tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post8928623457118594413..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Katelyn Markham 911 Call Analysis Report Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger110125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-51365491808814630322020-10-17T17:29:16.392-04:002020-10-17T17:29:16.392-04:00What I don't get is if she was at home by hers...What I don't get is if she was at home by herself how does he know so much detail. He would have at least been on the phone to her. He also mentions the fact the car is there before saying he is just on his way and then says the car is still their again. That to me suggests he was at the house. Also when she was at home how can he know for sure that's what she was doing. She might do that normally but she could have changed it slightly. If he was on the phone to her why hide it and if you were at the house. She is his fiancee why need to hide it unless there is more to it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08276259178643192751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42316435325926813172016-06-26T06:42:23.483-04:002016-06-26T06:42:23.483-04:00Thats why i wonder if phone records and where it p...Thats why i wonder if phone records and where it pinged when sending messages (picture) was looked intoHabundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-40249182565325449312016-06-26T06:24:55.185-04:002016-06-26T06:24:55.185-04:00LE is to pride? They probably mean....LE is to ARO...LE is to pride? They probably mean....LE is to AROGANT! Like many cops are out there....wanting to be the one figuring out the case so they can get promotion to higher functions....thats how it goes at police....so give away a case would mean no promotion to better funtionHabundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-45485947156261326922016-06-26T06:18:09.955-04:002016-06-26T06:18:09.955-04:00Guess those LE people didnt got proper scholing ab...Guess those LE people didnt got proper scholing about how to read statements, i totaly agree on you at seeing so much deception in this statement of hisHabundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7643404973119940172016-06-26T06:05:31.730-04:002016-06-26T06:05:31.730-04:00Question would be.....did she more often burned he...Question would be.....did she more often burned her document? Would she have given these documents in the past also to let them burn somewhere else (if she hadnt had a burn pit herself?) Or wouldnt itnbe something out of the ordernairy? Habundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-30193058338605860482016-06-26T06:01:00.538-04:002016-06-26T06:01:00.538-04:00So if he did send her message from driveway....the...So if he did send her message from driveway....then it would be possible to see where his phone pinged when recieving the pictureHabundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-31091696027927461312016-06-26T05:49:15.236-04:002016-06-26T05:49:15.236-04:00He also said that it would be great if someone wou...He also said that it would be great if someone would know how to ping it when its turned of.....everyone knows that that isnt possible....thats why he probably turned the phone off himself<br />Tho about the pic that was send......couldnt it be found out where the picture was send? I mean couldnt they figure out at which tower the phone had pinged when sending the picture to his phone and where his phone pinged when his phone recieved the pic? That could give clearity about sending the pic.<br />Habundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-90005534758283723842016-06-26T05:34:52.211-04:002016-06-26T05:34:52.211-04:00I would add to that....if he put in the key and tu...I would add to that....if he put in the key and turned it around he would know if the door was locked or not.....so he wouldnt had have to check it first...he would have known when turning the key...if a door is locked you need to turn the key more then if it wasnt locked.....so when opening the door he would have known if it was locked or notHabundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-17115902224259751612016-05-18T21:24:33.432-04:002016-05-18T21:24:33.432-04:00This isn't standard procedure. My husband has ...This isn't standard procedure. My husband has an IQ of 136 and has been a police officer for 15 years. rjbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16558675550692930478noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-2391132481522423422016-05-16T23:59:34.065-04:002016-05-16T23:59:34.065-04:00After reading that KM's remains were found in ...After reading that KM's remains were found in a bag, I believe we have been looking at this "burning of her documents" incorrectly. I think JC only said that to cover his tracks, in case someone witnessed him leaving with a bag...the bag KM was in. <br /><br />Which means she never texted him about the documents to say that she wished she had been there to see them burn; he probably texted that to himself from her phone. Violetnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-19849989064471554532016-05-16T19:08:37.599-04:002016-05-16T19:08:37.599-04:00Re: JC telling friend they had ingested magic mush...Re: JC telling friend they had ingested magic mushrooms within minutes of her getting home<br /><br />Is this leakage? Did he poison her? Did he tell friend they had taken magic mushrooms in case friend stayed longer and he were to witness Katelyn acting strange and disoriented from some kind of poison?HISGnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-90138534068193992742016-05-15T22:21:57.912-04:002016-05-15T22:21:57.912-04:00To the poster who suggested that he said "she...To the poster who suggested that he said "she stays by herself in a house" because he couldn't bring himself to say "she LIVES by herself". Well done. You are very perceptive.Alinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-19019888109320585532016-05-15T22:16:59.941-04:002016-05-15T22:16:59.941-04:00He says he went to her place at 7/7:30 BECAUSE she...He says he went to her place at 7/7:30 BECAUSE she was supposed to get back from work at 7/7:30.<br /><br />If she was supposed to be home at that time, shouldn't he be RELIEVED to see her car?<br /><br />Yet when he gets there and sees her car he says he was worried BECAUSE she should be at work. Huh?<br /><br />What a liar.<br /><br />The question about what they talked about in the last hour that he saw her devolves rapidly into how much (mainly cleaning) he did for her. How much he did for her seems to be a common element inhis statements.<br /><br />If she gave him instructions to burn her documents, why would she (seemingly disappointed)text that she wanted to be there for it? It doesn't make sense.<br /><br />There is a interesting pronoun slip too. He says "her friends were my friends and my friends were her friends but instead of saying "OUR friend has a fire pit, he says MY friend.<br /><br />I wonder what the friend/s know.<br /><br />I agree withthe posters who think they had a fight and she dumped him.<br />That's why we see the self justification (I did everything for her) and the subtle disparagement.( she didn't make her bed, she didn't dothe vacuuming, she was consistently busy)<br /><br />John Carter has guilt written all over him.<br /><br /><br />Alinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-91105481772525275012016-05-15T18:53:51.166-04:002016-05-15T18:53:51.166-04:00Nic,
short answer, yes.
I called her father...he...Nic,<br /><br />short answer, yes.<br /><br />I called her father...here is what he said...this would have been natural and expected. Instead, he went to introduce something new (and important) into the scripting of the case. <br /><br />He struggles and pauses and stutters because he is not speaking from experiential memory, but halting because when he goes into memory, what he wants to say is NOT THERE for him, thus, he disrupts the rapid process of transmission from the brain to the tongue. <br /><br />THIS is stressful. <br /><br />Even for sociopaths. Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-74382192512869326822016-05-15T17:53:26.498-04:002016-05-15T17:53:26.498-04:00J: I called her father. The only thing that's ...<b>J: I called her father. The only thing that's not there is her cell phone, which is positive,</b><br /><br />Actually, the obvious 'thing' that wasn't there was Katelyn, as in the missing person he was calling about in the first place. He doesn't identify Katelyn as missing, just her phone. Could we interpret this to know that she's not missing? He knows where she is?<br />Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-9420861588501361352016-05-15T16:10:18.693-04:002016-05-15T16:10:18.693-04:00...but at least we know the 911 caller wasn't ......but at least we know the 911 caller wasn't one of them! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47364049130862081562016-05-15T11:32:57.188-04:002016-05-15T11:32:57.188-04:00There's always going to be "questionable&...There's always going to be "questionable" people wherever large groups of people congregate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-83154998160649471622016-05-15T10:42:09.464-04:002016-05-15T10:42:09.464-04:00J: I called her father. The only thing that's ...<b>J: I called her father. The only thing that's not there is her cell phone, which is positive,</b><br /><br />If nobody knew about a piece of mail she received/a letter of offer, etc., (document,) and it wasn't there to be discovered, and nobody knew that they broke up and she took his key back (but he retrieved it the night before,) then it would be positive that the "only thing" <b>known</b> to be missing was her phone.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65818395112067179712016-05-15T10:32:32.568-04:002016-05-15T10:32:32.568-04:00lynda said:
I'm stymied by the "document&...lynda said:<br />I'm stymied by the "document". You certainly wouldn't call a list of errands or some such a "document" Also, the radio host was poor interviewer. He gave him the information to talk about instead of leaving open-ended.<br /><br />R: What was the last hour that you spent with her like? I mean can you remember, were you guys, were you talking about your future?<br /><br />____________<br /><br />Actually that interview was where he introduced/identified "the document" itself, so IMO, it was a great question. :0)<br /><br />Speculating:<br />He was talking about burning confidential waste for her that night and her texting that she wanted to be there. I don't believe she asked him to burn confidential waste for her. I believe whatever it was he wanted burned (a letter of offer? a letter of opportunity of some sort) was what would point to motive for a crime of passion/link him to Katelyn's disappearance/murder. As far as anyone knew, they were in a longtime relationship and engaged, he was out with his friends, she was home (busy/had to get up early), they had future plans together. She was 22 and they had been together six years. Her birthday was coming up. (But) she had been with him through h.s. and college. Her life was evolving and his was stagnant. She had enough "good" influence (school/work) around her to know she had outgrew him and his jealousy was holding her back. It's obvious from his interview he resented her "school friends", the forward looking/supportive people in her life. One piece of correspondence could be the crux, the power struggle. JC not "allowing" it and Katelyn basically saying you can't stop me and breaking up with him.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-20549428327974548142016-05-15T10:06:44.146-04:002016-05-15T10:06:44.146-04:00Lis
Note, too, he "just" put his key in,...Lis<br />Note, too, he "just" put his key in, etc.<br /><br />The word "just" is in comparison to something else.<br /><br />Could it be in comparison to trying the door first to see if it's locked?<br /><br /> Violet said...<br />I read somewhere that he was questioned about whether the door was locked or unlocked, so that may be why he threw that comment in there.<br /><br />_______________________________<br /><br />Lis and Violet,<br /><br />J: Um, I saw her at like 12 o' clock last night. <br /><br />So I ran inside - I, I didn't - <b>I mistakenly didn't check to see if the door was locked.</b> I just turned, put my key in and went in,<br /><br />Did he have a key to her place? I'm thinking they broke up earlier in the evening and she took his key (why keys would be sensitive and still in her purse.) He was there two times that night. Once at night and once at midnight. He suspected she was stepping out on him so he was watching her. He didn't have his key anymore, and being emotionally irrational he broke in and overpowered her/kidnapped her, went out the front door with her (which he had to unlock from the inside,) but forgot to lock it behind him (mistakenly didn't check to see if the door was locked). So he had to go back and lock the door. How could he do that without the key? He "ran" back inside, went back upstairs to fish his key back out of her purse. Upon leaving, he would have to turn, put his key in to lock the door...<br /><br /><br /><b>Lis<br />Note, too, he "just" put his key in, etc.<br /><br />The word "just" is in comparison to something else.<br /><br />Could it be in comparison to trying the door first to see if it's locked?</b><br /><br />I'm now of the opinion it was in comparison to what he did earlier. He had to turn to lock the door to leave. That day, he just had to put his key in and go in.<br /><br /><br />What I post is my opinion based on my application of statement analysis to public statements and a 911 transcript of John Carter.<br />Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47541396239002397692016-05-15T10:04:39.769-04:002016-05-15T10:04:39.769-04:00I would take it as he's mocking her.I would take it as he's mocking her. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-278983513960195832016-05-15T09:14:57.713-04:002016-05-15T09:14:57.713-04:00Short news piece stops short of naming suspect.
...Short news piece stops short of naming suspect. <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NXecKyBKOg<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-52825862784344589262016-05-15T08:13:23.940-04:002016-05-15T08:13:23.940-04:00https://www.facebook.com/kmbehervoice/
https://www.facebook.com/kmbehervoice/<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-38459290149555567252016-05-15T08:10:39.535-04:002016-05-15T08:10:39.535-04:00https://www.facebook.com/Ohio-Polygraph-Associates...https://www.facebook.com/Ohio-Polygraph-Associates-LLC-302832403260347/<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-26370780661843456532016-05-15T08:08:22.517-04:002016-05-15T08:08:22.517-04:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcfQy_lTuXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcfQy_lTuXE<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com