tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post2469574866946150762..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Sam Nunberg: Subjective Personal Dictionary Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-72846647354299594112018-03-10T11:41:04.064-05:002018-03-10T11:41:04.064-05:00Would customers also be trown out if they did call...Would customers also be trown out if they did call 911 in case of an emergency? I wonder.......as a customer i think i would look for another place to get my stuff......What kind of people will be attracted when such signs would be on the walls of the buisiness?<br />....guess they don't care much about their customers. I am not so sure if the community will risk their lifes for free! Even cops dont get paid enough for the dangerous job they aare working in.......if people want to do the same job for nothing........maybe they should volenteer with LE......i am sure they would be glad with free bullet catchers LOLHabundiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01826623123769885956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-53123965720030593822018-03-10T11:20:50.373-05:002018-03-10T11:20:50.373-05:00Habundia Awareness said...
@bobcat..........s...<b> Habundia Awareness said...<br /><br /> @bobcat..........so next time cops can tell them, we won't serve you for our safety when your shop is being robbed or some customer is acting violent?!</b><br /><br />Well said Habundia.<br /><br />Presumably should a crime take place at said location, they will call the community to come rescue them rather than the Police.<br />Personally if a business said that i would then oblige them to fill out a disclaimer stating that they will never dial 911 and ask for the police.<br />I would then force them to stick large notices all over the walls and doors stating that customers and staff will enter at there own risk as in the case of an emergency Police will not be available or allowed to respond due to company policy.Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-8315912776198160972018-03-10T09:31:56.653-05:002018-03-10T09:31:56.653-05:00@bobcat..........so next time cops can tell them, ...@bobcat..........so next time cops can tell them, we won't serve you for our safety when your shop is being robbed or some customer is acting violent?! Habundiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01826623123769885956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7140706222646471972018-03-10T09:28:13.032-05:002018-03-10T09:28:13.032-05:00"I had a prescription for a toothache."
..."I had a prescription for a toothache."<br /><br />To me it reads as if there was 'a prescription for a toothache'.......not for the medicine against the pain of a toothache :D<br />Habundiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01826623123769885956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-83957681968997429342018-03-10T02:36:34.939-05:002018-03-10T02:36:34.939-05:00Bobcats ot
Whom is "we" and "us&qu...Bobcats ot<br /><br />Whom is "we" and "us" ?<br />When the preverbial hits the fan, [for whatever reason] and they need help, guess who they will call on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-63028461492894769102018-03-09T13:16:29.608-05:002018-03-09T13:16:29.608-05:00OT: Victim Classes
http://www.kcra.com/article/b...OT: Victim Classes<br /><br />http://www.kcra.com/article/bay-area-coffee-shop-wont-serve-police-for-safety-of-customers/19299705<br /><br />https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfhk_ZHAIMU/?utm_source=ig_embed<br /><br />"Last Friday February 16th a police (OPD) entered our shop and was told by one of our worker-owners that “we have a policy of asking police to leave for the physical and emotional safety of our customers and ourselves.” Since then, cop supporters are trying to publicly shame us online with low reviews because this particular police visitor was Latino. He broadcasted to his network that he was “refused service” at a local business and now the rumblings are spreading. <br /><br />We know in our experience working on campaigns against police brutality that we are not alone saying that police presence compromises our feeling of physical & emotional safety. There are those that do not share that sentiment - be it because they have a friend or relative who is a police, because they are white or have adopted the privileges whiteness affords, because they are home- or business- owning, or whatever the particular case may be. If they want to make claims about police being part of the community, or claims that race trumps the badge & gun when it comes to police, they must accept that the burden of proof for such a claim is on them. OPDs recent attempts to enlist officers of color and its short term touting of fewer officer involved shootings does not reverse or mend its history of corruption, mismanagement, and scandal, nor a legacy of blatant repression.<br /><br />The facts are that poc, women, and queer police are complicit in upholding the same law and order that routinely criminalizes and terrorizes black and brown and poor folks, especially youth, trans, and houseless folks.<br /><br />For these reasons and so many more, we need the support of the actual community to keep this place safe, not police. Especially in an area faced by drug sales and abuse, homelessness, and toxic masculinity as we see here on this block. We want to put this out to our communities now, in case we end up facing backlash because as we know OPD, unlike the community, has tons of resources, many of which are poured into maintaining smooth public relations to uphold power. It will be no surprise if some of those resources are steered toward discrediting us for not inviting them in as part of the community."<br /><br />Bobcatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-72032926355214712382018-03-09T06:02:58.947-05:002018-03-09T06:02:58.947-05:00you're welcome.
Pronouns are powerful. What...you're welcome. <br /><br />Pronouns are powerful. What brought her to say "we" is typical in such interviews where the host will build a bond to gain info. This is likely significant time invested. <br /><br />The ethics of it came out in her use of this pronoun. She saw them as unified. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-20815386148639307942018-03-08T13:31:58.092-05:002018-03-08T13:31:58.092-05:00Thanks- I am not particularly familiar with either...Thanks- I am not particularly familiar with either person here. <br /><br />The analysis confused me because I thought it was about whether his words implied substance abuse. But then it was about the ethics of the interview being done at all.<br /><br />Your answer was both, which makes sense.Deejaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-12864972500139095392018-03-08T11:44:49.868-05:002018-03-08T11:44:49.868-05:00Deejay,
is your question about the analysis or e...Deejay, <br /><br />is your question about the analysis or ethics?<br /><br />ethics: he is not a government official. He was acutely intoxicated and stripped of his dignity. The IR words reveal that she worked to build a bond and was acutely aware of what she was doing in exposing him. <br /><br />This was not an investigation. There was nothing of value to gain other than humiliate a person with a drinking problem, before the entire nation. <br /><br />Her words tell the story. <br /><br />She knew there was no information useful other than attempt to get him to, while drunk, smear others personally for pointing out his drinking problem. <br /><br />I believe those close to the IR can best describe the personality type that would do such. She got lots of exposure through other networks for the shock value. <br /><br />He got his family to see him melt down and be humiliated. <br /><br />As to the analysis, its beyond this scope but he uses the language of substance abuse. It was more than just taking advantage of a momentary weakness due to alcohol. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-31454308493457526472018-03-08T10:34:23.053-05:002018-03-08T10:34:23.053-05:00Peter. I don't get this analysis. Why has the ...Peter. I don't get this analysis. Why has the guy's drinking problem become that of the interviewer? Shouldn't a government official who drinks (or takes drugs) that much be exposed? (I got the idea he was drunk on several occasions and he seems to ramble) Why should the interviewer hide the problem? Or do you mean it was unethical to interview someone who has been drinking until he sobered up? I see your point that the question was badly worded and did not present a good direct question. (I also got a bit confused as to who was referred to at different points- the part about the interviewer, who is a 'she' right?) <br /><br />Anyway- my thought was "I have not had a drink" (in the last several minutes while on tape).Deejaynoreply@blogger.com