tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post8567085125200750856..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Derek Norris Accused of Domestic Violence Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger62125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39384885916791645092017-06-22T08:08:47.075-04:002017-06-22T08:08:47.075-04:00The issue here is truth versus deception.
It is ...The issue here is truth versus deception. <br /><br />It is not morality.<br />It is not size. <br />It is not strength<br />It is not the roles of men and women<br />It is not personal experience in D/V<br />It is not relationships.<br />There is no need to condemn assault, nor need to justify. <br /><br /><br />These are all elements outside the boundary of the exercise. <br /><br />The comments are helpful and show how training must overcome personal projection and opinion. Analysts seek the truth, even if the subject is disagreeable. We seek truth even if motive is illicit or provocative. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-11592474349260401242017-06-21T13:27:14.718-04:002017-06-21T13:27:14.718-04:00Trump should order the military to kill Kim Jong-U...Trump should order the military to kill Kim Jong-UN....the North Korean people would be thrilled & I am sure most of the North Korean army would be thrilled too considering their lives suck too & they are not even fed. Free the prisoners, carpet bomb the concentration camps, do some food drops. Let the country see how great it feels to eat. They will gladly adopt a different system...the N Korean people HATE living in that system. It would be easy, a mass celebration. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15216636748396074712017-06-21T13:16:00.954-04:002017-06-21T13:16:00.954-04:00Otto had been in a coma for a year. No way was th...Otto had been in a coma for a year. No way was that a heart attack. They prob gave him a pill with some kind of "chemical weapon" in it that caused that extensive damage. Or gassed him w a chemical weapon. Prob used him as a guinea pig and also to flex their muscles to the world like "try to figure out what we did to him haha". <br />I will lose a lot of respect for Trump if he doesnt punish N Korea for doing that to Otto.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-56684409374602402482017-06-21T10:21:52.760-04:002017-06-21T10:21:52.760-04:00@12:50, Im not buying the heart attack theory. Th...@12:50, Im not buying the heart attack theory. They are saying oxygen deprivation to the brain...how does that lead them to conclude heart attack? They are saying massive areas of missing brain tissue. Again, that's not from a heart attack. Have you ever heard of a 22 yr old ending up in a state like that from a "heart attack"? Why would he have even had a "heart attack"?<br />The parents, understandably, prob dont want to know what was done to him.<br />My guess: They surgically did something to his brain. How was he kept alive all that time over there if he had been been vegatstive for any length of time? He looks like he had been eating. Any bed sores? <br />Either that or they gave him pills that they have developed that would cause that kind of damage. Look at the leakage in their language (botulism, sleeping pill). "Sleeping pill" could be this damage was caused by pills they have developed OR sleeping pill could be leakage he was put under anasthesia to operate on his brain to cause the damage. <br />The world does not know many things that go on in North Korea. We should have freed their prisoners & carpet bombed their concentration camps a long time ago. Suposedly North Korea is "powerless" hermit kingdom, yet everyone seems petrified to strike at them militarily. What I think: There is a reason their totalitarian regime has far outlasted any other--usually by their very nature they can not last long. I don't know what it is, but apparently the world is afraid of North Korea, the powerless hermit kingdom....The world turns a blind eye to their concentration camps. Why? If they are powerless why didnt we bomb them to get Otto back? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-5200847764358940162017-06-21T00:50:27.961-04:002017-06-21T00:50:27.961-04:00Anonymous at 1:15 PM, Otto was not walking when he...Anonymous at 1:15 PM, Otto was not walking when he returned to the US. He was in a coma. "Unresponsive wakefulness" is a politically correct way of saying a vegetative state. It was determined this was caused by brain damage from respiratory arrest. He did not show signs of having had broken/healing bones or damage to his skull. <br /><br />Causes of respiratory arrest could be overdose, an infection such as pneumonia, a stroke, inhaling dangerous fumes, etc. He was no doubt abused and this likely led to his condition. He was sent home to die. His family had to make a decision whether to continue his care or to let him pass. Obviously they decided letting him linger was no way of life for a once energetic, life loving young man who held so much promise. <br /><br />The family chose not to do an autopsy. Maybe they decided he had been through enough? Or maybe the doctors gave them a theory on the cause of death and they were comfortable with that. Hopefully the medical examiner can determine what happened and at least give them a little bit of closure.<br /><br />Violetnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-67143998678240740312017-06-20T18:52:46.687-04:002017-06-20T18:52:46.687-04:00Oh - I assumed they were married, probably because...Oh - I assumed they were married, probably because they had been together for so long - though is it usual to call a kitchen island 'ours' - iDK. <br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-11454112227572045892017-06-20T17:44:16.979-04:002017-06-20T17:44:16.979-04:00I can't believe US companies do trips through ...I can't believe US companies do trips through North Korea. That place is WAY too dangerous--they should know that!!! I have NO IDEA why we dont free all the generations of prisoners and then carpet bomb the concentration camps over there. Kim Jong-Un HAS NO POWER when faced with actual military might. SO STUPID we let him have his fake rulership!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-4212139120221323792017-06-20T15:11:59.210-04:002017-06-20T15:11:59.210-04:00I can only repeat that men are allowed to hold bac...I can only repeat that men are allowed to hold back women, and vice versa. Or remove them from an unwanted situation. It is called self defense. If I were to hit my husband, he would be allowed to stop me, by taking my hands or removing me.<br /><br />Likewise, if he hit me, I would be allowed to try to stop him.<br /><br /><br />Luckily, after thirty years of marriage, that has never been an issue :)<br /><br />I am from Europe, but I hope the law in USA protects men and women who are being assaulted.Lettice Knollysnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-57364385994537065872017-06-20T13:15:04.829-04:002017-06-20T13:15:04.829-04:00Off Topic: What did North Korea do to that colleg...Off Topic: What did North Korea do to that college kid? He was walking right (when he got back to US)? I read he was "in a state of unresponsive wakefulness & had suffered a severe neurological injury of unknown origin". What could that possibly be? Head injury? Lobotomy (wouldnt they have seen a scar)? Shellshock?<br />I just think it's so weird bc that is not even a diagnosis--"unresponsive wakefulness"? Are they not the least bit curious to figure out what exactly happened to him? It is really surprising too bc he was young & healthy...even if he was tortured/traumatized, how did that turn a young person into a non responsive zombie who then DIED!!! I feel like they must have lobotomies him. I feel like we are not being told the truth about what happened to him. Any thoughts? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-46589990612931753422017-06-20T08:16:29.225-04:002017-06-20T08:16:29.225-04:00Brian Delaney, I agree, she definitely doesn't...Brian Delaney, I agree, she definitely doesn't look like she's suffering in her post<br /><br />https://www.instagram.com/p/BU_DVRbBUqh/?hl=en<br /><br />robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-52084204875391257822017-06-20T08:10:23.254-04:002017-06-20T08:10:23.254-04:00I find the fact that she felt the need to post thi...I find the fact that she felt the need to post this on social media the biggest problem. If you've been attacked, call 911, pack up and leave, but the need to tell her story to the masses on social media, ummm, seems like she has an agenda. <br />I think she wants out, but with a pocket full of money. they are not yet married, so maybe she is not entitled to it? But getting the story out there, maybe he'll be willing to buy her off to shut her up?<br />If he wanted another woman, why not just tell her, it's over, get out.robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-49184293526392051622017-06-20T04:38:03.713-04:002017-06-20T04:38:03.713-04:00There is so much omitted from her account.
I thin...There is so much omitted from her account.<br /><br />I think the key is as Peter hints at above that her account is fundamentally unreliable.<br /><br />The icing on the cake for me is that she posted this "story" with a picture of her lying on a bed in her underwear reading a book entitled Watching Baseball Smarter" and smiling. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09797683609303173765noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39003036966162804962017-06-19T14:06:49.381-04:002017-06-19T14:06:49.381-04:00Some interesting comments.
The balance of an acc...Some interesting comments. <br /><br />The balance of an account is a reliability issue; not so much "truthful."<br /><br />25/50/25 suggests reliability in an account, but when motive shifts, we see this move to an area of "unreliable."<br /><br />Unreliable does not always mean deceptive, just as weakness can be appropriate or inappropriate. <br /><br />More to follow....I will probably put the analysis in a new article. I am working on some Employment Analysis articles, including narcissism in language and the language of thievery. <br /><br />Even for those who do not train, this is useful as gauging co workers, superiors, etc. (it's always relevant in relationships). <br /><br />By the way, this comment of mine is also a hint. :)<br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-5712366917147176632017-06-19T13:00:45.454-04:002017-06-19T13:00:45.454-04:00"Derek approached me from behind and put me i...<i>"Derek approached me from behind and put me in a choke hold."</i><br /><br />Put me in a choke hold is somewhat passive. She doesn't say "he choked me". Therefore, we can not say it for her. <br /><br /><br /><i>"I threw the phone onto the kitchen island and <b>tried</b> to get away."</i><br /><br />Tried means attempt but fail. She should still be with Derek and not away from him at this point.<br /><br /><br /><i>"DEREK <b>THEN</b> GRABBED ME BY THE BACK OF MY HAIR <b>TO PULL ME BACK TO HIM</b>."</i><br /><br />There is something missing before Derek "then" pulled her back to him. First she "tried" to get away. "Then" she was away when he grabbed her to pull her back. Missing information. Also, she relays why Derek pulled her back to him.<br /><br /><br /><i>"HE <b>EVENTUALLY</b> LET GO AND AS I TURNED AROUND HE GRABBED ME BY MY UPPER ARMS SO I COULDN’T LEAVE AS HE TRIED TO DRUNKENLY EXPLAIN THAT HE WASN’T TALKING TO ANOTHER FEMALE."</i><br /><br />There is more passing time for Derek to "Eventually" let her go, after grabbing "the back of" her hair to pull her back to him. How long did he grab her? What is "the back of her hair"? Did he grab her head? Did he grab her hair? Her description seems intentionally noncommittal. <br /><br /><br /><i>"I REMEMBER CALLING DEREK’S MOM BAWLING MY EYES OUT THINKING “I HAD SOMETHING WRONG WITH ME” AND THAT IS WHY DEREK AND I HAD ISSUES. BELIEVE ME, I STRUGGLED WITH ANXIETY, DEPRESSION AND AN EATING DISORDER. I DID AND STILL DO HAVE THINGS WRONG WITH ME. <br />BUT, NOTHING WILL EVER BE SO WRONG WITH ME THAT I DESERVED TO BE TREATED IN SUCH A WAY. <b>EVEN AFTER DEREK HAD LAID HIS HANDS ON ME IN SUCH AN AGGRESSIVE WAY</b>, I WANTED TO DO WHATEVER I COULD TO FIX US, TO MAKE THINGS BETTER.</i><br /><br />She chooses "aggressive" to describe how he "laid his hands" on her. She does not say "violent" or "injurious"; therefore we can not say it for her.<br /><br /><br /><i>BUT THEY WEREN’T, AND I HAD WORDS HURT ME AND <b>HIS TOUCH HURT ME.</b></i><br /><br />Again, she uses the soft word "touch" as what hurt her. She does not say "attack" or "abuse"; therefore we can not say it for her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-85316523488280649182017-06-19T10:52:57.285-04:002017-06-19T10:52:57.285-04:00Truthful accounts percentages are normally in the ...Truthful accounts percentages are normally in the region of 25%:50%:25%. The percentages for Kirsten’s account are approx.. 40%: 20% 40%<br /> <br />Expected vs unexpected language: For a serious case of domestic abuse I would expect some of the following:<br /> <br />Mental abuse: he constantly criticised me, he belittled me, he undermined me<br />Physical abuse: he shouted at me, he roared at me, he hurt me, he grabbed me, he intimidated me etc, bruises, pain….<br /> <br />There is no anger or description of any dialogue between them.<br /> <br />None of this language is present in the account.<br /> <br />She describes the domestic violence as:<br />“My experience” x 4<br />“This situation”<br />“With those interactions”<br /> <br />Not what we would expect<br /> <br />Her priorities are<br />I HOPE MULTIPLE WOMEN CAN READ THIS AND GET OUT OF<br />(1) CONTROLLING SITUATIONS<br />(2) ABUSIVE SITUATIONS<br />(3) MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY DRAINING SITUATIONS.<br /> <br />She does not specifically state “violent situations”.<br /> <br />Her account:<br /> <br />He was drinking and she wanted to go to bed. There appears to have been an argument at this point due to the repeated “as he was drinking” but she does not state that there was an argument. Missing information.<br />“I’m not sure how long it had been” – confirming something in the negative (sensitivity).<br />A female’s voice “stating”. Why stating , why not saying ?<br />I took the phone – took indicates it was not given. It is likely she grabbed the phone from his hand and she is using minimizing language.<br />She “walked up our stairs” and “approached our kitchen island” –using the verbs “walked” and “approached” seems to be minimizing language as it would appear that this was in the middle of a heated argument although she does not state that this was the case – why not ?<br />“I approached our kitchen island with the phone in my hand “ - why the need to tell us she had the phone in her hand. She had already told us that she took the phone “to try to get this girl to talk to me”. Why the need to explain ?<br />“Derek approached me from behind and put me in a choke hold” – approached seems to be minimizing language again – is she story telling - “and put me in a choke hold” – we would expect to hear something here about how she couldn’t breath, how she panicked, how painful this was and later the after affects(eg. a sore neck etc). This is a big strong man. Was he simply reaching over her to try to get the phone back in the middle of this argument. It appears she may have been running away with the phone and he was asking for it back and she wouldn’t give it. Some kind of tussle ensued.<br />She plays the innocent here “I thought he wanted the phone”<br />“I threw the phone on the (not ours anymore) kitchen island and tried to get away”<br />“Derek then grabbed me by the back of my hair to pull me back to him” - why the explanation ?<br />He eventually let go and as I turned around he grabbed me by my upper arms so I couldn’t leave as he tried to drunkenly explain….”. She does not say that this grabbing caused any her pain (or later bruising) She used the same verb grabbed to describe when she gets her own phone and her suitcase. Eventually suggests missing information – she doesn’t say she begged him to let go or she struggled.<br />After this I tried to go to our bedroom….” - from this point on it appears he is trying to convince her to stay or to resolve the issues. Again there is missing information such as what was said by either party.<br /> <br />Summary: There are some signs of deception. She over explains her actions whilst omitting expected information. She tries to justify her part in the argument though she never once actually states that there was an argument –why not ?<br /> <br />Norris statement does not contain a reliable denial and he uses the dreaded “never”. However this may have been worded by his solicitor and he is not likely to admit that he got drunk and had an argument with his partner because he appeared to be cheating.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09797683609303173765noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-49540430870775559532017-06-18T21:15:42.278-04:002017-06-18T21:15:42.278-04:00Im not sure she is lying. She may be being a litt...Im not sure she is lying. She may be being a little overdramatic, but that's just me...if a guy put me a headlock and pulled my hair it would just blur in with all the violence Ive experienced in my life & I doubt it would give me nightmares, but I think for someone else it could be disturbing...a headlock is kind of scary, borderline strangling...it's definitely not comforting. Was he squeezing her neck interfering with breathing? That is scary. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-3761889847523420582017-06-18T21:08:52.953-04:002017-06-18T21:08:52.953-04:00Also, and this is just general info, when you get ...Also, and this is just general info, when you get a perp attacking the neck, head or hair, this is a red flag of a more dangerous perp. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-87377163978209310552017-06-18T21:05:27.464-04:002017-06-18T21:05:27.464-04:00Tania, that is true, it is usually women who go fo...Tania, that is true, it is usually women who go for the hair, especially black women. One exception though: One often reads of male abusers grabbing, dragging, pulling their abused partner by the hair.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-58406512042847435882017-06-18T20:36:50.481-04:002017-06-18T20:36:50.481-04:00Regarding the pulling by her hair.
It is usually a...Regarding the pulling by her hair.<br />It is usually a woman thing that when they fight, they grab and pull at each others hair.<br />I don't see men going for the hair regardless of length.<br /><br />I wonder if women go for it as it is regarded as a sign of beauty, a woman's pride and joy and by pulling it they are destroying it and by default her beauty.<br /><br />It is often seen with black women in cat fights where they pull and tear at each others hair as they are usually wearing a wig or weave and by pulling the fake hair off, the real hair is revealed and it is often not that pretty to look at what with poor perming and short length.<br /><br />Also when hair is pulled out in chunks it takes a long time to grow back and may result in the woman having to have a major haircut/restyle to hide the damage.<br />She is marked until it grows out or she wears a wig/weave.Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-18979510056331990242017-06-18T20:33:19.252-04:002017-06-18T20:33:19.252-04:00AS THIS SITUATION IS ALL TOO COMMON IN THE WORLD, ...AS THIS SITUATION IS ALL TOO COMMON IN THE WORLD, NOT JUST THE WORLD OF SPORTS, BUT THE WORLD. A PERSON WHO IS ABUSIVE DOES NOT REALIZE THEY ARE, OR THINK THEY ARE. ESPECIALLY, WHEN THE PEOPLE, FANS, FAMILY AND FRIENDS GLORIFY THE PERSON FOR A SKILL THEY SPEND THEIR LIFE PERFECTING. AS I AM WAITING TO HAVE MY FORMAL MEETING WITH THE COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, THE ONLY THING I CAN DO TO CHANNEL MY RACING HEART AND SHAKING HANDS IS TO WRITE OUT MY EXPERIENCE<br /><br />—-<br /><br />Some more thoughts. <br /><br />AS THIS SITUATION IS ALL TOO COMMON IN THE WORLD, NOT JUST THE WORLD OF SPORTS, BUT THE WORLD. <br />That is major generalisation. I find it questionable why she says all that, as if she is needs to align herself with others, yet so vaguely, rather than giving her account plainly. It is as if she needs to ‘borrow’ credibility somehow - ‘situation’ and ‘experience’ sound weak and unconvincing in context. I find those to be quite relaxed words, and would expect her to say ‘horrendous experience’ or ‘intolerable situation’ at least. <br /><br /><br />A PERSON WHO IS ABUSIVE DOES NOT REALIZE THEY ARE, OR THINK THEY ARE. <br />She is speaking of ‘a person’ as though that could be her husband or anyone in the world (of sport), yet so far does not properly identify him. At the same time it is not as if she is trying to conceal his identity - why doesn’t she just say plainly who it is she is referring to? I wondered if she could maybe have been unintentionally referring to herself? (Why later)<br /><br />ESPECIALLY, WHEN THE PEOPLE, FANS, FAMILY AND FRIENDS GLORIFY THE PERSON FOR A SKILL THEY SPEND THEIR LIFE PERFECTING<br /><br />I don’t understand the logic there - if he is made vain in his professional life by praise, how would that cause him to ‘not realize’ he was abusive towards his wife? She still doesn’t name her husband as the abusive person. She is unhappy that his priority is his sport -and, I think, with the attention it brings him. I think that because she used ‘glorify’ - more usually reserved for God - she disapproves of him being glorified by fans, family and friends. <br /><br />So - she has referred to ‘a person’ non-specific, then leaps into the next sentence with herself - ‘AS I AM WAITING..’ as she is the only person she has actually introduced and identified thus far, I wonder is she connecting ‘a person who is abusive’ with herself? Is it that ‘a person’ often means the speaker is thinking of him or herself? Is it sensitive that she says ‘a person does not realize’ - if so, in relation to whom is that sensitive? I think to herself. <br /><br />AS I AM WAITING TO HAVE MY FORMAL MEETING WITH THE COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, THE ONLY THING I CAN DO TO CHANNEL MY RACING HEART AND SHAKING HANDS IS TO WRITE OUT MY EXPERIENCE<br /><br />Not really - she could have gone for a walk, phoned a friend, taken a nap, and not had a ‘formal’ meeting. She chose to publicise their break-up and to tarnish his professional image in the process. Is the fact it was a ‘formal’ meeting important to her? <br /><br />‘Racing heart and shaking hands’ - could be as much due to excitement as to nervousness.<br /><br />I think she spins out what she is saying in an attempt to create the impression that she is reluctant to name and shop him, when she is not reluctant. <br /><br />---<br /><br />That’s as far as I have got today.<br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-73374230124137654562017-06-18T18:32:28.905-04:002017-06-18T18:32:28.905-04:00Peter, It does make sense, thank you for explainin...Peter, It does make sense, thank you for explaining, it seems more my misinterpretation, I dont think you need to change the analysis. I understand what you are saying.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7225830053016356952017-06-18T17:58:31.141-04:002017-06-18T17:58:31.141-04:00I see what you mean, that is why I thought misunde...I see what you mean, that is why I thought misunderstanding or misinterpretation. <br /><br />She does not indicate that she knows him, but the familiarity is strictly to their interaction. Perhaps it was me who should have made this clearer. <br /><br />She uses language that tells us that there is "familiarity" within the statement; not that she knows him, but that they had two way communication. This is not the language of a stranger attacker, but of a stranger of whom there is such interaction that she can make judgement on his character. <br /><br />I should have made it clearer. She did not know the man she got into a fight with, but became familiar with him due to communication. <br /><br />Does that make sense? Otherwise, I will add it to the analysis. I do not want to leave the impression that she knew him before this night. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-75832644287397226502017-06-18T16:51:11.680-04:002017-06-18T16:51:11.680-04:00Hi Peter, I don't know if I may have misinterp...Hi Peter, I don't know if I may have misinterpreted...I thought she had some familiarity with her attacker...within your analysis you wrote<br /><br />"When a person attacks another, the attacker's qualities are not in question nor in need of address: he is an attacker and this, alone, tells his character. <br /><br />The she feels it necessary to visit his characteristics tells us that there was interaction between them that she is not disclosing but that she expected better behavior from him. <br /><br />This is not consistent with an unknown attacker. "<br /><br />I just get the feeling also by her use of phrases such as " the man then came back for more" it sounds like maybe there is familiarity of some kind with him, but maybe not.<br />I don't know...the story is very strange.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-1152775185323439282017-06-18T16:26:10.674-04:002017-06-18T16:26:10.674-04:00You can restrain someone from assaulting you. It...You can restrain someone from assaulting you. It is self defense. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-90455101611629711912017-06-18T16:22:38.719-04:002017-06-18T16:22:38.719-04:00Anonymous said...
Peter determined Bree was famili...Anonymous said...<br />Peter determined Bree was familiar with her attacker, therefore the whole bit about the 3 random strangers inflicting the violence CANT BE TRUE. Did she talk to 3 random strangers? Sure. Were they the attackers? No.<br />June 18, 2017 at 2:55 PM <br /><br /><br />Where did I determine that the subject was familiar with her attacker?<br /><br />I think you may be misinterpreting my words here. double check and let me know. <br /><br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.com