Thursday, September 22, 2016

Marion Cotillard Statement

In Deception Detection, we study words, not themes.  To learn advanced techniques, one must understand:  "I am not studying arson, nor am I studying murder, I am studying words."

This is important to remember as we take examples, not only from criminal cases, but in any public communication.  To limit it to criminal will hinder the professional analyst who may be employed in:

Analyzing Employment statements of "he said; she said" disputes that are common; 

Human Resource claims and counter claims. 

Statements with elements of relationship deception.  

At times, these words do reveal elements of Domestic Violence and child abuse.  There is a value in studying any communication that captures an audience's attention.  

To not study the words of athletes, celebrities and others in the news, is to miss an entire section of analysis that will be needed in advanced analysis. 

This is the statement of a French actress named, unofficially perhaps, as a 'corespondent' in a divorce case against actor Brad Pitt.

Why it is newsworthy will have to be explained by another.  Here, the media reported that the actress released a statement in which she  "denied an affair" with Pitt:  

This is going to be my first and only reaction to the whirlwind news that broke 24 hours ago and that I was swept up into. I am not used to commenting on things like this nor taking them seriously but as this situation is spiraling and affecting people I love, I have to speak up. 

Here we have a lengthy introduction by the subject.  She did not say "I didn't have an affair with Brad Pitt" which would have been short and it would have been strong. 

In the introduction, she calls being publicly named in an upcoming divorce as "whirlwind news", in her own subjective understanding of what this means.  

She further emphasized this with time:  "...broke 24 hour ago" which lets us know that she has had time to think about her statement for a day.  

Priority?  She wants us to know that she is not "used to commenting..." and that she doesn't "take seriously" these things. 

However, she used the small word "but" at this point:

She doesn't take these things "seriously", with the use of the word "serious", now set into a form of rebuttal by the word "but" here.  We should consider that this allegation is very "serious" to the subject.


As a actor, fortunes are made with publicity and in our current culture, any publicity is advantageous, which is why celebrities and publicists often create (and phone in) their own "intrusion" or event. 

" but as this situation is spiraling and affecting people I love, I have to speak up. "

She called the allegation a "situation", and used the word "this", making it psychologically, a "situation" that is very close or impactful upon her.  

She stated that the situation is "spiraling", that is, is kinetic and that this "spiraling" is, indeed, "affecting people."

If she did not have an affair with Pitt, why would this not only be "affecting" people, but with "spiraling", why would the impact be increasing?

Best is to write, "I didn't have an affair with Brad Pitt", leaving her without impetus or responsibility to write anything further. 

She needs to tell the public something because there is an ongoing, escalating impact upon "people" (plural), that she loves.  We now listen to hear who she introduces into the statement first. 

Firstly, many years ago, I met the man of my life, father of our son and of the baby we are expecting. He is my love, my best friend, the only one that I need. 

"Firstly" tells us that logical follow through is intended, yet the sentence is long (emotion).  What is "first" that the public is to know?

a.  Time 

it was "many years" that she met the "man"

b.  The man of her life, father of her son and baby, her love, her best friend, which all point to her, and not to the man.  This is how the man impacts her. 

Then notice the change introduced by one word when it comes to "need"; this man is the "only" one.  

The word "only" is called a 'dependent' word in Statement Analysis:  it works when another word (s) (thought representation) is present.  The man is compared to another who is not "needed."

This is a strong indication that the other man she is considering, is not the father of her children, was not met many years ago, and he is also someone she does not "need" in life.  

This sentence does not work unless she is thinking of another.  This is very close to an admission.  

Secondly to those who have indicated that I am devastated, I am very well thank you. 

She told us of a "spiraling" impact upon others, which has caused her to rebut her own norm and respond, yet she is, "very well thank you", which also, via additional language, tells us she is anything but.  

This crafted conversation isn't distressing. 

Here she reports what the conversation is not; that is, in the negative.  

And to all the media and the haters who are quick to pass judgment, I sincerely wish you a swift recovery.

Here she avoids issuing a denial, instead she has the need to insult those who want to know it is true by calling them "haters" who are "quick to pass judgement"; the judgment that she can answer, but avoids doing so.  

 Finally, I do very much wish that Angelina and Brad, both whom I deeply respect, will find peace in this very tumultuous moment. With all my love Marion Ceci

We note the order of the names, and we note the unnecessary emphasis of "both";
We note that the respect is said to be "deep" and that this "moment" is "very tumultuous" but she does not clarify for whom.  

Analysis Conclusion:

She does not deny having an affair with Pitt;  therefore, we cannot deny it for her. 

She gives indication of the need to persuade, while coming close to an actual admission via analysis.   When taken with the lack of denial, it becomes even stronger. 

The need to speak out comes from impact, while then denying the impact upon self, yet it is she, herself, who communicates.  

The subject also uses the Statement Analysis principle: "I love you" element of public declaration.  The need is to tell a world wide audience of her devotion to "only" one man.  She does not state devotion to one man, but "only" one man; herein lies the key.  The word "only" is unnecessary unless there is more than one man, and given the context of the announcement, it is Pitt.  

The relationship is in trouble. 


Anonymous said...

Peter your excellent analysis made me follow the structure of her words closely. I am wondering if the element of her insertion of the unnecessary words "many years ago" that she met the 'man who is father of their child and baby they are expecting" might indicate that the man "met many years ago" is not the father of the baby she is expecting. My reasoning for this is that the element of time that you pointed out in her use of the words "many years ago" could be tied in to what is often done during pregnancy which is calculation of time...time of conception, time of due date. It seems she is trying to "whitewash" the possibility of another man not met many years ago being involved with the conception of the baby who takes 9 months to be born??

Missy said...

This site has made me look at what people say whether I like it or not! When I read that the actress had issued a denial, I read her statement and thought "But she didn't deny it!" A few months of filming together, now an early pregnancy, followed closely by a divorce filing and a history of cheating. It will be interesting to see who the baby comes out looking like.

Anonymous said...

Marion Cotillard also posted her statement in the French language along with the English translation. .....just wonder if there is any variance in the interpretation.
Also, she isn't Publicly named in the documents or statements by the 2 parties or their representatives - she is responding to the rumors & speculation that have circulated.
True, she didn't issue a Denial, but a carefully worded response.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Her statement almost reads as if she's trying to convince the media and fans that she can't possibly be the reason for the Jolie-Pitt divorce because she's been with the same man for many years, he's the father of her son, and they're expecting a baby. The "he's the only man I need..." seems contrived. Note she doesn't say "he's the only man I want".

Props to Peter, her valuation of her man does seem based on her and her needs.

Strictly an aside, but she favors Angelina Jolie somewhat in appearance.

Hollywood promotes evil said...

Today, press confirmed today, the son of Mia Farrow has died.

Mia Farrows’ adopted son Thaddeus has died in a car accident at the age of 27, it has been reported. You can walk now Thaddeus. No more wheelchair. Fly in Paradise.

Analysis has been written by PH, the two bottom links
The new of Ronan Farrow, June 2016, PH I hope you are able to provide analysis

Woody Allen, you've presented deception indicated
Dylan Farrow, you found no deception indicated
Ronan Farrow, it would be very interesting, your analysis of his statements
same subject.

Journalist, Ronan Farrow writes, June 2016

His, Ronan's written, Woody Allen, Abuse Dylan, their childhood, his recall

Feb 2, 2014, PH, provided Statement Analysis
Dylan Farrow, Open Letter

2014 - Statement Analysis, Woody Allen Denial

Anonymous said...

I gotta say I cant realy blame Brad for cheatin. Thinkaboutit. If Brad goes to do lovemaking with Angie she is so skinny her bones wuld poke into him. Ow!!! That wuld really hurt. He mighta bin lookin for a woman with more meat on her bones that wuldin poke into him. Ow! Ow! Ow!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Think about the stress Brad must have been under what with preparing for his breakthrough role as a superhero and the stress of six kids from all over our globe tugging at him when he came home from work as an "actor". Angie was skin and bones which can be painful for the love partner, a simple cuddle can result in injuries from being impaled by a bony elbow. As Brad is preparing for his phenomenal role as a superhero, can he be blamed for being tempted by the charms of a fellow phony actor?

They mixed their two phony baloney personalities together into a delightful love mixture! Unfortunately, I'm sure Angie didn't take it too well.

Once a cheater, always a cheater. --Maury Povich

Anonymous said...

Angie should have just stayed with Billy Bob...who is actually a fun and creative man who made "Slingblade". Brad is a dud. What has he ever done that was memorable besides being very cute and charming in "A River Runs Through It"?

If I had a choice I would pick Billy Bob in a heartbeat. I think Billy Bob even said Angie was the love of his life but he wished Angie and Brad great happiness. I think maybe Angie and Brad were wrong for each other and that or Angie tried too hard to change who she really was into a very serious person...I feel like she didn't like who she was (kinda crazy and different) so she went to an opposite extreme (serious and not crazy) and it just wasn't the real her. So then she thought Brad would be a good counterpart...a good wholesome Hollywood actor. They were just wrong for each other. Brad is lame...I don't see why his partners care if he's like whatever,,,he's lame. The guy is lame...he's like an extra on "Friends" the worst show ever. No big loss. Christina Applegate dumped him mid-date...because Christina Applegate probably picked up on Brad just being a super dud.

Anonymous said...

"I sincerely wish you a swift recovery."

Someones not well!

Anonymous said...

@ 11:04, I picked up on that ties in with the "health of the family" statement.


This is all stuff pointing to physical sickness. Did Brad give Angie a disease and Angie's saying he got it from Marion?

Anonymous said...

"I am very well thank you"

Marion is sick with something. Brad got it and gave it to Angie. AIDS? Hepatitis?

Anonymous said...

I bet it's hepatitis. That could be spread through toothbrushes abd affect the health of the whole family.

Nic said...

This is going to be my first and only reaction to the whirlwind news that broke 24 hours ago and that I was swept up into. I am not used to commenting on things like this nor taking them seriously but as this situation is spiraling and affecting people I love, I have to speak up.

“news" is an announcement, made public, that she attaches herself to. She references the news breaking 24 hours ago; however, she does not state it was news to her, i.e., news she heard along with everyone else. “I was swept” is passive/distancing language.

She conceals “people” We can assume her partner and five year-old son are the people; however, AJ was the one who filed for divorce and publicly painted BP “unhealthy” to be allowed to share custody of the kids. So he is being severely affected by “this situation”. Affairs are not uncommon in Hollywood and BP and AJ did fall in love and begin their affair while BP was still married to Jennifer Anniston. (Confirmed by AJ in a printed interview.) Based on BP’s past behaviour it’s not “unlikely” that BP and MC could have had an affair if the on-set chemistry between BP and MC was as good as was reported. If the timing works, and you take into consideration AJ’s tendency to be mean spirited (admitting in a printed interview that her and BP indeed began their affair on set in an attempt to humiliate and hurt JA even more than she was, i.e., every story about AJ and BP meant there was an accompanying “loser” story about JA), I could see the need for MC wanting to protect the “people” she loves.

Firstly, many years ago, I met the man of my life, father of our son and of the baby we are expecting.

The man of her life many years ago. Past tense.
She declares him the father of their son. She doesn’t say he is the father of the baby she is expecting. “we” isn’t necessarily her and her partner, she leaves “we” to be assumed as her and her partner.

our son
the baby we are expecting


Anonymous said...

Check this out. I was right about Brad Pitt physically abusing his kids. He is being investigated by FBI and social services for a fight with son Maddox in an aircraft

Nic said...

"whirlwind" and "swept up"

Leakage. Here are two references typically made in reference to romance. i.e., whirlwind romance, swept up in the moment, swept off of my feet, swept away...


Nic said...


LAPD not investigating Brad Pitt for child abuse, but FBI 'gathering information

The Los Angeles Police Department said it is not actively looking into any incident involving Brad Pitt, after media reports that the actor-producer was being probed over an alleged incident involving one of his children with wife Angelina Jolie.

"We have no investigation that we are involved in, there is no criminal investigation and we do not have any active investigation ongoing involved with Mr. Pitt," Sgt. Barry Montgomery told CBC News Thursday morning.

A representative from the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services would not confirm or deny that Pitt is being investigated by the agency.

"We have very strict confidentially laws that don't allow us to confirm or deny the subjects of our investigations," spokeswoman Amara Suarez told industry media outlet The Hollywood Reporter.
The FBI said late Thursday it's gathering information about an alleged incident involving the family on a private flight last week.

Anonymous said...

Brad Pitt is not a good actor in my opinion. That is how I knew that his performance in "Tree Of Life" where he plays an abusive Dad had to be an actual aspect of his personality. Has anyone seen that movie? It wasn't widely watched--it wad kind of an artsy movie--Brad plays an abusive Dad, a lot of it is emotional abuse or intimidation if I remember right, not Brad beating the hell out of the kids, yet his mere presence is scary in the movie and one of his sons in the movie commits suicide as an adult because his Dad made him feel so bad :(

Anonymous said...

Amanda Knox Trailer.

Interesting choice of words. Though the context maybe misleading. She does however, have a knack of framing language

Anonymous said...

Yes Nic, your article confirms he is being investigated by the FBI and they are looking to see if charges should be pursued on a federal level. Watch "Tree Of LIfe". I was dumbfounded that Brad Pitt could portray such an intimidating character as the father as it was so unlike anything i had ever seen from was evident that it had to be an actual aspect of his personality because I cannot remember any good acting from Brad Pitt. Please feel free to correct me I'm wrong about Brad doing any good acting.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said... 11:29
"Check this out. I was right about Brad Pitt physically abusing his kids. He is being investigated by FBI and social services for a fight with son Maddox in an aircraft".

"physically abusing his kids," Subjective and passive.

"Fight", again, subjective.

I wouldn't rush to judgement, just yet.

Anonymous said...

Here is a trailer for "Tree Of LIfe":

This movie was very had the weirdest effect on me where it made me cry in the theatre and then when I woke up in the morning I cried again for like 2 hours straight?!?! The movie makes like an incredibly powerful statement about life that you can't even is also visually mind-blowing!

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 11:39,

I make every effort to avoid anything with Brad Pitt in it. My dislike has been reinforced by the entertainment industry's incessant need to report on "Brangelina". I forget what it was now, the happened to finally knock them out of the news, but I was grateful for the "pivot".

Anonymous said...

NIc, if you get a chance you should watch the's online...I've never seen anything like it...very powerful film...very emotionally moving and visually captivating.

Anonymous said...

Look how happy they look! I think they should get back together. Billy Bob said he blew it and he still love her on another clip

Nic said...

The FBI office in L.A. released the following statement on Thursday night: “In response to your inquiry regarding allegations within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States; specifically, an aircraft carrying Mr. Brad Pitt and his children, the FBI is continuing to gather facts and will evaluate whether an investigation at the federal level will be pursued.”


The “incident”: Sources told Yahoo Celebrity on Wednesday that “an incident” occurred prompting Jolie to file for divorce, but wouldn’t elaborate further. “Although they had been having issues for a while, something serious happened that was the last straw,” an insider close to the family said. “Yes, they had been having problems, but it wasn’t a spontaneous decision on [Angie’s] part.” Today, the same source confirms the “incident” was what happened on the couple’s private plane, although exact details won’t be divulged … for now, that is.

Another insider told People that Pitt “was drunk, and there was an argument between him and Angelina,” noting that one of the couple’s older children “then got caught in the middle, literally. He stepped in front of Brad. There was a parent-child argument which was not handled in the right way and escalated more than it should have.”

The source insisted Pitt did not hurt his son. “He is emphatic that it did not reach the level of physical abuse, that no one was physically harmed. He did not hit his child in the face in any way. He did not do that; he is emphatic about that. He put his hands on him, yes, because the confrontation was nose to nose and was spiraling out of control.”

Any accusations beyond that are “a combination of exaggerations and lies,” the insider added, seemingly blaming sources in Jolie’s camp. “They have taken the overall smallest kernel of truth — that a fight in which Brad was somewhat inebriated got out of hand and reached a regrettable peak, and that as a result DCFS is looking into it — and they are manipulating it to best suit their attempts to gain custody.”

I wonder what they were fighting about and if the above details are true, I wonder if it the norm for the older kids to get in-between the two when they fight.

Nic said...


Dr. Ted Noel - on Hillary Clinton’s recently reported eye movement abnormality.

[…] The control of eye movement comes through the 3rd, 4th and 6th cranial nerves. These are not spinal nerves. They come directly from the brain to the eye. That means that this is a control issue in the brain. You can’t make it into anything else. Now whether it’s due to post-concussion syndrome, one doctor I was speaking with yesterday suggested that the post-concussion syndrome is more likely for that lateral strabismus. But it can actually be both. The control issues, because they've come up very recently, say two things: 1) As I said, this is something in her brain, 2) it’s something that’s getting worse recently. It’s unavoidable. What is it? Parkinson’s can do it. If we look at the literature there’s lots of discussion of eye movement abnormalities in Parkinson’s and these eye movement abnormalities are part of what gets discussed. […]

Nic said...

The word, inebriated means drunk. It is a state of being. It is not tipsy, wherein the level of intoxication can be debated. Drunk is not "somewhat", just like you can't be somewhat pregnant.

Lilly, Norway. said...

I loathe Jolie, I have written in one post here before how insane her lies are (once claiming that her then two year old daughter had made her (Jolie) a full breakfast all by herself, including scrambled eggs)

I hope karma hit her for the many lives and relationships she has destroyed.

I dont know who Marion Cotillard is, and I dont know how famous she is. But could she really have written "I did not have an affair with Brad Pitt"?

Would that not have been too frank?

Now, she is hinting and implying that she did not, without saying it.

I dont like to accuse a pregnant woman of cheating.

Brad is certainly capable of cheating.

Anonymous said...

Uncontrollable eye movements are usually the first sign of MS.

Nic said...

Anonymous @ 9:37,

Both Parkinson's and MS have been tossed onto the table along with residual problems from her prior concussions. I highly doubt we will ever know the truth about HC's health. I think she released her cholesterol count and blood pressure results? And the "breaking news" discussion surrounded her triglyceride count. I have to give credit to the media to be able to present this sort of information like they're reporting on increasing unemployed rates.

She was diagnosed with mild, non-contagious bacterial pneumonia, her doctor said, a step the campaign took after the candidate had to take three days off the campaign trail after nearly collapsing at an event on Sunday.
Dr. Lisa Bardack, Clinton's personal doctor and the chair of Internal Medicine at CareMount Medical in Mount Kisco, New York, said she evaluated Clinton "at least" four times this month -- including Wednesday -- and found that the Democratic nominee had a small right middle-lobe pneumonia.
According to Bardack, "The remainder of her complete physical exam was normal and she is in excellent mental condition."

I guess they had to toss "non-contagious" into the ring because of the discussion around Hillary Clinton being in close contact with that little girl just an hour after she was tossed onto the back seat of her SUV like a sack of potatoes.

It's this sort of thing that fuels the fire.

Anonymous said...

Re: Brad: Abusive men dont like when their sons enter the teenage years. They are used to bullying the Mom and kids and any kids are physically small and pose no threat to the abuser's control. Teenage boys will sometimes stand up for the mother to the abuser, and abusers HATE that. Even if they simply walk up to the abuser (being possibly nearly as tall as the abuser), look him in the eye and say "Leave her alone." or something to that effect. Abusers are such cowardly scum used to their ability to dominate individuals weaker than them, they can become very enraged when challenged by another "man", as Im sure Brad was when Maddox stepped in between Brad and Angelina.
As a sidenote, I never had the sense these 2 were deeply in love...Brad always seemed aloof, miserable "poor him" hes with the most beautiful woman in the world but he just wants to smoke pot all day. Brad will lie profusely about what actually happened on the plane. Watch "Tree Of Life"...Brad is not a skilled actor, typically playing the same character (not well) over and over, yet in "Tree Of Life" he is stunningly convincing as an abusive Dad. Even when you watch a good actor like Anthony Hopkins it's clear he's "becoming" someone else when he acts. In "Tree Of Life" Brad did not seem to be turning into another person (abusive Dad) but rather just letting his colors show. Imo

Lis said...

Interesting comparison of statements:

Luc Tieman: "There’s only ONE woman in the word for this man."

Marion Cotillard: "He is my love, my best friend, the only one that I need."

In both cases, it is pretty clear that the subjects were unfaithful. Is the need to point out there is "only one" for them unexpected? i.e., when someone speaks of their spouse, is it common to bring up the fact this this is the only person for them? Or is this a need to persuade that actually reveals the opposite?

Anonymous said...

Interesting comments about Tree of Life and Pitt's portrayal of an abuser. I've not seen the movie but your observations make sense.

Re Marion Cotillard, there's a whole "art" to public statements, etc. By trying polite PR format, to avoid specifics and the various allegations, she may have ended up writing a statement that seems weak and avoidant, for no other reason than she's following a typical statement style.

The more interesting analysis is of the various media outlets, including People which initially had an article on their website that included: "He put his hands on him, yes, because the confrontation was nose to nose and was spiraling out of control."

It was revised and the updated version is "He put his hands on him, yes, because the confrontation was spiraling out of control." The phrase "nose to nose" was removed which says a lot about what was really going on, and what they instead want us to believe.

Anonymous said...

@2:15, Great observation about "nose to nose".
I can picture what happened with Maddox getting up face to face with him like a man would and telling Brad to cut the shit.

Also the spin that Brad put his hands on Maddox because it was getting out of control.
It was "out of control" because Brad's control was threatened when Maddox stood up to Brad, causing Brad to "put his hands on him".
The other facet of this event reminds me of Ray Rice's cold calculated move of waiting until he and his wife were enclosed in a private area of an elevator where he thought noone could see what he was about to do which was punch his wife in the face like he was battling a man. That was a premeditated assault that only one pro NFL player had the intelligence to point out. I cant remember the players name, but he pointed out how the assault was premeditated by Ray Rice as indicated by the fact Ray Rice waited till they were in the elevator to cold clock her. This is the same thing here with Brad Pitt where he waited till he was in the air enclosed in an aircraft where no bystanders, Paparazzi etc would be able to see what he did.
In the coming days and weeks, we will hear the story will become extremely slick and convincing until reality has been completely reversed and Brad becomes the victim of Maddox. And of course of Angelina's "lies".

Anonymous said...

From E News:

Both sources confirmed to E! News that no abuse took place. "There was no punching, and there was no inappropriate contact," says one insider. "This was a very normal family argument."

Wow, I am very troubled by this wording.

No punching
No inappropriate contact

"health" of the family

What was really happening behind closed doors??

Anonymous said...

I have a feeling when the whole story spills out, it is going to be very ugly.

I think this is more serious of a situation than I even first thought the more language I see coming out.

Think about it: Angelina does not want child support, spousal support, and she does not want Brad having any visitation with the children right now. Also Think of the upheaval this will cause her (and the kids) with all the paparazzi, trying to divide up their massive fortunes and multiple estates. There is something VERY serious causing this desire to get Brad away from the children, and considering Brad probably has tons of nannies etc it would be unlikely he would just strike his children in front of the nannies. The language that is coming out is disturbing and language that is not typical in these types of divorce situations.

"Health" of the family...something sick was going on behind closed doors. If it was him being abusive physically and verbally, which is certainly horrible, I think she would have said "Well-being" of the family, not "health" of the family.

Brad spokespeople saying "no inappropriate contact"?! Frankly I have never heard that term used when someone is denying a physically violent action like shoving, hitting, pushing, punching, whatever...

Also, whenever I have seen photos of Brad and Maddox I would always pick up on the worst energy, just BAD energy, fearful energy, but something worse than that, worse than I am afraid of my Dad because he hits me...

There is very ugly stuff that is going to come out about what was really going on. She wanted those kids away from him completely, and there is a reason for it.

Lis said...

"This was a very normal family argument."

Hmm, is that like saying "it was a normal day"?

Anonymous said...

Brad's Twitter

God, he seems very stupid.

Peter was also right about the public declarations of "I love you" spelling trouble in a relationship.

I am really dumbfounded by how stupid Brad Pitt seems. Wow.

Anonymous said...

Wow that's interesting that Brad instagrams about himself "I'm one of those people you hate because of genetics. It's the truth."

That's a scary ego right there. For someone to have gotten the fame and recognition he's gotten and to be 51 years old and they tweet that?! He is so not as good-looking as George Clooney and doesn't have anywhere near the class. He just seems so stupid and dumb and massively wonder Angelina looks miserable with him. To go from Billy Bob who has a creative intelligent mind to this dumbass.

Elizabeth said...

Neither Jolie nor Pitt are on any social medias. All those accounts are fake.

Elsie said...

Brad Pitt (unlike Johnny Depp) does not have any history of violence. No trashed hotel rooms, no ex girlfriends or fiancees with any bruising or marks.

He may be capable of hitting a child, however all the evidence point to another solution.

Angelina had to be comitted to a mental hospital when Billy Bob left her. She has admitted to have tried every drug there is. She was a cutter, she french kissed her (biological) brother, and started living with her boyfriend when she was 15. With her mothers consent.

I think she is either a soisiopath, or was abused (by her mother) as a child.

Untill evidence tells me otherwise, I will go for the most likely solution. Angelina being crazy.

Me2l said...

This comment section reads like The National Enquirer. In fact, it's recycled rumors that are and have been for years all over the tabloids.

Let's just call this Tabloid Digest, a far more appropriate description than anything having to do with analysis, especially SA.

Good laugh.

Anonymous said...

Brad and Maddox's fight was caught on camera: Footage may clear Pitt on abuse allegations with 'actor seen screaming at his teen son but making NO physical contact' before driving off on airport fuel truck

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Elsie, an anonynous caller saw Pitt being violen to his son after they landed and called 911.

You dont know what Brad does behind closed doors. He could be bruising Angelina and it was under her clothing, same with the kids. Just cause he has no "history" of it (that you know about) doesnt mean anything. I get a very bad vibe off him and always have.

Anonymous said...

Check out this brief interview with Brad Pitt when has was 28 years old that shows his true personality. Seems like a real nice guy doesnt he? He seems like the bully at school who torments people. What a sweetheart huh?

Lis said...

Elsie, Angelina being crazy doesn't speak to whether or not Brad Pitt is guilty.

Nic said...

Marion Cotillard’s Boyfriend, Guillaume Canet, Responds To Brangelina Affair Rumors

Cotillard and Canet, who have a child together, are apparently better matched than we thought ― on Friday, he shared a similar message on social media decrying the evils of tabloid culture and singing Cotillard’s praises.

“I don’t usually make it a habit to comment on rumors made about us,” Canet wrote in French, under an Instagram photo of a “Danger” sign, Entertainment Tonight wrote. “I also don’t usually talk about my private life, which, until now, I have always attentively protected.”

“But the fury of the tabloids, the venal stupidity of some people calling themselves journalists, the internet trolls who feel braver behind a keyboard, drive me to speak of the pride, love, respect and admiration I have for Marion staying strong and intelligent in the face all these stupid and unfoundedhe wrote.

“I think we’re all living with much more important things at the moment and now it’s time to move on and raise the bar a bit,” he continued. “Even if that’s a lot of work for some, I want to be positive. And as Marion said so well, I hope you get better and aspire to something more in your life than constantly sending shit!”


No denial here. Sounds more like a "prove it" response to me.

Anon "I" said...

Very interesting choice of a word from Canet: Fury. Fury was a movie Brad Pitt starred in.

Deemarie said...

It would be great if someone can do a statement analysis on the ex-wife that was interviewed in the Dan Markel murder! Please:) see interview: