The kids maybe were conceived with him
Being the father
But unnaturally at an
Infertility
Clinic.

This could explain when he said
"when you get that call from a doctor"
"when you get that bill".

Also when he tries to present himself like
He just cant wait till after dinner
It is a huge overcompensation.
But going on a sixth sense,
I do get a vibe like
He does not sleep with women
It is a really weird vibe.
I dont even get a vibe he sleeps with men.
It is a really weird vibe
Like I am not a psychologist
But it's like a vibe like any love/desire
Energy would be directed towards himself.

I can not picture him sleeping with a woman
At all
I am only picking up self-directed love/desire.

Sometimes with gay men though
Even when they are with their boyfriend or
Husband
My sixth sense picks up
Asexual energy
Or just self-directed love energy.
I dont know how to explain that?
Not with all gay men
But some.

Anonymous said...

^^^^ Clearly a student from Concerned's School of Annoying Line Breaks.

Anonymous said...

I would ask
Respectfully
That you pay more attention to my
Content
Than my presentation.

When I write
Like this it
Indicates
I am in a trance-like state
And uncovering deeper clues

I am serious
Real gays who love men give off a cuddly vibe
To women
Like a snuggly vibe.
Thats just a weird "energy"
Real gays give off
At least the nice ones
I know.
Other "gays" they give off a cold asexual vibe
Even with their husband
Why is that?
They often seem like they are enjoying
Some type of asexual worship
From their husband
I am getting all this info
From my sixth sense.

Me2l said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Me2l said...

September 21, 2016 at 8:33 PM
Anonymous said...
I would ask
Respectfully
That you pay more attention to my
Content
Than my presentation.

When I write
Like this it
Indicates
I am in a trance-like state
And uncovering deeper clues




As I understand SA, it doesn't require a trance-like state, leading to some sort of supernatural revelation but rather, it is a process whereby people innately reveal themselves through their words and statements.

Better go back to SA school, HISG

Anonymous said...

No, I am just sharing gut instincts I have that I hadnt previously shared. I cannot picture Davey sleeping with a woman or man. Yes, it's obvious he wants people to think he is attractive, but there is nothing "sexy" about him--he gives off a cold asexual vibe, even when he spouts words about how "insatiable" he is, it changes nothing about the cold asexual vibe. I would believe it if he had never slept with a woman (or man). But I definitely cant see him sleeping with a woman.

I also had commented that some gay men even when they are with their committed boyfriend or new husband...they seem to relate to their partner in a prudish, asexual way. But it is strange in terms of "energy" theres not that warmth or loving desiring vibe between many gay male couples Ive seen.
With Davey, there is a strong asexual vibe to the point where I would believe it if he and Amanda never consummated the marriage.
Weston may have been conceived w Davey's sperm at a fertility clinic.

Me2l said...

It's not unheard of for a gay male to be married to a woman, have sex with his wife, and conceive children.

Anonymous said...

Yes, we know.

The exception is the man who arranges to have his wife murdered.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 1945   Newer› Newest»