Friday, November 4, 2016

Erik Prince: Allegations Against Clinton

The following is allegations made by Erik Prince against the Clintons and those close to the Clintons.  He claims his source is NYPD.   Please answer the questions found at the end of this entry.  

Included in the allegations is the outrageous claim that Hillary Clinton went on "at least 6" trips with a pedophile to his sex island. 

Is this plausible?

We approach this from 2 fronts: 

1.  Is Erik Prince, the subject, truthful or deceptive?  
2.  What do we make of the child sexual abuse allegation against, specifically, Hillary Clinton?  

Keep in mind:  detecting deception comes through discerning "intent" to deceive.  We may conclude that the subject believes his allegations to be true, while the allegations may not be true or accurate in total, or in part.  

Blackwater founder and retired Navy SEAL Erik told Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM that according to one of his “well-placed sources” in the New York Police Department, “the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making” in the Anthony Weiner investigation, but received “huge pushback” from the Justice Department.

His statements are in italics with analysis/commentary in bold type. 
Prince began by saying he had no problem believing reports that the FBI was highly confident multiple foreign agencies hacked Hillary Clinton’s private email server.
“I mean, it’s not like the foreign intelligence agencies leave a thank-you note after they’ve hacked and stolen your data,” Prince said to SiriusXM host Alex Marlow.
That Hillary Clinton and those around her set up a private server is now known. That Barak Obama lied to the American people about it when he said "whenever everyone else learned about it..." is also now known.  
What is missed is that these people had a need to lie, and, more importantly, 
They knew such a private server would necessary in concealing information from the citizens of the United States.  
Donna Brazille attempted to say that the emails were forgeries. She was found to be deceptive.  That is to say, while she made this claim, she knew she was lying.  
The home server was not set up to be "convenient", but to both conceal information.  This was approved, de facto by the White House, the State Department, and the Justice Department.  The information within this private server was not intended for Congress, watchdogs, or the American people to see.  
Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.
Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.
They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said. 

a.  "really damning criminal information
b.  "money laundering"  (note:  this allegation has been since the Clintons were 'poor' and sought the governor's position and later national recognition) 
c.  Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein at "least" 6 times
d.  Bill Clinton went more than 20 times 
That Bill Clinton went with a pedophile is not something that should surprise readers of the Statement Analysis blog as his own words have revealed early childhood sexual abuse and a most unhealthy relationship with his mother.  He has a long history of sexual 'conquests' including allegations of rape. 
In this lengthy history, there is a de-sensitization process of which one experiences.  They need "new" and "different" ways of provoking sexual arousal, which is why pornography is so dangerous to society.  This process is either interrupted, or it is going to escalate.  Recently, due to online pornography's access, therapists report treating teenaged boys for impotency.  They are not capable of sexual arousal due to the desensitization process of separating healthy, normal human sexuality from emotional connection.  Pornography is a distinct separation from any emotional connection while engaging in sexual activity.  Though the trend in Europe and the United States is to redefine sexual activity, reducing it to biological functioning sans human morals, the escalation of consequences is both evident and should be expected to continue.  
What of Hillary Clinton's alleged attendance at such?
Many view her as "asexual" even with reports of her entourage arranging for her to have sexual "trysts" with men as well as women actresses?  
In the realm of child sexual abuse, the sexual activity within such an assault is not the only element involved. 
Humiliation and the infliction of harm upon another, especially those viewed as innocent (children), are to be noted.  This sociopathic like behavior is something that builds over many years, along with the means (financial) to indulge.  The same desensitization process over decades couples with natural declining hormonal levels.  
Those who are sexually aroused outside of normal sexual activity are noted specifically as criminal and habitually exploitive of others.  This is often seen in small detail.  Although some point to the now infamous, "what does it matter?" statement lacking human empathy over the deaths in Benghazi, one should consider even smaller details of behavior (and language) that reveal a personality:  one that is driven to the brink of physiological collapse by ambition. 
Consider the humiliation that Clinton experienced over her husband's affairs in the White House: 
she was already accustomed to this from governorship and we have evidence that she, too, was practicing her "open marriage."  Yet, the national embarrassment translated into New York Votes. 
When they left the White House, Clinton claimed she was "broke."
This is significant.  
She was extremely wealthy but in her personal subjective understanding of wealth, her reference point was quite different.  
She went on to take many millions of dollars from our nation's enemies in exchange for State Department favors and her and Bill grew even greater wealth from this. 
In the White House, when a secret service agent said, "Good morning, Mrs. Clinton", she is reported to have replied, "go F*** yourself." This was routine contempt she held for others.  This is not the expected reaction of a normal human being. 
When she left the White House, she stole furniture. 
She had the humiliation of having the Secret Service go to her home and take it back.  
What impact did this have on her?
Years later, she was appointed to Secretary of State, one of the highest and most powerful positions of government, she began the "pay for play" where she sold military technology, contracts, and other major favors for hundreds of millions of dollars.  She was no longer "dead broke."
She stole furniture from the State Department. 
If you take into account the contempt she holds for others, including going back to the child rape victim she laughed about, and look at her history, you see the sociopathic trend before you.  
She is a habitual liar who holds the world in contempt.  She called Obama by his first name, just to anger him.  She routinely cursed out those paid to protect her very life. 
She did not want anyone else using furniture that she used and could afford to buy 1,000 times over.  
She takes millions of dollars from nations that flog women for having sex, while millions of women say they are voting for her because she is a woman.  
The above is just a small insight into a personality that strongly suggests that Hillary Clinton enjoys humiliating others.  
This is at the core of female involvement in childhood sexual abuse:  they have been victimized and they want to victimize others.  
Those who were both armed and paid to hazard their own lives to protect hers she routinely held in vicious and released contempt. 
Even if she felt they were 'beneath' her, or even a 'nuisance' to her she might have 'turned her nose up' at them silently.
She did not. 
She ordered an entire segment terminated from their jobs because they put on gloves before pat downs; something they do always, but because Barney Frank's feelings were hurt, she tried to get them all fired.  
She was willing to destroy their careers and their lives, as she coerces millions of dollars from hostile actors, and tells people that she understands them and is going to get them "income equity."  
Sometimes we learn that the rich and powerful were among the most perverted of all and we are not surprised, as money becomes a means to fund their perversion.  We know that sexual perversion escalates due to the 'tolerance' built up by the brain's reaction, which is the desensitization process. 
Although I do not know if the allegation of trips to "sex island" with the known pedophile are true, I believe that she is capable of passive participation, while I believe her husband is capable of active participation.  This opinion comes in measuring the allegation against the many years of analyzing both Bill and Hillary Clinton.  That she paid .72 on the dollar to women than men, from her Senate office, is consistent with the victim turning victimizer, as it becomes almost a 'joking matter' to them in a 'sophisticated' contempt held for women.  

I do not know if the allegation is true, but I believe the personality type is consistent.  The intended verbal destruction of all of Bill's accusers was without human empathy.  It is one thing to deny an allegation, and even to accuse a woman of lying.  It is another to seek to re-victimize and destroy them.  Hillary chose the latter.  

This is not one who shows human empathy while being in a position of authority.  This is a dangerous combination.  

What she said about the child victim was disturbing.  As one commentator wrote, "One only need listen to her laughing about the diabolical steps she took to inflict lifelong harm on a child victim of brutal rape...Hillary also mocked, disparaged and intimidated Bill's sex victims.  This is a woman capable of extreme harm."

Why Hillary and Huma became so close is not lost on most readers.  Both were attracted to acute perversion.  

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.
I believeI know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said.
“There’s five different parts of the FBI conducting investigations into these things, with constant downdrafts from the Obama Justice Department. So in the, I hope, unlikely and very unfortunate event that Hillary Clinton is elected president, we will have a constitutional crisis that we have not seen since, I believe, 1860,” Prince declared.
Marlow asked Prince to clarify these revelations.
NYPD was the first one to look at that laptop,” Prince elaborated. “Weiner and Huma Abedin, his wife – the closest adviser of Hillary Clinton for 20 years – have both flipped. They are cooperating with the government. They both have – they see potential jail time of many years for their crimes, for Huma Abedin sending and receiving and even storing hundreds of thousands of messages from the State Department server and from Hillary Clinton’s own homebrew server, which contained classified information. Weiner faces all kinds of exposure for the inappropriate sexting that was going on and for other information that they found.”

He now claims that Huma and Anthony Weiner have both decided to cooperate with the investigation.  
Did they keep this laptop to protect themselves, knowing the ruthless history of the Clintons, and how others have ended up in prison, or deceased?  
Next, he moves into narrative form.  Now note the word "plot" following the present tense narrative:  
So NYPD first gets that computer. They see how disgusting it is. They keep a copy of everything, and they pass a copy on to the FBI, which finally pushes the FBI off their chairs, making Comey reopen that investigation, which was indicated in the letter last week. The point being, NYPD has all the information, and they will pursue justice within their rights if the FBI doesn’t,” Prince contended. 
“There is all kinds of criminal culpability through all the emails they’ve seen of that 650,000, including money laundering, underage sex, pay-for-play, and, of course, plenty of proof of inappropriate handling, sending/receiving of classified information, up to SAP level Special Access Programs,” he stated.
“So the plot thickens. NYPD was pushing because, as an article quoted one of the chiefs – that’s the level just below commissioner – he said as a parent, as a father with daughters, he could not let that level of evil continue,” Prince said.
He noted that the FBI can investigate these matters, “but they can’t convene a grand jury. They can’t file charges.”
The prosecutors, the Justice Department has to do that,” he explained. “Now, as I understand it, Preet Bharara, the Manhattan prosecutor, has gotten ahold of some of this. From what I hear, he’s a stand-up guy, and hopefully he does the right thing.”
Marlow agreed that Bharara’s “sterling reputation” as a determined prosecutor was “bad news for the Clintons.”
Prince agreed, but said, “If people are willing to bend or break the law and don’t really care about the Constitution or due process – if you’re willing to use Stalinist tactics against someone – who knows what level of pressure” could be brought to bear against even the most tenacious law enforcement officials?
“The point being, fortunately, it’s not just the FBI; [there are] five different offices that are in the hunt for justice, but the NYPD has it as well,” Prince said, citing the Wall Street Journal reporting that has “exposed downdraft, back pressure from the Justice Department” against both the FBI and NYPD, in an effort to “keep the sunlight and the disinfecting effects of the truth and transparency from shining on this great evil that has gone on, and is slowly being exposed.”
The Justice Department is trying to run out the clock, to elect Hillary Clinton, to prevent any real justice from being done,” he warned.
As for the mayor of New York City, Prince said he has heard that “de Blasio wants to stay away from this.
“The evidence is so bad, the email content is so bad, that I think even he wants to stay away from it, which is really telling,” he said.
This is something New York readers may find consistent with the mayor's behavior, including scandals and his relationship with law enforcement.  
Prince reported that the other legislators involved in the case “have not been named yet,” and urged the NYPD to hold a press conference and name them.
I wish they’d do it today,” he said. “These are the unusual sliding-door moments of history, that people can stand up and be counted, and make a real difference, and to save a Republic, save a Constitution that we actually need and love, that our forefathers fought and died for. For any cop that is aware of this level of wrongdoing, and they have veterans in their family, or deceased veterans in their family, they owe it to them to stand up, to stand and be counted today, and shine the light of truth on this great evil.”
From what I understand, up to the commissioner or at least the chief level in NYPD, they wanted to have a press conference, and DOJ, Washington people, political appointees have been exerting all kinds of undue pressure on them to back down,” he added. 
The qualification of "from what I understand" should be understood as weakness here, given its lack of necessity.  This suggests that what follows has increased sensitivity for him.  Consider "commissioner" as possible source of sensitivity.  If he does not have the authority to quote the NYC police commissioner, it could, immediately, cause sensitivity.  
Marlow suggested that some of those involved in keeping the details quiet might want to avoid accusations of politicizing the case and seeking to influence the presidential election.
“Sure, that’s it. That’s the argument for it,” Prince agreed. “But the fact is, you know that if the Left had emails pointing to Donald Trump visiting, multiple times, an island with underage sex slaves basically, emails, you know they’d be talking about it. They’d be shouting it from the rooftops.” 
“This kind of evil, this kind of true dirt on Hillary Clinton – look, you don’t have to make any judgments. Just release the emails,” he urged. “Just dump them. Let them out there. Let people see the light of truth.”
Prince dismissed the claims of people like Clinton campaign CEO John Podesta and DNC chair Donna Brazile that some of the damaging emails already released by WikiLeaks were fabricated, noting that “forensic analysis done shows that, indeed, they are not fabricated; they are really legitimate.”
We did not need forensic analysis to show us what Brazile already showed us:  she was lying.  
“This is stuff coming right off a hard drive that was owned by Weiner and his wife Huma Abedin, Hillary’s closest adviser for the last 20 years,” he said of the new bombshells. “This is not from some hacker or anybody else. This is a laptop seized from a warrant in a criminal investigation.
Prince confirmed that based on his information, Abedin is most likely looking at jail time, unless she cuts a deal with prosecutors.
“There’s a minimum of obstruction of justice and all kinds of unlawful handling of classified information,” he said. “Because remember, this laptop was in the possession of Weiner, who did not have a security clearance. And many, many of those emails were from her Yahoo account, which had State Department emails forwarded to them, so she could easier print these messages, scan them, and send them on to Hillary. That’s the carelessness that Hillary and her staff had for the classified information that the intelligence community risks life and limb to collect in challenged, opposed areas around the world.

“That’s not who you want in the White House,” Prince declared.

Readers:   What do you think?
First, does Prince believe his own words?
Secondly:  What, if any,  allegations do you believe to be true?


Anonymous said...

Peter, I am very glad you are addressing this issue and I will be carefully reading and replying to this article when I get home. Before any of this news leaked out about Hillary I suspected she was very capable of harming children and it is one of the reasons I despise her.

Here is a comment I shared on the other thread:
Hillary linguistically shows herself to be a pervert who would harm children imo. One need only listen to her laughing about the diabolical steps she took to inflict lifelong harm on a child victim of a brutal rape. I may review the recording of her speaking about that case today to listen more carefully for any linguitic indicators.
Hillary also mocked, disparaged and intimidated Bill's sex victims.
This is a woman capable of extreme harm.

Trigger said...

"This is a woman capable of extreme harm."

I concur.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Monday will be wikileaks biggest dump date

Hey Jude said...

I think Hilary is not fit to be President, even if only by the way she speaks to people - that should disqualify her.
I think Erik Prince believes his own words.
I think the contents of the computer are very likely as he says - he is so confident and forthright in stating what he believes that I believe him - he is confident in his sources; one should be able to view his sources as reliable. His alert is to 'great evil' - it is very strongly stated, and there is widespread concern amongst those who know the contents of the mail that they should be known and acted upon before Hillary Clinton can be elected as President.

Anonymous said...

I believe Hillary is capable of actively sexually abusing a child.
You are absolutely correct in stating that Hillary enjoys humiliating people.
Hillary is a sadist imo capable of exerting considerable planning and effort to attain the satisfaction of humiliating a victim which is a VERY bad sign. (This was shown in the way in which she defended the child rapist and laughed in a delighted way about what she had done).
Hillary does come across as asexual but imo it may be because her inclinations are so deviant they are masqued by the asexual facade.
I believe all the charges are true.

Bottle Cap said...

Yes, I believe she is capable. She seems the type to enjoy degradation of anyone.

Here' Hillary telling how she got a child rapist off as she laughs:

Well Joe Biden for sure. Check out this video of all his fondling and inappropriate comments to senators' children:

Nic said...

Peter Hyatt said...
There is a lot here to discuss.

I am most curious to learn what readers think about any possible involvement by Hillary Clinton in child sexual abuse.

Is it an off the wall allegation?

IMO, no. Is there anything else identified that has been reported we don't know about? No. Why would peadophelia be off of the table?

We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

This bugged me. "Timely" is subjective.

I love the NYPD. What they have done makes me want to book a trip to NYC and inject some economic love.

mom2many said...

I thought it was odd when Chelsea Clinton was answering a question about her mother, she said that she trusts her mother with her own children. At that time, no one had suggested that she shouldn't be trusted with children. Why would that come to Chelsea's mind? It stuck with me, I thought it so odd.

So now, we have these allegations, and it does not seem so odd why Chelsea would go there.

Anonymous said...

How Hillary spoke in the third debate of children/babies who are victims of partial birth abortion is indicative of her utter lack of empathy or concern for them, society's most vulnerable.

Anytime I've heard left-wing politicians speak of it, they either deny it happens or speak against it, that at least abortion should be done earlier. She didn't.

She defended the act, feigning sympathy for the mother instead of the child.

I think that she is capable of sexually abusing children because she thinks nothing of their murder.

Bobcat said...

“Even when he erupted at me, he admired my independence and accomplishments,”

- Hillary Clinton, writing about her father.

"Unleashed, his rage was frightening, and the household sometimes seemed on the verge of imploding. Betsy and the few other girlfriends whom Hillary brought home could see that life with Hugh Rodham was painfully demeaning for her mother, and that Hillary winced at her father’s distemper and chafed under his miserliness. Money was always a contentious issue, ultimately the way in which he could exercise undisputed control, especially in response to Hillary’s and Dorothy’s instinctive rebelliousness and the wicked sense of humor they shared. Sometimes his tirades would begin in the kitchen and continue into her parents’ bedroom. Hillary would put her hands over her ears. But the experience of standing up to her father also prepared her for the intellectual rough-and-tumble that honed Hillary and Bill Clinton’s marital partnership, and helped inure her in the arena of political combat. “I could go home to two parents who adored everything I did,” said Betsy. “Hillary had a different kind of love; you had to earn it.” As a child, Hillary was affected by her parents’ often-conflicting values, and her politics borrowed from both, she said later."

This story about Hillary's father Hugh and uncle Russell (seven years younger than Hugh) set off my hinky meter:

"By the time Hillary had reached her teens, her father seemed defined by his mean edges — he had almost no recognizable enthusiasms or pretense to lightness as he descended into continuous bullying, ill-humor, complaint, and dejection. In fact, depression seemed to haunt the Rodham men. Hugh’s younger brother, Russell, a physician, was the “golden boy” of the three children of Hannah and Hugh Rodham Sr. of Scranton, Pennsylvania. When Russell sank into depression in 1948, his parents asked Hugh to return to Scranton to help. Only hours after his (Hugh's) arrival, Russell tried to hang himself in the attic, and Hugh had to cut him down."

Apparently people close to not only Hillary, but her father Hugh, want to die.

Anonymous said...

fascinating stuff bobcat wow but i guess i should not be surprised

Anonymous said...

“Even when he erupted at me, he admired my independence and accomplishments,”

What an odd thing to say..

Anonymous said...

This is kind of interesting in the tape of Hillary discussing the rape case:

There is a lot of sensitivity surrounding who the "blood expert" Hillary traveled across the country to see actually was, and to whom she presented the wrong evidence after the crime lab had analyzed the correct evidence and found guilty evidence.

Hillary cannot remember the expert's name, and states this multiple times although not questioned about it, and at one point, unprompted, says "Sorry, I can't remember his name."

What I find interesting is her description of the "expert's" house, which she enters so he can look at her wrong piece of evidence with a magnifying glass.

At 4:15, she says in order to get to the expert's house, she took a taxi to a section of Brooklyn she "had never heard of, never seen before" (this is sensitive and calls into question whether she may actually have been there before). She spends a lot of time describing the man's house. At 4:20, she says "Got through the gates (wouldn't this be similar to the word "door"?), got into his office, and he had a little...he had a basement just absolutely packed with detective magazines and things like that."

Pedophiles often collect "detective magazines".

Anonymous said...

Here is the link for the Hillary rape case interview I referenced in my post at 10:30:

Anonymous said...

At 3:46, Hillary shows that she has odd amounts of knowledge about the history of the expert's house and what it used to look like (while claiming that she had never been there before).

She says "He still lived in the same house where his father had been born and now had a huge fence around it." She shows knowledge of what the house used to look like shortly before stating that it was in a section of Brookyln she had never heard of, never seen before".

Hillary had obviously seen the house before, otherwise how would she know that there did not used to be a fence around it????

Anonymous said...

Hillary's trip across the country from Arkansas to New York where, according to her, she "just happened to be" and her visit to this "expert's" house where she clearly had been before, although she claims to have never been in that part of Brooklyn, is what freed the child rapist. There is something very shady about this part of her tale, and there is something very shady about this "expert" imo.

Anonymous said...

@6:45, wow that is disturbing!!!

Ode said...

Read out loud statements written by HRC

Her life, her spirituality

It's a tough sell

Published on Nov 4, 2016

My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and journalist

Anonymous said...

HEllary and Bill surround themselves with sickos and they are sickos.

That is absolutely disgusting about Podesta's "spirit dinner". What a whacked out sicko.

lynda said...

I read an in depth interview that VOGUE had with Trump about 25 years ago. Here's the link:

He's an abominable person. He's a narcissistic pathological liar. He was 25 years ago and he still is now. He's dangerous, truly dangerous.

The same can be said about Hillary, tho HRC has a lifetime in politics that we can tear apart, whereas Donald has no political experience so we can't say he's "corrupt" in the same way as Hillary. Even though he is.

These are our choices for POTUS.

I find no redeeming quality in either of them. I'm not playing into the "Yeah, but at least HE/SHE didn't do blah blah blah

Now we have Erik Prince shooting his mouth off. That would be the same ERik Prince
1. whose "hired guns" murdered 17 civilian Iraqi's during an assault in Baghdad in 2007
2. Four of his men were convicted in US Court of murder/manslaughter for that same incident
3. Is supposedly under investigation of the Justice Dept. for trying to sell his defense services to Libya and was aided by Chinese Intelligence that was used to help broker that deal.
4. Opened a bank account in China to use to launder funds for Libya
5. Whose company before being sold, endured years of government investigations, criminal indictments. bribery accusations, and civil lawsuits.

Peter..I know that you have said we have to look at each statement for analysis separately, and that even liars give us much information. But then again, your mantra of Liars LIE. When confronted, the keep lying...after that, they attack. Even with SA, it is hard to believe ANYTHING anymore from anyone commenting on either candidates. It all seems politically motivated, hatred abounds, agendas are pushed, etc.

I would not be surprised, if on Monday, Hillary will have had at least one abortion where they "ripped the baby out of her body and killed it on the day it was supposed to be born" and perhaps Donald will turn out to have 100 illegal Mexicans, that he pays 2 bucks an hour, working for him cleaning toilets in Trump Tower while he rapes the girls. It just wouldn't surprise me at all.

What does surprise me is that people don't bother to fact check anymore, they don't care. We've become rabid dogs in the political arena and if someone doesn't think like you do, they aren't just disagreeing with you..they are THE ENEMY. I have NEVER seen anything like this in our country in all my years.

Does Hillary sexually abuse children? I don't think so
Is Prince telling the truth? I don't think so

In the VOGUE article I linked..Trump says one of his best weapons so to speak is "If you say something often enough, people will think it's true."

All 3 of the above are doing just that.

I am one tired, disillusioned, disgusted, embarrassed American citizen right now.

God help us all

John Mc Gowan said...

mom2many said...

I thought it was odd when Chelsea Clinton was answering a question about her mother, she said that she trusts her mother with her own children. At that time, no one had suggested that she shouldn't be trusted with children. Why would that come to Chelsea's mind? It stuck with me, I thought it so odd.

So now, we have these allegations, and it does not seem so odd why Chelsea would go there.

Do you have a link to this? I would love to read or listen to whatever else she had to say.


Nic said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nic said...

lynda, the pendulum is swinging. It's destructive and ugly and necessary. I think everything written about each candidate's character is true. IMO, your election boils down to one thing: one candidate is *for* the USA, one candidate is *against* the USA. If I was an American voting in your election, I would be voting to save America. I am a Canadian and you are my #1 trading partner, if Trump gets in, between your POTUS's America "first" platform and my PM's ineptitude/"the budget will balance itself", Canada is going to have a very tough time, economically. I would still vote Trump based on the common good. jmo

Nic said...

Further to the above, beyond Trump and Clinton there is Pence and Kaine. I don't think there has been another election where the running mate has been so important as this one based on the fact that HRC is sick! There wouldn't be enough Sundays in one month to convince me to vote for Kaine. The running mates' debate and further researching the candidates convinced me, hands down, I would vote Pence. jmo

Nic said...

So Katy Perry is scheduled to perform for Clinton tonight in Philadelphia. The thing about this is that the turn out for HRC has been so dismal they haven't been able to use any footage unless the cameras are three feet from her face and four people with massive signs are held up as a backdrop so the viewer cannot see that nobody is there with her. And when MO has been campaigning on her behalf, they have to cram all the turnout onto one side of the school *gym* up into the bleachers to make it look like a massive crowd. Now they're pulling out Katy Perry. How much does anyone want to bet it's to create a false narrative for MSM to splash all over their sites, that so many voters turned out to see "Hillary Clinton". Smoke and mirrors.

Anonymous said...

When the Clintons left the White House in 2001, pilfering over $190,000 worth of china, flatware, rugs, and furniture as they cleared out, they claimed they were flat broke. Their net worth today is now in excess of $150 million, accumulated not by traditional means of work and investment, but rather by pay-for-play influence peddling through speeches and Clinton Foundation fundraising -- with the tacit understanding that the Clintons would be in a position to return favors to donors after Hillary won the 2016 presidential election.

Anonymous said...


You both make valid points. I agree that there is so much wickedness and corruption, it is difficult to see us coming back from the point we've reached as a society. I understand the discouragement and feel it myself many times. As a Canadian, I also am embarrassed by our prime minister, his cabinet and their agenda, as well as many of our provincial politicians.
I've thought a lot about who I'd vote for if I was American...there is a divide among evangelical Christian on the voting issue: some say that Trump will stem the tide of corruption, that he is 'the lesser of two evils', while others say they cannot, in good conscience, vote for either. I think I would vote for Trump (Pence is one of the reasons I would) though a Trump win will not turn things around permanently, if it does at all. It is encouraging to see good men standing up for the truth, attempting to bring justice, but I wonder if things have gone too far. It has been said that the promotion of evil as good (e.g. The homosexual agenda) is the beginning of the end of a society.
Wickedness abounds on the internet, enslaving billions. I'm not surprised to see Katy Perry being used as an attraction for Hillary's campaign. She is an icon for the base and mindless depravity of the human condition. The only One that will 'save' America, even the world, is Jesus. He saves His people from their sins, and will not turn away those who cry out to Him in repentance and faith. When He comes again, it will be to judge the world and its wickedness. He will restore all things.
Paul, the great apostle, said "We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down but not destroyed" -this because of his hope in Christ.

Anonymous said...

Post at 1:31 is mine. I forgot to sign.

Anonymous said...

Franklin Graham -perspective on voting, this morning on Fox

mom2many said...

John McGowan,

I hope that link works. It's using Google's AMP program on my phone and I'm not sure how to get a direct link. SA gold on her few quotes.

Bottle Cap said...

While some voters may view Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton as dishonest, her daughter, Chelsea Clinton, says there’s no one she trusts more.

“With my husband, there’s no one I trust more than my mom,” Clinton said Friday during an appearance on The View. “If, God forbid, anything were to happen to Marc [Mezvinsky] and me, my mother would take care of my children. There’s no greater vote of trust and faith and love than that. So as a daughter, it doesn’t make sense to me” that polls show some voters find Hillary Clinton untrustworthy.

The former first daughter made similar comments about her mother in a rare interview with the press on Thursday, saying, “I don’t trust anyone more than my mom.”

“If anything were to happen to me, my mother would take care of my children,” the 36-year-old said, according to CNN. “I couldn’t imagine a better sign of faith or trust than that.”

Clinton, who married investment banker Marc Mezvinsky in 2010, has two children – Charlotte and Aidan.

The couple met when they were children in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. They began dating in 2005 and confirmed their engagement to PEOPLE in 2009 after they sent a mass email to their loved ones.

“We… wanted to… share that we are engaged!” the couple wrote on Nov. 27.

While sources have told PEOPLE that Mezvinsky is Clinton’s “equal in every way,” no one can deny the strong bond between Clinton and her mother.

As the only child of powerful political figures, Clinton has always been in the spotlight, although she’s been more open to speaking to reporters in support of her mother’s campaign.

At the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Clinton introduced her mother and said she was “grateful that she is Charlotte and Aidan’s grandmother.”

The mother of two also told reporters that she and her husband would observe the upcoming 9/11 anniversary at home.

“I haven’t talked to my mother about how she plans to observe the day,” Clinton said. “I know my husband and I will be home … so certainly we’ll be particularly grateful when I look down at my children that we are safer now. I recognize that we still have tremendous work to do.”

John Mc Gowan said...

“With my husband, there’s no one I trust more than my mom,” Clinton said Friday during an appearance on The View. “If, God forbid, anything were to happen to Marc [Mezvinsky] and me, my mother would take care of my children. There’s no greater vote of trust and faith and love than that. So as a daughter, it doesn’t make sense to me” that polls show some voters find Hillary Clinton untrustworthy.

I find this interesting. When it comes down to looikng after her children, ("trust faith and love") she is her "Mother"

When she talks about her trust (voting) she distances herself ("a daughter") away from her. She then goes on to give her her full title ("Hilary Clinton") right next to the word "untrustworthy". Does she give her full name due to the election, or is it further psychological distancing. Does she trust her when it comes down to politics?

Anonymous said...

“I don’t trust anyone more than my mom" - quote from above commenter

Does this statement indicate that Chelsea doesn't trust anyone? Therefore she doesn't trust her mother?

John Mc Gowan said...

'I've never said what he said in my life!' Trump blasts Hillary for appearing onstage with Jay-Z after the rapper drops F-bombs and N-words during concert rally – and draws a larger crowd all by himself!
Donald Trump clobbered Hillary Clinton on Saturday morning for appearing with Jay-Z in Cleveland
The rapper dropped one F-bomb and N-word after another, and then Hillary embraced him onstage
Clinton has been openly critical of Trump's 'tone' and the 'lewd' language he has used in the past
'I tell you what: I've never said what he said – in my life!' Trump declared in Tampa, Florida
Clinton held her campaign rally with Jay-Z and Beyoncé, drawing 10,000 people with free tickets
Many of them exited before Clinton spoke, and Trump drew a larger crowd by himself in Pennsylvania
He told a crowd in the town of Hershey: 'I'm here all by myself... No guitar, no piano, no nothing'

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Nic said...

From the comment section at:

Yeah, peaceful revolution sounds great, yet I suspect you haven’t necessarily given the same advice to the peoples of the countries where you were trying effect a change of government. Regardless, the small arms and ammunition factories have been working basically flat-out for the past eight years, police are popular with the people yet the rulers and media are unpopular with the police, local organization could crystallize at a moment’s notice, and all that was incorporated into plans. But you’re placating your audience, which isn’t at all your usual style. At least some clues on timing and magnitude of events would be helpful. Any interruptions in utilities or deliveries expected? There is so much information, misinformation, disinformation and sheer craziness that nobody on any side knows what’s really happening on anything. I doubt the Clinton’s faction is going to be tipped off by anything any one person might say, and if they are, that they’d be able to do anything about it at this stage.

I’m disappointed there’s no mention of:
the latest rumors of Hillary taking six trips to Epstein’s underage orgy island,
trafficking Haitian children and satanic ritual abuse (the “spirit cooking” ‘”art”being allegedly the tip of the iceberg),
alleged coded child abuse talk in emails.
the feud between DOJ and NYPD, DOJ threatening NYPD if it brings charges or makes data public,
the FBI seeming to be preparing for mass high-level arrests. (what’s happening with the grand juries, anyway?)
escalating troop movements on the Russian border,
Russians brought all government employees’ relatives back from abroad on an immediate basis weeks ago
DNS attacks
2/3 star missile defense general suicided, no details, Army sat on it for 2 months
Anonymous’s messages No.95833740 and No.95833807 on coming arrests, murdered gov’t source
Trump tapping a Goldman-Sachs weasel for Treasury Secretary
Chris Christie in charge of the Trump transition team
mainstream media blackout on these stories that have set the alt-right blogs afire

Nic said...

Anonymous message 95833740

HOMEPOLITICSIt’s About to Hit The Fan. ANONYMOUS: ‘Remember, Remember, The 5th Of November’
It’s About to Hit The Fan. ANONYMOUS: ‘Remember, Remember, The 5th Of November’

Nic said...

Over the next few days many new documents will be released. The contents of these documents will contain evidence of perhaps the largest coverup in American History. Before this happens we would like to explain ourselves and answer a few questions you may have.

Until this month, WikiLeaks and Anonymous have worked together in building an efficient, detailed, comprehensive set of documents that would be responsible for the incarceration of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and 21 individuals ranging from the DNC, FBI, CIA, and Clinton foundation. These documents will show without a doubt, evidence of Treason, Obstruction of Justice, Election Fraud/Manipulation, and Bribery.

This was intended to be the October surprise. But before the release of these documents, we were contacted by a member of the FBI, as well as another from the CIA, and a week later by the NYPD. All with information retaining to something much darker than even we imagined.

Due to the nature of these leaks, we all worked together as efficiently as possible to ensure two objectives.
That all necessary information would be given to the public in an organized, searchable, manageable way.

Those who provided us with this information would be able to find safety before these releases were made. (This concern wasn’t without warrant.)

Anonymous No.95833807

The new leaks being released this week will provide documents in the form of emails, pictures, and videos. Within these will be evidence of Bill Clinton, as well as at least 6 other Government officials, taking part in acts with minors. As well as evidence of Human trafficking that also included minors.

We believe these pictures and videos were taken for the purpose of political manipulation. In order to make sure all participants followed through on a previously agreed agenda.

These documents were given to us by an American Governement official when he had come to learn that this crime had been covered up by Hilary and her staff through methods including bribery and blackmail. He also told us that due to the restricted access to these documents, they would soon know he was the one who released him to us.

We tried to make arrangements for him to exit the country safely, but he was killed before those arrangements could be carried out. We are still not sure if this is because they became aware of the leak, or if they were scared that he may in the future. In either case, his identity will be made public in this next set of leaks so that he can be honored for the hero that he was.

We will not only be releasing these documents, but we have multiple memebers of the FBI, CIA, and NYPD who will be publicly verifying their authenticity once their safety is assured.

This hack has not come from Russia or anyone else they may try to blame this on. This is a leak from Americas own Government Officials who fear for their safety had the opposed them directly due to reasons that will be made clear soon.

We thank you for your patience, as well as your determination and assistance in helping us expose the corruption that has infested our own government. Democracy will be restored to America.

Remember remember the 5th of November

Nic said...

Could Huma Abedin be classified as a suicide bomber? Her inaction (destruction of Weiner's/home laptop) will be associated with a lot of "collateral" damage.

Suzanne said...

Hillary is warning that if you hear anything that is a "whopper" of an email, it's likely a fake. Sounds like she knows it's gonna drop soon,..

Amanda said...

If Hillary Clinton experienced an over bearing authorative father it would point to her seemingly unsatiable need for power. Which I believe is at the crux of everything this woman has ever done.
     She could have learned from her father that verbal and physical force is power and that power is attractive. That you can get whatever you want (respect, authority, obedience) if you just overpower those "weaker" and '"inferior" to yourself. A dominating parent teaches force is the way to get what you want even if you have to destory whats in your path to get it.
     Female sex offenders want to have a form of intimacy with someone who can't really return it in the normal way or in a true way because they are totally in charge. They sometimes choose an adolescent instead of an adult partner because they’re less threatening,and they can be in charge, rather than out of sexual desire.
     Also different than males is with  female sex offenders,a third of women do it alongside someone else – typically a male partner. Some are being dominated but some are doing it to feel closeness with the person they are doing it with.
    If the Clintons have a predominately disfunctional relationship she may particpate in sexual abuse as both a form of power and a perverted intimacy with her husband.
    Going out and playing football or baseball with the boys, when I was a tomboy, was a great way to learn about winning and losing, and most girls didn't have that experience.~ Hillary Clinton

Nic said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nic said...

I saw that. It is already dropping. There has been a lot found in Podesta's email leaks (Wikileaks) from Friday and yesterday. MSM is completely silent. Alt media is going crazy.

A story I found this morning:

Eric Braverman (former CEO of CF,) is supposedly in FBI protective custody.

Re what follows, supposedly FBI do not do raids/sweeping arrests on Fridays? Just arrest the b@stards!

BREAKING: Comey Mandates All FBI Agents Report to D.C. Offices; Prep for Raids, Possible Arrests in Clinton Probes

Me2l said...

FBI exonerates Clinton ... Breaking News

Amanda said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Amanda said...

Narcissists can have passive aggressive rage. If something threatens their self esteem, ego, or power. They will lash out or they may just get even.
If a spouse was attracted to children, in the eyes of the narcissist, the child could be seen as deserving of punishment. And their rage could be fulfilled in the childs suffering and abuse.
     In many cases of a dad, boyfriend, step-parent etc being accused of abusing a girl in the home, the mother will often blame the girl. Saying she seduced him or she came on to him. Even with men abusing boys, Dottie Sandusky still stands by her husband, even going so far as to doubt and shame her own son.
Hillary told the judge in the case of the pedofile she defended that the girl "made up the story because she enjoyed fantasizing about older men".
    There is a perception that these  women are passive and easily manipulated by the abuser, some are. But what if a woman in control of everything in her life and world she created would find power even in a passive role if she believed the victim was getting what they deserved?

Amanda said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Amanda said...