To properly assess the level of threat, we seek two dominant elements:
1. The strength of commitment within the threat;
2. The psycho-linguistic profile of the author to "know the man is to know the threat. "
We must understand the ideology. When we fought Germany in World War II, we studied the beliefs of National Socialism, beginning with "Mein Kampf" and then the outworking of the "NAZI" party. We did not seek to learn how many party members were not anti-semitic killers; we studied the ideology itself.
The analyst must understand the ideologies present. It is not about any person, but an ideology and how it might impact culture; as seen in language.
Here are some basic principles of analysis applied to Anonymous Author Identification. This is not a challenging letter.
We take careful note of where a statement begins.
This is the first thing on the mind of the author:
"To the Children of Satan."
What makes this phrase so vital to the author?
It is his greeting. It is where he has chosen his first words. In analysis, we recognize its importance and sometimes even its dominant influence.
Also in viewing priority, the first sentence after the greeting is also a priority, though subordinate to the initial wording.
"You muslims are a vile and filthy people."
These two sentences give us far more information than we may initially realize.
1. To whom is the author writing?
2. Does the second sentence affirm or deny the analysis of the first sentence?
The "Children of Satan" is a term used to describe the Jews from an distinctly Islamic perspective. This show, with statement analysis, the priority of the author: the Jews.
"You Muslims" is unnecessary emphasis with the word "you" which tells us, the author wants us to believe that "you" are the "muslims", therefore, he (or she) the author, is not. We note that this unnecessary emphasis is repeated in the letter.
This need to persuade is a strong indication that the author is a Muslim.
Then, we look back on the Islamic phrase for Jews.
Hatred of Jews is considered "pathological" in Islam as an ideology. The Jew is considered worse than anyone else, including the Christian, the atheist, and even the "apostate Muslim."
The priority of the author may appear to convince the reader that he is not Muslim, but he belies this by his immediate focus upon the Jew. We follow his wording; not his insinuation.
We view ideology; not persons. The analyst must view religions and political world views from the perspective of ideology; not of any one person. Ideology impacts culture; culture reveals itself in both action and language.
Islam is a supremacist ideology that seeks world conquest by coercion. It has specific elements of conquest, including both sexual assault and pedophilia, as in the Koran and hadiths. In Islam, "infidel rape" is a part of conquest and even in the religious aspects of Islam, rape and pedophilia are seen as "rewards" in the afterlife. For "apostate" or 'non religious" Muslims, jihad can be a 'redemption' for a lie without devout obedience to Islam. Rape as the reward of "the right hand" (as well as young boys described as "pearls") highlights the low view of women and the rape epidemic in Europe as a realist of Islamic migration.
This must be understood in light of deception.
"Tacquia" is the Islamic teaching of deception to propagate Islam. When Barak Obama said that Muslims were part of the founding fathers of America no journalist asked him to name one. His action to follow was to import as many Muslims as he could. When he scolded against religion based banning, it was revealed that he brought in more than 99% Muslim Syrians, with less than 1% Christian. This is "tacquia" in practice, even as he circumvented laws as well as FBI vetting. This was consistently practiced since he began. Belief will lead to action; action is communicated through speech, even in spite of deception.
Cultural Influence upon Children
With "rape" and the physical abuse of women, an Islamist male can grow up with domestic violence both seen and with the example of his mother's submission to it. This is a very dangerous desensitization that must be a part of every threat analysis. This low view of women, in general, may help us understand why so many rapes of prepubescent boys takes place, while at the same time, public execution of SSA males in Islamic countries. This inconsistency is difficult for the western mind because we project our own denial of Islam due to the heavy propaganda of "political correctness" deception common today. To do so is to falsify analysis and fail to assess a threat.
Here is a powerful tool to the ideology of tacquia: "Islamophobia."
Islam is, as an ideology, incompatible with freedom. It calls for death for even questioning it, making it immune to any form of reformation. This is key to understanding Islamic threat and tacquia. Each time Americans died as a result of Jihad, Obama did two things:
1. He denied that the Islamic terrorist was an Islamic terrorist as a direct lie.
2. He lectured Americans about "Islamophobia" before the American victims were buried.
It sets the stage that Islamists will do "whatever it takes" to propagate and protect Islam, including lying about it and using "red herring", or distraction.
Islamophobia: the irrational fear of Islam.
The ideology calls for your death. Is it irrational to fear the ideology, whether many or few Muslims practice it?
Ideologies become actions; actions are revealed in words.
Since 9/11, there have been more than 29,000 Islamic attacks around the world, excluding wars. The reaction to an ideology that, when obeyed, brings bloodshed, is genuine fear due to instinctive self preservation. The tacquia is that your rational fear is irrational, and that if you do not embrace Islamic immigration, you are a "racist." No one wants to be a racist, though Islam is not a race.
"You Muslims" seeks to point the direction away from "self", (author) which is unnecessary emphasis suggesting the author has a need to convince you he is not a Muslim. Hence, the need to persuade points us to a Muslim.
This came after the introduction which shows the subject's focus or priority upon Jews.
Descendents: Cultural Importance
"Your mothers are whores" is another insult against Jews and is a distinctly masculine statement.
Women struggle to insult women, and Islamic females generally keep their threats to "kuffar" women ("infidel", or "unclean") and to address a large group, which presupposes male and female audience, an Islamist female is not likely to do this. This is where we see gender segregation culturally in Islamic events. The women often walk behind the man and it is "unclean" for a woman to address a mixed audience.
It would be an 'insult' to her husband, who would have to take "corrective" action, should she have taken this 'dominant' role upon herself. Recently, an Islamic television station aired "make up" for "disciplined Muslim women" on how to cover up the bruises from their husbands.
Also note that descendent lineage is something specifically taught in Islam, especially in schools.
Jews and Hitler
In Germany, it is illegal (against the law) to deny the holocaust. This law is enforced in all the German schools but not in Islamist schools. These children are taught the same things in European Muslim schools that they are in Islamic nations. A recent report from the UK, by a leftist, stated that teachers and politicians have been afraid to confront the contradictions to British society due to fear of being labeled "racist."
In Islamic schools, children are taught that Jews are "sub human" and descended from "pigs" (unclean animal) which highlights...
'descendency' as a topic or "notion" that is important in the language of Islamist supremacists culture.
"You muslims are vile and filthy people."
"filthy" is the opposite of "clean" or "halal" and this further points to Islamic writer. Jews are considered "unclean" as a people by Islamists.
Islamists consider all other religions to be satanic in nature.
"You are evil. You worship the devil."
Although this could be directed towards Christians and atheists, it is likely to be aimed towards Jews, (ideologically, Jews and Christians share the same God). Islamic schools teach any worship other than "allah" is satanic.
Although they are "evil" and they worship the "devil", the writer uses the word "but" to now compare what follows with this evil status and worship:
"But your day of reckoning has arrived."
When the FBI analyst assessed the Orlando shooter, he failed to grasp supremacist ideology.
We see "white supremacists" groups in the United States, highlighted by Obama. Notices sent out by the State Department in the last 8 years has emphasized the "danger" that the "far right" poses. We saw even the IRS target "tea party" or other "right" political groups, while people all around the world continued to die at the hands of Islamists.
There is a marked difference between a true supremacists and a "wanna be" supremacist. The "wanna be" is dangerous because he has a need to "prove", but the actual supremacist is one that is far more lethal, but also more predictable if understood.
True supremacy is far more dangerous than the west understands.
Supremacist ideology, enforced by not only incessant repetition but also by social, economic and religious ideology is very powerful. Yet, when it is evidenced by violence against one's own mother, we have two powerful elements coming together:
1. Incessant indoctrination with acute singular focus;
If you are told that you are superior to all, especially women, and grow up seeing your mother attacked, you are not only desensitized to violence, but the frustration from the inequalities of life must have an outlet. Islamist ideology creates the "victim status" mentality that is powerful. It gives a ready-made excuse:
if your neighbor has more than you, he must have cheated you.
In Islamic countries, their ideology stands starkly against innovation and hinders progress. As they see the progress of the West, they are taught in school that this is the result of the "Crusades" from centuries ago, building resolve in Islamists to commit jihad against the west, not only for allah's sake (religious) but because we have "cheated"them.
Power of "Islamophobia"
How powerful (successful) is 'name calling' against the West?
In Maine, a teacher posted on Facebook that Islam did not produce many hospitals, libraries or food banks, culturally.
He lost his job for "Islamophobia" and "not embracing diversion."
Islamists could not be happier.
In the new UK report, fear of being called a "name" has led to wholesale refusal to punish criminal behavior, particularly sexual assault, throughout Europe. Even rape is considered a 'lesser crime' than being "racist."
Centuries of Insulation
Islam prescribes capital punishment to anyone who questions Islam. Even a cartoon of mohammad produced kept death threats. This creates a self-contained protectionism against reform.
If you add in the culturally encouraged sanguinity (first cousin marriages) over many generations, we now have consistent findings of lowered IQ scores , which combines with poor impulse control, incessant and singular repetition, (koran) all inclusive ideology (including religious), with a desensitized male, (more testosterone than female) living in a world where of natural inequality of ability, you have the perfect storm for violence by one who believes he is both superior and a victim. Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels work with Muslim youths in prison should be considered.
The threats that come from insult, therefore, must be "avenged."
The West grows up with several powerful notions including the social:
1. Self control equals strength.
2. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you..." We prize mercy, forgiveness and tolerance. This is 'western' thought.
Islamic ideology sees self control as weakness, and reciprocity as only for the inferior.
When the Orlando Islamic terrorist was "insulted" by being called names, the analyst failed to understand what this meant to him:
he was dishonored.
He was not dishonored by the name calling. This is expected by those who readily name call or label others, especially Jews.
He was dishonored for not retaliating.
He dishonored his god, allah, his parents, his father in particular, and he dishonored himself. By becoming 'westernized' he was further conflicted.
Here he had the clash of cultures: the West's value of self control versus Islamic supremacist ideology that demands "justice."
In the Paris attack, the government kept from the public the horrific details of the deaths that took place last year, including castration of live victims, the deliberate targeting of the "children of Satan" (Jews) and demanding submission to "allah" before death. Eye witnesses described this slow torture that continued for a long time.
Our western minds fail to understand how much damage is done to a male child who witnesses his own mother's assault, submission to assault, and the conclusion that this is all "pleasing" to their god.
The Threat Assessed
"But your day of reckoning has arrive" is also passive.
Passivity seeks to conceal identity and/or responsibility. When a threat is made, the one making the threat becomes central. Here, the one making the threat against Muslims is removed from the sentence.
This suggests, at this point, that there is no tangible threat against Muslims.
For supremacist ideology, we look for the need to avenge.
Here, the writer is male Islamist, making it a "fake hate" letter, and there is passivity in the threat, suggesting that there is no threat to the Muslims by this Muslim male writer.
"There's a new sheriff in town- - President Donald Trump."
The male Muslim author has a connection with American slogan usage.
Note "President Donald Trump" and not "President elect..."
What is President Donald Trump going to do to "you" "Muslims"?
"He is going to clean America and make it shine again."
This refers back to the "clean" versus "unclean" Islamic reference theme.
It is interesting to study Islamic prescribed "hygiene" in light of Statement Analysis and the connection between "water" and sexual abuse. That a man who married a 6 year old, prescribed rape in conquest, as well as young boys as a "reward", felt the need to describe specific religious toiletry; such is something, even in the translation, that is not lost upon the psychology of analysis and sexual abuse of children.
"And he is going to start with you muslims"
is not to say "And he is going to start with you."
He has already addressed the "muslims" and this emphasis now affirms the earlier analysis that he has a need to persuade that he is writing to muslims. This need to persuade tells us: he is not writing a real threat to muslims.
The passivity of the threat is now answered. The author tells "you" Muslims that the threat is not the author, but the president elect of the United States, Donald Trump.
"He is going to do to you muslims what Hitler did to to the jews."
The author cannot drift far from his priority, where he began his statement: the Jews.
How ingrained is this in culture?
In interviewing Islamists, no matter how much 'peaceful' dialog was found, any reference to Jews or Israel introduced either anger, or put an end to the interview. This is why it is commonly called "pathological" hatred of Jews.
In the U.S., this was highlighted when the prime minister of Israel came to the U.S. and pleaded with the U.S. government not to allow the Islamic Republic of Iran to further their plans to obtain nuclear bombs.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has publicly vowed to annihilate Israel. This is in accordance with their holiest books. Iran must keep its word, or lose face in the Islamic world. This authentic "anti-semitic" stance in arming a nation who has vowed to annihilate Israel highlights how deep the hatred of all things Jewish is to the ideology of Islam. We see the author return to his priority.
A non-Muslim American author would have no such connection to Hitler. Adolf Hitler is, in the American mind, a name that can never be rehabilitated. It is invoked by leftist politicians when they disagree with a position. Everyone 'races' to avoid being contaminated by being labeled "Hitler" or "Nazi", though the socialist of Germany (NAZI) have been dismantled for more than 2 generations.
In the mind of the Islamist, Hitler was 'well intentioned' but ultimately failed to "cleanse" Europe of Jews.
"You muslims would be wise to pack your bags and get out of Dodge."
Donald Trump said he would "make America great again" and the phrase is likely an attempt to mimic it, but the Islamic language comes into focus with "clean" or "shine" ("shine" is a result of cleaning) and the writer shows the continued need to persuade it is "you muslims" that he addresses.
Note his disposition here: "you would be wise to pack your bags" is not a threat to Muslims.
In fact, he allows them, in their "day of reckoning" the time to actually pack. This is a point of incongruity in language. The great "Hitler" is coming to kill millions of Muslims" but they have politely been told to pack, is not a threat.
He does not say "get out!" but that they would be "wise" which allows for other opinions on its wisdom.
Here we have another of many 'slips' where he associates being "wise" with the muslim.
The author's linguistic disposition towards Muslims is found in both favorable words as "wise", and generosity in giving them time to heed the warning. The author reveals himself to be in agreement with Islamic ideology of the holocaust.
Even though the "day" has arrived (passive) they have time (generous) to pack up.
"Get out of Dodge" is another American slogan from western movies. The author is likely familiar with enough of American culture to use this phrase, as well as the attempted phrase from the election period.
"This is a great time for Patriotic Americans. Long live President Trump and God bless the USA!!"
The threat of the day of reckoning has given way to an attempt to persuade the audience that the writer is not Muslim.
"Long live" is not a phrase used by Americans.
"God bless the USA!!" is a take from "God bless America" which further moves the writer from accuracy of American culture.
Who is This Author?
1. The writer is an Islamic male, likely living in America, but perhaps not born here.
2. He is likely middle aged, older and not part of "Generation Jihad", which is the 2nd generation Islamists living in Europe and America, who's parents were "only" 'moderately' Muslim, and who have now embraced "radical" or "devout" Islam, different from their parents. They are reached by jihadists through the internet and condemn their own parents for integration with the west. Many of these identified in studies are middle class to upper middle class. Our author is likely older than them, perhaps middle aged.
3. He has familiarity with American politics and perhaps some older movies, which will date him a bit older than what may be imagined. In some Islamic countries, people think of America from the portrait of older movies, particularly the old west. Although English may be his second language, he likely uses it without the need to 'translate' words; that is, he can freely process English words.
He likely moved to the United States, being born in an Islamic land. He may have emigrated in his teens or a bit earlier.
He is incapable of avoiding the pathological hatred of Jews.
He shows no fear of Donald Trump, nor does he show contempt, though he wishes to blame Trump. Even here, his own words give him away: His rage and hatred is saved for the Jews.
4. His education and intellectual level is below or slightly below average.
5. He is likely employed in manual labor or low paying work that does not require critical thinking skills.
6. He likely has ongoing and uncomfortable interaction with Jews. He may even have been 'forced' to wait upon, or serve Jews.
7. He has not been a 'devout' Muslim and may have gotten into some arguments with non practicing Muslim family members. The western slang culture suggests the mixed or "unclean" Muslim. This actually makes him more dangerous as he may have a very powerful need to be 'cleansed.'
8. He has specific sexual issues, including confusion and inner conflict.
9. Even with English as a second language, he can process English freely.
There is no threat to Muslims.
Yet, the threat assessment should not end here.
The "day of reckoning" is presented as one in which no urgency is pressed upon muslims.
Islamist threats are not veiled, but they are generally hyperbolic. This is not to say the hyperbole nullifies the threat: the threats made should be judged on the strength of the language (commitment) and background but 'poetic' language is often a trait of one who does not have American influence: "you will swim in rivers of blood..."
Some insight into him:
Our writer has distinct American influence. This can also contribute to the need to "cleanse" himself from the "decadent" west of movies and other cultural distinctive areas.
There are some points within Anonymous Author Identification work that need to be considered, but suffice for here, the language shows an emphasis on 'cleansing' that is both analyzed as part of the overall threat, but also viewed from the psycho-linguistic aspect of his need to choose these words.
Statistically, the writer also likely has some deep sexual issues which would, culturally include acute conflicted desires which put him at odds with his own beliefs. His education level and intelligence show below average, though he is not cognitively delayed. His need to be "clean" and even "shine" is evident.
Given his education level and intelligence, he is likely under-employed or living off the American welfare system. Even when viewed as the "jizrah" the Islamist still feels resentment. (The "jizrah" is a form of extortion where the "superior Islamist" will allow the Christian or atheist to live, but only if he pays the "Islamic tax" to the superior Islamists).
With welfare, there is an affirmation of superiority, but it is also part of "Muslim grievances", the psychological never ending list of complaints made due to supremacist ideology's impact. The conflict continues:
The Islamist male does not want to work for a female boss or supervisor.
The Islamists male is often likely to work at some point with Jews. Our author has likely has had forced interaction with Jews, which is part of his resentment.
With manual labor likely, our author may have had interactions with Jews that triggered this letter. His own need to be a "clean" Muslim should not be discounted.
Although there is no threat to Muslims, the terrorist designate organization "CAIR" has had a powerful influence upon the nation the past 8 years with repeated visits at the White House, furthering the cause of Islamic and sharia, through the deceptive technique of labeling all opposition "phobic" and "racist." This, alone, was seen in the analysis of the Orlando Islamic terrorist. CAIR recognizes that they will not have access to the White House or "the FBI on speed dial" after January, 2017.
His repeated use of "you muslims" is an attempt to persuade, unnecessarily, that he is not "one" of them. While doing this, he suggests his own alienation from other Muslims. While even Muslims indifferent to Jihad refuse to cooperate with investigations due to divided loyalty, our author has likely sought out other 'active' jihadists and has likely committed Islamic 'sins' of which he feels the need for cleansing. This could be the use of alcohol and tobacco as some have shown, but his need of cleansing suggests something deeper.
His use of Islamic phrases and his priority in identifying Jews repeatedly, undermines his own assertion.
In his letter, he is able to rally Muslims, falsely accuse Donald Trump, while being incapable of suppressing his hatred of Jews. His own frustration and need for being made "clean" is concerning.
The author's threat against Muslims is "fake" but he is not a youthful prankster, either. He is someone who, as an Islamist supremacist, thinks he is cleverly using "tacquia" but actually reveals that he, himself, may be a threat to Jews, or those who do not share his hatred of Jews.
"To the Children of Satan", the Jews, the priority continues throughout, which includes more Islamic insults to Jews, descendent focus, and the reference to Hitler. What we see as "obsession", is not considered obsessive by the Islamist.
I believe this author poses a threat of danger to Jews. There may be an actual "day of reckoning" upon Jews, by the author, himself. He may feel the need to "cleanse" the land of the infidel, which always targets Jews first, Christians and atheists next. They do not see "Christians" as those who attend church, but those who are descendants of Christianity culturally.
The Orlando terrorist "cleansed" the land of "homosexuals" as he confessed his motive in his 911 call, choosing a gay bar deliberately as his target.
This author may target Jews, and if he has had contact with any gay Jews, it may further strengthen his commitment to the "day of reckoning."
The author is, however, convicted, By ascribing the threat to Donald Trump, he is not locked into it by "honor."
What does this mean, practically?
It means that as he is conflicted about western culture and Islam, he may not act unless something triggers him. He is not duty bound, in his culture, to bring forth terror. Should a news event take place, he might act. As the US moves from its anti-Israel position to a more pro-Israel president, a single event, politically, could trigger him. Known Jewish sites could be his target.
There is far more to glean from his statement, but it is both beyond the scope of this article and part of more advanced techniques.
For training in analysis, please visit Hyatt Analysis Services.
We offer study at home as well as seminars, certification and ongoing live trainings.
For those who complete Statement Analysis, and our in depth Advanced Course, we hope to offer other courses shortly, including:
Sexual Abuse Analysis.