tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post2071759037063033992..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Mark Redwine Behavioral Analysis Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-9705110855142975372013-03-04T01:44:59.772-05:002013-03-04T01:44:59.772-05:00I remember that! Didn't you post your convo wi...I remember that! Didn't you post your convo with her on this site or a link to it? She claimed that her past tense references were typos..and went on and on about how people we making a big deal out of it. She has the same lying strategy as MR...talk in circles about meaningless issues, while claiming it's everyone else besides them who's got it all wrong!Jennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15480029167465147492013-03-03T18:43:40.256-05:002013-03-03T18:43:40.256-05:00I got into an arguement with her on Gather about a...I got into an arguement with her on Gather about a week after Dylan disappeared. It was over her continued use of past tense pronouns, and the subject matter she kept bringing up. When a kid has been missing for 7 or 8 days, who talks about whether or not he loved/loves both his parents? Had I been in her shoes, I would have been talking about places he might be, people he might be with, and how tall he was/his eye and hair color/the clothes he had on.....NOT family relationships that really won't mean a thing to a stranger wh spots him somewhere. So.....it has been my opinion ever since that Bridgett Redwine-Simmers knows exactly what happened to Dylan.Juli Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03263408768438573702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-60579981729848973592013-03-03T00:49:02.861-05:002013-03-03T00:49:02.861-05:00Hi Julie-
Even more telling she acknowledges that...Hi Julie-<br /><br />Even more telling she acknowledges that Mark is guilty...even by her standards he is only innocent UNLESS PROVEN guilty! If someone is innocent then they do not anticipate a point where they will be PROVEN guilty. <br /><br />Innocence is absolute. If you are innocent and yet found guilty by a court if law, you would consider yourself 'wrongly convicted'..you wouldn't change from an innocent man to a guilty man by a court decision. Not only is this sister an enabler, it appears she knows the truth about Mark, even if she's not ready to admit it to herself!Jennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-78358112341541640512013-03-02T18:22:56.994-05:002013-03-02T18:22:56.994-05:00Has anyone seen this facebook page? http://www.fac...Has anyone seen this facebook page? http://www.facebook.com/bridget.redwinesimmers?fref=ts#!/pages/Mark-Redwine-is-Innocent-Unless-Proven-Guilty/472976319435251<br /><br />I think it is admin'd by Mark Redwine's sister, Bridgett. What an enabler!!!Juli Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03263408768438573702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81307489322220692512013-03-02T13:31:33.888-05:002013-03-02T13:31:33.888-05:00P.S. Forgot to mention, Keli's mother, Sandra ...<br />P.S. Forgot to mention, Keli's mother, Sandra Lane is a nurse, her father a cop, like Caylee's grandparents.Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47652564500887396292013-03-02T13:20:52.509-05:002013-03-02T13:20:52.509-05:00Pepper, Thanks for the Keli Lane story. It is fasc...<br />Pepper, Thanks for the Keli Lane story. It is fascinating. <br /><br />She gives no reliable denial and in the couple of stories and phone taps I reviewed I noted repeated instances of (deception by) omissions and she was petrified with fear of her parents (rage?).<br /><br />Interesting that her father was in LE, like George Anthony; her mother reminded me of Cindy Anthony (a cold, controlling, manipulating, lying matriarch who highly values image over truth) and Keli became an accomplished liar, an epic manipulator and constant baby disposer, who like Cindy and George's spawn hid her pregnancy(ies). <br /><br />It's horrifying to think her mother (Sandra Lane) now has contact (custody?) with Keli's daughter. No one need suffer the fate of being "mothered" by either of these monsters.<br /><br />Several pregnancies in as many years; two aborted, two given up to be adopted, all unknown by family & friends - those are big secrets to attempt to keep, big lies to perpetrate. Something happened to Tegan and Keli is the only one who knows and she will not (yet) tell the truth, just whimpers and whines about her (miserable) life.Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-88288411113011228742013-03-02T12:39:52.698-05:002013-03-02T12:39:52.698-05:00http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/specials/keli-lan...http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/specials/keli-lane-files#<br /><br /> has links to the police interview and taped phone callsTania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-79614300162406135582013-03-02T12:37:42.851-05:002013-03-02T12:37:42.851-05:00Keli lane police interview
http://video.dailytele...Keli lane police interview<br /><br />http://video.dailytelegraph.com.au/1693566104/Keli-Lane-police-interview<br /><br /><b>LE: Did you kill the child?<br /><br />keli: No i did not, i did not do amything like that.<br /><br />LE: Someone else then?<br /><br />keli: No, No<br /><br />LE: Right keli, like i said, i'm gonna have to make a lot of enquiries now, i'm gonna have to go..<br /><br />keli: Please don't.<br /><br />LE: it's gonna go through the cornoner's court, there's gonna be a coroner's court hearing in relation to this, alright? That's why i say to you now, if there is something you're not telling us, now is the time to tell us.<br /><br />keli: I don't understand how, can you, can we stop the tape, can i speak.. without.. the tape on?<br /><br />LE: I'd rather you did it on the tape.<br /><br />keli: Ok i don't understand, how you're gonna.. go and speak with my parents or people like that who have no idea what you're going to be talking about... this is between me and Andrew.</b><br /><br />There we have it no strong reliable denial.Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-50380940855850835582013-03-02T11:03:53.608-05:002013-03-02T11:03:53.608-05:00Hi Pepper.
Wasn't she the olympic swimmer? If...Hi Pepper.<br /><br />Wasn't she the olympic swimmer? If so i recall the case and from her behavior and language concluded deception. I'll have to have a rummage on another blog where i think i posted about it (if it is still up since the blog owner was having problems with it)<br /><br />Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-30975463218643488272013-03-02T10:59:00.542-05:002013-03-02T10:59:00.542-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-59987493519496180762013-03-01T22:56:19.516-05:002013-03-01T22:56:19.516-05:00The links to the audio are :
Check out this video ...The links to the audio are :<br />Check out this video on YouTube:<br><br>http://youtu.be/q9JcLV7eTts <br /><br />Check out this video on YouTube:<br><br>http://youtu.be/fDOTuaBir48Pepperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15150599743959054266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-16258439422769330842013-03-01T22:52:34.958-05:002013-03-01T22:52:34.958-05:00I would be really interested if anyone could take ...I would be really interested if anyone could take the time to analyse the keli lane interview and phone taps from Australia. She has been convicted of murdering her newborn baby. The baby has never been seen since leaving hospital with her mum at 2 days old. Keli hid the pregnancy and others from her family. She maintains her innocence but her versions of what happened to the baby cannot be proven. Pepperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15150599743959054266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-21367410461000115362013-03-01T17:55:13.548-05:002013-03-01T17:55:13.548-05:00Hobs,
I think that is what i was trying to say in...Hobs,<br /><br />I think that is what i was trying to say in my first post,but without the police info.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-64538629309474714862013-03-01T17:36:26.626-05:002013-03-01T17:36:26.626-05:00Excruciating Headache said...
Okay. I buy this 99....<b>Excruciating Headache said...<br />Okay. I buy this 99.99% But I want to ask a quick question. If my child disappeared, especially my youngest, who couldn't disappear on her own, I would immediately think she was gone. Every time I see a missing young person, he or she is usually later found (gosh, I can hardly even write it *uncomfortable LOL*) dead.<br /><br />So, if my child disappeared and my first thought was that someone had taken and killed her, would my language reflect that? If it did, how could you distinguish that from someone who KNOWS their child is dead?</b><br /><br />Hi Excrutiating.<br />As a parent if your child vanished, especially the youngest, your natural instinct would not be to assume they are dead, parental instinct is so overpowering that you would believe your child was alive until it was proven otherwise, your language would be all present tense.<br />It is common that in cases where the child is dead and long buried, parents, especilly moms, will refer to their child in the present tense even after years have passed. it is a form of denial so to speak.<br />As it is rare that a child dies before their parents, the expected is that they will speak in the present tense, it is normal parental behavior.<br /><br />In cases where a child vanishes, the expected is for the parents to use present tense and to hope that whoever has them is looking after them, keeping them safe even loved even when the statistics show otherwise.<br />When a child is abducted, particularly young ones the mother will always hope it is a mom looking to bring a child up as her own, they either cannot have a child or have lost one and their maternal instinct is controlling their behavior, it is a better hope than their child has been raped. tortured or murdered. Any hope no matter how faint is better than none.<br />We expect parents to use present tense when referring to their child especially in the hours and days of the child vanishing, past tense may slip in over the weeks, months and years, this to is expected. What is unexpected is when a parent especially a mom uses past tense in the hours and days following the disappearance. We have to ask why they believe or sispect their child is dead. Is it because or police info, guilty knowledge or something else?<br />if you lost your child in a mall would you immediately assume she was dead? No, even if she is very young and unable to wander off, your instincts would compel you to believe she is with another family member, taken by accident, wandered off (you would be surprised how agile and mischevious they can be)or was taken to be loved by a childless couple, your parental instincts won't let you believe anything else which is why you call out to your child, search frantically and so on.<br /><br />With all of the cases we follow here, we expect the subjects to be telling the truth, we look for the expected, we know what is the norm, anything thus that is unexpected will stand out and get our attention be it language or behavior. We may not always be able to say why there is deception just that there is. The more the subject talks, the more they write or their behavior in public, the better we can pinpoint the areas of sensitivity.Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-64972929075781039482013-03-01T16:54:43.996-05:002013-03-01T16:54:43.996-05:00OT: "Court releases Sandra Inman's Confes...OT: "Court releases Sandra Inman's Confession" <br /><br />http://www.nbc4i.com/story/21430714/court-releases<br /><br />There is a PDF of her confession on that pageimpulsivehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15873993729782135264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-88012202904985793892013-03-01T15:17:04.145-05:002013-03-01T15:17:04.145-05:00Are MR transcripts available yet? I'm curious ...Are MR transcripts available yet? I'm curious about his use of "this", in context. <br />-------<br /><br />"That"<br /><br />"knowing that"<br />"over that"<br />"but that's"<br />"with that"<br />"something that"<br />"believe that"<br />"do that" <br />"do that"<br /><br />Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-48478901893674128792013-03-01T14:45:10.499-05:002013-03-01T14:45:10.499-05:00and another:
"this" is used two times.....<br />and another:<br /><br />"this" is used two times...both with body posture words nearby, "laying" and "sit"<br /><br />1) MR says: "relive" "seeing" "him laying on the couch" and (MR) "maybe" doesn't try hard "enough"<br /><br />2) "sit here", "beat yourself up"Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-45415397060966844692013-03-01T14:27:43.666-05:002013-03-01T14:27:43.666-05:00Another observation:
The words, "over" ...<br />Another observation:<br /><br />The words, "over" and "helping" multiple times. <br /><br />The pronoun "you", "yourself", etc near "over"<br /><br />and<br /><br />"me", "myself", etc. near "helping"Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-14332213858614763982013-03-01T13:52:57.451-05:002013-03-01T13:52:57.451-05:00Observation: the word "time(s)" appears ...<br />Observation: the word "time(s)" appears more often than "Dylan"<br /><br />MR is more than doubly concerned about "time" than he is about "Dylan".Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-70713322299131792872013-03-01T13:29:04.210-05:002013-03-01T13:29:04.210-05:00Ivy--I just watched the video--very interesting.
M...Ivy--I just watched the video--very interesting.<br />My opinion is that Erickson was mentally ill and did make up the story--basically, he was so mentally ill he thought something happened that didn't happen, he became delusional that he was responsible. He was and is a genuinely confused person, but I don't believe him and/or Ryan killed Heitholt. You can clearly see when he initially gives his "confession" he has no idea what he is talking about and the police spoon feed him the info. The nature of his "confession" is such that he is very eagerly trying to CONVINCE police that he is responsible. When they ask him what was used to strangle Heitholt, he eagerly guesses trying to "please" them like he is playing a "guessing game".<br />One important thing you can clearly see is Erickson's masochism and desire to self-punish. You notice he says he doesn't need a lawyer when he gives this taped deposition although this can seriously effect him through possible increased jail time. If it seems like Erickson does not care what happens to him, I think that is because that is the case, and that this is tied into his psychological problems.Laylanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-91297099255790619062013-03-01T13:26:30.569-05:002013-03-01T13:26:30.569-05:00Ivy, with the Ryan Ferguson case, you have to star...Ivy, with the Ryan Ferguson case, you have to start with the absolute beginning with Chuck. His earliest interviews showed that he did not know the facts of the case. After that, his statements have gone all over the place.<br /><br />Chuck Erickson IS a complete nutjob. Playing the role of an infamous killer is the biggest accomplishment of his life. He was a compulsive liar before this event and has been since. The timeline and other details of the night that he added to the police account have been proven to be impossible or have been denied by other witnesses. He has changed his story numerous times in numerous ways. <br /><br />The witness who identified Ryan at the trial has admitted he perjured himself, being pressured by the DA. He was made to feel that he would be serving justice by identifying Ferguson even though he did not know whether it was him or not. He trusted that the DA was sure it was Ferguson. Afterward, when he found the facts of the case, he felt he had done a terrible wrong and admitted to it.<br /><br />Members of the jury have said that they convicted an innocent man and would find differently if they knew what they know now.<br /><br />The night of the murder, there was a huge Halloween party at the bar that Ryan and Chuck snuck into, underage. Ryan's older sister was a college student at the time and worked at the bar, which was a popular hangout for students, and it was her idea that they come down there, thinking there would be no harm in it. So there were numerous college students in the area and it would not be unusual for another pair of guys to have come upon the crime scene who resembled Ryan and Chuck. It also would be likely they would be people who long since graduated and left the area and may not even be aware of what transpired 2 years after that night, unless they happened to have seen a tv show about the case.<br /><br />I do not think the two who were seen in the parking lot were the killers, they were two who came upon the murdered man and stood there in shock. They called out for someone to call 911. It is not likely that any witnesses are going to come forward after seeing what happened with Ryan. <br /><br />The chances that DNA and bloody fingerprints were all over the place but none matched Ryan or Chuck makes it far-fetched to me that they were the killers. The victim was clutching hair that did not belong to Ryan or Chuck. I wonder how much has been done to match the DNA to anyone in the system?Lisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-52536294548033926732013-03-01T13:25:28.843-05:002013-03-01T13:25:28.843-05:00Okay. I buy this 99.99% But I want to ask a quick...Okay. I buy this 99.99% But I want to ask a quick question. If my child disappeared, especially my youngest, who couldn't disappear on her own, I would immediately think she was gone. Every time I see a missing young person, he or she is usually later found (gosh, I can hardly even write it *uncomfortable LOL*) dead.<br /><br />So, if my child disappeared and my first thought was that someone had taken and killed her, would my language reflect that? If it did, how could you distinguish that from someone who KNOWS their child is dead?Excruciating Headachehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07133745404507060277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39412083084996554452013-03-01T13:23:55.106-05:002013-03-01T13:23:55.106-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Excruciating Headachehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07133745404507060277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-9086161787777971532013-03-01T13:18:19.543-05:002013-03-01T13:18:19.543-05:00John said " they either know the child is dea...John said " they either know the child is dead and or have guilty knowledge of it?"<br /><br />One has to look at the statements given before the circumstances have become clear, that the child is likely dead. In the case of Elaine, she has had to face what MR has done. Lisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47246535234782403712013-03-01T13:07:31.024-05:002013-03-01T13:07:31.024-05:00O: Ok, what's your name please?
Mick: Michael...O: Ok, what's your name please?<br /><br />Mick: Michael, I'm the, THE Daddy.<br /><br />Placing THE in front of Daddy to me seems like he is distancing himself away from his children.<br /><br />I would expect to hear.<br /><br />"I'm THEIR Daddy"John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.com