Friday, October 21, 2016

Amercia's Nuclear Response Time Top Secret

There are carefully guarded U.S. defense secrets that must be kept secure.  The notion of a private server is deliberate; to allow donors to access privileged information within the United States government.  This is why laws are set up to protect private, confidential, classified, and secret information.  A simple state worker would be terminated and possibly subject to legal consequences should he carry the name of a single state client on a personal cell phone.  

With military secrets, only a select few know the nuclear response time beginning with:

President
Vice President
Secretary of State 

The "need to know" list continues:
  • Secretary of Defense
  • Secretary of Homeland Security
  • Attorney General
  • Director of National Intelligence
  • CIA Director
  • Deputy Secretary of State
  • Deputy Secretary of Defense
  • Special personnel designated solely by the President in writing

The nuclear response time is a carefully guarded secret in the United States government to protect our nation's viable integrity.  It is not something we wish North Korea, ISIS, The Islamic Republic of Iran, or other belligerents to know.  

Here, a statement was made by Hillary Clinton at the last presidential debate:  


“But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.”

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Should be Trumps newsest and loudest commercial.

Anonymous said...

UK covering with towels the adult muslm males entering from Calais posing as children.

Nic said...

Our media really played this down. IMO, this is why HRC was given the questions the debates ahead of time and was "preparing" in lieu of campaigning (she had Barak and Michelle Obama for that). She cannot be spontaneous. She cannot talk/answer on the fly. Everything must bescripted; all she ever did was look down at her notes throughout the debates. She is unpredictable and evidently does not know as much as people give her credit for because if she did, she wouldn't need cheat sheets. That she would even go "there" (excitable utterance) tells me, that's what's on her mind, that's what she wants: ultimate power and control. She wants to have everyone's fate in the palm of her hands. She wants all that and more and Wikileaks proved she will lie and cheat to get her hands on it.

She is crazy.

jmo

Peter Hyatt said...

This is not a partisan issue. It is a fight for our survival as a nation.

To answer the deleted:

The posting wasn't statement analysis. It was beyond fixing. I would not accept the person for training. The desire to supplant truth with narrative, itself, is deception. I would only be adding my name to the person's resume, harming our science and bringing embarrassment to my business.

I deleted it; not the staff. One offered to try to correct it, but it was overwhelming and the poster would have been humiliated. This is why I posted the need for training, not for the poster, but for others. It was that bad.

Peter

Anonymous said...

Many of Trump interviews over the decades present him as a calm, non bombastic & thoughtful man. Oprah. Letterman. Etc.

Peter Hyatt said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
UK covering with towels the adult muslm males entering from Calais posing as children.

October 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM Delete


When the government admits that 70% of the "children" are 21 to 29 years of age, what is the real number like?

Success if vilified and the Islamization given traction. I feel for the silenced citizens who live in these neighborhoods with those who hold to an ideology that calls for citizens' submission or destruction.

That crime is up 23% is another government statistic. They do everything they can to limit it, yet 23% increase in just one year?

Businesses needing protection is creating the need for more trained analysts.

Hey Jude said...

I spoke out on the adult males posing as children on Facebook - I now will be cold-shouldered by more people than I (possibly) care about. It's ridiculous when people pretend not to see what is obvious. I'd like to put it down to ineptitude but it's hard not to suspect some level of mischief or cowardice to be involved when children are potentially put at risk by adults allowed to pose as children. I wouldn't want them in school with my kids if I had school age kids. Not sure how far ahead people actually think.

Anonymous said...

A blue collar lesson in deception. This week UAW mailed HRC endorsement ad to membership saying HRC is pro 2nd Amendment. The deception? Pictured on ad is a sportsman. A hunter. THE CURRENT DEBATE ABOUT 2ND AMNDMNT ISNT ABOUT SPORTSMEN!!!! Its about the lawabiding owning a legally purchased handgn for self protection. The ad doesnt mention any of this. The democratic party has been betraying its base by supporting immorality and UAW follows. Only to alienate members. The Dem party just coddles the illegals and all minorities to make up its losses. The UAW follows.

Peter Hyatt said...

If you listen to Obama, we will be a lot safer with more islamists and less guns.

Check This said...

A DoD intelligence source said,

“Secretary Clinton proved tonight she is unfit to be commander-in-chief. What she did compromises our national security. She is cavalier and reckless and in my opinion should be detained and questioned so we can unravel why she did what she did.”

The info Hillary publicly divulged falls under the U.S. Special Access Program (SAP), which dictates safeguards and protocols for accessing and discussing highly classified and Top Secret intelligence. The details of the nuclear response time are known only to a handful of individuals outside top military brass, including the following “need-to-know” (NTK)

Peter Hyatt said...

I saw the article and do not expect MSM to cover it.

Anonymous said...

https://twitter.com/wikileaks

Peter Hyatt said...

I wish every discerning person in America would watch this, even if for a few minutes. Then, look for rebuttals, and "fact checkers" and so on.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM


This left me unable to comment on it. It explains so much that we have seen, via analysis, for many years. It is not Republican, Democrat, left or right.

It is about our nation and that which we leave for our children. We have so much damage that needs repair, that it is going to take a long long time, but 8 more years of this and there may be little left to salvage.

I respectfully ask readers to view the "Clinton Cash" video and then search for rebuttals wherever you can find them.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

Hey Jude,

Consider the Islamists operatives that ISIS sends in and the laughter they must have as the British welcoming charity uses glazed plastic to shield their faces and insist that dental checking is intrusive and unjust.

It is self-loathing for money, but the supporters, outside holding signs, are just self loathing to please their moral narcissism.

At least the charity knows it is destroying safety but getting paid for it.

Peter

Nic said...

Peter,
The YouTube video you linked to is sickening.


*excited utterance (from above) 0.o

Anonymous said...

Oh no, someone chalked trumps name on campus sidewalk. Better call 911.

Anonymous said...

The European immigrants at ellis island were medically examined.

Anonymous said...

I don't get why ppl come to this blog to complain. They have 98% of all media, 98% of all Hollywood, 98% of all schools + they still have to come here with their nonsense ? Peter, why would thy trust your analysis and then suddenly attack who when thy don't see what they like about hillary or barry or whatever?

Hey Jude said...

Peter, the Home Office claims that the adult 'children' underwent rigorous checks before being admitted to the country from the Calais Jungle. It turns out they were rounded up as "children' by megaphone appeal (which suggests there weren't any actual eligible children in Calais). It has to be untrue that there was any rigour to the checks - if the selectors can't determine the true ages, they therefore also can't know the real identities of any they are letting in. It's worrying as even though it is a small number, they can't really know who they are letting in. UK is strong on intelligence and good at intercepting extremists, but I don't see how tabs could be kept on them all, as they will be settled in different areas.

I think, for most supporters, it is not self-loathing so much as a combination of genuine good intentions, and guilt for the devastation Western interference has caused in the Middle East. The tendency is to consider that these young men are fleeing the horror of ISIS and extremism themselves, of being forced to join and fight with ISIS or other groups, rather than wishing to cause harm.

I think these are a risk, not only because their age, origins and intentions are unknown, but also due to their willingness to enter the UK fraudulently as 'children'. It is easier to see the temptation to a sixteen or seventeen year old to claim he is only thirteen or fourteen, if it is in order to receive an education he has missed out on - but in a twenty or thirty year old, that speaks to poor character and I can't understand some people's willingness to believe the excuse that war has toughened them up to the extent that a boy can somehow turn into a thirty year old man.

In one sense, it is a small issue as now the numbers are comparatively small, and this has been going on for years - but as with Germany, and as with what is happening in Sweden, it sends the signal to others to come to the welcoming countries, which they must believe are run by fools.

Yes, they are laughing, and it is painful to watch. I don't know about a charity getting paid - lazy reading, or just too fixated on the photos, I will go and read more carefully. It is a strange happening - no-one likes to be taken for a fool, but rather than admit that is what happening, some people will rather join the pantomime.

Anonymous said...

"There is no doubt in my mind that we have never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy. That just hasn't happened." - Bill Clinton, in response to Clinton Cash

SLH

LisaB said...

Peter, Have you watched "Hillary's America"? Thoughts?

LisaB said...

Peter, Have you watched "Hillary's America"? Thoughts?

Anonymous said...

Maybe he just doesnt consider it inappropriate even though the money was knowingly taken to influence american government policy.

Anonymous said...

Meaning the word Inappropriate is relative.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous...

Yes, I see what you mean...as Peter says in his latest article that the word 'sex' means different things to different people...what is inappropriate to Bill Clinton? We already know what he considered appropriate to be doing in the Oval Office.

To me, "there is no doubt in my mind" sounds a lot like "there is no evidence".

SLH

Anonymous said...

You guys need to tell Hayden and Ted Turner to see stop talking about it. They were blabbing the response times and attack analysis framework before Hillary did!

http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/launch-under-attack-feasible/

And these people were talking about it on 2012!

http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/reducing-alert-rates-of-nuclear-weapons-400.pdf

And these motherfuckers were talking about their Cold War rules of thumb last year!


http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=761451

Goddam mother fucking Hillary reminding the stoopid Russians of what they already knew! Thanks Obama!

Nic said...

Is this the person we (not just the American people, this election has far reaching consequences,) want at the helm?

NBC Crew - Crooked Hillary’s MASSIVE MELTDOWN at Commander-in-Chief Forum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NfFAaPZqs8


[…] … the technical crew for NBC which produced the event is now speaking out about what took place moments after Clinton walked off the set. A massive profanity laced tirade aimed at NBC’s host Matt Lauer. It turned out that Clinton had been fed all the questions for approval in advance of the forum. But then after the approval process, Matt Lauer had a change of heart and decided he would start his questioning with an unapproved line concerning Clinton’s use of an illegal, private server… According to a Comcast official, the parent company of NBC Universal, who apparently was quoting those on the set, “When Matt posed the one legitimate question about the FBI investigation concerning her homemade server, and the unsecured emails, we could see she was beginning to boil.” According to an NBC producer of the forum, as soon as Clinton got off the set she exploded. “Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and throw it at the face of her assistant, and then the screaming started. She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her - she went kind of manic and didn’t have any control over herself at that point. How these people work with this woman is amazing to me. She really didn’t seem to care who heard any of it. You really had to see this to believe it. She came apart - literally unglued; she is the most foul-mouthed woman I’ve ever heard … and that voice at screech level … awful! She screamed she’d get that f…ing Later fired for this.” Referring to Donald Trump she said, “If that f…ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses! Lauer’s finished…and if I lose it’s all o n your heads for screwing this up.” So Crooked Hillary fears the gallows, eh? Interesting. Her dozen or more aides were visibly disturbed and trying to calm her down when she started shaking uncontrollably as she screamed to get an executive at Comcast, the parent company of NBC Universal on the phone. Then two rather large aids grabbed her and helped her walk to her to car. Matt Lauer was massively criticized on air by the Clinton campaign and the rest of the MSM as having conducted “…an unfair and partisan attack on Clinton.” According to the email, calls were made to the NY Times, the Washington Post, Huffington Post and Twitter executives with orders to crush Matt Lauer. One staffer on the Clinton campaign told NBC staff that they all fear Clinton’s wrath and uncontrollable outbursts, and one described Hillary as an egotistical psychopath. Since Hillary does not allow any staff to have cell phones when she is in their presence, no footage is available. Interim DNC chairman, Donna Brazile, the first black woman to hold the position was singled out by Hillary during the rant. She screamed at Donna, “I’m so sick of your face. You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting that f…ing Lauer get away with this. What are you good for, really? Get the f… to work janitoring this mess - do I make myself clear?” A female NBC executive said that Donna Brazile looked at Mrs. Clinton and never flinched, which seemed to enrage Hillary all the more. The executive continued, “It was the most awful and terrible…and racist display - such a profane meltdown I have ever witnessed from anyone, and i will never forget it.” That woman should never see the inside of the oval office I can tell you that. She was unhinged and just continued to verbally abuse everyone - she was out of control.” Why did Lauer ask his rogue question? According to sources close to Lauer, because “…the American people deserve an answer from the former Secretary of State." […]

Anonymous said...

Nic.

If that story is true, then it should be Headline News. 24/7

Anonymous said...

Yes on the Clinton Network News

Me2l said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Thanks for heads up Me. But the comment is about her alledged tirade after Matt Lauers question. Private email issue.

Me2l said...

Friday, October 21, 2016
Amercia's Nuclear Response Time To



I was responding to the title of this blog.

Peter Hyatt said...

For thoughtful contemplation:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/think_you_know_how_bad_the_clintons_are.html

Peter Hyatt said...

Regarding felonious financial crimes, Hillary appears to have well surpassed Herman Goering's plundering of Europe.

In terms of deaths, we don't know the number of deaths in the Middle East due to the facilitation of "Arab Spring", uprisings, ethnic cleansing, and so on. It's well into the hundreds of thousands.

We don't know what satellite technology sold to the Chinese that ended up in the hands of our enemies.

We don't yet know what death toll awaits tomorrow due to Islamic republic of Iran infused with billions and w nuclear capability.

The hand-picked successor to Obama, a sociopathic who women are voting for because she's a woman.

The hatred of police

The Islamization of colleges

The importation of jihadists..

That's discernment?

This is not a partisan fight it is a fight against deception and evil.

Peter

Peter Hyatt said...

Islam is a world domination ideology. It would matter not if we dropped bombs or dropped food.

It is a criminal supremacist ideology of conquest, with specific sexual assault claims, and a religious component affirming these things.

only Islamists blame the west for dropping bombs, as part of Tacquia.

Supremacist ideology always leads to violence and even in lands of 100% Islam, supremacist ideology thwarts progress and turns on each other.

It is akin to taking a pedophile murderer, and starting an entire social, political and religious movement. In close marriages (in breeding) with low IQ and poor impulse control, only reinforces.

What the West will not yet acknowledge, until more die, is the truth about the world's most successful criminal ideology.

Anonymous said...

Why do you hate America?