tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post8890396373181220861..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Why It's Called "Sensitivity"Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-68505243004499653852013-01-25T23:56:33.599-05:002013-01-25T23:56:33.599-05:00This was a great read before ending the night...th...This was a great read before ending the night...thank you. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-59066815148956506272013-01-25T23:54:40.003-05:002013-01-25T23:54:40.003-05:00LOL!!! LOL!!! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15656335077923456882013-01-25T16:34:57.972-05:002013-01-25T16:34:57.972-05:00OT re Casey Anthony's convictions reduced from...OT re Casey Anthony's convictions reduced from 4 to 2: Here is a link to the actual Florida Fifth District Court's opinion: http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2013/012113/5D11-2357.op.pdfKatprintnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-70847470916482506072013-01-25T16:14:06.096-05:002013-01-25T16:14:06.096-05:00This is a good post for me. I realize how easy it ...This is a good post for me. I realize how easy it is for me to equate sensitive with deceptive. Skepticalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-54950608298124491652013-01-25T16:03:21.841-05:002013-01-25T16:03:21.841-05:00Looks like Hobnob beat me to this, but here is the...Looks like Hobnob beat me to this, but here is the CNN link to the story on the 5th Circuit reversing two convictions. Not totally clear from the story what the deal is but it looks like maybe some of the convictions may have been lesser includeds of the other two so that two of them violated double jeopardy? Haven't read the ruling...<br /><br />http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/25/justice/anthony-convictions-overturned/index.html?hpt=hp_t3Ivynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-75697175801528343032013-01-25T15:03:06.045-05:002013-01-25T15:03:06.045-05:00Peter I am confused.
Example: A man walks into h...Peter I am confused. <br />Example: A man walks into his wife's office and asks his wife's boss,<br /><br />"You're sleeping with my wife?" in anger in his voice. <br />The boss says, "Excuse me?"<br />-- <br />This is not a question but an accusation is it not? A husband to enter his wife's work place, to enter her bosses office unannounced " You're Sleeping with my Wife" - I too would reply with excuse me, myself not the boss, as it is written, this a person blindsided, a man, husband of an employee, barges into the bosses office and ..blurts. I too would be stunned, " Excuse me" where the hell did this guy come from? <br /><br />Add the word " ARE" to it, then it becomes personal, and a question directed, ARE YOU sleeping with my wife?! <br /><br />2nd Scenario: The married man was at lunch with the boss and were discussing the same topic, when he finally asked the question, "You're sleeping with my wife?"<br /><br />*this a totally different setting as it is what is being discussed, the topic of infidelity. It is sensitive to both individuals. As they are wagering upon each others saids. The words to come out, <br />" You're Sleeping with my wife" is<br />sensitive to the Husband first, yes, sensitive to the boss, as well. They are putting their cards on the table so to speak. Who is the connector, " the wife/ female employee" within this discussion is the why, of the discussion. <br /><br />As you have followed up with written reasons of why. Yes, it is that the boss has endearment felt * to the wife, that it is known to the husband, that boundaries have been crossed (doesn't mean cheating has occurred - although cheating comes in many forms) The pretense is alive, by the Husbands own intuition. Husband to note it on his own, by how his wife acts, reacts, when she speaks about her boss. <br /><br />This makes total sense to me: <br />A. Because he is sleeping with the man's wife. * does not mean he and she are having sex, they can be in a tango, emotionally, mentally, which is alike " the act". The act never to commence. <br /><br />B. Because he hasn't slept with the man's wife, but has been flirting with her, in hopes of<br />C. Because he wants to, but didn't think it was evident to anyone but himself (yes, this happens)<br />---<br />Sticky yes. Working in offices for 11 years, I have seen with my own eyes, relationships between men and women single and married. <br />My younger years, propositions to come from my bosses, that I did not take the bait, thank god. Myself in my 20's, they much older, married, they to pull me aside and offer me ( practically anything everything) in exchange for yes, Sex. My reaction, thank you but no thank you, they to retreat. Move on to the next new girl? No, I believe they found in me a hunger to succeed, that I would be vulnerable to their offerings. Funny how the single men who were my bosses, never approached me this way. Only the married ones. Sensitive to me, yes. <br /><br />Human nature, we want what we cannot have? willing to risk it all? depends on the character, I guess, of the person propositioned. Not so much on the proposition-er, as they have told you to your face, exactly who they are. A person who feels they have nothing to lose. She/He will either garner a Yes or a No. It's a 50/50 risk. They the boss, willing to take, as they are at the top of the food chain ' Boss'.Vitahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10394778721572395732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-38016548242519718402013-01-25T15:02:41.760-05:002013-01-25T15:02:41.760-05:00I like this one.
It seems like as the conversatio...I like this one.<br /><br />It seems like as the conversation continues, if there are a number of other clues, a person could possibly come to a conclusion, but based on this one response alone, one must realize it is only an area of sensitivity. <br /><br />It makes a lot of sense to ask to hear the question again if someone asks a bizarre and unexpected question. Otherwise, a person might start answering it and find they had, indeed, heard the person's question wrong, and that could make for an awkward moment. Then the first person could be thinking "why would you think I would ask if you are sleeping with my wife?!" hehLisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71942088796297651372013-01-25T15:01:33.041-05:002013-01-25T15:01:33.041-05:00I thought of a couple more possibilities why the b...<br />I thought of a couple more possibilities why the boss might be sensitive about that question... <br /><br />- he's sleeping with someone else's wife. <br />- he thinks the mans wife is too ugly to sleep with<br />- he's unable to have sex<br /><br />... etc.<br /><br />Thank you for the important reminder. Mainahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-11816500790850747522013-01-25T14:27:03.639-05:002013-01-25T14:27:03.639-05:00OFF TOPIC
Court sets aside 2 of Casey Anthony'...OFF TOPIC<br /><br /><b>Court sets aside 2 of Casey Anthony's convictions</b> <br /><br />ORLANDO, Fla. – Florida appellate court has set aside two of the four convictions Casey Anthony faced for lying to detectives during the investigation into her missing 2-year-old daughter.<br /><br />Judges on the 5th District Court of Appeals agreed with Anthony's attorneys Friday that two of the charges constituted double jeopardy, or being convicted more than once for the same crime.<br /><br />The judges, however, ruled that the trial court was correct to allow her statements to detectives to be used during her murder trial.<br /><br />Anthony's attorneys had argued that she was in police custody at the time and hadn't been read her Miranda rights.<br /><br />Anthony was acquitted of killing Caylee in 2011. Jurors convicted her of four counts of lying to detectives, and her attorneys appealed those convictions.<br /><br /><br /><br />Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/25/court-sets-aside-2-casey-anthony-convictions/#ixzz2J17VKZdFTania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-59700020041686553092013-01-25T13:57:21.485-05:002013-01-25T13:57:21.485-05:00As a person with some loss of hearing, who hasn...As a person with some loss of hearing, who hasn't yet bothered to get the hearing aid that was prescribed for me, I often respond, "What?" or "Excuse me? I didn't hear what you said." I am just as likely to say that in response to my husband asking me if I'd like to go out for dinner or to my son telling me that his homework is finished or any other non-sensitive question/remark, as I would be to something sensitive. OTOH, when my son asked me where I had put everyone's Christmas presents, I responded by asking him, "Why do you need to know?" Which is intentionally answering a question with a question and reflects my sensitivity that I didn't want him to know where I had put the presents so I wasn't going to truthfully answer that question.Katprintnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28104881726639006502013-01-25T12:36:09.516-05:002013-01-25T12:36:09.516-05:00You must be reading some other blogs where untrain...You must be reading some other blogs where untrained SA followers are running amok. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com