tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post4767495023422588790..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: What Happened to Heidi and Margot Broussard? Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger76125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71711811016625661572020-01-04T16:45:52.777-05:002020-01-04T16:45:52.777-05:00Always made contact....
Thw word contact makes m...Always made contact....<br /><br /><br />Thw word contact makes me think of hitting. He made contact with his fist... the wall... the road...<br /><br />.Nadine Lumleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05591663475427502169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-37166910281163406542020-01-04T16:44:37.136-05:002020-01-04T16:44:37.136-05:00I feel many men kill their victims out of blind st...I feel many men kill their victims out of blind stupid panic.<br /><br />.Nadine Lumleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05591663475427502169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-20147627502549206062020-01-04T16:32:27.225-05:002020-01-04T16:32:27.225-05:00Thx. You cud always pay for training and then you ...Thx. You cud always pay for training and then you cud hang out with the pros in their private FB group 😂Nadine Lumleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05591663475427502169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-25735553731861350182020-01-04T15:56:20.292-05:002020-01-04T15:56:20.292-05:00I'm worried cutest little pucker lips is him r...I'm worried cutest little pucker lips is him referring to the baby's anus, excuse my ugggg post. UgggNadine Lumleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05591663475427502169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-32931353710556106962019-12-30T10:37:09.347-05:002019-12-30T10:37:09.347-05:00A lot of what gets written in these comments has l...A lot of what gets written in these comments has little to do with statement analysis and more to do with conspiracy theorising.Richard Strakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02388953965144063917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-46603880941843194822019-12-24T23:22:26.818-05:002019-12-24T23:22:26.818-05:00Tania,
Thank you for your Christmas hug....warm wi...Tania,<br />Thank you for your Christmas hug....warm wishes to you xoxoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7159134954615599072019-12-24T21:08:48.157-05:002019-12-24T21:08:48.157-05:00Merry Christmas and a happy, peaceful and prospero...Merry Christmas and a happy, peaceful and prosperous New Year. Big hugs all round xxTania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-8517211715495324902019-12-24T17:35:51.395-05:002019-12-24T17:35:51.395-05:00@Unknown December 24, 2019 at 1:21 PM
“You got it...@Unknown December 24, 2019 at 1:21 PM<br /><br />“You got it wrong dude admit that, your “analysis ' is just like a lie detector machine all bullshit”<br /><br />What is wrong, which part don’t you agree with?<br /><br />For example:<br /><br />“I left the house at 6:40 err…… and that’s the last time I [spoke] to my, err……… [my son].”<br /><br />Shane picked his son up from Day care at 6:00pm after they rang him to tell him Heidi had not picked him up. He tells us he took him home. At 7:30 he called the police. The interview must have taken place after speaking to the police at some point in the evening. He tells us that last time he spoke with his son was at 6:40 in the morning. That’s not possible; he picked him up from Day care at 6:00pm so we know he spoke to him.<br /><br />I haven’t got it wrong dude. It is Shane who has got it wrong, he did all the talking.<br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-44167128428891893202019-12-24T16:18:21.719-05:002019-12-24T16:18:21.719-05:00How do men come to believe they are the father of ...How do men come to believe they are the father of a baby born within another relationship??<br /><br />HOw can they know they are the real father?<br /><br />I wonder with my real Dad why he was so insistent he was my father, calling my grandparents over and over, demanding to know where I was.Daphnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-70698673987727515062019-12-24T16:16:26.496-05:002019-12-24T16:16:26.496-05:00mind to matter,
That is crazy, but why is Margo i...mind to matter,<br /><br />That is crazy, but why is Margo in foster care awaiting DNA tests?<br /><br />I thought the baby was given back to Shane? I wonder why another man claiming to be the father would cause the baby to go into foster care??<br /><br />One thing for sure: The baby needs to be kept away from Shayne.<br /><br />The baby doesn't look like Shayne and Shayne's linguistics show he is a predator.<br /><br />--DaphneDaphnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71301315441613524502019-12-24T13:42:02.376-05:002019-12-24T13:42:02.376-05:00I just hope Shane really wants Margot. His deplora...I just hope Shane really wants Margot. His deplorable behavior in those interviews does not convey that of a loving, nurturing person. <br /><br />Even if he was glad Heidi disappeared, you'd expect his interviews to be peppered with true concern for Margot and he would've been more active in trying to find them.<br /><br />And if he knew Margot was safe (meaning: he supported giving Margot to the friend), then he didn't care enough about Margot to keep her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-9122826411461232902019-12-24T12:43:44.136-05:002019-12-24T12:43:44.136-05:00Also note in the Maddie and Jerryl video, how nerv...Also note in the Maddie and Jerryl video, how nervous Tom is about the cops being onto him...<br /><br />A state trooper pulled him over "for no reason"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65666657038272216192019-12-24T12:38:56.421-05:002019-12-24T12:38:56.421-05:00Tom asks Maddie and Jarryl if they have heard abou...Tom asks Maddie and Jarryl if they have heard about Amanda getting beaten to a pulp, and also mentioning that Amanda's boyfriend had died a few months back....<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIRSJnAqMkMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10109463494252637682019-12-24T12:36:37.152-05:002019-12-24T12:36:37.152-05:00Off Topic:
Another one of Tom's prostitutes b...Off Topic:<br /><br />Another one of Tom's prostitutes beaten to a pulp--now in medically induced coma.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab4gU6l7_TkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39121173263980470072019-12-24T06:32:47.977-05:002019-12-24T06:32:47.977-05:00https://www.crimeonline.com/2019/12/23/heidi-brous...https://www.crimeonline.com/2019/12/23/heidi-broussard-mystery-man-claims-he-is-the-father-of-newborn-baby-abducted-by-mothers-alleged-close-friend-report/<br /><br />Even though the baby has been returned to Shane Carey it is interesting that another man has come forward claiming the child is his. If the unknown man is genuine and believes that Margot is his, it means Heidi Broussard was seeing someone else. Would Shane have been aware of this? This introduces the possibility of a love triangle, and add to that the birth of a child where the identity of its real father is in doubt. This puts a new twist on the whole case.<br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-90933972466472433442019-12-24T02:06:30.078-05:002019-12-24T02:06:30.078-05:00Joe, ty for spurring me to clarify.
I had in min...Joe, ty for spurring me to clarify.<br /> <br />I had in mind that the way a homicide may be accidental is that someone gets panicked. In this incoherent frame of mind they strangle without premeditation to kill. Willownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-20235287558607527782019-12-23T23:36:25.172-05:002019-12-23T23:36:25.172-05:00@ 4:12 Maybe it was an accident that Heidi died? T...@ 4:12 Maybe it was an accident that Heidi died? The cause of death was ligature strangulation - not a common cause of accidental death.Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-17483071243424246292019-12-23T17:11:24.607-05:002019-12-23T17:11:24.607-05:00A quote from the first interview and my analysis.
...A quote from the first interview and my analysis.<br /><br />SC: “By the time she drops them off I`m like getting in my trucks around like 7:40, 7:45 and [we always make contact like right before I get in my truck], and then go to work. They just went to the book fair and they just bought three books. It’s like $25 err… She couldn’t wait to read to err… Silas, whenever she err… whenever Silas got home. We just bought three brand new books which is right here inside the house. And err… that’s the last time I [actually] made contact with her.”<br /><br />R: Yeah, yeah, could you just tell us a little bit more about when and where was the last time you saw Heidi?<br /><br />SC: Yeah, it was err, [actually] like before I left this morning at 6:40. I left the house at 6:40 err… yeah. Err… yeah like I left the house, I won’t look at the light (points at light in room). I left the house at 6:40 err…… and that’s the last time I spoke to my err… [my son].<br /><br />This above is taken from the first interview the one posted on the blog. Shane was having a hard time recalling what had happened that morning and was having major transmission problems. He uses the comparative word “actually” twice in relation to the last time he saw Heidi and also tells a lie.<br /><br />To use the word “actually” in a statement you have to be making a comparison against something else relative to what you are talking about. It comes into language like below:<br />Question: So you arrived at work at 10:00 this morning?<br /><br />Answer: No, it was [actually] 9:30 when I got there.<br /><br />The person answering the question compares the interviewers’ suggestion of 10:00 with the time he knows he got there. The word actually automatically comes into the subjects’ language. You need two pieces of data to compare for this to happen.<br /> <br />If the question was simply “what time did you arrive at work?” then the answer is simply “I arrived at 9:30”, as there is nothing being compared. If the subject answers the question “what time did you arrive at work?” with “actually it was 9:30” we know he is comparing something in his own mind, as no one has introduced anything into the conversation that he could be comparing against. It could be the subject is thinking about how little traffic there was which allowed him to get into work half an hour early for instance. He is comparing the time he thought he would get to work with the time he did get to work in his own mind, and it has produced the word “actually” to come into his language.<br /><br />Shane Carey uses the word “actually” twice in relation to the last time he saw Heidi. On both occasions he was not given anything by the interviewer to which he could compare what he knows against. This means he was comparing against something in his own mind.<br /><br />I believe he is comparing the real last time he saw her against the one he wants us to believe is the last. That means he is being deceptive, and of course we ask why would he hide such information. But there`s more…<br /><br />“I left the house at 6:40 err…… and that’s the last time I [spoke] to my, err……… [my son].”<br /><br />I believe he was going to say my “fiancé” but realised he had just told us he had [spoke] to her at 8:00 at work on the phone. He pauses a while as he thinks of a way out and says “my son”. The problem there is we know he told us he picked Silas up from school. Brought him home and Silas “told him” to grill his unfinished lunch for him. This mean he has told a direct lie.<br /><br /><br />The two uses of “actually” and a direct lie point to Shane being guilty of deception.<br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-55052444675026589552019-12-23T16:12:26.002-05:002019-12-23T16:12:26.002-05:00Anonymous at 1:27 says:
..."I wondered if Sha... Anonymous at 1:27 says:<br />..."I wondered if Shane drove to Megan's to get Heidi's things to "show" she left her things at home and must've been kidnapped." <br /><br />1. Earlier in the discussion we focused in what Shane didn't mention, what he particularly omitted in the interview. <br />He must have known Heidis best friend F. who should have been first in his list of calls when Heidi disappeared.<br /> <br />Shane didn't mention anything about F. <br /><br />What you say, Anonymous, about driving fits in the scenario. <br /><br />Shane may have driven those 200 miles, 320 kilometers, in some three hours, to Megan F. <br /><br />What Shane encountered at F. may have been a tragic surprise. Maybe it was an accident that Heidi died. <br />Shane could not take baby Margot with him as he needed to maintain the script of kidnapping. He brought back home the purse etc. to support the story. <br /><br />If Shane drove to F. he may have been the person who moved Heidi to the car trunk.<br /><br />So far the media reporting has said that Heidi was found in the trunk but left untold how she got there. <br /><br />Willownoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-13065638178253020092019-12-23T13:36:49.212-05:002019-12-23T13:36:49.212-05:00Thank you for the breakdown. Last night I discover...Thank you for the breakdown. Last night I discovered the following examples, among others not listed:<br /><br />KEYS AND PURSE CONTRADICTIONS<br /><br />KEYS:<br />Dec 20 People.com <br />Heidi Broussard Found Dead But Baby Alive, at Least 1 Person in Custody: Reports<br /><br />"Speaking to KTBC earlier this week...CAREY SAID HE WENT INSIDE, FOUND the baby’s car seat and BROUSSARD’S KEYS."<br /><br />Dec 16 Nypost.com<br />Texas Mom Heidi Broussard, 2-week-old Daughter Mysteriously Vanish<br /><br />"'THE ONLY THING GONE IS her, the baby, HER KEYS and her cellphone,' HE TOLD FOX, saying HE WAS 'GOING THROUGH DUMPSTERS' LOOKING FOR CLUES...'"<br /><br /><br />PURSE:<br /><br />Dec 16 Crimeonline.com<br />She Would Not Do This By Herself’: Fiance Says No Signs Of Struggle...<br /><br />"'EVERYTHING WAS LIKE SHE WAS HOME,' Carey told FOX 7. '…..Her car seat is upstairs, HER PURSE IS UPSTAIRS, her ID, wallet..."<br /><br /><br />Dec 19 Dailymail.co.uk<br />Friend Reveals Heidi Broussard Went Through A Rocky Break-up...<br /><br />"He said Broussard's CAR WAS UNLOCKED AND HER PURSE WAS INSIDE WITH HER ID AND BANK CARDS STILL IN IT."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-91328080570787121522019-12-23T13:27:42.392-05:002019-12-23T13:27:42.392-05:00The money thing makes sense. How else would Shane...The money thing makes sense. How else would Shane know it was all there, aside from him tracking every cent.<br /><br />Megan needed privacy when she killed her. If she wasn't in Heidi's house, then Megan may have driven Heidi to her house under the guise of giving back the baby.<br /><br />Did the footage show that Heidi wasn't carrying her purse? I wondered if Shane drove to Megan's to get Heidi's things to "show" she left her things at home and must've been kidnapped.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-61025190009028710562019-12-23T12:59:32.070-05:002019-12-23T12:59:32.070-05:00@ Anonymous December 22, 2019 at 5:55 PM
You ment...@ Anonymous December 22, 2019 at 5:55 PM<br /><br />You mentioned a contradiction with Shane saying the purse being upstairs and then saying it was in the car. Shane first stated “The cart seats upstairs, her purse is upstairs, her ID wallet.” He is telling us where they are located now at the present moment (is). By him telling us the purse “was” in the car shortly after his first statement it reveals he has taken it upstairs into the apartment. He has moved it. It is not a contradiction.<br /><br />Also you said how did he know “all "the" (not "her") money was still inside her purse?”<br /><br />It is possible Shane knew how much money was in her purse. Later in the interview he says “. She only has $4 in her bank account and she’s still helping somebody out, you know.” He knows she has four dollars in her account which shows money is an issue in general. They may have spoken about the money with each other that morning or the evening before as budgeting would be important. How much money she had may have been revealed during that conversation. He may have checked the purse on finding it in her car and deducted the $25 off spent at the book fair and concluded what was left inside was correct. Or consider we know she had no money ($4 in bank) so Shane may have given her a certain amount of cash (“the money”) and based his conclusions from that.<br /><br />Shane is essentially telling us that he has concluded she was not robbed. If we believe he is innocent then we would expect that would leave him in a bad place mentally, as if the motive was not robbery more sinister possibilities will be running through his mind.<br /><br />He did say “I don’t know anything about that” in relation to the car door being unlocked which could be viewed as sensitive and a need to convince. We need to consider he had just been talking about the car seat, purse etc… which are things he does know about so he may be saying I know about this (car seat etc..) but I don’t know anything about that as in I can’t work it out. It could be a case of “this and that”.<br /><br />Also you said when he says “"And she never leaves her car door unlocked. BUT I mean she DOES have a three week old baby so… I don’t know"<br /><br />I don’t think he is blaming her for leaving the door unlocked I think he is trying to work out why it was left unlocked. It reads as he is saying maybe she forgot due to having to carry the baby etc… from the car, she had her hands full so to speak.<br /><br />Shane does show sensitivity in his statement, and a need to convince but we must explore to see what is behind it. Being short of money will lead to sensitivity when speaking about it, but does not mean someone has killed their wife. Also a person feeling guilty because they are reflecting on the things they could have done to have prevented something which has happened will lead to a need to convince in their language. <br /><br />“Err, everything was… like she was home. I mean that’s [why] I thought she was at her friends house, like she walked to her apartment complex”<br /><br />“why” is sensitive as it justifies in this case why a thought was held. But imagine if Shane thought she was at her friends and never did anything to check on her, all that time he sat at home watching television or whatever. In his mind on reflection he would be thinking “if only I had checked on her” etc… This would lead to his sensitivity and a need to justify to himself why he didn’t do anything.<br /><br />We need to explore all the things we flag against the greater context to get a fuller understanding.<br /><br />Adrian.frommindtomatterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252360561115191735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-34060331504504799162019-12-23T12:01:22.968-05:002019-12-23T12:01:22.968-05:00Anon,
Whoah we're on the same wavelength wit...Anon, <br /><br />Whoah we're on the same wavelength with this case.<br /><br />"The money" is central to the case. I believe that baby was sold and with Heidi's knowledge.<br /><br />You make an excellent point about Megan's pregnancy following the timeline of Heidi's pregnancy, Megan even being pregnancy at the baby's birth. It reminds me of the behavior of someone who has hired a surrogate to carry their baby. Not saying that's what happened, just that it has the vibes of "You're carrying that baby, but when it's born, I'm buying it and you're giving it to me."<br /><br />Did Heidi for real think nothing was up when her friend, who had a Dec. 1 due date, simply became "unpregnant" once the due date came with no baby???<br /><br />As far as the scenarios you propose, I'm not sure if the friend said she had a buyer or simply wanted to buy the baby and keep it...I tend to think that that was what was going on, since the friend pretended to be pregnant?<br />I think you are absolutely correct though that it was a deal gone bad in that either the friend did not pay the full amount she had promised OR Heidi changed her mind, and the friend/Shane/or accomplice killed Heidi.<br /><br />I think Heidi went in that car with the friend because she had changed her mind: and that is why Shane says "The Money" was still there (in her purse)....Translation: Heidi told the friend she did not want to go through with the sale anymore, but did not return the money to the friend due to perhaps not even having the purse with her at the time or simply being killed before she was able to give back the money.Daphnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-79214664155497728482019-12-23T03:47:07.509-05:002019-12-23T03:47:07.509-05:00And speaking about the car, he knew Heidi’s car wa...And speaking about the car, he knew Heidi’s car was at the apartment therefore he must have known she wasn’t picking up their son but he still waited until he received a call from the school to go pick him up.... /ceciliaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42930415038184481452019-12-22T23:40:39.938-05:002019-12-22T23:40:39.938-05:00I thought early on that someone might want to sell...I thought early on that someone might want to sell the baby but dismissed it. I'm now revisiting this possibility and going full-on "Lifetime" with it. Sorry, this not Statement Analysis based. I sound like a nut, I know, but the more I wrote, the more plausible it seemed.<br /><br />This is a theory.<br /><br />Friend and bf can't have kids or afford adoption (or have been turned down). <br /><br />Friend talks Heidi and Shane into selling/giving Heidi's baby to her and faking the kidnapping of Margo. Maybe Heidi got pregnant for that purpose and that's why Friend pretended she was pregnant and tried to follow Heidi's pregnancy timeline (I read that somewhere). <br /><br />To prevent authorities from questioning it, Friend overtly publicizes her fake pregnancy as "proof". Friend even Face-Times that "her" baby is born while in the hospital. <br /><br />If this was actually Friend's kidnapping plot, why take the chance that Heidi or Shane could easily find out?<br /><br />Clearly Friend can't tell loved ones what they're doing, so they think she's delusional.<br /><br />But Heidi gets scared or wants to keep Margot. Friend: "Come with me and let's talk about it." Heidi: "Well, okay."<br /><br />Shane was not part of the murder, but he's involved in the baby scam, so he has to cover his a**. So all the red flags we catch from his statements and behavior are due to THAT cover-up, not the murder.<br /><br />Variation 1:<br />Friend pretended to want baby in order to sell it. Maybe went halfsies with Shane, who talked Heidi into it. Heidi finds out Friend is selling baby, or decides she wants it, and one or both kill Heidi.<br /><br />Variation 2:<br />All are hard up for money. Friend has a baby buyer. Shane talks Heidi into faking a kidnapping in order to sell the baby. But Heidi chickens out, or wants the baby, and one or both kill her.<br /><br />If he's a narcissist or sociopath, his blatant duping delight is part of who he is. Remember when he chuckled in the raw interview and said, "This is hard"? Not hard emotionally due to grief, but that his skills in deception are challenged by all the questions he thought he practiced well enough for. <br /><br />He looks down to concentrate because "this is hard." Laughs to stall while he comes up with an answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com