Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Steve Pieczenik Video Statement

What do you make of his words? Remember: deception detection is based upon intent.


What was on the 30,000 "yoga" emails deleted?

Why the need to destroy computers?

Why blame the Russians if the home system was safe and secure?


9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nothing struck me as deceptive.

I'm not sure why the need to overly explain that this was all done on the internet.

Later backed up with no guns/weapons etc., didn't we just give up control of the internet?

If he is to be believed, it's one heck of a bombshell story, let's see what did he confirm.

Secret group of patriot's obtained HC emails and GAVE them to JA to leak on the internet.

Why couldn't they just create their own website to promote it?

Anonymous said...

same here-he believes his words. How is this still up on youtube? I saw it from drudge and now the hits are going through the roof so it is getting out there. I read something about FBI agents refusing to follow orders to destroy the stuff. that was brave.

Anonymous said...

He seems believable to me. I think he is part of a movement to bring the establishment down, and I think he is American. He uses the words "our" and "we" a lot when referring to the citizens and intelligence agencies.

I don't know why he switched from "we" to "I" when referring to the video (I am beginning to announce), and I also don't know why he said "with their permission".

Who is he? He says they will 'convict and indict' the president and others who've had part in the coverup. How will they do this? I'm sure BO is heavily guarded...and if he is not an American citizen (I'm not saying this for sure) then could he escape indictment?

It is a forceful video with powerful statements. I think there is real intent there to bring justice..whether they can actually carry it out is another question. That's how I see it.

SLH

Anonymous said...

He also says that they have no guns or weapons, and no 'intent to kill anybody' and do not 'intend to harm anybody', and then he uses the word 'but'... they will stop Hillary from becoming president, etc etc.

Again, how will they do this.? ...a silent counter-coup on the internet is not enough. They will need a lot of people and force to effect it. Without weapons, it is difficult to imagine them doing this.
SLH

Trigger said...

There has been a silent civil war in the making since Bill Clinton became president. There are too many "scandals" connected to both Bill and Hillary that have been unleashed on Americans since they have come into power.

Sex, power, and privilege seem to be the recurring themes, with the Clinton's as they keep assuming more power and money at the expense of tax payers.

Take away their soldiers and weapons of war, and ability to tax more, and they are just another crime family.

Thank you, to all those Americans who see through the deception and are willing to speak up and resist these dishonest power mongers.

Hillary Clinton reminds me of the woman named Lavinia, who was the oldest Roman patrician family serial murderer, who begged Emperor Claudius to make her a "goddess", lest she die without a pardon, for all her crimes.

She believed that only a "goddess" could be held harmless for what she had done to so many innocent people, then lied to cover it all up.

Give the voters the truth, then the voters can decide who is fit and who is not fit.

Bottle Cap said...

I believe him. Have you anons actually read the leaks?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5a3x7l/wikileaks_central_station_on_rthe_donald/

The FBI is using it's own site and its own twitter as well:
https://twitter.com/FBIRecordsVault
https://vault.fbi.gov/vincent-foster/vincent-foster-part-01-of-04/view
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton

Bottle Cap said...

Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favored Hillary)
“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS [DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz] had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they’d either ignored or forgotten to something critical.”
“[Bernie is] someone who has never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do.”
“He isn't going to be president.”
“[F]or KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”
“If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually."

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5477
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9999%20
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643

Nic said...

And then comes the bombshell:

"BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury"

With a headline like that, I have to wonder what kind of individual would vote for HRC.

Droll Skeptic said...

I believe Pieczenik...
Others have brought up his excessive need to assert that "everything was done via the internet".
I think this speaks to his perceived sensitivity of the term "coup", and it's ability to evoke images of bloody, violent, insurrection, in the minds of the public. "Soft Coup" may be the most accurate label to describe the situation, but the term "coup detats" carries an undeniably negative connotation. It's usually attached to insurrections mounted in Banana Republics, and virtually always involves usurping the democratic will of the people-- and NOT defending it.
Pieczenik doesn't want his organization-- or himself, personally -- to be suspected of plotting, carrying out, or advocating for criminal violence, murder, or assassination.

An understandable fear, IMHO, considering how willing the MSM has been to shill for Hillary and castigate all who oppose her as fundamentally evil. How easy would it be for them to latch onto the word 'coup' regardless of it's actual context, in order to distract the public's attention to any valid reasons behind such an operation.
This has been their strategy with Wikileaks: Ignore the information and evidence the leaks contain, and instead assert the leak "CAME FROM" Russia, and is an attempt to "INFLUENCE" our election. The American MSM has become a literal propaganda arm of the left wing liberal political machine. Disgraceful!
Thank God for the remaining patriots who watch over us all.
Without them, we are lost.