Monday, November 21, 2016

Analysis Error and Corrections


With analysis, if the conclusion is errant, we can (and must) go back and trace the root of the error.  It is a scientific process that allows for input and conclusion, repetition, input and conclusion, and so on.  

If the analysis is thoroughly done, the conclusion is very likely based upon at least several points within the language.  This means that the analyst must have erred in, for example, four or five separate places and there must be a different explanation for the sensitivity shown.  

Analysis by top professionals is almost ways checked by other professionals.  

An amateur often makes a conclusion that is not supported by the statement and the correction ends up being a great lesson.  The most common error made by amateurs is a rush to judgment.  This means taking a single indicator of deception and concluding deception by it.  Even upon review, the indicator of deception was likely an indication of sensitivity that had an alternate explanation.  Once the truth is learned, the sensitivity question is usually answered.  

When the analysis conclusion is based upon, let's say 5 points of sensitivity, each one of these points must be reviewed and re-considered, but it is a lot.  Would it mean that on each of these 5 points, the analyst was incorrect?

The greater the number of sensitivity (or deception) indicators, the less likely error is going to exist.  

When To Dig In One's Heels 

When the analysis is based upon overwhelming points of sensitivity throughout a statement or interview, I encourage the analyst to make no changes:  let it stand and see what time does to it.  

Here is why:

I have seen some very talented analysts say, "I must have been wrong; the subject passed the polygraph."  

This comes after the analyst's work has been reviewed by another analyst and two analysts found the exact same result.  

Slow down.  

I always ask that the polygraph pre-screen interview be reviewed for contamination.  

A polygraph when administered without contamination and only with the subject's own words is near impossible to beat.  

I have had two cases in which analysis and polygraph results have differed.  One case was extreme.  In both cases, I stood to be "wrong" and plainly so.  

Case One:   Child Molestation 

1.  Statement  

The accused wrote out a statement prior to the interview.  I concluded that mother's boyfriend molested her daughter while mother was not home, and, according to the statement, it took place in the little girl's bedroom shortly after dinner.  

I sent the statement to an instructor, without my analysis.  He sent back his finding:  the subject was deceptive, likely molested the little girl in her bedroom sometime early evening but before she went to bed.  

2.  Interviews 

The little girl's interview was recorded.  In her own language, she showed that he had 'tickled' her chest area under her shirt, while she was playing with dolls on her bed after dinner.  Mom was at work.  She said her mommy's "friend", using the name "Uncle" played this game but she did not like it.  

The mother was interviewed who was truthful in not knowing what had happened but stated that she did not believe it did happen.  She stated that her daughter was not known for making things up and "really liked" her new boyfriend. 

The suspect was interviewed and gave a lengthy account of his day, in great detail, but gave only a short account from dinner time to bed time.  His interview affirmed the analysis but he denied contact.  

Collateral interviews showed no concerns about boyfriend, and no concerns about child making up things.  

Boyfriend took and passed his polygraph.  

The analysis was plain, including the skip of time and the timeline the little girl gave.  The local police dismissed the analysis, and the boyfriend was permitted to return to the home where I learned, years later, he re-offended on the victim.  

He passed the polygraph because he "tickled" not "molested" his victim.  The polygraph used language that was not in the internal dictionary of the suspect.  This is precisely how we teach suspects to lie and to falsely pass a polygraph.  

This second case is much worse:  

Case Two:  Murder 

In this case, we have a battle, from my perspective,  of two forces.  One is Goliath, strong, large and overwhelming, the other is tiny David, young and weak.  

On one side is analysis of a 4 minute statement; nothing else.  This is David.  

a.  statement analysis of a 911 call 

nothing else.  

But on the other side:

a.  A complete and thorough police investigation with a cumulative 20 years experience in investigation and training.  

b.  All known facts of the case, privy to test results, interviews (plural) with the subject,

c.  collateral interviews 

d.  forensic evidence

e.  Suspect cooperation

f.  Suspect passed a polygraph


On one side is a short analysis where nothing else is known, while on the other side, there is a mountain of reasons to overrule the analysis.  I, personally, hold great weight to the polygraph. 

                            Which would you believe?

What would you do if you were told all of these things, and then were told, "statement analysis is junk science.  He passed his polygraph.  We collected all the evidence..."

If this were not enough, consider that in court, one of the two original investigators would testify against the conclusion of the analysis and stand upon the original clearing of the suspect.  

I, and those who worked with me, including in depth review later, concluded "deception indicated", which is not enough for a murder case.  In the analysis we concluded both "deception indicated" and "guilty knowledge" of the murder, but still, I was able to show the motive of the murder, plainly. 

In other words, there was no other conclusion for me to follow, and there was no way of dismissing each indication of deception, sensitivity and guilt.  

Yet, one short analysis versus an in-depth police investigation, a ton of material unknown to me, and a suspect who has passed his polygraph. 

He was found guilty of the murders after initially being cleared by police. 

When error exists in analysis, it can, and must, be traced and corrected.  By using a scientific process, when in error, we may find and correct the error. 

But when a statement is overwhelming, and no error can be found, even in light of various news announcements, the analysis should b left to stand. 

There are such cases.  

No one is willing to say "Casey Anthony was found not guilty, therefore..." and, there is other cases that have been dropped or even cleared by police in which the analysis still stands:

Baby Ayla.  

Baby Lisa. 

Amanda Blackburn.  

Several years ago, analysis showed that Lena Lunsford had guilty knowledge of her daughter's death but up until recently, the analysis appeared 'incorrect' by the standard of arrest or adjudication.  

When analysis is 'overwhelming' and has been checked, rechecked, and reviewed by other trained professionals, it should be left to stand. 

And wait...

"Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks" has proven to be truth. 

Truth is timeless. 

Truth is not impacted by time, culture, or opinion.  

In either of the two above cases, particularly the second, it would have been the easier path to fold the analysis but the road of less resistance is not always the correct course to take.  

As analysts learn to work in depth, they learn to trust the results of the science, and from past errors, learn how to go back and trace the origin of error, but when the conclusion of the matter is plain, they must stay with it. 

For formal training for you or your department or business, click Here

Knowing how to detect deception is to enter an investigation fueled with truth.  





77 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here's a great one Peter.... http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/man-busted-nyc-party-stabbing-innocent-article-1.2881439

Says he's INNOCENT... totally completely slept thru a murder.

Zsuzsanna said...

Oh wow! Romans 1 comes to mind.

Zsuzsanna said...

Great post! Amanda Blackburn's name came to my mind too while reading. I hope the facts of her case will eventually be discovered.

John mcgowan said...

Re Polygraph

Does the sheriff have doubts in it's accuracy, overall, doubts in his account, or were there questions he just scraped through?.

Family of missing mom holds out hope

MOUNTAIN GATE (AP) — The family of a Northern California mother of two who went missing while jogging is holding out hope she will be found alive.

Sherri Papini, 34, has been missing since she went for a jog Nov. 2 in the tiny town of Mountain Gate in Shasta County, a case some say resembles the 1998 unsolved disappearance of a teenager in a nearby town, the Sacramento Bee reported Saturday.

Her husband, Keith Papini, reported her missing when he came home from work and found that she hadn’t picked up their two children from daycare. Her cell phone and headphones were found near where she was reported missing, officials said.

Without a body or a suspect, investigators homed in on those closest to her — namely her husband.

The Sheriff’s Office announced last week that he had passed the lie-detector test, and that they confirmed his story that he was at work when she went missing.

It appears he’s telling us the truth,”said Sheriff Tom Bosenko.
“Generally, you can’t trick a polygraph.”

Many are wondering if the case is connected to the 1998 disappearance in nearby Shasta Lake of a teenage girl who resembles her.

Like Papini, Tera Smith, a blond 16-year-old Central Valley High School homecoming princess, was wearing running clothes the last time she was seen. Her body was never found.

In Smith’s case, detectives zeroed in on a possible suspect though they never made an arrest. Smith’s martial arts instructor, a man with a prior rape conviction, told investigators he dropped her off on the night she disappeared a few minutes’ drive from where Papini’s cellphone and earphones were found.

The similarities prompted Keith Papini to reach out to Tera Smith’s father, Terry Smith, for his advice.

“I didn’t have a lot of comfort to offer him. I’m not real confident that anything’s going to come out of it, but how do you tell somebody five days after their wife’s gone missing that she’s probably gone for good?”

Sheila Koester, Sherri Papini’s sister, also knew Smith, and the teen’s disappearance has been on her mind.

“For them to be so closely related in that we all went to high school with them, and they look like each other, it’s all very strange,” she said.

Koester believes her sister’s disappearance will end differently than Smith’s.

“We feel that she’s going to walk through the door at any time,” Koester said.

http://www.mantecabulletin.com/section/140/article/139234/

Anonymous said...

Is religion the cause for many Mslm men being demented? Or are they already derranged and the religion compounds tbe psychosis? The women dont seem as psychologically unsound as the men.

Nic said...

OT:

President Obama Claims He Cannot Pardon Snowden; He's Wrong
from the yes-you-can dept
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161118/17160636087/president-obama-claims-he-cannot-pardon-snowden-hes-wrong.shtml


In a big interview with the German media outlet Der Spiegel, President Obama was asked about his interest in pardoning Ed Snowden in response to the big campaign to get him pardoned. Obama's response was that he could not, since Snowden has not been convicted yet:

ARD/SPIEGEL: Are you going to pardon Edward Snowden?

Obama: I can't pardon somebody who hasn't gone before a court and presented themselves, so that's not something that I would comment on at this point. I think that Mr. Snowden raised some legitimate concerns. How he did it was something that did not follow the procedures and practices of our intelligence community. If everybody took the approach that I make my own decisions about these issues, then it would be very hard to have an organized government or any kind of national security system.

At the point at which Mr. Snowden wants to present himself before the legal authorities and make his arguments or have his lawyers make his arguments, then I think those issues come into play. Until that time, what I've tried to suggest -- both to the American people, but also to the world -- is that we do have to balance this issue of privacy and security. Those who pretend that there's no balance that has to be struck and think we can take a 100-percent absolutist approach to protecting privacy don't recognize that governments are going to be under an enormous burden to prevent the kinds of terrorist acts that not only harm individuals, but also can distort our society and our politics in very dangerous ways.

And those who think that security is the only thing and don't care about privacy also have it wrong.

Anonymous said...

The coronation of BHO with the Nobel Peace prize for the accomplishment of being elected POTUS was a troubling sign of just how far away from realty Europe had drifted. There must be a reason for his affinity between himself and A Merkel. There must be a reason he thought lecturing the UK population on eve of Brexit would influence them to remain. How can they be so confident in their opinions and so wrongly estimate what the general population wants and how damaging the impostion of their poor judgement has been.

John mcgowan said...

OT:

When will this end?!

Hate Hoax at Bowling Green State University

Bowling Green State University student Eleesha Long made her bid to join the Hate Hoax List on the day after the election by claiming to have been subjected to assault and a racial slur:

Long wrote a police complaint on November 9th that reads in part, “while walking down Crim St to ask for yard signs, three boys began to throw rocks at me.”

Long continued to write the white males shouted profanity at her while wearing Trump shirts.

Among the first clues that this was yet another hoax, she took her tale to Fakebook rather than calling 911.

A high % of hate hoax's adopt this outlet.

A BGSU officer took Long to the police station where she gave a statement.

However, throughout the investigation she changed her story multiple times.

Police soon confirmed that she was not present at the time and place the incident supposedly occurred.

Her text messages allegedly reveal her real motivation may have been frustration with friends and family who were Trump supporters. …

The police reports are laced with racist remarks against Trump supporters that she sent to her boyfriend and mother. According to reports, she used words like, “this is why you should take an IQ test to vote,” “I hope they all get AIDS,” “I haven’t met a decent Trump supporter yet.”

Typically of moonbats, Long expressed her hostility by weaponizing phony victimhood.

Here’s some good news:

Long was charged with falsification and obstructing official business.

The only way to stop the avalanche of hate hoaxes is to prosecute the hoaxers. This will undermine the corrosive liberal agenda, as the well of oppression will run dry, and also free up police to attend to real problems.

http://moonbattery.com/?p=78382

Anonymous said...

Do you know the meaning of MANY? Do you see skin color listed? Do you see ethnicity listed? Is 'groups'of people listed? No, No & No. Just your blanket accusation. Many does not imply ALL. In the world right now there are routine attacks by indivuduals and in groups and only 2 common ingredients. Male. Mslm. 1 + 1 still = 2.

Anonymous said...

School bus driver Johhthony Walker had been seen before driving the bus too fast. Now 5 children dead. Dozens injured. Is he a school district employee? Whom in human resources are responsible for hiring and supervision?

Jon said...

It seems like the most common form of defending any act associated with a group these days is to yell out "NOT ALL (Insert group here)".

And you have the "How dare you!" tactic, as well as claiming moral superiority by accusing the other party of "textbook bigotry" whilst never actually addressing what the original poster's legitimate concerns.

This is all an attempt to put the original poster on the defensive to try and divert attention away from the main issue.

Peter Hyatt said...

The ideology of Islam teaches a very low view of women.

Next, it is anti homosexual.

Yet, the koran teaches the reward in the afterlife not only includes rape of virgins but "young boys like pearls"

This may explain the rape of little boys by those who stone homosexuals.

As to being sexually capable of violent rape: I believe the origin of such, which most men do not have, comes from earlier exposure to domestic violence, among other factors.

Peter

Jon said...

Two news articles relating to an Imam here in little ol' NZ.

I haven't read all of the 2nd article yet, but I going to take a stab in the dark that the Imam going to be a little bit dishonest about his religion.

1)
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86708921/antisemitic-speeches-concerning-and-appalling

I had to laugh at Islamic Women's Council of NZ "denouncing" the Imam, but then following it up with a bald faced lie defending their own religion (always their first priority).

"The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) had good relationships with his Jewish neighbours & encouraged Muslims to do the same," they said in a statement."

2)
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86716199/auckland-imam-demands-apology-after-backlash-from-antisemitic-speeches


Anonymous said...

HE DID IT AGAIN....BHO commuted 79 more drug felons' prison sentences today. Surpassing 1,000 and more expected before leaving office. Some were also firearms violations. Is he so far disconnected from reality to not understand the human ruin from illegal drugs? Or is this an intentional act of subversion of US society? The appearance is of favoring criminality.

Anonymous said...

women wearing garbage bags and submitting to beatings seems normal to you?

Anonymous said...

You may've helped thousands. Tens of thousands. Perhaps millions in time. Just think how fast TB would correct if millions of slighted bean burrito connoisseurs checked their order b4 leaving. Oh my gosh. A revolution on every steet corner. Maybe even more customers for Del Taco.

Jon said...

How did you communicate with "that guy" to make sure he understands to make your bean burrito with no cheese?

Jon said...

It's just not explained in your original post is all.

Anonymous said...

She be sayin that he do it on purpose cuz he nose she dont like cheese.

Jon said...

Wait, how do you know it's a she?

Anonymous said...

She dint report it to police, but instead posted online. Seems suspicious but may be legit. Hope taco bells fix it before trump tower has to.

Bottle Cap said...

More fake hate caught. Two Williams College students are now facing disciplinary action after hoaxing vandalism which appeared to be Ku Klux Klan (KKK) inspired days after the 2016 Election.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/11/21/students-face-disciplinary-action-hoaxing-kkk-vandalism/

Jon said...

@ anon 6.43pm. "She dint report it to police, but instead posted online. Seems suspicious but may be legit. Hope taco bells fix it before trump tower has to."

Wait, what? How do you even know this? Is there a link that I've missed somewhere on this page? There's no mention on the original post @ 6.07pm about this being posted online elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

So stoopit sayin kkk nowadays. No one nose em. They be just tryin to dredge up some past monstir that been dead. Most caulk asains would be O'fended seeing them spooks on horse back. I nose I is.

Anonymous said...

Reported to taco bell headauarters via online complaints. Better than calling outsourced 800# customer service.

Anonymous said...

Hurray....Hurray....more presidential medals of freedom awarded today to Celebrities.

Anonymous said...

Just reported. NY Daily News. Wayne state university police officer shot in head by black male wearing brown jacket and gray skullcap. Everyday this happens. The evil doers dont realize they could be opening the door of totalitarianism to crush lawlessness.

Anonymous said...

She's just like 'him'. German Chancellor merkel warning about fake news (misinformation) causing the rise of populism. What timing!! She meets with 'him' then soon after announces she'll attempt a 4th term. What did 'he' discuss with his 'closest ally'? Arent they both subversives accusing their rivals of extremism?

Freedom said...

it is so ironic to see those who lived in a land that once, when they disagreed with their government they were labeled and eventually lost jobs arrested put in concentration camps and now the same thing is happening in the same country again

John mcgowan said...

Another

OT:

Election Inspires Phony Sexual Assault Claim

Snipped:

On November 11, the Kirkland Police Department received an email from a concerned citizen. It was a Facebook post from a female who stated she was sexually assaulted. She said Kirkland Police responded but would not investigate the case or even file a police report.

After a weeklong investigation officials finally tracked down the author of the original post at her work in Kirkland.

During the interview, the woman admitted she fabricated the entire event, and no assault occurred, and the Kirkland Police were never called.

Her reason: she was “distraught over the recent election.”

http://moonbattery.com/?p=78426

Anonymous said...

Anonymous donor set up ransom and website for Sherri Pappini with an email and number to a disposable cell phone

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/11/17/anonymous-donor-offers-50k-ransom-papini/94057732/

Anonymous said...

Chattanooga school bus driver,Snoop's momma say, He a good boy. Crash be Gods will. But injired and kilt kids momma say, I called wrote and complaint bout the Snoop reckless drivin. But now ya'll wanna doo right thing? My baby died.

Anonymous said...

One of the things that makes me doubt Sherri Papini's husband is that TV interview when he said over and over "Bring her back. Bring her back. Bring her back. Bring her back.".

His statements "Bring her back" come so rapidly it leaves ZERO space afterward each plea AS IF THERE IS ACTUALLY NO REPLY.

I can't explain this well.

Okay, let's assume a hypothetical where a husband is innocent, and he tells the TV audience "Just bring her back!"

I would expect an innocent man, desperate to get his wife back, would need to say that only once to the camera AND would be silent after saying it, showing his face/emotions, and allowing that HUGE PLEA to resonate across the community.

But this guy can hardly stand to leave even a split second after saying "Bring her back", and we get a cascade of "Bring her back", like a waterfall.

He stumbles over himself to say it again and again, and one gets the feeling he knows there is no "response" to his plea "Bring her back."


Anonymous said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym3ruN0ClDU

Oh, excuse me: He says "Bring her home" over and over, not "Bring her back".

"Bring her home."

Oh, don't get me started. "Bring home" is not what one says to an unknown kidnapper of a loved one.

Anonymous said...

I'm curious: Is it THAT EASY for a person to hire someone to kill their spouse, and then never ever get caught? I've been riveted to a couple cases lately, and it appears the spouse actually gets away with murder! It's worrisome to realize how easy it seems to be for people with the wherewithal to just go ahead and have their spouses gotten rid of!

Jean said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jean said...

I am one of those people who says not all, because that is a way of refusing to see people as individuals, and that makes it easy to hate a clump of people, some of whom may not agree.

Ima.grandma said...

I hope all you detectives are enjoying the bounty of Thanksgiving and not letting these cases weight too heavy on you. I myself just finished a 5K Turkey Trot in style---first place in my age category. If I can do it so can you all! Blessings!!! Now I need to go change out of my sneakers and put my apron on to begin whipping up a mighty feast!

Anonymous said...

Sheri Papini has been found safe. DailyMail UK.

Anonymous said...

Anon, 2:50, thank you!!! OMG - They found her!! Press conference about Sherri Papini case at 2pm California time, 5pm eastern time. I'm so interested to find out what really happened. Someone on the Facebook page said she left on her own. Hmmm. We shall see, I guess. I am so curious to hear the story!! Did she want out of the marriage, without having to hurt her husband (thus, fake abduction)? Or, was she actually abducted? Was it the ransom $$$ offered, & videos from the surrogate guy - was that what saved her from abductors? The news stories all say "no arrests"!! Does that mean they actually kept their promise to the abductors to absolutely let them off the hook?? DYING TO HEAR ALL THE FACTS!! ha ha!! Plus, very HAPPY to hear the good news!!

Anonymous said...

I wonder if she is like the woman in the movie "Sleeping with the Enemy", trying to get away from a controlling/abusive husband she's afraid of. The "half-wrapped" present to him seemed too obvious a clue left behind to reassure him she loves him, while she vanishes into thin air.

Anonymous said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbNXBlORFao

Anonymous said...

Woah!!!!

http://www.kcra.com/article/mom-missing-for-3-weeks-found-alive/8363283

Anonymous said...

"Papini was released by her captors, and despite being bound with restraints, was able to flag down a passing driver, the sheriff's office said in a news conference."

Anonymous said...

SHASTA COUNTY, Calif. (KCRA) —
A Northern California mother whose disappearance made national news was found bound with restraints, but alive on Thanksgiving morning along Interstate 5 in Yolo County, officials said.

Officers received information about 4:30 a.m. Thursday that Sherri Papini, who went missing while out for a jog on Nov. 2 in the tiny town of Mountain Gate, had been found near County Road 17 and I-5.

Papini was released by her captors, and despite being bound with restraints, was able to flag down a passing driver, the sheriff's office said in a news conference.

"She is safe, in stable condition and receiving medical clearance at an undisclosed hospital," the Shasta County Sheriff's Office said. "She has been reunited with her husband, Keith."

The sheriff's office did no give additional details as to what injuries Papini suffered, but that her injuries were non-life-threatening.

Sheriff Tom Bosenko said that investigators are looking for a dark-colored SUV driven by two armed Hispanic woman. Anyone who see anything is asked to call the Shasta County Sheriff's Office at 530-245-6135.

Investigators believe that Papini was abducted from the area where she went out for a jog, but no motive has been released.

http://www.kcra.com/article/mom-missing-for-3-weeks-found-alive/8363283

Anonymous said...

Great news! I said the husband didnt do it!!!

That story sounds less than believable that 2 Hispanic women did it?!?!

Also, what does "dark SUV" mean? I ask bc I didnt understand what "dark SUV" meant when that was recently released that as a clue in the MA jogger killing (Vanessa Marcotte case).

Anonymous said...

@4:05, I agree, I bet it was an escape attempt from hubby staged as abduction.

Anonymous said...

Anon 5:51 we don't know yet the husband had nothing to do with it. I am so enthralled with this story and I am so hoping they let us in on what really happened!

Yeh, dark SUV with 2 Hispanic women - that is so weird.

Anonymous said...

That's true...we dont know for sure. I got a bad vibe off SIL...I still stand by the idea that hubby and SIL were abusive to her.
2 Hispanic women? I dont believe that story.

It is an intriguing case. I am intrigued by the Vanessa Marcotte case.

Anonymous said...

I'm gonna look up Vanessa Marcotte case! I know nothing about it!

Anonymous said...

REDDING (CBS13) – Sherri Papini, the Redding mother who disappeared while jogging three weeks ago, has been found safe, and now law enforcement officials say she was kidnapped.

Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko said Papini was kidnapped on November 2 and had been bound by her captors. Around 4:30 a.m. today, they released her along County Road 17 near Interstate 5 in Yolo County.

She was bound with restraints but was able to flag down a motorist.

CHP, Yolo County Sheriff’s deputies, and medical aid arrived on the scene. Papini was taken to the hospital to be treated for non-life-threatening injuries she suffered while in captivity.

Shasta County Sheriff’s Department deputies are looking for two Hispanic females who are said to be driving a dark-colored SUV. At least one of them is armed with a handgun.

Papini is in stable condition and is receiving medical treatment at a local hospital. She has been reunited with her husband.

Bosenko said it’s unknown if Papini’s knew her captors, or what their motives may have been.

“I spoke over the phone with her husband, Keith, and he is overjoyed with the outcome…,” said Bosenko.

After hearing the news about her discovery, Keith drove to the hospital.

This is a critical, active, ongoing investigation,” said Bosenko.

Anyone with information about Papini’s abduction is being asked to contact the Shasta County Sheriff’s Department at at (530) 245-6135.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/11/24/missing-redding-mother-sherri-papini-found-safe/

Bill said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Bill said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Bill said...

Ok Anon, I think I "get it". Thats a good way to make him think youre extremely obnoxious. I wouldnt count on it having a positive effect. I think you sound unbelievably immature, and I dont feel like talking about it anymore. Good luck.

Anonymous said...

A California woman who went missing in the beginning of November has been found safe after being released by her captor or captors this morning, the Shasta County Sheriff's Office announced today.

Sherri Papini, 34, was reported missing on Nov. 2, 2016, after she went for a run in the afternoon and never came home.

Papini was last seen jogging alone on Sunrise Drive in Redding, California, according to a poster that was distributed in the search effort. The mother of two young children has been described by her family as a "super mom."

"We are very ecstatic to report that Sherri Papini has been located and has been reunited with husband and family on this day of Thanksgiving," Sheriff Tom Bosenko said at a news conference today. "I am happy to say that Sherri is now safe and that she has been treated at an area hospital outside of Shasta County for non-life-threatening injuries."

Bosenko did not specify the nature of her injuries.

Bosenko said Papini was released early this morning by her captor (or captors) on a rural road in Yolo County, about 150 miles from her home. "She was bound with restraints but was able to summon help from a passing motorist," Bosenko said.

The sheriff said that this is still an active investigation and that authorities are "looking for a dark-colored SUV with two Hispanic females armed with a handgun."

“This is a new chapter in this investigation, sensitive information has yet to be disclosed,” Bosenko said.

The sheriff's office added that she has been reunited with her husband, Keith Papini.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-california-super-mom-found-safe-sheriffs-office/story?id=43764177

Anonymous said...

Bill, how bout this? Im gonna unblock him, send him a smiley face and a heart, and then reblock him!!! He'll be like whoah, this chick is super cool!!!!

Bill said...

Anon, youre right...I bet he'll think thats awesome, or, he might think youre the most obnoxious person on the planet, but go ahead and give it a whirl.

Anonymous said...

“This is a new chapter in this investigation, sensitive information has yet to be disclosed,” Bosenko said.

Anonymous said...

OT, until hopefully Peter covers it, but has anyone else been following Pizzagate? It is some seriously fkd up sht and should be receiving as much media coverage as possible.

Here's some statements from James Alefantis who owns the Pizza joint at the centre of the controversy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/technology/fact-check-this-pizzeria-is-not-a-child-trafficking-site.html

Isn't it amazing that NY Times, Snopes and other publications can simply state something as "debunked" solely based on the word of the accused.

Anonymous said...

Something tells me he already knows.

Anonymous said...

I sent him a heart, a turkey pic and a unicorn pic, and then I did a double reblock! Hahahaha!!!!!! I cant stop laughing!!!!!! Joke's on him! Hahahaha!!!!!

Anonymous said...

It's a riddle!!!! Heart plus turkey plus double reblock plus unicorn!!!!! I am rolling on the floor!!! He will NEVER figure it out!!!!!!

bellalina said...

The question is why did Sherry wrap the present so early? A busy Mom of 2 wrapping presents weeks before Thanksgiving. Did Sherry run away?

Anonymous said...

One person having a dialog with self. Awesome. Cool. Obnoxious.

Anonymous said...

Press conference:

http://www.krcrtv.com/news/local/northstate/sherri-papini-was-found-in-yolo-county-bound-with-restraints/183165592

Anonymous said...

Imaginative and talented. Career in short stories.

Anonymous said...

And screenplays.

Anonymous said...

Or straight to CNN...

Anonymous said...

Perfect example. Just more stupidity @1001 1002 1007. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Who the f--- would do that? Oh my God there's this beautiful girl....I know what I'll do...I think I'll whip out my guitar and sing her a love song and then tell her it was really written for a butt ugly girl with a man's haircut...that'll be smooth!!! And then if she gets annoyed I'll sulk for years bc that means she's a HORRIBLE person...And then extrapolate that and multiply it by 50 and keep doing it.

The shit you do is just stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

http://www.unilad.co.uk/news/father-of-mystery-homeless-girl-opens-up-for-first-time/

Father Of Mystery Homeless Girl Opens Up For First Time

Habundia said...

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/11/24/missing-redding-mother-sherri-papini-found-safe/
What happend here? Seems like a strange story, but the article doesnt say much.

Habundia said...

Strange story isnt it? Glad she's found safe tho!

Qwerty said...

OT I have been looking into pizzagate and it is really disturbing. There is actually a YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKTiUaloDDA where the owner of Comet Ping Pong is answering questions that might be interesting for statement analysis. There is no reliable denial. He is smiling and extremely cordial, even though the interviewers are more or less accusing him of running a pedophile ring. There is no anger, outrage, defiance or legal threats. He is probably not even lying in the video, which is all the more disturbing. At one point he is showing some protesters around the pizza place and he says "This is where we turn the lights on". That got me the chills.