Tuesday, March 3, 2020

Missing: Casie J. Weese, 37


New York State Police in Owego are asking for the public's help in finding a missing Glen Aubrey woman.
Police say 37-year-old Casie J. Weese of Glen Aubrey was leaving a party with her husband in Apalachin Sunday morning at approximately 1:30 a.m., but their vehicle ended up getting a flat tire a short distance away from the party.
State police say Weese was last seen by her husband walking eastward on Main Street in Apalachin. 

She hasn't been seen since.
"Later that morning, she was reported missing by her daughter at the direction of her father when he responded home," said Capt. Erik Dauber, a zone commander with state police. 
Police say they are investigating the husband's whereabouts from the time he last saw Weese to the time he returned home later that morning. They said he has fully cooperated with their investigation.
Weese is 5 foot 5 inches and weighs approximately 100 pounds. She has brown hair and brown eyes. Weese was last seen wearing a black and white checkered jacket, jeans and black boots. 
Police used man patrols, as well as canines and a helicopter to search for Weese on Monday.
State police ask that if you see Weese to call 911 or the New York State Police at Owego at 607-561-7400.


Update Facebook posts 


Casie if u can see this let people know u are ok. love u miss u deeply,” Ronnie Weese wrote on Facebook Sunday afternoon.
An hour later, he wrote  “It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."

He continued to post messages throughout the night, including “Casie Weese hope u make it home safe tonight love u” and “God please help me I need my wife with me casie come home please. love u.”

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

State police and family members -- including her husband Ronnie Weese -- have posted on social media asking anyone who has seen or heard from Casie Weese to let them know.

“Casie if u can see this let people know u are ok. love u miss u deeply,” Ronnie Weese wrote on Facebook Sunday afternoon.

An hour later, he wrote this message: “It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."

He continued to post messages throughout the night, including “Casie Weese hope u make it home safe tonight love u” and “God please help me I need my wife with me casie come home please. love u.”

https://www.syracuse.com/crime/2020/03/upstate-ny-woman-disappears-after-leaving-party-with-husband.html

Shy Covian said...

Casie's husband has to answer more questions.

Anonymous said...

I will wait for the analysis but this profiles as another spousal killing.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like a drunken bruhaha on the side of the road.

Not a lot of "I" involved though he does claim she's his wife at one point.

IF you can see this. Doubtful since she's dead.

"miss you deeply"...how deep are we talking here? 6 foot, 20 ft under water? How deep is his luv?

God please help me?
That's his only recourse now, imo.

The only other thing could be violence and she hid herself well enough not to be battered again.

Shy Covian said...

A drunken argument after hours in the street as a last sighting is an awful sign. More info is required here...

frommindtomatter said...

“Casie if u can see this let people know u are ok. love u miss u deeply,” Ronnie Weese wrote on Facebook Sunday afternoon.

He has put a condition on his wife letting people know she is OK. It is only “if” you “can” see this that she will be able to let people know. He is revealing that in his mind there is a possibility that she can’t see this. I question what would cause him to have such thoughts, does he know or believe something to support his words.

He could of said “when you see this” or “if you see this”, but he added the word “can” which has created a condition which must be met.

“let people know u are ok” – If she meets the previous condition he wants her to let “people” know she is OK. He doesn’t want her to let him know or he would have said so. I ask why would he not want her to let him know she is OK? It is possible he knows she can’t let him know. He did set a condition on her at the beginning of his statement.

The dropped pronouns on “love u” and “miss u” stand out due to the context. It is as though he is writing a casual message as though everything is normal. When a loved one is missing or any other emotional event, I would expect to see commitment (“I”) even in a text or message.

Adrian.

Hey Jude said...

“Please let people know u are okay” - why not “please let me know you are okay?” Does he have reason to think that given the choice, she’d contact anyone, or everyone, over him? Is he saying she would not choose to contact him?

“Miss u deeply” - yet she’s only been missing for a day. - no pronoun, so he doesn’t sound very sincere. It might not be good that “deeply” is on his mind - it invites the question as to whether he possibly dug a deep grave, or if she could be in deep water.

Again, there’s no personal pronoun with “starting to get really worried.” He’s not committing to being worried about her not coming home.

Calling on divinity, and that for himself, though it’s not he who is missing. He creates distance between himself and Casie by saying he needs his wife “with” him, rather than that he just needs her.

He writes every word except “u” in full. Maybe that’s his usual usage, or maybe he doesn’t consider there’s any longer a you” for Casie. Is the “u”just text-speke, or does it also say something about how he views his wife?

The messages are meant to convey that he’s concerned for his wife, but the only need he mentions is his own, which could be because he’s worried he will be under suspicion as time goes on, and the only avoidance of that would be for his wife to be there, with him. He asks for God for help with that rather than appeal again to Casie.

The messages are intended for his readers - people - rather than his wife - he’s telling FB that he loves, misses and is concerned for his wife, yet he doesn’t actually say any of those things.

Shy Covian said...

I cannot locate a lot of info on this case yet, most articles seem to have been posted a couple of days ago. The husbands language is worrying, he blames his wife for being missing and as other posters have said he puts the onus onto his missing wife to make her way back home.

Mike Dammann said...

“Casie Weese hope u make it home safe tonight love u”

Remember the mother of the "missing" girl in Malaysia?
"Hope" is passive. "Hope" is hopeless if you will. It is too weak in an early missing person's case. Its lack of confidence indicates knowledge there is not hope and confidence expressed would be too difficult considering guilty knowledge indicated.

“God please help me I need my wife with me casie come home please. love u.”

Deity introduced. As often discussed. "Help me"... priority is SELF.
"I need"
"my wife"
he takes ownership with "my". Was there ever a doubt of loyalty or "ownership" as in "togetherness"?
Did she cheat on him? Was she threatening to leave?
"with me"
can show fear of being left. Is she coming back? Is she doing okay? His priorities are:
#1 Himself
#2 ownership, his wife not leaving him
"casie come home please."
"Please" puts the ball in her court, but how is he sure she is able to?
What about potential abductors? Is he not going to appeal to whoever may have taken her? Is he certain of no abduction having taken place?
"love u.”
This is highly sensitive as in such a crucial situation, he leaves out the pronoun "I".
This is not routine.
I will continue with more comments on my blog.

Mike Dammann said...

“It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."
What is " getting dark" referring to?
Is her referring to his state of mind in the recent past?
The lack of light or fading can introduce a state of no hope.
Hope disappears.
"and my wife still isn’t around"
has this been ongoing and not changing despite "hope" for it to change?
"still"
"starting to get really worried."
"I'm" is missing. Is he not sure about the "starting" part as his worries were ongoing regarding what?
"my wife still isn’t around"
an ongoing theme of suspecting her absence to mean something important? Absence in marriage. Physical or emotional absence.

Mike Dammann said...

"Casie if u can see this let people know u are ok. love u miss u deeply,”
"let people know"
not "let ME know", but "people".
Who are these "people"?
Was it common for her to go to others in confidence and comfort, but not him?
This indicates strong emotional disconnect in their marriage.
"u are ok"
not "IF you are ok"
In his mind, she is okay. Does he know the state she is in?
Does he consider that state to be right and appropriate for her?
Why?
Based on past behavior? Was something done to her that in his mind she deserved due to past behavior?
" love u miss u "
We are missing the pronoun "I" which is highly sensitive considering this is the one time you would expect the husband of a missing person of unknown whereabouts to express whatever selfless love there is expected to be in him. He doesn't do that. He introduces a routine "love you" which is the type often joked about when it comes to superficial acquaintances.
Notice also that "love u" and "miss u" is twice dropping pronoun or connection of such via "and".
"deeply"
This can indicate what he hasn't been able to express in their time together. He deeply feels what she may not have reciprocated in recent past. It is him wanting to show what he doesn't believe he has been able to in terms of connecting. This can show regret, but not necessarily in terms of having failed, though it can. His relationship triggers feelings of regret. He either wasn't able to connect or she didn't reciprocate his attempts. It shows a strong disconnect that affected him "DEEPLY".

Kim said...

I read through all the comments on his page and I find it interesting that he continues to post messages to her but one of his comments he says, "I have her phone." Someone even asks him how she's supposed to see the messages if he has her phone, then she answers herself and says, well I guess she can look at a friends phone.

Someone else asked him, "She just walked away?" and his response was just, "Yep." As if that was perfectly normal for someone to walk away in the dark in the middle of the night.

Anonymous said...

I think they should inquire if she took any drugs or had behaved differently than any time before. People normally don't just walk off without some influence or are simply mad. It must still be cold there.

Maybe he'd been flirting with someone else or visa versa.

Shy Covian said...

He has her phone? Yet he keeps communicating as if she has her phone?

Anonymous said...

He sounds guilty as hell.

Autumn said...

“It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."

Around -> a synonym for "around" is "alive". If his wife "isn't around" does that mean she isn't alive anymore? His wife "still" isn't around. Did his wife go "still"? (Also mentioned by Mike above).

It's "getting dark out". "Out" is an unnecessary addition. Did his wife go "out" as in "black out" ("dark out")? As in "die"? If it's "getting dark" that means there is no longer light. Did his wife's light go "out".

"Starting to get really worried" -> is he reliving his wife's going "out"/going "still"/ceasing to be "around"?

Martina said...

“It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."

out is unneccessary - where else would it get dark if not outside? Storytelling.
isn't around - around is very laid back, casual. He does want her "around"? A spouse concerned with her, high state of alert, panicked - where would he want her to be? Where she is safe - home. He should be wanting her home. "My wife still isn't home."
Missing "I", not committed to being worried.

That is just one sentence. Why let his daughter - at whatever age - call to report her missing? Distancing behaviour.

Katinjax said...

I think this will be another case where husband killed spouse. His story is sketchy.

Anonymous said...

Yes, it is sketchy. He doesn't mention if he went back to the house where the party was to see if she returned. Maybe he/she/they were friends of hers. Did he look nearby to see if she walked off to relieve herself and fell prey to something, or passed out?

Did he drive back and forth on the road and look for her? Were there businesses with cameras?

Did he look in his trunk where the spare tire was?

Anonymous said...

Casie if u (1) can see this let people know u (2) are ok. love u(3) miss u(4) deeply,”

“It’s getting dark out and my wife still isn’t around starting to get really worried."

“Casie Weese hope u(5) make it home safe tonight love u(6) and “God please help me I need my wife with me casie come home please. love u.”
Ronnie writes Casie's name with a capital "C" = Ronnie can use Capitals and indicates knowledge of proper grammar;
"if" = "condition, stipulation, doubt," hesitation," "exception, challenge" = conditional and a Challenge;
"u" = Ronnie's way to diminish Casie in status and power;
"can" = conditional and also a Challenge +
EXTRA WORD - "CAN";
"let people know u are ok ; Why people, why not him? = Ronnie knows Casie is OK;

"love" u miss u deeply;
= Missing Pronoun "i" = no commitment, no responsibility to what Ronnie wrote;
= small "l" at beginning of sentence = non committal + lowers status being it's the word starting a new sentence;
the 4 small "u" = Ronnie keeps Casie's status "small" + extra word "DEEPLY"

"It's getting dark" = Ronnie knows proper grammar and uses it here;
[OUT] = EXTRA WORD;
"and my wife still isn't around" =
= Ronnie knows exactly where Casie is and where she is, is "deep" and "still";
"starting to get "really" worried =
no pronoun = lack of commitment and responsibility and Ronnie isn't worried, because he knows where Casie is, is a place deep and still really.
Order is important ...Ronnie is more concerned it's getting dark, than where his wife is;
and being worried;
Casie Weese = uses last name to assert authority over Casie;
"hope" = something desired;
"u" = single small letter = diminish status and power;
love u = missing pronoun "I" = no commitment, no responsibility and Casie is diminished in status and power again ;

God = Capital letter for God;
please help me
"I" = Capital "I' giving himself Status, Power and self importance;
"need" - why does Ronnie write "need" here?
the word "need" is Old Norse na, Gothic naus "corpse;" Old Irish naunae "famine, shortage," Old Cornish naun "corpse;" Old Church Slavonic navi "corpse," nazda, Russian nuzda, Polish nędza "misery, distress;" Old Prussian nowis "corpse," nautin "need, distress," nawe "death;" Lithuanian novyti "to torture, kill," nove "death."
Nied was common in Old English compounds, such as niedfaru "compulsory journey," a euphemism for "death;"
The word NEED also laces with force, violence, danger, anxiety, fear; = indicates Casie is dead and was killed with force and violence and Ronnie knows it;
Casie was Ronnie'w wife = Ronnie killed Casie;
Ronnie knows Casie's body is a corpse;
my wife = mentions wife, does not mention Casie's name = lower status and power;
"with me" = Casie was with Ronnie when she died and his words indicate Ronnie killed Casie with force and violence;
"casie" = diminished in status and power;
love u. - missing Pronoun "I" = no commitment to the word "love" and the word "u"
"u" = low status of authority and power.
Summary:
Ronnie's writing indicates Casie is dead;
Ronnie knows where Casie's corpse is;
Ronnie killed Casie with force and violence, and indicates he may have hit her with the car;
Ronnie is controlling and expresses this in writing,
Ronnie considers Casie to be 'beneath him ' in status and power; now physically.
The writing indicates Casie's body was put in the boot of the car, and taken somewhere by Ronnie; buried deep, more likely in water ;
it may even be in the 'can' of an old boat.

Anonymous said...

happens at 130 a.m. and he posts he's getting worried cause it's getting dark? it was already dark. short distance from the party, but they both dont go back to the party? flat tire? who sends their wife for help for a flat tire at 130 in Appalachin? whole thing is a joke. Cops just waiting to find body for more evidence before they lock this guy up. case closed. he did it.

Anonymous said...

Peter, PLEASE do an analysis of Andrew Gillum's statement regarding him being found inebriated to the point of not being able to talk in a hotel room with two other men and crystal meth, one of whom had overdosed. Gillum's statement:

"I was in Miami last night for a wedding celebration when first responders were called to assist one of my friends. While I had too much to drink, I want to be clear that I have never used methamphetamines. I apologize to the people of Florida for the distraction this has caused our movement.

I’m thankful to the incredible Miami Beach EMS team for their efforts. I will spend the next few weeks with my family and appreciate privacy during this time."

voici_je said...

he stayed home?...because...as the last person who've been with her...he knows where their walk ... side apart.