tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post3288126115007341434..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Complete Statement Analysis: Course Assignment Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-33541544070046447972019-03-27T15:40:37.034-04:002019-03-27T15:40:37.034-04:00Regarding the Chris Watts interview, the parts in ...Regarding the Chris Watts interview, the parts in the interview where he talks about what happened that night...Did Chris kill all 3? Or did he have an accomplice? His neughbors’ videotape seems to show a female during the “truck loading”.<br /><br />Hey Jude & I have noted how passive Chris’ language is. Did Chris definitely kill his wife and/or girls? (FBI also asked that question of Chris in that interview with him in jail, but asked the question in a way that Chris could just say “yes” or “no”. <br />A huge thing being discussed on the internet is whether Chris killed the girls at home or at the site of the oil batteries. The FBI was also focusing in on that very much in the interview. Chris says he smothered them at the site of the oil batteries, but it is questionable whether he is telling the truth about that. <br /><br />Did he act alone? <br /><br />Did he kill the girls at home or at the site of the oul batteries?Michaelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-6079653037319072862019-03-27T11:07:13.283-04:002019-03-27T11:07:13.283-04:00From what I have seen online, there is a lot of in...From what I have seen online, there is a lot of interest in whether Chris Watts truly acted alone. Or whether he had an accomplice in the killing and disposal of his families bodies. LuciaDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03658572205280231522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-11376060461597901012019-03-27T08:56:54.457-04:002019-03-27T08:56:54.457-04:00Question on the interest in the Chris Watts' i...Question on the interest in the Chris Watts' interview:<br /><br />What is the Analysis Question that is sought to answer?<br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10882547924206972212019-03-27T04:50:13.557-04:002019-03-27T04:50:13.557-04:00OT: Reaction Kamala Harris to all charges against ...OT: Reaction Kamala Harris to all charges against Jessie Smollett being dropped<br /><br /><a href="https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1110704493849505792" rel="nofollow"> https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1110704493849505792</a><br /><br />Wolf Blitzer:<i>”You’re a former prosecutor, you understand the law. Eh, what do you think about what happened to Jessie Sl..Smollett in Chicago today?”</i><br /><br />Kamala Harris: <i>“Ha ha, to be perfectly honest with you Wolf, I’m completely confused</i> [shaking head: no] <i>I don’t understand, I don’t know, I, I don’t know the underlying evidence, I haven’t, you know, there, there’s a sealed document obviously. I don’t know, I’m at a loss, I think we’re gonna have to leave it up to the judgement of the, the prosecutor. I think we should leave it up to the police chief and, and the Mayor. I don’t know. I’m confused, I’m confused.”</i><br /><br />Harris starts with "to be perfectly honest with you". Could that be a sign of deception, an attempt to strengthen the weakness of her statement? Also: why does she say "I don't know the underlying evidence"? Shouldn’t that be obvious? After all: this was a Chicago criminal case and she is a senator from California. So why does she feel the need to say that? I don't think Blitzer was even implying that she knows the evidence. Blitzer may have meant the question in a more procedural way, as in: "Is this a normal way to deal with cases like this?" Also: a total overkill of "I don't know's" and "I'm confused's". There’s one thing she <i>does</i> know though ("obviously") and it’s the only substantive fact important enough for her to mention here: there is a <i>sealed</i> document. Is she implying that she could tell Blitzer more if the document wasn't sealed? That can't be: she wouldn't even have access to police/court documents regarding criminal cases in Chicago (at least I assume). <br /><br />My personal opinion: She's not "perfectly honest". She <i>does</i> know what happened and she <i>does</i> know the under<i>lying</i> evidence. She's not confused at all. She's relieved. Because the document is sealed.<br /><br />AutumnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-979873877620506842019-03-26T15:09:21.950-04:002019-03-26T15:09:21.950-04:00Crime & Lawlessness. From 'W' and wmd&...Crime & Lawlessness. From 'W' and wmd's: no accountability for the lies.<br />Bengazi lies: no accountability. If you like your Doctor: no accountability. Framing Trump: no accountability. Feinstein's chinese spy on staff: no accountability. Military like raid to procure child Elian Gonzales: no accountabilty. Destroying Yugoslavia: no accountabilty. Destroying Lybia,Syria: no accountability. Military like raid to procure Roger Stone: no accountability. Attempted coup against Trump: no accountability.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-76571748490222154612019-03-26T14:58:58.961-04:002019-03-26T14:58:58.961-04:00Hopefully all crooked judges and prosecutors lose ...Hopefully all crooked judges and prosecutors lose their licences. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-22191404815967462252019-03-26T14:01:04.908-04:002019-03-26T14:01:04.908-04:00"George Soros donated $408,000 in 2016 to a s...<i>"George Soros donated $408,000 in 2016 to a super PAC that supported Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx, whose office prosecuted — and dropped — the Jussie Smollett case."</i><br /><br />https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/26/george-soros-donated-408k-to-kim-foxx-prosecutor-who-let-jussie-smollett-walk/<br /><br />Is that - i.e. Soros' agenda - the "movement" Jussie mentioned in his press conference?<br /><br />Also: I don't think they let him off the hook just because he is a celebrity. High profile people were involved in the hoax.<br /><br />AutumnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-46532374246085306252019-03-26T13:52:22.233-04:002019-03-26T13:52:22.233-04:00From Hope and Hype to subversion and lawlessness T...From Hope and Hype to subversion and lawlessness The great disapointment. Leading from behind. The new Soviet Democrat party. Ruining the country for the political and celebrity classes. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-38668531248859605812019-03-26T11:36:17.534-04:002019-03-26T11:36:17.534-04:00OT: Jussie Smollett
The Cook County State’s Attor...OT: Jussie Smollett<br /><br />The Cook County State’s Attorney’s office will not be prosecuting Jussie Smollett ...<br /><br />https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollett-wont-be-prosecuted-on-charges-he-faked-attack<br /><br />AutumnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com