tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post3386093270558582445..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Deborah Bradley on Being Drunk Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15770879280927691362015-01-07T14:56:35.640-05:002015-01-07T14:56:35.640-05:00The last anon made me laugh. And I agree, those th...The last anon made me laugh. And I agree, those that don't agree with SA, why are you on this blog? It's like did you stumble here while reading the case and just decided to voice an opinion with nothing to back it up....? I mean, it's not like SA is admissible in court, so why come here and state you think they are innocent and not even take the extra minute to type up one valid reason to back it up.<br />trustmeigetithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05707304982363758140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-80111985718512219272015-01-07T09:48:38.541-05:002015-01-07T09:48:38.541-05:00OMG!
To Anon that believes baby Lisa was kidnapped...<br />OMG!<br />To Anon that believes baby Lisa was kidnapped:<br /><br />If the parents expect to be believed, then they need to be much clearer in what they think should happen in order to find their child, and say it repeatedly. <br /><br />Right now, all they keep doing is providing reasons to inject doubt of their guilt, which begs the assumption they are only concerned with staying out of jail. <br /><br />If a young child is kidnapped and being kept by strangers, then it's assumed that the public's help is needed in order to find that person, yes? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47392276051748352432015-01-06T20:51:22.227-05:002015-01-06T20:51:22.227-05:00Oh dear. You think the baby was kidnapped!? Lord...Oh dear. You think the baby was kidnapped!? Lordy, Lordy. <br /><br />Then why do you even bother to read statement analysis which clearly points out AND PROVES that baby Lisa died on the night she was declared by her mother, THEN her father with his bumbling and stumbling, to have been murdered and disposed of? Where've you been all this time? <br /><br />Even if you don't want to accept Peters' highly proficient statement analysis which is not based on mere guesswork, Debbs failed poly and her drunkenness, subsequent DNA tests (and lack of in certain areas), PROVES this baby died right in the home on the evening in question. <br /><br />YOU have something better to go on that says baby Lisa was kidnapped? PLEASE share with us just what this may be... Don't tell me this is just another one of those gut feelings... T/Y! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-11567245653270806492015-01-06T20:30:03.633-05:002015-01-06T20:30:03.633-05:00Anon, I'm curious, why do you think the baby w...Anon, I'm curious, why do you think the baby was kidnapped?Lindanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-44216999574674941172015-01-06T19:45:56.518-05:002015-01-06T19:45:56.518-05:00I think the baby was in fact kidnapped.I think the baby was in fact kidnapped.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-153143539481882652015-01-06T18:42:59.787-05:002015-01-06T18:42:59.787-05:00TrustmeIgetit; Eyes for Lies is just a bag of hot ...TrustmeIgetit; Eyes for Lies is just a bag of hot air. She's proved it over and over. I could see this long ago and gave up on her way back when. No need to waste another minute of your precious time on this ridiculous c'rap. <br /><br />She ought to be put out of business, with her 'gut' feelings. Lord have mercy... She's no more authentic than the psychic readers she defends. <br /><br />You're too sharp to give her another thought. Let her pass, she'll hang herself sooner or later and will quietly disappear into the night never to be heard of again. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-318708415735527842015-01-06T18:12:08.008-05:002015-01-06T18:12:08.008-05:00Hi John,
I remember seeing that question and comm...Hi John,<br /><br />I remember seeing that question and comment. If this is your gift... then no one is going to steal your thoughts. I have gotten into arguments with her about the Mccanns and she states her gut just tells her they are innocent. Ok. But your selling your lie detection... not your feelings... But ok. I actually think some may say that just to avoid problems with their lawyers. But to be fair, if that's your concern, don't talk about the case instead of stating they are innocent. But who knows.<br /><br />She also thinks Mark Redwine is telling the truth but his ex wife is lying. <br /><br />She did talk about Charlie...<br /><br />The first post she gives us the case history and then starts to comment but it stops. I am not sure if it's the blog OR if she was trying to remove part of it. But its quoted below. Then below I have the links...<br /><br />"When I first watched this video, I felt Charlie's"<br /><br />Then a later post she stated this:<br /><br />"A couple of weeks ago I reviewed the video Charlie Rogers talking about her alleged anti-gay attack. I found her behavior odd, and there were definitely hotspots. My final conclusion was, "At this point, I believe there are enough red flags to investigate Charlie Rose's story further, though I want to be sensitive to hate crimes as they are real, and should never be tolerated in our society."<br /><br />http://www.eyesforlies.com/blog/2012/08/charlie-rogers-to-be-charged-with-lying/<br />http://www.eyesforlies.com/blog/2012/08/charlie-rogers/<br /><br /><br />trustmeigetithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05707304982363758140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-55985024062671232892015-01-06T17:49:50.652-05:002015-01-06T17:49:50.652-05:00You're welcome John ~ curtsies~
Charlie roge...You're welcome John ~ curtsies~ <br /><br />Charlie rogers was another case that made me go hmm something is off here right from the get goTania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-3271307814147324012015-01-06T16:08:03.159-05:002015-01-06T16:08:03.159-05:00GeekRad said...
I see you posts John. And thank yo...<b>GeekRad said...<br />I see you posts John. And thank you.</b><br /><br />Hi,<br /><br />Ive finally sorted it, with help from our own Tania :) John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28213116795042908652015-01-06T15:58:06.387-05:002015-01-06T15:58:06.387-05:00I see you posts John. And thank you. This is somet...I see you posts John. And thank you. This is something I want to follow. Even a cursory look doesn't pass the Statement Analysis test.GeekRadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-4681402658516553452015-01-06T15:01:23.505-05:002015-01-06T15:01:23.505-05:00Hi Trustmeigetit,
Re Eyesforlies. lol
I have stu...Hi Trustmeigetit,<br /><br />Re Eyesforlies. lol<br /><br />I have studied Body language, Micro Expression for about 10 yrs or so.<br /><br />It was not long ago i asked her "WHY" when you "SAY" that something aint right with xyz, do you NOT point out Why you have come to that conclusion.<br /><br />Her answer was, this is NOT verbatim, but i will have a look back to see if i can find my Q and her A/ She said. I will not disclose why i come to the conclusions i do, because i will give away what i know and people will steel my technique, and thats my lively hood.<br /><br />Now, if memory serves me correct, Peter, asked her what her analysis was on the "Charlie Rogers" case. I don't what her reply was. But what i do know is. That everyone, press, media etc, all said she was telling the truth, and it was Peter, as far as i am aware, was the only one to put it on record that she (charlie Rogers) was deceptive.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47673200281796792302015-01-06T14:07:49.686-05:002015-01-06T14:07:49.686-05:00I so love Statement Analysis. It’s the one thing I...I so love Statement Analysis. It’s the one thing I can really count on.<br /><br />Regarding the “human lie detector” I think that while some may be more tuned in and see past the BS more so than most, I do not for a minute give these titles any real credibility.<br /><br />And let’s be honest, how do you measure it when so many cases are unsolved.<br /><br />Take the eyes for lies blog chick.<br /><br />Now, I can’t find it on there anymore but at one point, she actually had on her blog that she “accurately identified the truth or deceit in 37 out of 39 cases”. Those were the exact words. I copied and pasted since I discussed in in the past.<br /><br />Now, so many things wrong here…..<br /><br />For starters, shes got thousands of cases she gave her “lie” or “truth” prediction on. So why are you now only claiming 39.<br /><br />I mean, if I have a spelling test with 100 words and I spell 38 right…. I don’t brag that I got 38 out of 40 right! No, with 38 I have failed.<br /><br /> <br /><br />I could see if they were at least cases where we now know the truth. We don’t. Most (not all) of them had either a conviction or acquittal but hello, we all know very well this does not determine truth. So again, how are you determining truth?<br /><br />Which takes me to my 2nd point….. 3 of those cases…. Amanda Knox, Drew Peterson and Adam Baker.<br /><br />Ok, in all 3 of these cases, the truth is not known. At least not for sure. It’s not like we had confessions or DNA proof. In fact, we actually still don’t know. Again, a conviction means nothing. Innocent people are convicted and guilty are acquitted. And all 3 somehow claim they are “innocent”.<br /><br />But she uses these to validate her high accuracy. How exactly do you do that?<br /><br />Maybe that’s why I can no longer find this little paragraph of BS on her page. Maybe she removed it?<br /><br /> <br /><br />But people buy into the bullshit. They read that and think this person knows their stuff. But they don’t. <br /><br /> <br /><br />It’s like Sylvia Brown the “psychic”. The woman claims her “visions” are highly accurate. And in her credit, she’s loaded and charges like $500 for a reading…<br /><br />But funny part is there is not a single prediction that has been validated yet many and I mean MANY have been proven wrong. In fact, there’s a blog that talks about all her failed predictions… Pretty sad…. And, perfect example one of very popular case of hers we have talked about on this blog….Amanda Berry. Her mother was on Montel years before she was found. Sylvia Brown told her that her daughter was not only deceased, but in water. Well, we all know that she was found alive locked in Ariel Castro’s home. So FAIL. They also had a reporter go undercover with a photo of a child they claimed was missing. Again, Sylvia reported the sad news… the child is deceased. Well, the sad part was the reporter had provided her a photo of herself as a child. So as she stood there alive and well, this “psychic” just told her she was no longer alive. FAIL<br /><br /> <br /><br />And back to eyes for lies… She believes the Mccanns are being truthful and are innocent….. After reading that I started to look at her so call accuracy numbers and that is when I realized she didn’t have anything to back up her claims. That she is making money off this self appointed title and nothing more.<br /><br /> trustmeigetithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05707304982363758140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-29901781588717751452015-01-06T13:56:05.442-05:002015-01-06T13:56:05.442-05:00Sorry, I don't know. I'd close out the bro...Sorry, I don't know. I'd close out the browser and restart, but if you're seeing my post then it's reloading the page. So strange.Buckleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04087082956705159705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-45301625735249195672015-01-06T13:39:10.833-05:002015-01-06T13:39:10.833-05:00Hi Buckley,
Thank you.
I can see your post, but,...<br />Hi Buckley,<br /><br />Thank you.<br /><br />I can see your post, but, i can not see mine, although it is allowing me to post. Would you know, or have any advice as to what has happened, and why i can't see my posts ?<br /><br />TIA <br /><br />John<br /><br />Ps. If you can see this :(John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-63222221943817356772015-01-06T13:18:11.368-05:002015-01-06T13:18:11.368-05:00I see it :)I see it :)Buckleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04087082956705159705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-12311546433488034682015-01-06T13:06:55.594-05:002015-01-06T13:06:55.594-05:00If this is showing, would someone PM me and let me...If this is showing, would someone PM me and let me know. Its not showing up on my account!!<br /><br />TIA<br /><br />JohnJohn Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-36892220354207555602015-01-06T13:03:04.791-05:002015-01-06T13:03:04.791-05:00Tania, if you can see my posts, would you inbox me...Tania, if you can see my posts, would you inbox me please and let me know.<br /><br />Thanks <br /><br />John.<br /><br />I will PM you anyway.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-86363942718616086262015-01-06T13:00:22.150-05:002015-01-06T13:00:22.150-05:00Dam, my computer has gone all funky, i hope you ca...Dam, my computer has gone all funky, i hope you can see this ?<br /><br />Its not showing up on my account !!!John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-34682360424763251682015-01-06T12:59:21.348-05:002015-01-06T12:59:21.348-05:00Cont..
""I woke up and saw my kids sit...Cont..<br /><br /><br /><b>""I woke up and saw my kids sitting next to me. I didn't see my wife," Shepherd cried."</b><br /><br />He doesn't say he went to bed? Where did he wake up ?<br /><br /><b>"siting"</b>. body posture.<br /><br /><b>"I didn't see my wife,"</b><br /><br />This is said in the negative too.<br /><br />We mark time by what what happens, what we see hear etc. That is unless the question posed is "did you see your wife" ?<br /><br /><b>""I just want my wife back," Shepherd said, "That is the missing piece to my puzzle. That is my heart. She is my baby and if anybody got her, just bring her back to me please."</b>John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-66912080989409353722015-01-06T12:49:56.787-05:002015-01-06T12:49:56.787-05:00A couple of points i would flag Peter. I maybe wro...A couple of points i would flag Peter. I maybe wrong though ? Going by the principles and the expected Vs the unexpected.<br /><br /><b>“We didn’t argue at all. Everything was bliss. It was very peaceful. And that’s why it’s so weird</b><br /><br />He starts off in the negative "“We didn’t argue at all."<br /><br />Anything in the negative is sensitive. He brings up the word "argue". Why ? What does argue mean to him ? (SID)<br /><br /><b>"Everything was bliss."</b><br /><br />This is a need to portray that they were happy. Why does he need to say this. Were things not "bliss" ? What does "bliss" mean to him ? (SID)<br /><br /><b>"It was very peaceful. And that’s why it’s so weird</b><br /><br />What was "peaceful" ?<br /><br />His wife is missing, again he wants people to know things were ok.<br /><br /><b>"And that’s why it’s so weird"</b><br /><br />Why is it "so weird" ? Couples argue, "peace" is not always a happy peace. It can be used, to keep the peace. "i won't say nothing, i want to keep the peace" i don't want to upset you. (egg shells come to mind) ?<br /><br />The word "And" when at the begining of a statement suggests missing information. "And" is a connecting word from one to the other. Yet, there is a broken connection ?<br /><br /><br /><b>“I’ve been sitting on the couch waiting and waiting, looking through the window, waiting for her to come home and she has not come back. I’m just really worried about her,” Shepard said.</b> <br /><br /><b>“I’ve been sitting on the couch waiting and waiting, looking through the window,</b><br /><br /><b>""Sitting"</b><br /><br />When body posture enters a statement, its flagged as a possible increase in tension.<br /><br />My boss said "i think you should do better etc"<br /><br />Vs, "my boss stood and said, i think you should do better" Tension. <br /><br />This tells me that my boss is in front of me saying "you could do better"<br /><br />If the word "told" entered the statement, then his words would be more authoritative.<br /><br /><b>"waiting and waiting,</b><br /><br />Anything said and or repeated is sensitive.<br /><br /><b>"looking through the window,</b><br /><br />This, for me is disturbing. Why he he looking through the window instead of being out there looking for her. He is not waiting for his puppy to come home, its his wife he is waiting to come home ?<br /><br /><b>""She gave me a hug and a kiss and told me it was a new year," he said. "I said 'yeah baby, it's a new year.'"</b><br /><br />Note he doesn't say "we" gave each other a "hug" Then we have the word "told" enter his statement. Was she angry with him ?<br /><br /><br /><b>"I said 'yeah baby, it's a new year.'"</b><br /><br />He uses the word "said" which is a softer word than "told" Was she angry with him, and he wanted to make the "peace" ?<br /><br /><b>""I said, 'Where are you going,'" he said. "She said, "I'm going to the living room and its been cold in there,"</b><br /><br />Note he still uses the softer word "said"<br />John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42291895510796499942015-01-06T10:05:45.766-05:002015-01-06T10:05:45.766-05:00As usual, thank you John.
I am putting together s...As usual, thank you John.<br /><br />I am putting together some of the statements of the husband. Right now, we do not have enough for a conclusion and the choppy writing style of the journalists makes it difficult to know if something is an open statement, or if it is in response to a direct question. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-64948213705107465462015-01-06T09:16:56.815-05:002015-01-06T09:16:56.815-05:00Houston and Stanton are closely connected to the 1...Houston and Stanton are closely connected to the 100,000 reward benefactor.<br /><br />https://www.facebook.com/KristiSchiller/posts/928003363907189<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-25457963414111719242015-01-06T08:43:44.963-05:002015-01-06T08:43:44.963-05:00@Anon 8:18
This could be one of the articles
htt...@Anon 8:18<br /><br />This could be one of the articles<br /> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/20/deborah-bradley-baby-lisa-irwin-missing_n_1022905.html<br /><br />You would think that if Team Taco/Stanton had intended this whole Kelly File stunt as a way to stir up support for the star-crossed couple that they would have gotten them to straighten out the marital status. <br /><br />They have gone to alot of trouble to draw attention to them, when otherwise no one, certainly not local media, are paying any attention to them. They could otherwise just keep going on with their lives.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81889046783247001432015-01-06T08:18:27.847-05:002015-01-06T08:18:27.847-05:00Anon @ 7:16, Deborah and her legally wed husband S...Anon @ 7:16, Deborah and her legally wed husband Sean, a military man, had quite a history together while living on and near military posts where he was stationed. According to earlier accounts, Deborah was also a party gal, boozing it up with other couples and other womens' husbands and stirring up trouble amongst the wives in general during her 'neighborly' fiascos in and around the base. I don't have access to any of those old articles now but they're out there. <br /><br />Why in blazes this man has not divorced her and tried to obtain custody of their son together escapes me, as it seems to me that he certainly could. As for Debbie ("does Dallas") part, she would likely still be receiving Seans' allotment checks for her as his wife and their son as a dependent; which of course, also gives her all these commissary and medical benefits. For all we know, the U.S Military could have paid for Debbs' prenatal care AND the delivery of little Lisa, as well as her pediatric care.<br /><br />On top of this, she's got Jeremy supporting her. She doesn't have to hit a lick at a snake and can eat high off the hog. This flea-bag trollop has got it made! AND while all this is going on, Jeremys' ex ole lady has to pay him support for THEIR son that she could file custody of herself if she were so a mind too; BUT, for Jeremy & Debbie dearest: more cha-ching! <br /><br />As for Jeremy, let's face it, Debbie carries her own weight (financially that is, or let's say her legally-wed-hubby carries it FOR HER AND HIM); he's a weak, (low-morals not withstanding), wet-noddle partaking in adultery with another man's personal belonging who actually helps to feed him, with no backbone and no honor in his character; who ALSO has his own son exposed to his trashy, bang-another-mans' wife lifestyle, PLUS eat his food off this man; that WE the Gov't are paying for! <br /><br />If he had any morals OR character, he would NOT be living with a married woman, fornicating and siring with her, much less covering up HIS childs' death for her. Speaking of the honesty of Jeremy Irwin? He doesn't know what the words means! <br /><br />They are BOTH nothing but white trash. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-35690322120789107382015-01-06T07:16:27.256-05:002015-01-06T07:16:27.256-05:00Buckley,
Jeremy and Deborah are NOT married. She ...Buckley,<br /><br />Jeremy and Deborah are NOT married. She is not his wife. Why is he covering for her? Why is she still married to Sean Bradley. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com