tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post5423638885503143194..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Statement Analysis: DeOrre's Parents' Interview Part One Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger125125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-14327060333256506702015-07-28T12:41:44.969-04:002015-07-28T12:41:44.969-04:00..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-41992103167941244522015-07-25T14:33:23.720-04:002015-07-25T14:33:23.720-04:00Mr. Walton is Jessica's grandfather, so the ch...Mr. Walton is Jessica's grandfather, so the child's GGF.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-68688710248422498062015-07-23T21:11:43.688-04:002015-07-23T21:11:43.688-04:00No, Jessica's great-grandfather, Robert Walton...No, Jessica's great-grandfather, Robert Walton, was 76 years old in January. He is the one who went on the camping trip with them.Rose City, Oregonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-17806977244828342122015-07-23T17:47:21.301-04:002015-07-23T17:47:21.301-04:00There is word that the friend with Grandpa is a gu...There is word that the friend with Grandpa is a guy in his 30's that is a registered sex offender. There is discussion on a fb group under baby deorr discussion. The grandpa met him at an AA meeting. I cannot remember his name, but it's listed on the fb site. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-57081732783506596492015-07-21T22:26:17.052-04:002015-07-21T22:26:17.052-04:00The grandfather who was quoted in the People artic...The grandfather who was quoted in the People article, and who is 70 years old, is NOT the grandfather who was on the camping trip. That guy is the paternal great-grandfather of little Deorr. The maternal great-grandfather of little Deorr is the one who was on the camping trip (Jessica Mitchell's grandfather), and apparently is over 80 years old.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-59937948097040321172015-07-21T13:32:18.118-04:002015-07-21T13:32:18.118-04:00Just to throw something else into the mix ( i pref...Just to throw something else into the mix ( i prefer to stick to SA principle's) but, what if DeOrr was never at the campsite. Do we have any independent sightings of him at the campsite, apart from his parents, his Grandfather, and the mysterious (my words) person who was also there?John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-31598050341652050942015-07-21T13:03:46.405-04:002015-07-21T13:03:46.405-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-45504643986321178912015-07-21T12:33:30.487-04:002015-07-21T12:33:30.487-04:00I'm sorry as well, Anonymous-no harm no foul! ...I'm sorry as well, Anonymous-no harm no foul! <br />I agree a big red light went off when I read above comments about "exploring" and being possibly a code word for drug use- that is a very good possibility.<br />I am thinking you may be right.<br />It makes a lot of sense.<br />You may be onto something, it would explain a lot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65623052605072910102015-07-21T11:26:22.259-04:002015-07-21T11:26:22.259-04:00I was wondering about possible drug use as well. T...I was wondering about possible drug use as well. That might help to explain why Dad seems so hyper. Maybe they needed time to ditch everything? Could the boy have gotten into their stash?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-83517057339375115872015-07-21T11:16:56.203-04:002015-07-21T11:16:56.203-04:00Sorry Anon @10.53, I didn't mean to speak so s...Sorry Anon @10.53, I didn't mean to speak so sharply. Did not mean to sound so critical, was just pointing out the facts which seemed to be being overlooked, that's all. Again, I'm sorry. Forgive. I'll try to do better next time. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42500980653666478292015-07-21T10:53:33.045-04:002015-07-21T10:53:33.045-04:00Thank you Anonymous at 9:04 for your FACT based op...Thank you Anonymous at 9:04 for your FACT based opinions- they are much appreciated. It's the fact based opinions that make it hard for me to believe the things that DeOrr Sr. Is saying. But I do want to believe they are telling the truth.<br /><br />It's ok to brainstorm and keep an open mind.<br />I am not trained in Statement Analysis, but I love to read Peter's blog, and see things through SA.<br /><br />So yes facts are facts, but you don't need to be rude, we were just talking about it and the possibilities. An open mind remember.<br />Your opinion isn't the only opinion.<br /><br />And I was conversing with Juliet.<br />Not you.<br />I'm sorry if you thought I was hijacking your facts. I will have to allow my full name on here so we don't get confused with each other lol.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-36566032737527027412015-07-21T09:20:31.524-04:002015-07-21T09:20:31.524-04:00BTW, John in his vast body-language experience, ha...BTW, John in his vast body-language experience, has indicated more than once that the stance and posture between the mother and father is suspect and is not good between them. This too, is worthy of being remembered with caution. Just MOO... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-16650170135590042602015-07-21T09:04:44.643-04:002015-07-21T09:04:44.643-04:00Ref my post above where I am highlighting several ...Ref my post above where I am highlighting several areas of the sheriff's statement; I am dealing with THE FACTS as stated and NOT speculating on what could or could not have happened. Jesus, a thousand things 'could' have happened but they didn't.<br /><br />We could sit around all day and speculate this could have happened that could have happened; but all we know FOR A FACT, now, is that; <br /><br />the child was missing a lot longer than we were first led to believe;<br /><br />the child was NOT left in the hands or care of the grandfather, regardless as to his age or health criteria, or that the parents 'claim' he was supposed to be watching their child when they never placed him in the elder gentleman's hands. Duh... !<br /><br />There has not been one drop of blood found that would indicate the child was injured, run over, beaten or abused by an abductor or anyone else, OR absconded with by an animal; NOR has there been one shred of clothing, tissue, not even a shoe, a discarded cigarette or soda can, snack rapper, broken down bush or shrubs, or anything else that would indicate the child wandered off or was abducted. <br /><br />If any blood or tissue has been found on, in, or around the truck, this has not been mentioned. No point in speculating on this possibility when we don't know if this possibility exists. We DO know that a child likely matching toddler DeOrrs' description, and a black truck that could also match the family truck has been described by a clerk at a nearby store. And that's a fact. Daddy DeOrr claims he went to the store much earlier; but then, a liar is a liar. We'll see.<br /><br />There has been no evidence whatsoever that the child wandered down to the creek or was dumped in the creek. Not one shred. There was only evidence of old cremated remains found near or in the creek that had previously been discarded. It is not unusual for survivors to cast their loved ones ashes to the wind or into a creek. These were NOT DeOrrs' remains. There is no evidence of DeOrr anywhere near or in the creek, nor of having been swept off down river. <br /><br />Daddy DeOrrs' comments lead me to believe he is nervously lying. Ditto for the mother who will not let loose of little DeOrrs' blankie. And why not? Guilty people do experience guilty grief, do they not? She lied too, saying he never lets his blankie or his other trinkets out of his sight. OH? Then how could it be that his little blankie was found inside the truck but little DeOrr wasn't? huh? <br /><br />IMO, both are liars; this baby was NOT abducted or kidnapped; he was NOT snatched by a wild animal; he did NOT drown in the creek nor was he thrown into the creek; there is NOT one drop of blood or tissue that indicated ANYTHING happened to this child for miles around; all based on statements made by the Sheriff. NOW, Daddy DeOrr wants the sheriff and searchers to go on searching for an abductor/kidnapper, and for everyone to believe their baby was snatched, when the sheriff knows this did not happen. Facts people, facts, NOT speculation. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-82436888747912927912015-07-21T08:41:56.308-04:002015-07-21T08:41:56.308-04:00If "exploring" was a code word for doing...If "exploring" was a code word for doing drugs, that would explain:<br /><br />Confusion, a poor sense of time<br /><br />Reluctance to bring authorities to the scene<br /><br />The father (and mother) being in trouble<br /><br />The need to go "hauling" for cell phone receptionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-16360086854148420952015-07-21T08:30:54.204-04:002015-07-21T08:30:54.204-04:00As strange as it is to think a parent could find t...As strange as it is to think a parent could find the child and then leave him there, or know where he is all along it could happen.<br />Look at the Charlie Bothwell case- the FBI was all over that house and didn't find a trace of him until he got loose. <br />And it was the stepmom all along who hid him there. <br />But for what reason?<br />BC search and rescue were already called?<br />To attract national attention and possibly money from a GoFundMe site, or to sell their story and make money off of it?<br />Idk, as out there as all of those conclusions could be, anything is possible.<br /><br />I know this though, it is FOREVER engraved in my mind the moments before, during, and immediately after finding "C"- I can still envision it in my mind at any time. <br />Which makes all the mixup over who had him, and the statements made after all the more troubling.<br />Idk. Something is being left out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42838395791634911652015-07-21T07:19:21.124-04:002015-07-21T07:19:21.124-04:00Hi, anon - I need to catch up with the gone 45 min...Hi, anon - I need to catch up with the gone 45 minutes and not suspects AT THIS TIME update - I had wondered if maybe they were actually gone fifty minutes rather than gone fifty yards, because of the way the mother jumped in at that point. <br /><br />I recognise the terror you felt at losing your toddler in the store - I've had some of those hair-raising moments, too, so yes, I also try not to be too quick in judgement, but we can't help but compare what we either know, or would anticipate our own actions to be, to those of parents in cases such as this. I agree, the baby wouldn't have been let out of sight alone, at least not by the mother, so I don't think that's true. He must have been with grandpa, but I'm not willing to hold grandpa responsible. Does anyone know for sure which grandpa we are talking about? Is it the fit seventy year old, or the eighty-one year old with failing health? Links would help. We know it is a great grandpa to deOrr, and a grandpa to DeOrr's mother, Jessica. <br />Julietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-69657417561943305972015-07-21T06:28:35.206-04:002015-07-21T06:28:35.206-04:00I am trying to work out how what the parents said ...I am trying to work out how what the parents said can all be true - DeOrr was with grandpa, DeOrr went missing, they searched, they called, dad jumped into his truck, they were lucky and blessed - but also trying to think what they might have left out, what could fit with their words. What if dad had discovered the baby, either in the truck, or on the roadside - that would be real cause for him to feel blessed, and to consider his wife very, very lucky. Is it possible he found the baby, then in a moment of madness, decided to hide the baby for a while, because search and rescue were already on the way, and that would be way more interesting, for a day or two, than camping with grandpa? He could 'discover' or help others discover the baby within a day or two, while he was still alive. It seems possible, except that the baby has not been found, and the dad does come across as having care for the baby, so even if he had done that, he would not let it go on past the point at which the baby could still be found alive. He is so animated in describing search and rescue, though, it does make me wonder if it could have been too much excitement to miss, even if the baby had already been found. I can see why the authorities want to discourage speculation -it soon becomes crazy, but at the same time, it's crazy for them to be saying they do not suspect either parent of a missing toddler, when statistically a parent is most likely to have caused the disappearance.<br /><br />.Julietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10713139751621881252015-07-21T06:25:21.826-04:002015-07-21T06:25:21.826-04:00Just to clarify, I meant the parents saying anythi...Just to clarify, I meant the parents saying anything about being worried about wild animals up in the mountains, not LE. We live in the woods, and I spent much time in the woods as a child, making camps and exploring. But it wasn't until I had my children that I now feel anxious or scared when I go into them with the kids and without my husband, bc we do have bears and mountain lions and such. So I am always watching. I just really didn't hear them talk a lot about that, but that could be that they are too upset. The whole thing just isn't jiving with me. I want to believe them, but something is throwing me off here.<br /><br />Juliet you are right, it WOULD be an accident of course, no reason to cover up an accident. But are the other two children with the mother or father? I read in above comments that they might not have custody of the two children and that they live with their dad, but not sure if that's true. Could it have been an accident but they are currently trying to get custody back or worried they would never see the kids again so they covered up what happened to him as to not have to deal with the legal repercussions of being looked at as negligent? Even so they would have to pass polygraph, and if they both did then it couldn't have happened that way.<br />He could have got shut into the truck by accident, someone could have shut the door while he was in there like you said. Our toddler can't stand in the truck and reach for the door that's wide open and shut it closed as it takes too much strength, but if the door was close enough he might be able to. Covering for that? It's possible.<br /><br />Is it possible he saw him walk off while he was with mom and they were "exploring" and thought he would be fine until he caught up to him, only to find out he was gone/hurt?<br /><br />There's so many things. And nothing is too outlandish for me, keep bringing the ideas!!! Feeling "blessed" about making a call is just strange when it has no positive outcome of finding Deorr. Unless he expected search and rescue to find him quickly.<br /><br />When our oldest "C" was our youngests age (2 1/2, his birthday is 12/26) <br />We went to a local Lowe's store. My husband was chasing him and he was squealing with delight.<br />My husband went down one aisle to catch him at the end of our isle and scare him while the baby, in front of me about 15 feet was in the other. I watched him round the turn knowing my husband was right there, and in the 3 seconds it took for me to get to the end I ran straight into my husband who asked "Where is C?" Our son was gone. I thought he was joking, but he wasn't. He had vanished in a matter of seconds, when we looked.down every aisle and realized we could not find him I went into a SEVERE panic and just cried, while they shut and locked down the store. After 10 minutes went by, my husband was crying too. We were sure maybe someone had grabbed him. I have never experienced the level of terror I felt on that day again, I couldn't breathe. 15 minutes after we last saw him, a clerk comes up walking with him in their arms and hands him over, in which we both cried tears of joy and left everything we were going to buy that day in the cart and walked out. Where was he? <br />Hiding from his Daddy in a model kitchen cabinet. He shut the door and waited to be found not understanding we weren't at home and Daddy didn't know he was hiding. He came out when someone didn't come for him!!<br />Scariest day ever. I try not to be too judgemental, bc it has happened to us, but something isn't making sense. Something about his need to explain the truck, but could that be guilt surrounding something with the truck?? IdkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-78927138981932184272015-07-21T05:43:35.460-04:002015-07-21T05:43:35.460-04:00Ref this article. #1, there is zero evidence and ...<br />Ref this article. #1, there is zero evidence and the sheriff does not believe the child was abducted. Big red flag there. #2, the sheriff does not believe the child was overtaken and dragged off by any wild animal(s). Another red flag. #3, the sheriff states that nothing has been found that would indicate the child was lost to the fast moving but shallow and narrow small creek. Red flag. #4, the sheriff relates that the parents are not persons of interest AT THIS POINT. This does not mean they are not being looked at as persons of interest. Huge red flag. THEY ARE.<br /><br />#5, NOW it surfaces that the parents left the child unattended for 20 to 45 mins, claiming they thought he was being watched by his great granddaddy. WOAH! This is a big difference from the statement when we were told they took a stroll for ten mins. They were actually out of sight for up to 45 mins according to the sheriff, which leads me to believe they were gone from the campsite possibly even longer than 45 mins. They (both!) ARE suspects. If they aren't, they should be. <br /><br />#6, They return from this lengthy 'stroll', find the child missing and do not call for emergency assistance for another twenty mins while they call and "look" for him, already knowing the granddaddy had not seen him since before they left the campsite; while wasting more time trying to find a cell ph signal? Spare me! This child was missing way longer than an hour before emergency dispatch was called. <br /><br />Why would they even set up their campsite so close to a dangerous fast moving creek in the first place, and them with an active toddler? THEN not even making sure the child is taken care of prior to wandering off on their lengthy excursion? Perfect set up for a 'disappearing' child to mysteriously disappear.<br /><br />How far was their campsite from granddaddy's campsite, and did they actually expect the little boy to toddle over to his granddaddy's site all by himself just because they told him too? What parents in their right mind walks off and leaves their active toddler child unattended too in a dangerous place like this, knowing there is a fast moving creek just 120 feet behind them, without making certain the child is in the care of another adult? They don't. <br /><br />A 70-yr old man is not necessarily forgetful or slipping into senility. Plenty of 70-yr old (and older) seniors are in full control of their faculties. For many, their age, including executives of large corporations, are NOT on the verge of senility. This man knows if the child was left in his care; AND HE WASN'T.<br /><br />THEN, #7, we come back to the truck and the fact that the child's special trinkets plus his blankie was left inside the truck; those things the child never parts from; PLUS the fact that this same truck was probably THE truck that was seen by the store clerk WITH the child inside, and it becomes HIGHLY SUSPECT that both parents are involved in this toddlers' disappearance and the sheriff knows this. <br /><br />I am thinking that BOTH these parents are involved in little DeOrrs disappearance and that one or both know exactly where he is; was not left lying anywhere nearby nor was he dropped off anywhere still alive to wander around, suffer and die all by himself. I am coming to conclude that one of them killed him, whether accidentally or otherwise, and disposed of him; then tried to establish the perfect scenario when there isn't one. <br /><br />OR, was one or both of them into drugs and/or child porn? Could one of them have made prior arrangements and sold/traded the child? I'm not necessarily suspecting this to be the case; I just thought of it as a remote possibility and have heard of nothing that might lead to this; however, something IS remiss in their stories and the way the baby 'disappeared'. <br /><br />Sure, it 'sounds' good that the 'old' great granddaddy wasn't paying any attention to him so there lies the fault. Too good to be true, therefore it isn't.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-32229042497820772762015-07-21T04:29:10.258-04:002015-07-21T04:29:10.258-04:00What if, on discovering DeOrr missing, the mother ...What if, on discovering DeOrr missing, the mother makes the call, the dad rushes off to check DeOrr has not got into the truck, doesn't at first see him - decides to drive down the road where he knows he can get service, they both make their calls, then DeOrr wakes up, and dad realises he is in the truck? What's he going to do now, with search and rescue already on the way? Okay, too outlandish. Julietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39348909951670510582015-07-21T04:13:17.155-04:002015-07-21T04:13:17.155-04:00Or the other way round - if the father had found t...Or the other way round - if the father had found the baby, he would feel blessed, absolutely - and he'd have reason to say the mother was very, very lucky (that he'd found him). I wish that could be the case - it's very puzzling that he said those things in the circumstances.<br /><br />(Sorry if I am making too many posts and should try to put my thoughts more clearly into fewer.)Julietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-24716624907225507912015-07-21T03:56:41.324-04:002015-07-21T03:56:41.324-04:00Anonymous - if he had been run over it would be an...Anonymous - if he had been run over it would be an accident, and there would be no need to cover up an accident rather than call for help. In accidents, even if a child has died, parents will still call for medical help in the hope the child can still be resuscitated by those who have all the knowledge and resources - unless there is a reason not to, as in fear of signs of abuse being discovered. Is there any reason to believe that was the case? I think Peter, early on, found no likelihood of DeOrr being a victim of ongoing abuse.<br /><br />Is it possible he was accidentally shut into the truck by one of the adults? A door could've been left open while they were unloading camping gear, perhaps, and shut when they had got everything. If he had managed to climb in unnoticed, they perhaps would not expect that he could have done that, and may not have seen him if he was snuggled into his blanket, especially if they were not expecting him to be there. Like many little boys, he likely was fascinated by trucks, and by daddy's truck - he had a little Hotwheels truck in his pocket - maybe he was drawn towards the truck, either taking his blanket with him, or also because the blanket was in there. Something about the truck which makes the account begin there, rather than from the point at which they discovered DeOrr was missing, or the time immediately leading up to that - he talks about what happened after (maybe). The father spends a lot of time explaining why he was in the truck, but really it wasn't necessary for him to be in the the truck, and to drive away from the site in order to make the phone call as his wife got a little service from where she was, and as they were together, there was also no need for each of them to call, or for them even to delay a call for long enough to have separated, unless, say, neither had their phones on them, so mum went to their base, and dad's phone was in the truck.. I think, though, that he might have created a need to be in the truck, in order to justify driving away from where his son went missing. By the time he made the call, his wife was already on the other line - so he likely made the call within a minute or two of getting into the truck, neither had a problem getting through, so he's keen to explain that away - and his being blessed while he's just discovered his baby is gone - such an incomprehensible, bizarre thing to say. In my version of reality, he would only be able to consider himself blessed just then if he had discovered his son alive on the roadside - but if that's not it, what else could cause him to find himself blessed? His wife being able to call is not it, as he was confident he would be able to do that himself within a couple of minutes, it's too much language, overkill, for just having been able to place a call, when he knew he could do that, anyway. Why were they lucky, very lucky, and blessed? -the baby had not been found. I would expect him to say that if the mother had found the baby, and the father to be blessed by that knowledge. That can't be it though - so what was that about? Julietnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-43171603654907362682015-07-21T03:33:19.848-04:002015-07-21T03:33:19.848-04:00Searches of reservoir, wolf den yield no clues in ...<b>Searches of reservoir, wolf den yield no clues in hunt for Idaho toddler</b><br /><br />For the past 10 days, Lemhi County Sheriff Lynn Bowerman and his deputies have scoured the rugged terrain surrounding a remote Idaho campsite for any sign of a missing 2 year-old boy -- using sonar imaging equipment to probe a nearby reservoir and searching a wolf den for any trace of the child.<br /><br />As of Monday, authorities said they have no clue where Deorr Kunz could be, after the Idaho Falls toddler disappeared July 10 from a campsite near the Timber Creek Reservoir in Leodore where he was staying with his parents, great-grandfather and another adult.<br /><br />"We've literally torn that country apart and found absolutely not one clue," Bowerman told FoxNews.com.<br /><br />"We conducted an exhaustive search of the area, which included eight agencies, multiple dog search groups and well over 100 people," he said.<br /><br />At 2:30 p.m. on July 10, the child's 25-year-old mother, Jessica Mitchell, called 911 from the campsite to report her son missing. Mitchell and the boy's father, Deorr Kunz Sr., said they left their son with his great-grandfather while they went off to explore. The great-grandfather believed the boy was with his parents, according to police.<br /><br />What happened during the 20 to 45 minutes the child was alone is a mystery to authorities, said Bowerman, who noted "all possibilities" are being investigated.<br /><br />At 2:30 p.m. on July 10, the child's 25-year-old mother, Jessica Mitchell, called 911 from the campsite to report her son missing. Mitchell and the boy's father, Deorr Kunz Sr., said they left their son with his great-grandfather while they went off to explore. The great-grandfather believed the boy was with his parents, according to police.<br /><br />The family's campsite sat approximately 40 yards from a fast-moving creek -- four to six feet in width and about a foot deep -- that spills into the Timber Creek Reservoir, a half mile from where the toddler was last seen.<br /><br />Cadaver dogs led law enforcement directly to the reservoir but Bowerman said unrelated cremated remains dumped into the water during the search likely prompted the canines' interest. A search of the reservoir using advanced sonar equipment yielded nothing, he said. <br /><br />Over the weekend, the sheriff and his deputies carefully examined a nearby wolf den but found not a single clue -- no remnant of clothing or sign the boy had been dragged from the campsite. <br /><br />"We've got a pack of wolves in there -- about 15 of them," Bowerman said. "We actually chased one out the day before yesterday." <br /><br />The boy's parents, meanwhile, have volunteered to take polygraph tests after being interviewed <b>and having their vehicles examined by police</b>. The two have said they believe their child was abducted.<br /><br /><b>"I don't look at them as suspects at <i>this point in time,</i></b>" the sheriff noted. <br /><br />This is the first time i have heard LE use this type of language.<br /><br />"They want to believe he's abducted because that would make him still alive."<br /><br />Bowerman, however, said he's not convinced of an abduction, noting that no other campers were seen or heard in the area at the time of the disappearance. He also described the terrain as "steep and rugged" and said vehicles can reach the site but "the road is extremely rough."<br /><br /><b>"We don't have any evidence that somebody kidnapped this child,</b>" he said.<br /><br />Still, the Lemhi County Sheriff's department has received tips from Canada to southern California to New York reporting a possible sighting of the child.<br /><br />http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/20/searches-reservoir-wolf-den-yield-no-clues-in-hunt-for-idaho-toddler/John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71968833196919177862015-07-21T03:28:55.966-04:002015-07-21T03:28:55.966-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65236628841329728682015-07-21T00:37:32.970-04:002015-07-21T00:37:32.970-04:00The truck, the truck, the truck.
Is it possible th...The truck, the truck, the truck.<br />Is it possible that they were gone but a few minutes, whatever, come back, notice him missing, Dad gets in the truck to look for service and accidentally backs him over?<br />Something keeps bringing me back to the truck. Not sure if he could get into the truck and close the door, as we have a toddler apprx. The same age and he's incredibly strong but not strong enough or tall enough to shut the door to our full sized F150.<br />I'm troubled by his parents thinking this was an abduction, but not giving any merit to a clerk seeing him at a store in a black truck (only BC DAD has a black truck), seems to me that they are explaining why it could have been Dad instead of looking into a stranger abduction, and if my toddler was missing I would want to look at all avenues.<br />Especially troubling that they are saying they don't think he's in the mountains anymore.<br />Why? A wild animal could have been watching in the shadows since they got their and dragged him off, but I didn't hear anyone bring that up and that and the reservoir would be my number one worry.<br />Didn't Casey Anthony's mother, after sending Tim Miller and Texas Equisearch away, say "We don't think Kaylee is in the woods or anything."??<br />the last troubling thing is that every Facebook picture on their page I have seen Deorr in with his father he is bawling his eyes out. Pics with mom he's smiling.<br />That just bothers me.<br />My toddler is a strong willed little one, but also very perceptive like his father, and he does not like many people outside of our immediate family and my maternal family. This includes my husbands family, who he doesn't see often. When he does, it's almost like he is sensitive that they are not comfortable around him (they don't understand what I call the terrible twos) which makes him uncomfortable and he cries even more.<br />Just somethings that are concerning to me- but I am worried that either little Deorr was hurt on his way back from the store (he was crying and dad tried to placate him with candy which didn't work) and Dad, being gone all the time has no idea how to handle him and hurt him, or in the "dead panic" of it all they didn't see him underneath the truck, behind the truck, etc. and had ran over him.<br />Something about the truck and his need to explain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com