tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post2422650266367278899..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: The Disappearance of Madeline McCann Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-37352410772769843362018-11-27T04:22:02.618-05:002018-11-27T04:22:02.618-05:00They would use children with no ties for this kind...They would use children with no ties for this kind of blackmail. Women are held captive to breed children. I think it’s more likely that they shared their children amongst the group. Did you know Gerry was, I believe a Non Exec Director of a board that Gordon Brown’s brother was also on. So this (almost proven) conspiracy went all the way to the prime minister himself. Do you think it will ever be solved knowing this?! Riahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00064872808639067660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-84874127092220636932018-11-26T16:18:34.827-05:002018-11-26T16:18:34.827-05:00Did you listen to them both talk about Karlie usin...Did you listen to them both talk about Karlie using pot the night prior to her disappearance? Very sensitive for sure.LuciaDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03658572205280231522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-79409413028138548542018-11-23T16:26:56.631-05:002018-11-23T16:26:56.631-05:00Why were three royal Sirs despatched to support th...Why were three royal Sirs despatched to support the family in Portugal? (Green, Branson & Hunter) Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-75611152511244676592018-11-12T14:26:53.782-05:002018-11-12T14:26:53.782-05:00Wow, you have lost a lot of weight, Peter. Good fo...Wow, you have lost a lot of weight, Peter. Good for you! (If that is what you wanted, that is)Letticenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-66209061192157557332018-10-31T17:59:47.916-04:002018-10-31T17:59:47.916-04:00Your work is outstanding. I'm sick to death o...Your work is outstanding. I'm sick to death of this being covered up. And to Pamela Gurney and Co, you help them continue their lies. It is obvious Madeleine was murdered in a satanic ritual. Much the same as Jonbenet Ramsey, same bastards involved in all these things. Gerry McCann is clearly a Mason & possibly opus dei or knight of Malta, she's clearly under some kind of programming akin to mk ultra, possibly been abused herself. Gerry will never crack but she might. This charade has gone on long enough . Let Madeleine rest in peace you sick bastards. Feel free to do a dossier on me, I'd love Martin brunt on my doorstep ��Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-77513565682486931932018-10-31T04:59:37.739-04:002018-10-31T04:59:37.739-04:00And the answer is?And the answer is?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10370841203859243562018-10-30T19:36:02.710-04:002018-10-30T19:36:02.710-04:00??????????Coletteskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769014706789896204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15398047429637278402018-10-30T17:09:27.521-04:002018-10-30T17:09:27.521-04:00Anonymous said...
Earth to Peter?
1st comment he...Anonymous said...<br />Earth to Peter? <br /><br />1st comment here. Can you answer it please?<br /><br /><br />that is addressed in the 3 part video with Richard Hall. Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13483448852508335175noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-53071260242895395672018-10-30T15:08:35.727-04:002018-10-30T15:08:35.727-04:00Earth to Peter?
1st comment here. Can you answer...Earth to Peter? <br /><br />1st comment here. Can you answer it please?<br /><br />(and for future reference do make sure you spell Madeleine correctly)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-56837689901853038962018-10-30T06:08:03.939-04:002018-10-30T06:08:03.939-04:00Holy cow. She tells CHP "Thank you, I love yo...Holy cow. She tells CHP "Thank you, I love you guys," and tells the Mono Sheriff's Dept "I love you guys," and although she has no idea what happened to Karlie, she says she thinks she was abducted "because it happens. I'm being real," and obviously wants focus on abduction and not the desert. And then in the middle of what should be a soul destroying plea that she never gets around to, she stops to announce Alisha is calling, asks if she's watching, and answers!<br /><br />Disturbingly, she says "She was, she was a little bit different but, not much." Was = past tense. And who describe their daughter this way? Different?<br /><br />I'll have to research this case bc until reading this transcript, I hadn't heard about Alisha's disappearance bit sadly, it doesn't look good. Marynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-70293598412197301572018-10-28T21:19:03.480-04:002018-10-28T21:19:03.480-04:00A reliable denial as you said consists of three pa...A reliable denial as you said consists of three parts:<br /><br />1. The pronoun "I"<br />2. The past tense verb, "did not" or "didn't"<br />3. The specific allegation.<br />If a denial has 2 components or 4 components, it is unreliable. The most common unreliable denial by the guilty is, "i would never..."<br /><br />If the subject says "I didn't do it" it violates the principal because they don't say what the "it" refers to.<br />they are hoping the listener will interpret their denial as relating to the accusation.<br />The interviewer should press them to learn what the "it" is or press them to make the strong reliable denial.<br />Innocent people will make said denial, they may need some prompting as they may not realize they are being questioned in relation to having committed an offense such as having stolen money as an example. Once confronted with the accusation an innocent person would then make the reliable denial.<br /><br />guilty people would not make a reliable denial, they use future conditional tenses such as would, they could drop the pronoun not taking ownership of their words, they could skip the crime using replacement words such as IT, or they could minimize the crime for example saying they did not hurt xyz when the crime was murder, a paedophile could claim they were hugging/cuddling/tickling the child when they were molesting the child.<br /><br />Innocent people declare their innocence and will not accept their innocence being questioned or doubted.<br />Guilty people declare their guilt via language, they can accept that others might find them guilty, they talk the listener who is presuming their innocence, out of their innocence.<br /><br />Innocent people shout it from the rooftops that they are innocent, there is no legal reason for them not to speak publicly of their innocence and they will not be told to stay quiet by their lawyers.<br />Guilty people are told by their lawyers to say nothing even if they don't do as they are told and start talking. They will say they are prevented from speaking or that the truth will come out during the forthcoming trial.<br />Their language and often that of their lawyers will reveal their guilt, their lawyers in their belief of guilt about their client.<br />They will use phrases such as vigorously defend, intend to defend, plan to defend and so on only to later seek a plea deal or confess.<br />Lying is stressful and the human body does not like stress and seeks to end/avoid it.<br />We may not have an out and loud direct admission of their guilt, we will however hear it in their language, the words used as well as the words not used.<br />The expected as well as the unexpected both for innocence and guilt, innocent people will speak one way, guilty people another way.<br /><br />In some cases such as the mccanns, it has gotten to the stage that regular viewers and listeners can almost predict verbatim what they will say, when they will say it as well as alleged sightings such is the predictability of language and behavior of guilty persons. It is almost a standing joke that on such and such a day this statement will be made or there will be a new sighting in abc or some person will claim their child was almost abducted by one of the multitude of descriptions of alleged abductors years before Maddie went missing and the police weren't interested at the time or remembering seeing someone suspicious on such and such a date and they have only just remembered, a favorite along with the sightings of 'Maddie' in some airport but the subject only bothered to report it after their return home after a 2 week vacation, and so on.<br /><br />Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-19503393982901756032018-10-27T22:18:31.788-04:002018-10-27T22:18:31.788-04:00I would think if the question the person is asked ...I would think if the question the person is asked includes the specific allegation, then the “it” refers to the specific allegation, it’s pretty reliable.Buckleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04087082956705159705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-67268246377841867872018-10-27T17:57:10.476-04:002018-10-27T17:57:10.476-04:00@Tania cadogan
Now it seems to be criminal to call...@Tania cadogan<br />Now it seems to be criminal to call islam's prophet what he is, a PAEDOPHILE!<br /><br />October 26, 2018 at 2:39 PM<br /><br /><br />This is not something we as 'Eurepean' (Dutch) get to hear on the news about. Maybe Wilders could come up with it and share it to the public through media.<br /><br />It is scary to read that there are Eurpean Courts who judge and rule in this way. Where facts......a 50 year old married to a 9 year old who have a sexual relation, would in my country, as in many others, be considered a pedofhile, who raped and abused a 9 year old. When judges rule people can't call others what they are....in this case being a pedofile, because a religious group feels offened by it.......then what is next?<br />Where are the human rights for the children who have NO VOICE in this? What kind of judge from a human rights court! can be taken seriously when this is what they come up with as a judgement on that specific case?<br />It's scary to think these are the people who have 'the power' and use it in scary ways!Habundiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01826623123769885956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-24226392208105208272018-10-27T17:34:13.494-04:002018-10-27T17:34:13.494-04:00The past couple of weeks i've been reading thr...The past couple of weeks i've been reading through old blogtopics.<br />It is fascinating. There is one thing that I find confussing at the moment. It's the 'reliable denial'<br /><br />One of the blogtopics reffered to the site ISISCAN<br />When i was reading the analysis on that site I got confussed about the Reliable Denial rule.<br /><br />On different occasions the writer state 'I didn't do it' to be a 'reliable denial' or tells the reader that "the subject didn't say: 'I didn't do it'."<br /><br />But reading your blogs the rule for a 'reliable denial' is:<br /><br />A reliable denial has three components:<br />1. The pronoun "I"<br />2. The past tense verb, "did not" or "didn't"<br />3. The specific allegation.<br />If a denial has 2 components or 4 components, it is unreliable. The most common unreliable denial by the guilty is, "i would never..."<br /><br />So when a subjects says 'I didn't do it'.......is or isn't this considered a reliable denial?<br /><br />It has been mine understanding 'I didn't do it' isn't a reliable denial, because the statement doesn't has component 3; the specific allegation, in the denial.<br /><br />Can someone help me out here?<br />Thank you for the effort in advance!Habundiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01826623123769885956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-41807734662832175752018-10-27T14:45:11.799-04:002018-10-27T14:45:11.799-04:00Sat Oct 27 2018
Erdogan, Putin, Macron, Merkel gi...Sat Oct 27 2018<br /><br />Erdogan, Putin, Macron, Merkel give statement following Syria summit<br /><br />Merkel speaks with translator @ 29 minutes <br /><br />Topic, hers to introduce, the Syrians and or persons who were displaced, who migrated, those residing in Germany, those spread out residing in the EU. <br /><br />Her stated: they we(who is we they) mission is,the displaced be returned to their motherland/s. Buyers remorse ? or this too will come with a price? https://youtu.be/cezjdhuEd18Folly the leadernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-20250752055359145402018-10-27T11:48:25.212-04:002018-10-27T11:48:25.212-04:00^. Karlie's stepmother and her father were, on...^. Karlie's stepmother and her father were, on Nancy Grace's podcast, quite similar in their responses to Chief McCollum in his 911 call after he shot his wife. <br /><br />They didn't even try - it was as though they know there is no point, yet the stepmother is apparently non-stop on a private Facebook group, and mostly interested in tips from mediums. <br /><br /><br /><br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-55873964972015411462018-10-27T09:26:41.853-04:002018-10-27T09:26:41.853-04:00Hi, Peter
would you consider doing a Vt on Police...Hi, Peter<br /><br />would you consider doing a Vt on Police Chief William McCollum 911 call given his extreme distancing language.<br /><br />Thanks<br /><br />..<br /><br />For those who have not read Peter's original analysis re the above i recommend it.<br /><br />http://statement-analysis.blogspot.com/search?q=chiefJohn Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-1748811578668729592018-10-27T03:42:12.974-04:002018-10-27T03:42:12.974-04:00Can Peter answer my question please?
3rd or befor...Can Peter answer my question please?<br /><br />3rd or before?<br /><br />Peter?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-51590180797511502482018-10-27T01:31:50.645-04:002018-10-27T01:31:50.645-04:00Why do people say things like, "I'm being...Why do people say things like, "I'm being real"? <br /><br />Most obvious would seem because they are not "being real" - is that too obvious, though? <br /><br />Does she think people will think she is not "being real" while making a YouTube about her missing daughter - step-daughter, though you would not know it, as she doesn't say - the viewer/reader doesn't know what the relationship is. Maybe it was in the video title ? - the video now appears to have been deleted.<br /><br />It's notable how she tells everyone she loves them, except Karlie, and she also doesn't appeal to her, in case she might be watching. <br /><br />Maybe she is being real, all unintentionally, in not naming any relationship with Karlie, or saying that she loves Karlie, whilst apparently loving the rest of the world.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-72905973983376130662018-10-27T01:07:44.461-04:002018-10-27T01:07:44.461-04:00That would be a good project; more pressure on the...That would be a good project; more pressure on the parents to give the truth - one day Kate might have enough of the charade. <br /><br />I wonder if the twins know the truth of what happened by now; would I take the risk of giving them my version of what really happened, or let them live under the impression that Madeleine was abducted by a paedophile while I was out with my mates? i think I'd tell them the truth, if that is that Madeleine fell off the sofa and broke her neck, and they didn't find her for a while, so they covered up her death to avoid the twins being taken into care - except they probably would not have been, as there was extended family to care for them... there's no way hiding Madeleine's body, and inventing an abductor, could be made to sound remotely justifiable. So no, I'd probably continue living with the lie rather than have the twins understand quite what type of parents they had. I wouldn't be too happy, if I was the twins, knowing I'd been left in an unlocked apartment and my parents found that was a risk worth taking - I'd be so suspicious of the story, and resentful of them as the years went by. I probably wouldn't believe them. <br /><br />I watched the 'McCann Embedded Confessions' YouTube series again, and appreciate anew how much SA teaching they include.<br /><br />---------<br /><br />OT - <br /><br />Nancy Grace speaks to Karlie's step-mother and father - it's painful to listen to - as she says, "like pulling teeth". They are not helpful in giving information - so many one word responses. <br /><br />https://www.crimeonline.com/podcast/?<br /><br />I also watched the YouTube of the stepmother - it seems mainly she wants the audience to know how stressed out she is - seemed some acting with the water and telling herself to "Breathe". What would make her find a video appeal necessary after just ten hours - it was not that late in the day, and Karrie is sixteen. Why were helicopters out already - there must be more to the story than she is willing to say. <br /><br />Why is she telling the CHP "Love you" and praising the search effort while Karlie is still missing - a bit like DeOrr's father? She's telling the Sheriffs that she loves them. <br /><br />Interesting the first reason she gives for why she has to do something - because there are helicopters out searching. Only later does she say she's "putting this out there" because Karlie has been missing for ten hours, and because she doesn't think she's in the desert. How could she know? Does she think making a YouTube will or should change the course of the search? If Karlie was abducted along the highway, it's doubtful the helicopters are going to change course in search of vehicles that might have been on the highway ten hours ago. What's she doing there? <br /><br />What about "they had their copter today" ? They could not be out looking except for today if Karlie had not gone missing until today. Is that possibly leakage? Did Karlie disappear earlier than reported - not today? Or does she maybe mean the helicopter was available today, but may not be available every day? Is she anticipating they will need to search again tomorrow? <br /><br />"And I'm being real". - okay. <br /><br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15657547914181172762018-10-26T23:01:31.686-04:002018-10-26T23:01:31.686-04:00Another fascinating OT. @2:39; Tania. This is mi...Another fascinating OT. @2:39; Tania. This is mind boggling. Defamation of the dead? This isn't, and shouldn't, be considered in a legal context.<br />" The dead cannot currently be defamed under English law. ... The reason for this principle is quite simple: defamation is an act or statement that damages a person's reputation and once you are dead, you are taken to not have a reputation in legal terms which is capable of being damaged.<br /><br />Arguable?<br />Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-60088104963116522012018-10-26T22:49:51.767-04:002018-10-26T22:49:51.767-04:00I totally agree, Anon @7:10, and Bobcat's OT (...I totally agree, Anon @7:10, and Bobcat's OT (complete with statement for analysis) is a perfect example of a great OT.Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-82681224802038386482018-10-26T19:10:26.113-04:002018-10-26T19:10:26.113-04:00Mike, this blog's comments have always been op...Mike, this blog's comments have always been open to OT posts, Peter sometimes writes about other cases or topics in response to them and they are a source of info to others.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-4907663679971609162018-10-26T18:39:53.977-04:002018-10-26T18:39:53.977-04:00Its as obvious as the nose on my face that The McC...Its as obvious as the nose on my face that The McCann pair know what happened and where they his their child, they never even looked for her, just making excuses, They will face Judgment from God , and i hope from the ones covering it up will get common sense and tell the truth, look at the last pictures of kate , she looks 60 all from guilt, he is smug and the video of him laughing at the apartment door is enough to know , God help the twins , they will find out the truth, im sure there not stupid .<br /> May God forgive them pair.<br />99% of people know their guilty of lies and more <br />No Justice but Justice from God they will face soon enough. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-12066944282998947432018-10-26T18:36:47.809-04:002018-10-26T18:36:47.809-04:00Its as obvious as the nose on my face that The McC...Its as obvious as the nose on my face that The McCann pair know what happened and where they his their child, they never even looked for her just making excuses, They will face Judgment from God , and i hope from the ones covering it up will get common sense and tell the truth, look at the last pictures of kate , she looks 60 all from guilt, he is snug and the video of him laughing a the appartment door is enough to know , God help the twins , they will find out the truth, im sure there not stupid .<br /> May God forgive them pair.<br />99% of people know their guilty of lies and more Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com