Thursday, March 23, 2017

UK Islamic Terrorist Attack Ideology

While on the road, I heard a partial description of the death of the police officer in London.  I almost pulled over to the side of the road, sick to my stomach.  

The police officer was unarmed.  

He works where there is more than 50% Islam, but does not possess the basic right to defend himself, that Americans have.  

The denial of ideology is responsible for his death, as well as so many other deaths, rapes and the crime to come in the name of mohammad.

Here, the wisdom of Winston Churchill is desperately needed. 

Statement Analysis sees ideology, its impact upon culture, through both language and behavioral analysis.  

Islam is a political and social ideology that is supremacist and criminal in nature, with distinct sexual violence, with religious overtones.  As suspect as statistics are, even if more than 90% of all Muslims reject Jihad, we have 100,000,000 who do not. 

The Koran and hadiths teach supremacy, violence and sexual degradation of women.  This is the ideology.  Barak Obama and Angela Merkel have been two major architects in bringing "change" to the West by importing this violent base ideology all the while declaring that those who disagree are mentally ill (phobic) and morally unworthy of an opinion (hateful, nazi, islamophobic). 

The imans deliberately target those with mental health issues for exploitation. 

Turkey tells Muslims in Europe to continue to "outbreed" Europeans to conquer, while western support systems are overwhelmed with birth defects and learning disabilities due to Islamic close marriage inbreeding.  

Europe pays for child rape with Islamic child marriages. 
Tax dollars are used for female genital mutilation. 

Those who speak out can be barred, fined, and even imprisoned.  

Mosques are storage houses for weapons and violent ideology, while citizens are disarmed.  

Sweden is the rape capital of the West, no matter how much effort is made by politicians to obscure statistics and protect their religious-like submission to "multiculturalism" (without discrimination).  

In the United States, the FBI has routinely told us:  Mosques do not cooperate with law enforcement.  They claim to want peace, but will not yield information on jihadists.  

But police disarmed in the UK?

This is the absurdity of illogic and refusal to speak the truth about both Islam and its appeal to the base elements within human nature. 

As soon as steps are taken to protect Americans, the political elite claim "Naziism!" 

Islam is inconsistent with freedom. 

When a state votes to exclude Sharia law from its courts, why does CAIR and other Muslim associations object?

Do they not want to be safe from brutal Sharia?

The West says it is not at war with Islam but Islam is at war with the West and the invasion has political cover and has been funded by the West.  

It is to watch history unfold before our eyes, as the Gates of Vienna have not only been opened, but the invaders have been met with offerings of both finance and praise. 

Barak Obama's Ben Rhodes boasted how stupid the American public was when he sold the plan to make Iran a nuclear weapons country while Obama lied repeatedly to the American people, as he gathered untraceable cash payments to supplement Iran's terror network.  

Refugee Status 

Why would Muslims in America object to vetting?

Refugee companies get wealthy, political elite get votes, and citizens are endangered by an ideology that demands their surrender if they want "peace."  

The Lies

Obama's "widows and orphans" have been up to 90% male, 18-35, often posting as "children", receiving welfare benefits just as the smugglers (and Koran) promised, further affirming the supremacy of Islam.  For these, whatever money they are given, it is not enough.  It is, to them, the "jizrah" the Koran teaches, that must be paid to the Islamist by the non-Islamist, "infidel."

The Hijab, or coverings, is a teaching of the Koran that exempts women from sexual assault, allowing for non-hijab or covered women to be sexually abused.  The hypocrisy of feminists wearing it is front and center.  

In October 2001, British Prime Minister held a press conference where he stated:  "This is not a war with Islam. It angers me as it angers the vast majority of Muslims to hear bin Laden and his associates described as Islamic terrorists. They are terrorists pure and simple. Islam is a peaceful and tolerant religion, and the acts of these people are wholly contrary to the teachings of the Koran."

George W. Bush after 9/11 said, "Terrorists have hi-jacked a peaceful religion."

This was not an error, but a lie as bold as Barak Obama's scolding of Christians each time Islam took lives.  

The two presidents motives may have been different, but the end is still as Obama said:

Either give Muslims free entry into the United States or they will attack us.  

This is surrender.  

He said, "America is better than that.  We don't vet by religion" as he barred almost 99% of Syrian Christians from entering in favor of Islam.  

When British Army soldier was run over and beheaded on the streets of Woolwich, England in May 2013 by two Muslims, British Prime Minister David Cameron stated:  

"This was not just an attack on Britain and on the British way of life, it was also a betrayal of Islam and on the Muslim communities who give so much to our country.  There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act."

After British aid worker David Haines was beheaded by Muslims in ISIS on video in September 2014, British Prime Minister David Cameron stated:  "They claim to do this in the name of Islam.  That is nonsense.  Islam is a religion of peace.  They are not Muslims.  They are monsters."

Islam is a religion of "peace", that is, the cessation of violence once you submit.  You are then at "peace." 

Societal, with supremacy, Islamic nations remain ripe with violence due to the inherent nature of supremacy and the inequalities of life.  

"Fight and slay the unbeliever wherever you find them" (Koran 9:5) 

This is taught in prisons everywhere:  'You are a victim, not a perpetrator.  You are better than them.  You are their superior and have been defrauded.  Fight for allah!' 

London elected a jihadist mayor who agreed with Barak Obama: either let Muslims have free entry into western countries and pay them for not doing any work, or they will be even more violent.  

Note:  he has already said the West must learn to "live with it."

This is not a time for teddy bears and tears.  It is time for action.  

This ideology of supremacy must always lead to violence.  As long as there are those unwilling to yield to it, there will always be violent coercion. 

We do not address individuals, but ideologies.  

Muslims who resist Jihad are often the first targets and the first to yield to threats of violence.  

When Islam gains footing in an area, the non religious Muslims are the first to side with Islam, as they know the violence that can come to them as "apostates."

Islam teaches that you are not allowed to leave. 

Islam teaches that it cannot be reformed, which is why it has resisted reformation for 1400 years.  It calls for the death for anyone who even questions it, hence the silence. 

Although people have done bad things in the name of religion, for Jews and Christians, the evil done is in opposition to its own teaching. 

For Islam, it is "devout" and it is "obedience" to commit acts of violence, including specifically using knives and terror.  

see:  Leathernecks and the Tripolitan War, our nations first fight against Islam.  

This is why beheading is so popular.  It is "sacred" to the teaching of Islam.  

The obsession with sex (see Islam hygiene) produces not only execution of homosexuals, but the rape of little boys as a cultural acceptance.  Many American and British soldiers first confronted this in Afghanistan, made helpless by "political correctness" (fear of hurting the rapists feelings or insulting Mohammad), they were traumatized by the cries of the young boys' bodies being torn apart.  Those who did intervene paid a terrible price upon their careers.  For American policy:  to stop an Afghan male from raping a little boy was to insult Islam and mohammad.  

Yet, main stream media refused to question why.  

Here is what Sir Winston Churchill said:

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men...Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.  Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

[Winston Churchill, The River War (Volume II, 1st edition), pages 248-250]


Marliese said...

Peter, I assume you've seen where Canada's Parliament is voting today to make "Islamophobia" illegal. How long before they try to do that here?

Anonymous said...

Reaction from liberals: "Gosh I hope the poor terrorist was wearing a seatbelt so he didnt get hurt while running over a bridgeful of people.

Anonymous said...

Liberals "tolerating" homosexuals raping children and female genital mutilation? Who woulda thunk?
Liberals worship perverted promiscuous gays and men who have sex change operations, thinking that is "fabulous".

Anonymous said...

How often have we heard this?

A long history of criminality.
Was known to intelligence & police.
Arrested then released.
They will not divide us.
They will not prevail against us.


Trigger said...

These Islamic terrorists only understand violence, destruction, killing, car bombings, acid attacks, beheadings, mutilations, and chemical attacks on unwary people.

The English condone this behavior by having a police force with have no power to stop this kind of violence. Isn't this a way of creating a civil crisis so the citizens can plead to the government for legal justice and then have to roll over and grovel for protection, while the system churns out more ineffective solutions?

Anonymous said...

Are no cops in England armed? How the hell do they stop burglars or people wielding weapons?

Anonymous said...

Also, WHY was the UK Bridge Terror story on LAST (BACK PAGE) of my newspaper today? When typically all other similar terror attacks have been on the front page? Is this to further the liberal agenda against Trump like to act like terror is not a big deal and Trump is wrong to take steps against it?

Anonymous said...

The above link is a world ranking of weaponry exporting countries. Do the discerning notice any parallels?

Louise said...

Yes, most cops over here are unarmed. But so are nearly all civilians :)

Statement Analysis Blog said...


check the Mosques.


Anonymous: wikipedia? really?

Anonymous said...

Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives
A. Guns save more lives than they take; prevent more injuries than they inflict

* Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year -- or about 6,850 times a day. [1] This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. [2]

* Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3]

* As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse.[4]

* Even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that guns are used 1.5 million times annually for self-defense. According to the Clinton Justice Department, there are as many as 1.5 million cases of self-defense every year. The National Institute of Justice published this figure in 1997 as part of "Guns in America" -- a study which was authored by noted anti-gun criminologists Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig.[5]

* Armed citizens kill more crooks than do the police. Citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as police do every year (1,527 to 606).[6] And readers of Newsweek learned that "only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The 'error rate' for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five times as high."[7]

* Handguns are the weapon of choice for self-defense. Citizens use handguns to protect themselves over 1.9 million times a year. [8] Many of these self-defense handguns could be labeled as "Saturday Night Specials."

Anonymous said...

B. Concealed carry laws help reduce crime

* Nationwide: one-half million self-defense uses. Every year, as many as one-half million citizens defend themselves with a firearm away from home. [9] * Concealed carry laws are dropping crime rates across the country. A comprehensive national study determined in 1996 that violent crime fell after states made it legal to carry concealed firearms. The results of the study showed:

* States which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rate by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7% and robbery by 3%; [10] and * If those states not having concealed carry laws had adopted such laws in 1992, then approximately 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults and over 11,000 robberies would have been avoided yearly.[11]

* Vermont: one of the safest five states in the country. In Vermont, citizens can carry a firearm without getting permission... without paying a fee... or without going through any kind of government-imposed waiting period. And yet for ten years in a row, Vermont has remained one of the top-five, safest states in the union -- having three times received the "Safest State Award."[12]

* Florida: concealed carry helps slash the murder rates in the state. In the fifteen years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state. [13] FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 52% during that 15-year period -- thus putting the Florida rate below the national average. [14]

Anonymous said...

* Do firearms carry laws result in chaos? No. Consider the case of Florida. A citizen in the Sunshine State is far more likely to be attacked by an alligator than to be assaulted by a concealed carry holder.

1. During the first fifteen years that the Florida law was in effect, alligator attacks outpaced the number of crimes committed by carry holders by a 229 to 155 margin.

2. And even the 155 "crimes" committed by concealed carry permit holders are somewhat misleading as most of these infractions resulted from Floridians who accidentally carried their firearms into restricted areas, such as an airport. [15]

C. Criminals avoid armed citizens

* Kennesaw, GA. In 1982, this suburb of Atlanta passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the house. The residential burglary rate subsequently dropped 89% in Kennesaw, compared to the modest 10.4% drop in Georgia as a whole. [16]

* Ten years later (1991), the residential burglary rate in Kennesaw was still 72% lower than it had been in 1981, before the law was passed. [17]

* Nationwide. Statistical comparisons with other countries show that burglars in the United States are far less apt to enter an occupied home than their foreign counterparts who live in countries where fewer civilians own firearms. Consider the following rates showing how often a homeowner is present when a burglar strikes:

* Homeowner occupancy rate in the gun control countries of Great Britain, Canada and Netherlands: 45% (average of the three countries); and, * Homeowner occupancy rate in the United States: 12.7%. [18] Rapes averted when women carry or use firearms for protection

* Orlando, FL. In 1966-67, the media highly publicized a safety course which taught Orlando women how to use guns. The result: Orlando's rape rate dropped 88% in 1967, whereas the rape rate remained constant in the rest of Florida and the nation. [19]

* Nationwide. In 1979, the Carter Justice Department found that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32% were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes were actually successful. [20] Justice Department study:

* 3/5 of felons polled agreed that "a criminal is not going to mess around with a victim he knows is armed with a gun." [21]

* 74% of felons polled agreed that "one reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear being shot during the crime."[22] * 57% of felons polled agreed that "criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running into the police." [23]

Statement Analysis Blog said...

Our friends in the UK hear about America and gun violence from the media.

Criminals have guns and criminals don't register nor follow laws.

The police officer would be alive today had he been armed.

We will suspend someone's driving license for repeated minor offenses because: it shows a personality unwilling to follow the law of the land.

This is why the media will not air Mexican Americans who do not want illegal immigration. They say it gives THEM a bad name because Mexican criminals come to the US.

Why not just follow the laws and migrate legally?


Trigger said...

Thank you Anon for the fact sheet.

I am a grateful for the second amendment of our Constitution.

MARY ANN said...

It's ridiculous that police officers in Britain are unarmed - it's not only ridiculous - it's insane. How different would it have been if when that madman got out of his car, and the ARMED police officer pulled out his gun and shot him in the head as he was running up instead of being brutally murdered. What's more infuriating is that this guy was on the intelligence radar for radical violence and other crimes for who knows how long. By their own admission, the British government has confirmed that 50,000 ISIS fighters have been let back into England but Pamela Gellar is BANNED for speaking out against radical extremists. Explain that to latest families (Kurt Cochran from Utah, Aysha Frade, Keith Palmer) who's loved ones are gone forever and the ones still in hospital who may never been the same again.

I agree with Katie Hopkins of the UK - I'm sick of "our thoughts and prayers are with the families; we have to reach out to the Muslim Community" drivel spouted by the politicians. Stop the hastags, stop the political correctness, stop the cute little hearts made by people in Brussels, stop turning out lights on Broadway and other places, stop spouting words that mean nothing and start doing your job - protecting your countrymen. It's absolutely disgusting that we have veterans in our country that are committing suicide daily and living on the streets because "the resources just aren't there" but yet our California politicians can spend millions on funding sanctuary cities, give Eric Holder $25,000 a month to fight any policy coming out of the White House that might "be unfair to migrants."

The rape of that little girl in Maryland last week in her own school by 2 illegal aliens who have no business being in the country, much less her classroom sent me over the edge. As a victim of childhood sexual assault around the same age as that poor little girl, I've spent DECADES putting my life back together and still am struggling with some things. I got enraged listening to an interview with the woman politician who's sponsoring the bill to make Maryland a Sanctuary State say "I'm sorry for what happened to her but every one knows I'm an advocate for rape victims ... and hey it's proven that more white men are rapists than minority men". She was big enough to say that ICE could have them and do with them what they will after they go to jail, that's if they get convicted. Of course there was no mention that one of them was in custody for a different crime Texas and was let go and able to be out and about to not only get a free education, but destroy this little girl's life. I saw an interview with a reformed bleeding heart liberal (her words) who is so outraged by what happened to her, she's totally changed her mind on sanctuary cities. Could this by why ABC, CBS, NBC have refused to cover this story?

Is it any wonder why Trump won?

Trigger said...

"Why not just follow the laws and migrate legally?"

Those who have a personality unwilling to follow the law of at the land, and want to ignore the laws so they can feel entitled, is my first thought.

Anonymous said...

Are you so ignorant not to know the weaponry exportation refers to WMD?
Military weapons.

Not a firearm for self protection.
The ignorant with pitchforks, a bad combination.

Anonymous said...

Liberals will be more concerned if a fish got injured when that poor woman jumped from the bridge and plunged into the River Thames.

Unknown said...

He works where there is more than 50% Islam????

Unknown said...

Hi Peter,

I have recently come in to contact with your site through the Madeleine McCann case and I have great respect for the fantastic work you do. I saw you on Richard D Halls show and was hugely impressed by your skills and recommend anyone who hasn't seen it to go and watch it.

However, I'm struggling to see where your area of expertise in statement analysis is at work here. It just reads to me as Islam bashing. As an average white Englishman I have to disagree with some, if not most, of what this article purports. One quick google search will tell you around 5% of the UK are muslim so where do you get 50% from? Also Sadiq Khan may be a twat but to call him a Jihadist is a bit extreme.

As for our Police, not all Police officers are armed as our culture dictates, although we do have armed Police officers. These armed police are generally posted in highly sensitive places such as central London landmarks, airports and train stations etc. We also have armed response units that react to serious crimes.

I understand American police have the right to carry guns to defend themselves and the American public but that is appropriate as American citizens also have a right to own firearms. The general public in the UK would be horrified to see all of our police force carrying guns as it's not part of our culture.

I agree there are problems across the Western world regarding immigration [widows and orphans] some of which gave momentum to our decision to leave the EU. As a nation we want to take our power back and not be ruled by unelected officials in Brussels and control our own immigration policies amongst other things. However, the man reported of committing this senseless crime was born in this country and a citizen of the UK from birth.

I really love your work Peter, you clearly have a real talent and are a champion in your science. I love to read your articles on Statement analysis but this article is more like a call for arms opinion based article. Stick to what your good at Sir


General P. Malaise said...

thank you Peter for your posts on this subject. there are too few who understand the threat we face from islam.

Anonymous said...

Oh Adam, please spare us the apologia.

"However, the man reported of committing this senseless crime was born in this country and a citizen of the UK from birth"

But he's still a Muslim practicing a literal interpretation of the Koran, the fact that he's a citizen is secondary and it's only because the Main stream media have jumped all over this description in yet another attempt to insult the West and pretty much gloss over (or leave out altogether) the fact that he's a Muslim. Their mutual hate for the West is one thing that unifies illiberals' and Islamists.

"The general public in the UK would be horrified to see all of our police force carrying guns as it's not part of our culture"

Dying will be part of your culture soon if you continue this politically correct twaddle.

Barb said...

Adam, Your country seems really strange to me. (I don't understand why Policemen don't carry guns...don't criminals like bank robbers carry guns in England?) But I do love Princess Diana and Hogwarts. Your old buildings look really special. I hear you guys cook a mean fish and chips! "Mean" means "good" in American sometimes.

Anonymous said...

Really Adam?

Didnt you hear Nigel recite TODAY on LBC the result of Chatham House survey of 10,000 people from 10 Euro countries regarding an end to muslm immigration? And for the record, as stated You're not liberal. You're not conservative and you're not Muslm. What then are you? The UK is in turmoil and you offer no opinion of solution? Monumental changes occuring in your country and you offer no specifics?

Anonymous said...

As nations I suppose we are very different and very similar in a lot of ways.

No specifics. Vague. Just like the other posters here claiming to be UK. Monumental changes taking place right now and no specifics.

Anonymous said...


There's no other way to put this.

You are stunningly ignorant of Muslims and the Koran. I'd say you're also being wilfully blind to current events, particularly the increasing and escalating attacks by Islamists.

"Why someone would do something like this is beyond me"

Only someone completely ignorant of the Koran would say this. Otherwise you'd be aware that such actions aren't only permitted by the Koran, they're encouraged.

KORAN 9:29
"Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."

"But just because one bloke went mental..."

No, don't conflate this with mental health issues. This is a man who, along with the rest of the Islamist Terrorists, who has been inspired by ISIS to carry out their attacks against infidels. ISIS has explicitly told its followers to use cars in exactly the same fashion as Nice, Berlin and now London. Tell me that's a coincidence of three blokes going "mental" with a straight face. It was intentional and it was based on a death cult ideology.

These attacks aren't a surprise, because the Koran calls explicitly for death of non-believers.

I get that you wish to stay as neutral as possible, but your pacifistic stance is just giving a pass to the community which should be introspectively asking the biggest questions of themselves - the Islamic faithful.

Anonymous said...

Adam, You are correct, Chris Rock is one of our greatest thinkers here in America.
Thank you for bringing his quote to our attention to help us open our minds at the very least with the help of one of our most talented Afican-American comedians.

Anonymous said...

The biggest question is: Is God the Lord of the bible punishing the west for apostasy and great immorality? If so, how can there be any improvement without repenting?

Anonymous said...

So police in the UK don't carry guns because "culture". Um, UK culture has already changed. Do your comrades in the UK need fainting couches because *gasp* your military and "SWAT" is armed? Just do an image search on CO19 Force Firearms Unit, The Met's specialist firearms unit, SFO and ARV units. I think your "culture" can handle it.

"Police in the UK don't carry guns because criminals don't have guns." So by that logic, shouldn't they carry knives? Because the criminals surely do carry knives. One of your finest bled to death today for no reason.

"Why someone would do something like this is beyond me." Um, read Peter's post again. Better yet, ask the terrorists. They will be happy to enlighten you. They are very clear about their motives.

"I suppose the point I'm trying make is that it would foolish of me to comment on another countries ability to uphold its laws because I know nothing of that country or its culture." But you're okay coming over to Peter's blog and telling him what to write and what not to write.

Darlene said...

Adam, i think its cool there are no guns in ur country. Just cuz pepl here cant understand it cuz its different than what we have dont mean it aint kool.

trustmeigetit said...

Muslim are told to emulate their prophet.

He married a 6 year old
He murdered
He started wars
He had slaves

ISIS does as they are told.

The other are not true to this "religion"

And what's sad is they do not live.

So many have spent their entire lives in war. Violence. They are told what their truth is. They are not allowed to see it. Many live in poverty. Are uneducated about the real world.

This is all many of them know.

The do not learn. They do not seek truth. They follow.

They will never accumulate.

It is like cancer.

You don't let it spread. You need to isolate it and treat it.

Bringing them to other countries only feeds the cancer and allows it to take over the whole body..

I will never understand the liberal mind.

I fear the only way they will learn is the day they are a victim personally. Even then...maybe not.

Anonymous said...

I still think Adam's country has cool ways with no guns imagine all the peepl living life in peace you may say I'm a dreamer but im not the only one I hope someday everyone on this blog will join with it and the world will live as 1 .

Statement Analysis Blog said...

Adam West:

1. Statement Analysis deals with crime. What happened in UK was crime.
2. 50% of London not England, UK
3. Islam bashing? No, just describing the fundamental teachings of Islam, its impact upon culture, and how we view it in language.
4. The mayor of London's own statements, before he was elected, tells us who he is. He is a jihadist.
5. Not arming your police. This is moral narcissism. It is like decrying the death penalty while praising the slaughter of babies.

Had he been armed, the police officer would be alive today.

What you miss, as have so many, is why I used the word "ideology" so often in the article.

I am not talking about Muslims; I am talking about an ideology that calls for you to convert or die.

We fought Germany in WWII.

There were many Germans who were moral.
There were German members of the Nazi party would resisted the evil while others tried, but failed.

Statement Analysis does not deal with Germans, but with the ideology of National Socialism.

There are many fine Muslims and there are many not so fine Muslims. This is not the scope of the article. The article addresses the ideology that is at heart:


While you are respectful in your disagreement, you and I consider this "strength."
Islam considers it weakness.
Supremacy, in any and in all states, must lead to violence because we live in a world of inequality.
I regret that many so influenced by emotion, cannot separate Muslim from Islam, people from ideology, MSM from news, and political correctness from truth.
If one has any understanding of human nature, they'd want police armed.

This man was denied a basic right to defend himself as the perpetrator was more armed than he was, pounding the knife into his back over and over.

This police officer and family man was denied a basic right that I have.

If you come to a diner in Maine, it may be that 50% of the patrons are armed. Your wife and daughter will never be raped in a diner in Maine as long as law abiding citizens are armed.

I wish we lived in a world where arms were not necessary but we do not.

Today, the politicians who wish to take away arms are guarded by them, personally.


Statement Analysis Blog said...

trust me;

Islam teaches that Mohammad is to be emulated in all things, including pedophilia.

I think Birmingham and other locales know this fact quite well.

I appreciate your post,


Trigger said...

"I wish we lived in a world where arms were not necessary but we do not."

Guns and weapons are a fact of life. Smart people know the value of bearing arms, so the the criminals.

The killers in the San Bernardino massacre were armed above and beyond most Americans. It was a calculated advantage in an effort to kill as many unwary people as they could in one attack.

Anonymous said...

Desmond Doss.

Anonymous said...

"He works where there is more than 50% Islam"

Where is that? This is the first point in your argument, and I'm sorry but you are wrong.

I live 500 yards from the Palace of Westminster, and I can assure you, there is not 50% Islam, either in the surrounding area, the Borough of Westminster or the City of London.

Why do you make up such total nonsense? It discredits the rest of the your argument.

I"m certainly no apologist for Islam or multiculturalism, but to spout such absolute nonsense, just makes everything else you have to say seem weak, biased and ignorant.

Anonymous said...

If you want to hear a passionate, intelligent, eloquent, courageous, factual response to Wednesday's attack, that doesn't have to invent fake statistics to beef up it's point, watch this

Anonymous said...

Video is a direct defiant response. However, the barbarians arent at the gate, they're already inside. They were invited inside. And as Nigel said today, Its a BIG problem. And how will leadership respond?

Unknown said...

Hi Peter,

I'm both humbled and flattered you have taken the time to respond to my comment.

I have to inform you it's more like 15% of the population of London that are muslim. I believe what you are referring to is a handful of boroughs of London where the proportion of muslims living there is unusually high. Cities such as Bradford, Birmingham and Luton also have an unproportionately high percentage of muslims compared to the general population of the UK. I'm sure most would agree that the existence of these ghettos play a major part in the proliferation of radical Islamic ideologies and this is where our problems lie in regards to home grown terrorism and tensions between different groups of people.

In regards to rape and paedophilia, these aren't things that are exclusive to Islam in this country, although you might be led to believe that if you were listen to MSM. Institutional child abuse is rife and pervades every religion, class and culture unfortunately. Often highlighted within ethnic and poorer classes and generally covered up or minimized in others. I would even argue the Christian church has played a bigger part in committing such despicable crimes in our society.

You say if Police were armed in this country PC Palmer would not have been murdered and I can see logic in this argument even if I don't agree with arming our Police. It would be just as likely that someone motivated to commit such an atrocious act would be inclined to bring a bigger gun to the fight. The Police in the USA are armed, are they never subject to violent attacks and murders? We must not forget there were many other people killed or injured in this attack, should we have given them guns too?

I know Birmingham extremely well. It's our second largest city and by far the best. I'm privileged to work there quite a lot and despite it being a big city in our terms it has a real sense of community and pride in itself. It's a really unique place populated with beautiful people. It has it's problems I'm sure but where doesn't.

Ultimately, I think we are in agreement on the most important issue, that politicians are actively trying to erode our rights. While across the pond in USA they are trying to take your guns away, here in the UK they are going to use events like these to try to militarise our Police force which in both cases will end with us eventually living under a totalitarian dictatorship without the ability to defend ourselves. Britain leaving the EU is a massive step backwards for the global elites. Having control of our own immigration policies will only help to ease tensions within our society and make it harder for people with unwelcome intentions infiltrating our wonderful land.

You may think I'm just naïve but I believe the overwhelming majority of people are good people and when we treat each other respect and understanding we can stand up to anything even with empty hands. All we need is to collectively wake up to tricks being played on us.

I'd like to thank you again for taking time to exchange ideas and opinion with me, it's a real honour and I wish you and your family all the best.

Kind regards

Anonymous said...

I can't believe Batman (Adam West) isn't taking names and kicking ass.
50% stat refers to the majority vote an ideologically jihadist politician received to become the mayor of London.

Anonymous said...

Adam, with all due respect, you wrote

You may think I'm just naïve but I believe the overwhelming majority of people are good people and when we treat each other respect and understanding we can stand up to anything even with empty hands. All we need is to collectively wake up to tricks being played on us."

Are you serious?

Particularly where you say "We can stand up to anything with empty hands"?!?!

The only reason the bridge terrorist stopped killing people is because someone shot him dead. How can you overlook that fact? Also, if a citizen on the bridge had been armed they could have shot his tires or just aimed for the drivers side window of the terrorists car and that would have stopped him.
What about the Paris shooting? If one person had a gun they could have stopped the terrorists from killing like 80 people.

Can you give ONE example of any terrorist who has been stopped by "empty hands"?

Anonymous said...

One & half months but no info about Abby & Libby. Statements Analysts have not come up with anything. Zero.

Trigger said...

"all we have to do is to collectively wake up to tricks being played on us"

Are you saying that this idea will stop murder, rape, wars, and all evil?

Are you saying that terrorist attacks where mass murders occur are "tricks being played?"

This all smacks of delusion. I am grateful that I don't believe that pie in the sky notion.

Hey Jude said...

The MPs don't want the police at the Carriage Gates armed because it would 'spoil the atmosphere' round Parliament, according to the Guardian. They are so vulnerable on the gates - the armed officers are further back - it doesn't make much sense for them to not all be armed round Parliament - they maybe don't even have tasers. Much of the talk by the politicians is about their own security, the future safety of the police on the gates has, mostly, been figuring as an afterthought for the MPs who have even remembered to mention them. Someone said it was something to think about, but on another day - well, easy to say when it's not their job to stand at the gates, defenceless,against any attackers, today, or any other day.


Now investigators are wondering if the terrorist had an accomplice. I wonder why some photos seem to show anomalies. I posted them here if anyone is interested:

Tania Cadogan said...

In regards to rape and paedophilia, these aren't things that are exclusive to Islam in this country, although you might be led to believe that if you were listen to MSM. Institutional child abuse is rife and pervades every religion, class and culture unfortunately.

You do not mention that that rape and paedophilia are mandated and permitted and encouraged in islam for muslim males.

Do you know of any christian religion that mandates and demands rape and paedophilia?
Do you know of any hindu, jewish,buddhist,sikh or other genuine religion that says such is permitted and expected of males?
Cults are not religions.

Islam is an ideology much like nazism is an ideology.
Unlike other religions which have over the years reformed and modernised, islam cannot and will not.
The words in the koran are inviolate and are the words of their prophet who was the perfect man.
To change one letter of anything written would be to imply he was not perfect and going down that path results in an unpleasant death.

read and learn the truth of their lies

Lemon said...

adam west said:
"You may think I'm just naïve but I believe the overwhelming majority of people are good people and when we treat each other respect and understanding we can stand up to anything even with empty hands. All we need is to collectively wake up to tricks being played on us."

Could you speak more to your statement "All we need is to collectively wake up to tricks being played on us" ?
Also, who is "we" and "us"?
Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Off Topic: What is going on here? Young black girls going missing every couple days in Washington, DC and this is just making National News???

What is going on???

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

RE: tania cadogan @ 7:19PM March 24, 2107- Very good post!

you said...
The words in the koran are inviolate and are the words of their prophet who was the perfect man.
To change one letter of anything written would be to imply he was not perfect and going down that path results in an unpleasant death.
Mohammed, having been driven out of Mecca for "madness"; he escaped a plot to kill him and traveled, eventually settling in Medina. While there, to feed his followers, he "arranged" robberies of the caravans traveling to and from Medina to trade. He brokered a 10 year peace treaty between Medina and Mecca, only to break it 2 years in with a "jihad" in 630 AD. With both Mecca and Medina under his control, the Jews were forced to convert or die. Approximately 600 Jewish men were killed and buried in the marketplace at Medina. The surviving Jewish women and children became slaves.

The Koran was not written by Mohammed. It was compiled by his father-in-law and close friend, Abu Bekr (one man), a year after his death, from scraps of paper that Mohammed had written on and various things he had said to his followers. Abu Bekr then assumed the position of first caliph (Arabic for "Successor"), much to the anger of Mohammed's adopted son Ali(actually Mohammed's cousin). Descendants of Ali are known as Shiites.

Trigger said...

Has anyone besides me, heard about the disgusting practice of "cone" or "coning" of young children in Muslim families?

Anonymous said...

Do USA now need a wall on north border because of Candada?

Hey Jude said...

Photos of the terrorist's assorted footwear - I found that strange - I think my first URL doesn't work.

Unknown said...

Who knows how Many lives would be saved if the British police were armed....

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tania Cadogan said...

How many lives would have been saved it someone had managed to kill mohammed way back then?

Hey Jude said...

British police hardly ever fire a gun - seven times in the twelve months prior to March 2016, across the whole country. Armed response units are called out thousands of times per year, yet rarely find in necessary to fire. There is much less criminal activity with firearms, and many fewer in circulation.

The officers on the gate should have been issued with tasers, at least - it's quite astonishing they were not equipped to deal with such an attack.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

RE: Anonymous @ 1:50AM March 26, 2017-Actually, the latest medical studies indicate that male circumcision has preventative properties with regards to certain types of cancer in men. Many in the medical community have done a 180, as circumcision has proven to be more "hygienic" over the course of a man's lifespan. Biblically, the Jews were instructed to do it after the seventh day following birth because it takes seven days for the baby's body to produce enough Vitamin K. Because we learned that along the way, we now give babies get a Vitamin K shot (usually in the heel) right after birth.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

RE: Anonymous @ 9:04PM March 25, 2017

"Anonymous said...

How many poor Chinese wouldnt have become drug addicts if the British had not forced drugs into China."
Attempting to divert or hijack the discussion much? Why does discussing Islam make you uncomfortable? This article is about an ideology and it's practitioners, not a political entity. The ideology involved originated with one man in the Middle East. The abuse begun by it's leader in 630 AD is now perpetrated by this ideology world-wide. None of which have anything to do with the British, the Chinese, and the Opium trade. This is the second time you've tried to offset any negative discussion of Islam with this topic. The failures of men and the failures of governments are not mutually exclusive. Both situations can be classified as moral failure. You seem to be having a real personal issue with this.

Statement Analysis Blog said...

It is a difficult question to answer, Tania, so here is a short view:

Since 9/11, there have been 30,511 Islamic terror attacks documented. This is not war, just terror attacks.


Anonymous said...

Fools, everyday there is new info on what "prevents" cancer. Im sure if I had my breasts removed right now I would never get breast cancer--does that mean I should do it?
Our society is obssessed with disease and seems to view every body part as something just waiting to be infiltrated by cancer. Particularly female anatomy--they've already proven some of the tests for breasts cancer increase the risks of getting cancer. Sorry Im not letting someone crush my breast to shoot radiation through it. How can that be helpful? Just "in case" I have cancer. Now they are actually saying they were wrong, those tests are useless for early detection.

More hygienic? It's called soap.
I think it is stupid to circumsize babies...what if a mistake is made? It happens...where scar tissue forms the wrong way etc causing serious problems. All so things can be more hygienic? You know what would be a better option? SOAP.
It's like my dentist wanted to pull out my wisdom teeth that cause me no pain, lined up perfectly in my mouth because wisdom teeth are "harder to reach with a toothbrush"?!?! And therefore I MIGHT get cavities?!?! No thanks, Ithink I can take an extra second to make sure I brush my wisdom teeth! Rather than have them yanked out of my mouth!!!
Re: circumcision....there are negative things such as loss of sensation...they dont people that though do they!

Anonymous said...

Why would God make something a certain way if it was "unhygienic"? I feel like Western society is obssessed with germs and disease. Hand sanitizer? Anti-bacterial soap? A close friend of mine had breast cancer at age 35--she had the Braca 1 gene and her mother had died of cancer in her 30's so understandable she had been researching for yrs everything that can fight cancer in case she got cancer. She was going through chemo/surgery/radiation but also was taking TONS of vitamins, but she said to me that "THIS is the most powerful natural anti-cancer thing there is" and she held up a jar of purified dirt!!! (Meaning all pebbles taken out). I said "Youre kidding." She said no, she's not kidding...dirt is the best thing there is for revving up your immune system...she said she had been researching it for yrs. She would mix the dirt into juice every morning and drink it. So how ironic right.

Anonymous said...

One of my friend's brother had something go wrong during his circumcision & they told his mother it might not effect him till adolescence, so his mother waited in fear all that time, and too afraid to ask him herself, had his sister ask him if everything was working OK. He told her "yes". But after my friend told me that story I became against circumcision. I don't get why that kind of risk is worth not having to take an extra second to wash.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Long, medically-based response to Anonymous @ 12:25PM and Anonymous @ 12:26PM March 26, 2017- feel free to roll and scroll.

Part 1
First of all since you brought up God, then you’re likely aware that everything God made was good (i.e. perfect, perfectly functioning) at the moment He created it. When Adam sinned, Adam introduced disease and death into the world (human and animal bodies included). That's why people and all things (manmade or pre-existing) age and decay, eventually resulting in death and ruin. The outward physical effects of inner spiritual decay .

Long after the initial Creation and the Fall of Man, He instructed Abraham to institute circumcision as a sign of his covenant with God, a literal representation of what is unclean becoming clean. The Jewish people have been circumcising their male offspring for over 3000 years, with their language, culture, and religion in much for endangering mankind.

Third, the location and function of the female breast as opposed to the location and function of the male's foreskin is an ignorant point to argue. The issue is not removing breasts, but removing a covering of skin that regularly comes into contact, not only with sperm, seminal fluid, urea, fecal matter, hand-transported surface germs, and the bodily fluids of others, but also by virtue of it’s structure traps those contaminants under a rolled layer of skin...a warm, moist, dark environment for bacteria to grow combined with friction from clothing, etc. Medically speaking, circumcision is more hygienic. Very few men are going to thoroughly wash their hands and under their nails for 30 seconds, turn the water off without touching the faucet, urinate, and then thoroughly clean around and underneath the foreskin with SOAP [your emphasis, not mine] for 30 seconds each time they visit the bathroom. Very few mothers of infant, toddler, and preschool boys are going to do that for them either when they are toilet training them.

Foolsfeedonfolly said...

Part 2 of long post

Some women carrying a specific gene or with a well-documented family history do indeed elect to have one or both breasts removed in an effort to decrease their cancer risk. Having the male foreskin removed is a far less invasive procedure with a significantly shorter recovery time. Your argument was a little extreme. There's far less risk involved in circumcision than a mastectomy. Circumcision may not only reduce the risk of prostate cancer and some penile cancers, but current research shows it may also decrease the risk some sexually transmitted diseases. Like any other medical procedure, it is not without risk of injury or infection, depending on the skill level of the surgeon and the commitment to aftercare by the patient/caregiver.

Finally, depending on your age, you may remember a time when Doctors automatically removed children's tonsils if they became inflamed at any point- they were thought to be extraneous organs. Now we know they're important to the lymphatic system. Likewise, appendectomies at one point were also common as the appendix was deemed to be a leftover remnant of the evolutionary process that humans no longer needed. More recent research is leaning toward the concept that appendix may actually be useful in some ways to maintaining the balance within the digestive tract. Within the last 10-15 years, scientists have discovered that the Dietary Laws prevalent in the Old Testament of the Bible have some medical validity. They’ve also discovered that the “Social Laws”, particularly with respect to communicable diseases were instrumental in preventing widespread plague type outbreaks. Likewise, the Old Testament practice of circumcision may have preemptive protections from certain types of diseases; it’s still in the early stages of study, observation, and follow-up testing within the medical community in an attempt to definitively prove or disprove that hypothesis. That’s what Science does.

The Point??? Even with three thousand years of documented medical history, there are still many things human beings do not know about the human body regarding all of it’s organs, their individual functions, and the extent of their interdependency.

The Good News: No one is mandating that you or any male family member be circumcised (provided you live in North or South America or a European country). To be clear: There is no medical need or evidence supporting female genital mutilation and it is not the same argument, nor is it done for the same reasons as circumcision. FGM is perpetrated specifically to decrease a woman's natural response with the mistaken underlying pervasive belief that women are inherently promiscuous and morally deficit= lustful, sinful...reprehensible for any society.

That's why it is so important as individuals that we research medical issues for ourselves/our friends and family members. We need to be well-informed to make good decisions.

Anonymous said...

Fools, you're ignorant about foreskin and also about germs. In order to be kept cleaned it needs to be washed underneath once a day. Not every single time a guy pees. (Im not going to get into specifics but its obvious you are also ignorant on several points regarding foreskins that would dispel your concern about germs esp w toilet training if you werent ignorant).
Circumcision has been proven to have no medical purpose. God made it that way for a reason. It is actually there TO PROTECT that part of the body. There are many risks to circumcision as well as loss of sensation.
Why not just give each person the chance to decide for themselves when they grow up?

Anonymous said...

That is not an embedded confession. Why dont you just state which of Peters beliefs you disagree with or dont you have the courage to?

Anonymous said...

Is Tania's rhetorical and hypothetical question worthy of discussion? Its really the Hitler question, Isnt it? Or, how much misery has been averted by abortion? Or, of how much good has the world been deprived due to abortion? Can you do the math? No. Nobody can. How many 10's of millions killed in the 20th century due to Russia, Europe, Asia?

Anonymous said...

Or, how much misery has been averted by abortion? Or, of how much good has the world been deprived due to abortion?

I love how liberals say these kinds of things, like they have no misery in their life lmao. Only people who have been aborted would have had misery in their lives. Not liberals, who shit roses and drink fine wine while discussing baby part sales. Perhaps liberals are so miserable, they fail to notice their own misery, so deeply ingrained as it is into the fabric of their existence.

Same thing with liberals claiming only "wanted" babies should be born. Impressed as they are with themselves, like the world oohed and aahed when they popped into the world.

Liberals are diabolical.

Habundia said...

This was again an interesting read, with a lot of interesting responses in a little headed debate

"He works where there is more than 50% Islam"
Many fell over this statement and were immediately defending this. To me it only says that at the place he WORKED there is more then 50% Islam.
That tells us nothing about the city or the country he is living in......It's about his WORK place.
It doesn't say he lives where 50% is Islam, he works where 50% is Islam.....There are places in countries where the working people in the company are merely from foreign cultures.....Like my country has demanded that more people of different culture will be hired as police officers. People shouldn't be hired based on culture they should be hired for "being the best candidate for the job".

" As suspect as statistics are,"
This means that this number of 50% is suspect number and could be even 40% or less or even more....It all depends on the place of work that is looked at and being number does with statistics.

We just had elections and right before president Erdogan from Turkey wanted to come to our country to hold conferences for Turkish people to encourage them to vote for expansion of his power our country (Mark Rutte) said this was not going to happen. This has started last Monday for voters around Europe who have rights to vote and April 16 the Turkish people themselves get to vote.

As a Dutch woman I feel like surrounded by an invasion of Muslims from all over the world to Europe......Germany, England, Belgium, France (all surrounding our tiny little country and also make use of our country, 245.000 registered Turkish in the Netherlands alone, not mentioning all other countries they came from)

I am a social as can be and think people have the right to have a safe life. Does that mean we should let everyone come and stay here, not fully knowing what all these damaged people will bring to our country and cities and just think it will be all okay if they just become "integrated".........I say that's just FOOLISH!

Habundia said...

Part two
This is what our officers are allowed to carry. And do have a pistol, which unfortunately has sometimes (everyone is one to many) led to killing innocent people (like that happens almost daily in us)

In a country that aloud weapons to be carried by anyone (within certain rules) encrease the chance "that it's being used".
I understand the US has far more dangerous people living there then UK and Netherlands has. And I do understand why people feel a need to have the right to protect themselves from danger with being aloud to carry a weapon. But people are also known as a spiecy that will do stupid things in a split of a second......Guns have the ability to react in a split of a second, so the chance something stupid happens encreases when human get a hold of it!
There is no measurement for "threat" but I do think that those people who are being payed a low salary and are willingly want to "serve and protect", they should have the equipment to at least protect themselves when needed and get some proper defence training with it along.....Because we do want them to protect us from those who serve and protect their own business outside the rules of law and where some of don't care if that means killing anyone in the way.

I also find it ironic that countries as UK and The Netherlands sell weapons to many countries around the world, but don't give their "protectors of the country", proper tools to protect.....But are giving anyone else the best weapons one can buy!Which are then being brought (illegally) back to the country to be used against their officers and citizens.

Circumcision​ can be done out of medical need, and I think that should be the only reason why this should be done, when there is a medical problem with the foreskin and therefore should be removed, but to do it out of hygienic reason as a religion believe, which would be a strange contradiction saying at one hand God made humans "perfectly" to then circumcize boys (and girls) from birth (or later in life), it is just contradicting itself and it shows how contradicting these believes can be. If humans are being created by some god "perfectly", why would you then go and make humans "less perfect".....I doesn't make any sense and so without medical cause, I just call it mutilation of a human body.....which is a crime to human (children's) rights!

"If you come to a diner in Maine, it may be that 50% of the patrons are armed. Your wife and daughter will never be raped in a diner in Maine as long as law abiding citizens are armed. "
Although the article is from April of 2015, I don't think in these times the numbers have increased
But we do have to be aware that these people from countries that have lived in war for most of their lives, if not their entire lives, and are very damaged according to our culture standards and should not be underestimated!