tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post4636362358119789645..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: William Tyrell Missing Emergency Call Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger278125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-58109922619440875422021-12-01T07:40:26.101-05:002021-12-01T07:40:26.101-05:00I’m just reading this as the search has now been r...I’m just reading this as the search has now been revamped to areas close to the foster grandmothers house and foster mother is now a “person of interest” <br /><br />I always felt that the truth was being omitted by the foster family and William died due to negligence and was covered up by the family.<br /><br />I found your comment so amazing about the time stamp being altered as it’s since been revealed that the picture was actually taken at 7.37am and was changed to approx 9.45am. You were bang on the money with this before it was revealed! This completely alters the timeline we’ve been given and gives the foster family ample time for poor William to have passed away and the family cover it up before calling authorities.Mummynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-79056285069202716762021-11-18T12:00:07.660-05:002021-11-18T12:00:07.660-05:00There have been a lot of new developments in the c...There have been a lot of new developments in the case over the past few days. This article (link below) contains a 22 second video of the foster mother doing a 'police walkthrough'. The video was apparently made just 6 days after William went missing. It's only a short interaction but I'm happy to create a transcript if its analysis might prove helpful. <br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10214373/William-Tyrrell-foster-mother-gives-police-version-happened-home-disappeared.htmlHamishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17106527759295034544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-36483369852988352512021-11-16T06:07:55.258-05:002021-11-16T06:07:55.258-05:00Looks like they were onto something now...Looks like they were onto something now...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-74469576966309068062021-11-16T05:22:38.000-05:002021-11-16T05:22:38.000-05:00To play devils advocate can I just point out a few...To play devils advocate can I just point out a few things that I think got "lost in translation"<br /><br />As and Australian I want to point out that it's quite common for us to say "sorry?" instead of "excuse me?" etc... When we didn't hear what someone said. <br /><br />Also, the "would" about his height, again I think it may be more to do with her Australian vernacular. <br /><br />Don't get me wrong there are definitely things that are off about this call, but I would be very interested to see someone familiar with Australian English usage analyse it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-59707528405717599402020-04-19T10:02:49.244-04:002020-04-19T10:02:49.244-04:00This is fantastic analysis/detective work. This is fantastic analysis/detective work. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18328919450992889752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-37398391056514120002020-01-11T16:03:44.396-05:002020-01-11T16:03:44.396-05:00Who are you!?? Thank you for sharing Karlie's ...Who are you!?? Thank you for sharing Karlie's story!!! God bless you!!! 💜🙏Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14676912185622181330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-56677291525898571562019-11-28T15:50:41.758-05:002019-11-28T15:50:41.758-05:00Just a comment on the last part. My 4 year old son...Just a comment on the last part. My 4 year old son is obsessed with Batman and The Hulk and constantly goes out dressed up as them. However for christmas he was an Anna or Elsa doll. Nothing sinister in that, and very much a boy. He's 4 too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-3689376049270850352019-11-22T16:46:14.073-05:002019-11-22T16:46:14.073-05:00Also listen to the family friends during the searc...Also listen to the family friends during the search they say William was a happy little boy”. Speaking in the past tense. Also they left several hours earlier than planned to go to the foster grandmothers house. Why has no one questioned why BOTH parents were absent during that short time William went “missing” ? And that 000 call reminds me of Susan Smith here in the US that killed her boys. I have children and that is NOT a frantic mother whose child is missing. Sit A Spellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09681843306644618191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28367646939850154602019-08-12T09:41:46.801-04:002019-08-12T09:41:46.801-04:002-3 metres away from where they were sitting is th...2-3 metres away from where they were sitting is the gate to the balconyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47233712775490498682019-08-12T09:36:16.231-04:002019-08-12T09:36:16.231-04:00Perhaps William fell from the large front balcony?...Perhaps William fell from the large front balcony?<br />The foster mother ran her hand over William's head, as a loving person would? <br />"William why won't you answer me?"<br /><br />"red, red why don't I see any red? "<br /><br />Perhaps they became fearful of losing Williams sister also? <br /><br />I have been following this story for years now and have seen the house. The balcony is very high. <br />Google street veiw it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-45816247502999621002019-08-12T09:25:39.727-04:002019-08-12T09:25:39.727-04:00There is a very high front balcony accessible from...There is a very high front balcony accessible from the back area at ground levelAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-88873760593897052922019-08-12T09:12:24.738-04:002019-08-12T09:12:24.738-04:00Perhaps she was simply goung to refer to her "...Perhaps she was simply goung to refer to her "other foster child" or "other chikd" but cut her self off mid sentence and said daughter?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-3900573861897838082019-08-12T09:01:48.355-04:002019-08-12T09:01:48.355-04:00Kids love to dress up.
I used to wear my dressing...Kids love to dress up. <br />I used to wear my dressing gown as a batman suit when I was young (we were poor).<br />If you google image the address you will find a very high front balcony accessible by a gate a ground level at the back area where William was playing. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-60070431740934125362019-08-12T08:54:36.941-04:002019-08-12T08:54:36.941-04:00The Gate to the balcony.
The Gate to the balcony.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-75538569960754279002019-08-09T02:14:01.698-04:002019-08-09T02:14:01.698-04:00I am far form an expert statement analysis althoug...I am far form an expert statement analysis although I have been reading analyzed statements for three years. I am about to do the course. Looking forward to learning and using my skills when I have completed my course. I've just been reading the police interview with the foster parents again. I note the foster mothers words, using "we", indicates she does not want to be alone on this. She uses the word "boy" several times, distancing herself. Other statements I have read of genuine missing persons, the mother calls the missing child by name. The more I read the more suspect the case looks. The casual nature of the triple zero call is concerning. No excited utterance.Paully2019https://www.blogger.com/profile/08281176582245366596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-89049678832549427832019-07-30T07:52:55.476-04:002019-07-30T07:52:55.476-04:00Exactly, bungled case. Lack of investigation of fo...Exactly, bungled case. Lack of investigation of foster parents. Detective charged. William never stod a chance and now the case is cold.Paully2019https://www.blogger.com/profile/08281176582245366596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-41154543781517224982019-06-16T19:49:21.043-04:002019-06-16T19:49:21.043-04:00It came out at recently mother had taken 5 photos ...It came out at recently mother had taken 5 photos not 3 as she continually stated. Why would she say 3?<br /><br />She drove around looking for William before the father returned. This concerns me no end.<br /><br />In one prior documentary she is talking to the offender and says something like......you just cant throw him out like rubbish from the road. How does she know that or how could she consider that!<br /><br />She never says William's name.<br /><br />She kept calling William HER son or boy.<br /><br />She tells the emergency operator no no no in answer to a question about strange cars in area. The night if the day William disappeared she drove to the airport 20 kms away to pick up her sister. On way home she remembered 2 strange cars parked opposite the address William was taken from. She also remembered about a 3rd car that turned in a neighbour's driveway when she was playing with William's sister at the front of the house. When the 1st police responder arrived she said in a early documentary that she was standing on the spot where 2 cars were parked earlier when the officer arrived. She still doesnt remember to tell the officer about the 2 cars. The 2 cars she says were parked between 7 and 9am. A female neighbour who helped in the search and testified said she took children to school at 8.40am and there were no cars when she drove from her driveway. The 2 cars were supposedly parked near this neighbour's boundary fence. The grandmother whose property William disappeared from had told police she thought the immediate next door neighbour to the above neighbour was involved. The 2 cars were supposedly parked before his driveway.<br /><br /><br />Her stories read like a plot in a really badly written crime novel. NOTHING makes sense. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-6252695291599157152019-05-29T02:13:14.196-04:002019-05-29T02:13:14.196-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Andrea Dujardin-Flexhaughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03426539691824414938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-29123799247201579532019-04-26T07:22:44.094-04:002019-04-26T07:22:44.094-04:00Autumn said:
“Another thing that crossed my mind:...Autumn said:<br /><br />“Another thing that crossed my mind: why does the foster mother say that the daddy tiger roar is the last “sound” memory she has of William? Was there another sort of memory that came after (a visual one)?”<br /><br />That’s a very good observation; I have just taken a look at that interview now and made a transcript of her answer.<br /><br />Interviewer: What was the very last you saw or heard of William?<br /><br />Mother: That was it. So that’s, [yeah], that’s [my last sound], [my last sound memory] of William is Roar. And [then] it’s nothing, and [then] it’s [just] silence and he`s [just] vanished.<br /><br />She actually answers the question with her first words “That was it.” The problem is she feels a need to expand on what was a good answer.<br /><br />“So that’s, [yeah], that’s [my last sound] ], [my last sound memory]”<br /><br />She pauses to think a moment, “So that’s, [yeah]”, the yeah being her confirming with herself (her own mind) whether that was the last sound she heard. That’s interesting that she has to consider what she is going to say, we expect she knows this moment very well. It should be something etched into her memory. Bear in mind her initial answer was “that was it”, and now by continuing on she has weakened her first statement substantially, and also shown self-doubt by having to confirm her words in her own mind. We also note the sensitivity relating to the repeated words “[my last sound], [my last sound]”.<br /><br />“And [then] it’s nothing, and [then] it’s [just] silence and he`s [just] vanished.”<br /><br />She still continues adding to her statement this time stringing together three uses of negative language. Here she lists more memories of William although there should not be any more as he is allegedly gone at this point. Think about this I believe it speaks volumes. If William is gone there should be no more memories of him, so why does she carry on and state her next memories of him were:<br /><br />Nothing, Silence and Vanished<br /><br />“And [then] it’s nothing”<br /><br />She has made many similar references to “nothing” in her statements. It is a way to avoid saying what there actually was. There is always something. There is no memory of “nothing” as in order to have a memory there must be something to have one about. A legitimate memory would be to say “and then he was gone” or something similar.<br /><br />It’s like if someone asks a loved one what’s wrong if they sense they are upset, and they answer “nothing”, that means there is definitely something. It is an avoidance of dealing with reality which prompts their answer.<br /><br />“and [then] it’s [just] silence”<br /><br />Again we have a memory of silence which is connected to William. In order for him to be silent he must be there. Also note the word “just” which could be there to minimise/compare the word “silence” with something else.<br /><br />I believe what she is telling me. William (the life force, spirit, call it what you will) has vanished, he is no longer alive.<br /><br />My conclusion is based on what she literally told us in her own words. Why after giving the answer “that was it” did she carry on when she had already answered the question? The answer is that there was more to say, in her mind she hadn’t answered the question fully, and she had more memories to give so carried on to see it to its conclusion.<br /><br />It’s possible if we had access to the original police statements that they would reveal where William is now. <br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28234227381839364862019-04-26T01:42:00.716-04:002019-04-26T01:42:00.716-04:00Adrian, you may be right about that. She also says...Adrian, you may be right about that. She also says <i>"There was no answer. There was no answer"</i> during those gestures. That could be a conscious or subconscious warning to her husband: Don't answer! Don't answer! Apparently she didn't want him to say <i>"They always run to the gate"</i>, etc. She starts interrupting before he says “gate”. What did she think he was going to reveal.<br /><br />My impression from the beginning was: the foster mother feels guilty/responsible. More so than the foster father. But the father may be involved somehow. We just don’t know what happened. Maybe there is only one cell tower in the (rural) area. In that case, the police may not have been able to fully check the timeline. <br /><br />In any case, I don’t think it was an abduction. The foster mother says that herself in many different ways in the police interview. For instance:<br />- the statement about her brothers’ kids (<i>“There’s no reason for them not to be safe at Nanna’s house”</i>);<br />- the statement about William not going blindly with people (<i>“He wouldn’t do it, he just wouldn’t do it, it’s not in him, (…) he’d run back, (…), I can’t see him do it”</i>);<br />- the statement about expecting abductions in the city rather than Kendall ( <i>“You’d expect abductions in the city, you don’t expect to hear about abductions out here in Kendall, I mean it’s just ridiculous”</i>;<br />- etc.<br /><br />I’m not so sure the mother was inside when it happened. The first statement we have about that is in the triple 0 call: “I was <b>out there</b> talking with my mum and my other daughter”. So the foster mother and grandmother were together when it happened. I don’t think the grandmother was responsible (I’ve also read that she has early dementia or alzheimer’s). <br /><br />Another thing that crossed my mind: why does the foster mother say that the daddy tiger roar is the last “sound” memory she has of William? Was there another sort of memory that came after (a visual one)? <br /><br />AutumnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10372777690213682882019-04-23T19:44:10.249-04:002019-04-23T19:44:10.249-04:00Autumn said:
Several times the foster mother used...Autumn said:<br /><br />Several times the foster mother used the word “clump” when describing the moment William “disappeared” (“glassy…grassy clump” / “I sort of feel like they’ve gone “clump” on his shoulders”).<br /><br />Yeah very good observation, I hadn’t noticed the two uses of that word. It is a word that you don’t hear very often so it is interesting it comes up twice. It is possible the noise of William colliding with something would have made a clumping sound.<br /><br />I still feel the father is connected to the accident but it may just be that he being coerced into lying which is causing a lot of cognitive problems for him. Please take a look at this clip from 60 minutes, I posted it before but I see more in it now.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTh6DM5FEAY<br /><br />11m 44s<br /><br />If we look at the mothers body language we see that she interrupts the father and at the same time does two firm downward hand gestures. That body language is the same wherever you go in the world and it doesn’t take an expert to understand it. It means “keep it down”. But there is something else I missed last time, if you keep watching her hand you will see she makes another gesture seconds after the first. She makes a backwards winding movement with her hand and finger which finishes with the hand going down. Again that is very simple to understand as we see people do it often. It is “wind it down” which essentially means shut up. When she drops her finger at the end of it she looks at her husband to make sure he gets the message.<br /><br />People who have been together for many years know each other so well that a simple look can be enough to convey a message and the partner will understand. The father wants to talk but the mother knows he might say too much so shuts him down. I am sure they know what happened to William.<br /><br />I look forward to any new information the inquest in August brings. I think you mentioned in an earlier post about the grandmother not being present at the inquest which could suggest her distancing herself from the parents. This is from the Police interview:<br /><br />P: She can’t blame herself.<br /><br />M: No she doesn’t, well I hope she doesn’t, but, no she can’t.<br /><br />The mothers statement starts strong but she weakens it, then we see she says “but” to weaken her already weakened words further. Then she self-censors before changing from the two uses of “doesn`t” to “can’t”. Her words suggest that the grandmother may have reason to feel some amount of blame.<br /><br />I believe the mother was inside when it all went down and that grandmother would have technically been the only supervisor of William at that moment. Perhaps she does blame herself and the distancing is because of that. It would be good to see any statements the grandmother made. It stands out because everybody seems to have made statements either in interviews or in the press, both Williams foster family and his biological family, yet the one person we haven’t heard from is the grandmother.<br /> <br />If we look at the information coming from the family’s side we have 85% from mother, 15% from father and 0% from grandmother. Possibly the grandmother and father want to tell the full story but the mother is running the show.<br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47201025390657685772019-04-22T21:53:01.550-04:002019-04-22T21:53:01.550-04:00Why was William under illegal surveillance before ...Why was William under illegal surveillance before he was taken away from bio parents?<br />Who was following him/them?Menoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81677621476213218432019-04-22T16:56:51.486-04:002019-04-22T16:56:51.486-04:00One more thing. The below text is from the foster ...One more thing. The below text is from the foster parents statement of Sept 20, 2014 (see for entire statement one of my above comments). <br /><br /><i>“<b>William is</b> only three years and three-months-old and really <b>still a baby</b>, he has so many more years to live and we desperately want him home. <br /> (…) <br />To the Kendall community: You are amazing, every day we would hear how many volunteers had shown up at the showground and every day the numbers got bigger. <b>People had taken time off work,</b> we saw <b>a lady pushing</b> a pram and holding <b>a baby on</b> her <b>front walk</b>ing looking for <b>William</b>, we saw a man <b>walking</b> his <b>push bike</b> looking for <b>William</b>, and we saw everyday people just like us <b>in the bush</b> and <b>on the road</b> looking for <b>our little boy</b>. And every day – all through the day – people were <b>dropping off</b> food and drinks to support the searchers.<br />Thank you so much! You should feel very proud of yourselves and the community.”</i><br /><br />Could the bold parts be a leak of what happened to William? -> <br />- William was still a baby.<br />- The foster parents had taken time off work to visit Nana. <br />- The foster mother pushed baby William on Nana’s front walk. <br />- She was walking and pushing his bike. <br />- William landed in the bushes on the left side of the front walk (the front walk is going down and the foster mother may have lost control over the bike -> could that be how she “grazed” her hand?)<br />- Then he dropped off onto the adjacent, lower gravel road (going to the first/lower floor of Nana’s house).<br /><br />Several times the foster mother used the word “clump” when describing the moment William “disappeared” (<i>“glassy…grassy clump” / “I sort of feel like they’ve gone “clump” on his shoulders”</i>). The fall may have made a clumpy sound or his head may have hit a clump of something. I think it was not the (i.m.o. non-existent) driver of a “third car” who had “sandy reddy-coloured hair”. It was William.<br /><br />AutumnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-83427846597491703282019-04-22T15:00:00.652-04:002019-04-22T15:00:00.652-04:00Interesting, Adrian. It may well have been an acci...Interesting, Adrian. It may well have been an accident on his bike on the driveway or on the footpath off the driveway (which leads to <i>steps</i> + front door). The kitchen is on the upper floor (= upstairs) of the house, though, and situated directly on the patio. So going "back upstairs" is not incongruent with "I've just walked out" I believe. I guess we've now looked at it from every possible angle. A tragic case on many levels. Let’s see what the remainder of the inquest brings (resumes in August).<br /><br />Autumn<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-4425322215350538962019-04-22T11:58:55.523-04:002019-04-22T11:58:55.523-04:00My conclusion part 2
“and I just see nothing. I s...My conclusion part 2<br /><br />“and I just see nothing. I see nothing, I hear nothing, I, I’m speechless.”<br /><br />She tells us she sees nothing but we know she must have seen something. If she had said William wasn’t there she would be telling us what she saw through her words. I believe I now know what happened to William and what she is telling us is that she is looking at William who is unconscious/dead, and she sees no life in him and she hears no noise from him and she is stunned and speechless due to what she is seeing.<br /><br />“and I’m yelling out, “William, where are you, you need to talk to Mummy”<br /><br />She is yelling to Williams body trying to get a response from him but as she told us earlier he was nowhere. Her use of the word nowhere now becomes very obvious. She is not lying to us she is telling the truth as William was literally “nowhere”. You could not honestly use a positive statement like “he wasn’t there” to describe him because he was “there”. But even though his body was there, William the child who screams, shouts, laughs, cries, runs and jumps wasn’t. That William was nowhere.<br /><br />I won’t analyse any more of her statement because it is all self-explanatory when you have point of reference to work from. I want to explain what I believe happened to William and that is related to his bike. When references to this bike in statements are analysed they show a lot of sensitivity. See some of those statements below:<br /><br />The next morning, William [suggested] [racing] on his new bike, riding on the [path] off the driveway.<br /><br />“William rode his bike down that same footpath and [deliberately] [crashed] his bike into the garden,” the foster mother told police.<br /><br />I couldn’t see him, I couldn’t hear him, it was the world, you, it’s like, the world just came to a [screaming halt]<br /><br />“so many thoughts that just go [crashing] through your brain in a split second”<br /><br />“We’ve got pictures of William riding [this] bike, and there is just [unbridled] joy, [just] over his face, he was [just] free, and [he], [we] would have, and he was really good. [Just racing]<br /><br />I believe William was racing his bike and had an accident possibly breaking his neck or banging his head against something hard which resulted in his death. I believe his mother did hear the sound of the crash and it was that which caused her to come down stairs and out of the house to look for him. Unfortunately the accident must have been fatal. She called her husband who returned home and decisions were made on what to do.<br /><br />Adrian.<br />frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.com