tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post1449216793397669455..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Bill Clark, Journalist Reports Abuse by PoliceStatement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-68600449655344850522017-07-11T12:20:14.447-04:002017-07-11T12:20:14.447-04:00Well, it seems that Bill Clark will not be writing...Well, it seems that Bill Clark will not be writing any more stories for that newspaper. He has been fired. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-78405590547684191722017-07-11T08:43:41.734-04:002017-07-11T08:43:41.734-04:00Someone is posting under my name, I did not make t...Someone is posting under my name, I did not make the last 2 posts.robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-73650364880199864892017-07-11T01:13:29.095-04:002017-07-11T01:13:29.095-04:00I never picked up the FACT the old man felt TERROR...I never picked up the FACT the old man felt TERRORIZED by the incident.<br /><br />"Danger lurked" doesn't sound like terror (IMO)<br />"I'm lucky I didn't get shot" doesn't either considering what he described though it may have been blown out of proportion for his own agenda.<br /><br />Seemingly and seems tells of what he THOUGHT happened. Obviously his eyesight isn't what it once was and the fact he stopped in the middle of an intersection makes me wonder if his family might not look into giving him rides to and fro the gym and elsewhere.<br /><br />Arguing about the semantics of a "moving" violation sounds like a life-time of similar quarrels...with people other than police, too.<br /><br />He gives me the feeling he could be in the Fred Phelps category by the way he addressed the female officer assuming the other officer to be her superior. He wants to relive the chaos of the recent Ferguson debacle and tell tales of his part in the '60s (which he fabricated then, too).<br /><br />The Adventures of Ol Clark amuses other old men in his area. I suspect he has always been a drinker and maybe more.<br /><br />To receive death threat over such an article is ridiculous; it's today's society.<br />The inability to beleive old men do such things calls for the police to 'set the record straight?' Really? It's a no-win. Though perhaps an eye opener for his family.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-23720178965318931552017-07-11T00:08:09.858-04:002017-07-11T00:08:09.858-04:00Exactly, Rob!
Hard to believe the Calis that bumr...Exactly, Rob!<br /><br />Hard to believe the Calis that bumrushed a neighborhood because they thought their children had the right to destroy property and even a cop shouldn't have any right to defend theirs.The mayor backpedaled and yielded to the masses of morons.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-167539049186416952017-07-10T08:36:40.703-04:002017-07-10T08:36:40.703-04:00Local to me, we had a 10 year old kid on a woman&#...Local to me, we had a 10 year old kid on a woman's property, shooting other kids with a BB gun. The property owner called 911. County officer showed up, got out of the car and told the kid to drop the gun, then handcuffed him and placed him in the back of the car. While he is talking to the property owner to see exactly what happened, kid's mama showed up, acting like a fool. she also got cuffed and placed in the car. The property owner then agreed that the kid didn't damage property and the BB's didn't go thru the other kids clothes, but she wanted him to stop shooting before someone did get hurt and she wanted him off her property. The officer then released the two from the car and explained to them the problem. Mama goes home gets on social media and you would think her and the child were all but killed. So the sheriff releases the video from the officer to the news media. Haven't heard from mama since.<br />In my day, mama would have taken me out of that car and switched me all the way home, after thanking the officer. <br />what attitude will this kid grow up with?<br />Yeah, we all know.robnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81591236277471157412017-07-09T23:08:48.038-04:002017-07-09T23:08:48.038-04:00Well you apparently have this all wrong. He's ...Well you apparently have this all wrong. He's not a liar. Not at all. He just made a lousy call. It was just an overreaction. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28038905983719717952017-07-09T13:35:34.266-04:002017-07-09T13:35:34.266-04:00O'Clark displays characteristics of a disturbe...O'Clark displays characteristics of a disturbed liar who cannot avoid telling lies that make his narrative interesting by bringing ridicule upon someone else and attempting to seed the intellectual environment with particular ideas thereby 'poisoning the well.' (motive: to amuse himself and attract eyeballs to his articles in the newspaper.<br /><br />Sigmund Freud defines pedantic as, “The pedant is he who finds it impossible to read criticism of himself without immediately reaching for his pen and replying to the effect that the accusation is a gross insult to his person.ima.grandmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09319771909287767461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-76552031700107137272017-07-09T10:07:18.792-04:002017-07-09T10:07:18.792-04:00He said to the officer: ' I know that I did no...He said to the officer: ' I know that I did not signal right.'<br /><br />Yet he still says he didn't do anything wrong. He didn't forget, as he says that he knows he did not signal. Yet he also says that 'up to that point' (when he was pulled over) he hadn't done anything wrong. No-one said he did 'anything wrong', just that he failed to signal, which at eighty-four he might have forgot (though he says he knew, so he did not forget?). Could he have said he knew he didn't signal, because he'd rather say he knew than because he's getting older, and actually he forgot? <br /><br />Is it interesting that in his apology, he speaks of 'error' rather than doing anything wrong? The failure to signal is more easily seen as a driving error, whereas to lie is to do something wrong. When it happened, he magnified the driving error into doing something wrong, or rather into not having done anything wrong. In the apology he minimises the lies of police harassment and arrogance, his claim he was lucky to have not been shot, into 'error', and ‘over-reacting’. He says he has been called a liar, received threatening phone calls, and accused of disrespecting the police officer - he says ‘Overreact yes, liar I am not’, making the ‘apology’ a continuation of the lies rather than an admission. He says he ‘allegedly ‘didn’t signal, which is to continue to suggest doubt exists, despite he admitted to the officer he knew he didn’t signal, and he says he has paid a fine. <br /><br /><br />--<br /><br />I think it interesting that in the apology he talks of lousy decisions, mistakes, error in judgement, distortion, the original sin, overreaction - but the word ‘wrong’ does not appear again, neither in his article -one can’t say he avoids it, only that previously has used it. The thought of having done, or rather not done ‘anything’ wrong was there, when the police pulled him over - he says up to that point he hadn’t done anything wrong. So, why did he think they stopped him? What was he doing when he realised his hands weren’t on the wheel? He did not have his driver license and insurance ready when they were asked for, despite he said he got them before the officer had approached the car. So, yes, I think interesting the suggestion made above, and by himself, that he maybe has a weed habit - also we didn’t need to know he had left the gym, but he chose to put that early on in his narrative, and the police were soon behind him. Some say weed can be bought at such places - maybe he was so defensive/rude/arrogant because he initially thought he was being pulled over for a different reason, (because he had done something 'wrong' rather than made a traffic mistake), and thought next they would ask to search the glove compartment? He still seems to be of the belief he signalled ('alleged violation'/'allegedly'), so even though he said to the police officer he knew he did not signal, I am wondering, did he forget to signal, and assumed he has been stopped for another reason? I think the doing or not doing of 'wrong' seems a bit excessive in relation to failing/forgetting to signal - whilst later, in the article and apology there is no suggestion of his doing or not doing anything 'wrong', when it would have been easier and ,appropriate for him to have said he was wrong to have written the article because the claims he made in it were not true. Is he hiding there was a bigger 'wrong' than either his failure to signal or to wear a seat belt?<br /><br /><br />Also:<br /><br />‘For the benefit of those callers who question my disrespect for the military’ - does he own his disrespect there? <br /><br /><br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81810896580293316692017-07-09T08:27:28.052-04:002017-07-09T08:27:28.052-04:00The subject speaks of the arrogance of the two off...The subject speaks of the arrogance of the two officers that pulled him over but the only arrogance I can see is his. I have to wonder what else he does in his life that he isn't supppsed to do but does anyways because he thinks no one else sees it or that he won't get caught. Most people would have said "oh I must have forgot to use my blinker, I applogize" but the subject tries to justify why he didn't use his blinker by telling the officer there was no one around so who did it hurt. He implies that because there were no other drivers visible he is above the common rules of the road, which is also exhibited by his lack of seat belt and pulling over in an intersection to allow an emergency vehicle to pass (which every student driver learns right off to pull over to the shoulder). <br />I think the subject knows he was in the wrong and he knows the only hint of danger they pose to him is the potential loss of his license and a few dollars on a ticket. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-91838816640838975862017-07-09T08:06:59.596-04:002017-07-09T08:06:59.596-04:00OT
Cheney Mason, Casey Anthony's lawyer's...OT<br /><br />Cheney Mason, Casey Anthony's lawyer's statement:<br /><br />“I BELIEVE that Casey’s mind, IN SOME DIMENSION , I GUESS the common word WOULD SAY ‘snapped.’ She DIDN'T go crazy BY ANY MEANS — but blackout — COMPLETELY a blackout — of what WENT ON AND WHAT HAPPENED” Mason told <br />“I wasn’t there. I don’t know ALL that happened,” Mason added.<br /><br />George Anthony's statement:<br />“We are done because when this happened, I lost my daughter and my granddaughter. I lost them both,” he said. “Justice would be to have my daughter behind bars and have her suffer the way Caylee suffered.”<br /><br /><br />http://www.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment/tv/tv-guy/os-et-casey-anthony-blacked-out-death-20170708-story.htmlNeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65999341956065854762017-07-09T07:44:27.998-04:002017-07-09T07:44:27.998-04:00I think he and balloon boy's father would prob...I think he and balloon boy's father would probably get along well - they share the same contemptuous and blame-shifting attitudes towards the police - probably no less in regard to anyone else who ever crosses, doubts or questions them. Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-80530899021817999662017-07-09T07:34:53.533-04:002017-07-09T07:34:53.533-04:00I listened to the video a few times - the officer ...I listened to the video a few times - the officer was courteous and patient. Ol Clark is unaccepting that he did anything wrong - even after the video is released he continues to challenge it as the reason he was stopped - in his non-apology he says he 'allegedly' didn't signal. <br /><br />He says the officer said:<br /><br />' "If you don’t agree, plead “not guilty.” <br />Why bother? It would be me against two officers. If they said, “no turn signal,” the cost of the ticket would be increased. I said: “Give me the ticket. If you say I’m guilty, I’ll be guilty.” '<br /><br />Twice on the video he demands the bill/ticket. He does not sound as if he believed his life was in danger, rather he was angry and irritated because he was stopped.<br /><br />I transcribed from when the officer returned with the ticket - Ol Clark interrupts throughout, and nowhere did the officer say 'plead guilty' or that he would be taken to court. I think the officer meant Clark could take it to court if he wanted to challenge the ticket?<br /><br />PO [inaudible] Here is a citation for failure to signal when turning right, alright? I’ve got more information right here [inaudible] - your information right here [inaudible] you’re given thirty days to send it in this envelope to pay by mail<br />OC [inaudible]<br />PO Yes sir, yes sir<br />OC [inaudible]<br />PO Sorry?<br />OC Is that a supervisor with you?<br />PO Th - supervisor? No, he’s not a supervisor<br />OL Oh [inaudible] back there. <br />PO No sir<br />OL Okay. What did I do to - uh - put other people at risk? I know that I did not signal right. I’ve got a clean road, nobody coming to the left, nobody coming to the right. I made a dead stop and I turned right. <br />PO But, sir, you<br />OC There was nobody else on the highway.<br />PO There’s nothing to argue about. Okay? Failure to make <br />OC: There is something to argue about<br />PO: Okay, well, if you want to go to court that’s <br />OC I probably will<br />PO Okay<br />OC Give me the bill<br />PO Well, I’m not done explaining it to you<br />Okay, Like I said, here’s your vehicle information, here’s your information with uh<br />OL: [inaudible]<br />PO Okay<br />PO Do you have any other questions for me?<br />OL I have no other questions <br />PO Okay. One more thing I just want to address. Whenever you get pulled over you need to stop until we tell you to move over or otherwise <br />OL You know what? I hadn’t done anything wrong at that point<br />PO: Failure to<br />OL: I pulled over so that you could go by me because you were on a mission<br />PO You failed to signal, sir, and that is just as much a violation as anything else -<br />OC give me the ticket!<br />PO Right, there. Thank you.<br /><br /><br /><br />Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-73978219338234413592017-07-08T20:48:24.995-04:002017-07-08T20:48:24.995-04:00The Columbia Tribune has now published a non-apolo...The Columbia Tribune has now published a non-apology by "Ol Clark". http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/20170707/clarks-response-i-made-a-lousy-call<br /><br />The way this liar refers to himself in 3rd person is telling. Distancing himself - his made-up character, from reality? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-10989294491418024592017-07-08T18:20:02.538-04:002017-07-08T18:20:02.538-04:00Lake of the Woods Road doesn't exist. He turn...Lake of the Woods Road doesn't exist. He turned onto St. Charles Road (which would take him to Lake of the Woods Recreation Area). <br /><br />I wonder if his "weed habit" had anything to do with "leaving" the gym.<br />I wonder what police would have found if they had searched his vehicle.Bobcatnoreply@blogger.com