Fake NewsHat tip: John
Islam's power has changed western travel, adding billions of dollars and long and often intrusive vetting at airports. On a cross country trip, at O'Hare, I was pulled aside and subject to an intensive search. The delay was about one hour. I answered questions "yes or no" and only stated the time of my departure. My cooperation made it go smoothly.
Fake Hate via Islam is very popular today.
Here we get the statement to analyze.
Olympic Fencer Ibtihaj MuhammadMuhammad, a lifelong American citizen, claimed in an interview last week that she was detained “just a few weeks ago” by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents. She said she was held for two hours without explanation.Her remarks on Feb. 7 earned her an entire news cycle, as several journalists ran with reports suggesting, and alleging outright, that the American Olympian had been ensnared in the president’s executive order temporarily barring immigration from seven Middle Eastern countries.
When asked if she knew anyone directly impacted by the travel restrictions, Muhammad responded,
“I personally was held at Customs for two hours just a few weeks ago. I don’t know why. I can’t tell you why it happened to me, but I know that I’m Muslim.
Always note the additional unnecessary wording.
Note what is told to us in the negative as an elevation of importance. We expect to hear straight forward sentences of what happened, what was said, and so on.
She was "personally" held; there is no other way for her to be held for a security check. It is a routine flagging, and the TSA is looking for weapons. The TSA did not need to tell me what they were looking for. With the rise of Islam, this is now done throughout the western world due to an ideology that is political, social, sexual and religious, which uses violence as a conquest.
She said she "can't" tell us why it happened to her. This is to be restricted ("can't") which is immediately 'challenged' in her language by the word "but." What follows "but" is elevated above that which preceded it: "but I know I am a Muslim."
Did you notice that she did not say, "I am a Muslim"? In Statement Analysis, she did not tell us that she is a Muslim but told us what she "knows."
She has now just created some distance, unnecessarily, from being a Muslim. You may interpret her words, but in analysis, we do not. We believe what one tells us unless they talk us out of it. I believe her when she avoids saying she is a Muslim, reducing it to only what she "knows."
Next, she makes a similar statement, without any distancing language:
I have an Arabic name.
And even though I represent Team USA and I have that Olympic hardware, it doesn’t change how you look and how people perceive you.
She frequently poses in Islamic covering with an American flag behind her.
“Unfortunately, I know that people talk about this having a lot to do with these seven countries in particular, but I think the net is cast a little bit wider than we know. And I’m included in that as a Muslim woman who wears a hijab.”
The seven countries known for exporting Islamic terror were named by Barak Obama. Note that she does not say she "knows" the net is "cast a little bit wider", as she goes to the plural pronoun "we": this is a very strong indication that she is influenced by someone else, and an activity outside the airport vetting. This is confirmed by the unnecessary 'addition' of "And I'm included."
She strongly relates to having an Arabic last name, but she does not strongly (linguistically) relate to being Muslim.
This should cause us to ask about her Muslim beliefs here, in context. "As a Muslim woman" is what we classify as "passive voice" (though it is not the same as "passivity") in particular, if the subject has avoided a close connection to being Muslim. This is something reserved for Advanced Analysis.
A Customs official confirmed that she was detained in random vetting; less than one hour. The TSA is also aware of the boarding time and will not cause someone to miss a flight unless they have very strong suspicion of weapons.
Even though this is a plane booking, with dates confirmed verbally, electronically, and on the ticket, Muhammad refused to commit to the date she was detained by Customs. "I don't remember" is the number one deceptive response in courts and we find it in language. The article did not give the quote, but only to say that she would not give a "hard date"...not only do we know our plane ticket dates, but we are to believe she had a memorable experience. If the date was long ago, it could be forgotten, but if it was since the January 27th mandate, the date will be known. This is our 'expected.'
She is an outspoken Trump critic, and that she is extremely displeased with his immigration order.
Leftist media including Motto, the Independent, the Daily Mail, the New York Daily News, the Hill, Sports Illustrated, and ESPN all published outraged articles stating or heavily implying that Muhammad was subjected to this horrific inconvenience as a result of Trump’s travel ban, which was instituted on January 27, 2017.
Is this "fake news" again?
We rely on the language to guide us.
Muhammad elaborates on her ordeal, and here we are given insight into why she used distancing language as to being a Muslim:
“It’s really hard. My human response is to cry because I was so sad and upset and disheartened — and just disappointed. At the same time, I’m one of those people who feels like I have to be strong for those people who may not be able to find that strength.
Here we see the narcissism. She did not say she cried, but it would be her "human response"; which is to be "human." She gives a rebuttal about being human, however:
"I'm one of those people..."
"human response" is now "people", separated by the word "but", which relegates being "human" to the lower side of comparison.
She wants us to know her strength is superior to her human side.
She is not one of "these", herself, but she is one of "those." This, too, is distancing language.
She does not keep herself from crying for herself, or for her religion, but for "people who may not be able to find that strength. "
Note "that" strength is distancing language as well. She does not say "for people who may be unable to find the strength..."
In a security vetting, it is a passive position. Agents search your person and belongings for items used to harm others.
Here we are given insight into why she did not give in to her human side to cry. We know she has a "human" side and some other side, hence, the narcissistic language.
“I feel like I have to speak up for those people whose voices go unheard. It was a really hard two hours, but at the same time, I made it home. I try to remember to be positive and to try to leave all these situations, even if they may be very difficult, with love.
She puts herself in 'messianic' status: she was given a security check by TSA and did not cry for others.
How does her not crying, while separated from others, for a security check assist people? This is the language of narcissism.
Next: Who are the "people" that she refuses to be human for?
We now see why being a "Muslim" produced an instant weakness of distancing language. When we see "I know I didn't shoot him", analysts immediately flag the statement for what he "knows", not what he did. Here, we flag it the same way.
With "voices go unheard", I would be very interested in obtaining her childhood background under Islamic males. as a female.
There are many Muslims who are not religious and not interested in jihad or coercive conquest; they are Muslims by culture, but not religious. This is similar to many who may have been raised as Christian but do not consider themselves Christian. This is why analysis views the cultural impact of religion upon language. We are all impacted by our culture. In Islamic lands, Muslims are target by the Islamists but in confrontation, resistance quickly dissipated (Bat Ye'or) historically, and freedom fell. When Islamists settle in western lands and do not integrate, the host natives deal with increased crime, "no go zones", and the increasing aspects of civil war. As violence increases against host citizens, demands are made by the guests, and when the welfare finances become unsustainable, conflict is inevitable. A huge step towards this conflict is when police are targeted. This is an attack on authority in general; a glue that is necessary for any society to survive. When police are out-gunned and flee, the criminal mindset is filled with resolve. In the states, it is the "Ferguson Effect" where officers fear being labeled racist, and having their own families attacked by "protestors." Baltimore politicians taught police that they had to preserve their own employment first in order to protect and serve. Their service has been targeted since 2008. This video is similar to others and is disturbing. As Angela Merkel invited Islam into Europe, she and Obama told the public that they were "refugees" and were "women and children" in need of protection. They were actually 80-90% male, age 18-35.
100,000 troops now patrol France, yet their politicians claim that there is no foreign enemy present as in past wars. The elite who imported Islam refuse to name those of whom protection is needed.
Children are growing up with this as a norm, with armed guards posted at Jewish schools. One French police officer allegedly snapped and the result has been rioting, looting, burning cars; night after night, even though he faces charges.
Lying by Muslims, especially CAIR, exasperate the American public. "Fake Hate" has consequences.
Discernment via deception detection is critical.
Why did she distance herself from being a Muslim?
She pulls out the popular political identity victim list that politicians use to exploit, of which Islam's direct teaching and practice are contrary to what the west believes as basic human rights.I think that we will come out on top as women, as people of color, as Muslims, as transgender people, as people who are part of the disabled community — I think that we’ll come out on top.”
Islam executes homosexuals, as well as men who claim to be women, and it subjugates women.
Why are Muslim women taught to cover themselves up?
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies that they may thus be distinguished and not molested.” (Koran 33:59)
Here is an article that explains why the coverings are symbols of sexual violence and they identify those who can be targeted. The hina clause tells us "why" they are to cover themselves.
Note the word "think" as a weak assertion for someone who is above human emotions. She does not say "we will come out on top" but she only "thinks" this to be so.
This sheds light on why she identifies more as Arab than Muslim.
You should be able to identify her statement as "fake hate" but if confirmation is needed:
Research into why she refused to give a date showed that she was detained before the 2016 election, while Barak Obama was president.
Journalists ran with her deceptive story without checking out dates or corroborating it with Customs. This is an example of "fake news"; as it fits a narrative.
It is not an error by a journalist, but a pattern of deception by the political elite and main stream media in criminal conspiracy against the people.