tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post3198738395902181628..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Kate and Gerry McCann Ten Year Interview Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger79125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-30739878494062024652020-01-09T17:16:51.918-05:002020-01-09T17:16:51.918-05:00A double dose of Calpol wouldn't cause sedatio...A double dose of Calpol wouldn't cause sedation nor death. People who try to overdose with paracetamol die slowly from liver failure which only starts to become evident weeks later. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07843968518896245846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-14142898209951095382020-01-05T07:18:01.909-05:002020-01-05T07:18:01.909-05:00Evianne Cream Reviews
Evianne Cream You need to pu...Evianne Cream Reviews<br />Evianne Cream You need to put off your wrinkles, properly, the day past. In any case, it’s no longer very past due to roll out an development. <a href="https://debbiesmiracles.com/evianne-cream-uk/" rel="nofollow">Evianne Cream</a> With a pinnacle new enemy of maturing cream, you could reestablish your youth and truth both. As indicated by means of the Official Evianne Cream Website, this enemy of maturing cream has the capability to assist you:<br /><br />Read News >> https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Is-Evianne-cream-legitcwanihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06965646500987381032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-69404025845495351782020-01-01T10:07:00.611-05:002020-01-01T10:07:00.611-05:00How Does Luxe Trim 1 Work?
You might be thinking ...<br />How Does <a href="https://debbiesmiracles.com/luxe-trim-1/" rel="nofollow">Luxe Trim 1</a> Work?<br />You might be thinking how Luxe Trim 1 capabilities because ketosis is a natural mechanics. Well, this formulation activates your frame to go into ketosis without you having to take any ketogenic food or a selected food regimen. How does this occur?<br /><br />When you're taking Luxe Trim 1, it begins its most important function, that is the release of fat inside the body.<br />The fats amount needs to be excessive for the frame to go into ketosis.<br />This is why Luxe Trim 1 Diet releases fats that are already found in your body but are not to be had for fuel.<br />Read More About It >>> https://www.completefoods.co/diy/recipes/luxe-trim-1-to-buy-weight-loss<br />momychttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02135527436441992288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-73567947896049058642019-05-06T13:01:37.311-04:002019-05-06T13:01:37.311-04:00Great analysis.
I have a question.
Gerry says at...Great analysis.<br /><br />I have a question.<br /><br />Gerry says at a point in this interview, "Yeah I think the key thing was - and I suppose the injustice of it (...)"<br /><br />I noticed that throughout many interviews that the McCanns had over the years, Gerry says constantly "the key thing" instead of "the main thing" or "the main concern".<br /><br />Is the word "key" an example of leakage, where an actual key might be associated with Gerry? <br /><br />Because... when Madeleine went missing, the local priest gave the McCanns a key to enter the church freely and "supposedly" pray for Madeleine's "safe return". However, the ex-detective who believed in the parents' involvement in Madeleine's disappearance, suspected that Madeleine's body may have been brought there to be cremated. Thus, the confidence in them that the body will not be found.<br /><br />So, is it possible that the word "key" may be linked to a vivid experience that Gerry had when Madeleine was reported missing?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71337106249228915122019-05-04T15:15:39.322-04:002019-05-04T15:15:39.322-04:00Dear Peter,
This is an excellent analysis.
Thi...Dear Peter,<br /><br />This is an excellent analysis. <br /><br />This comment is somewhat off-topic, but there is another case, the Jill Dando murder, which happened 20 years ago and has some similarities to the Madeleine McCann case. It is still unsolved, and the mainstream theories are quite wild: Serbian hitman, pedophile ring etc. I would be very interested in your opinion.<br /><br />Here is an interview with Jill Dando's fiancé, a highly respected doctor, shortly after her murder. <br /><br />Jill Dando's BBC television colleague, Anna Ford, began by commiserating with Mr Farthing:<br />'Alan, first of all, I just want to tell you how very upset all Jill's colleagues are and how we send you all our best wishes and condolences, and to ask you how you are coping at the moment?'<br /><br />Mr Farthing said: 'I think I am coping in the same way as anybody else would cope under the circumstances. I'm devastated, everybody around me is devastated. Everybody is trying to offer as much support as they possibly can.<br />'There are many, many friends of Jill's who are completely devastated, colleagues who have expressed their condolences and many, many people all around the country who have sent in best wishes and who are also devastated.<br /><br />'I cannot believe what has happened, I cannot understand what has happened, I do not think for one moment what could go through somebody's mind when they do such a thing to such a beautiful, caring and well-meaning person.<br /><br />'Somebody has planned this in some manner or means and somebody around that person will have noticed a change in behaviour, I would imagine, and somebody has suspicions that this person may have done this dreadful act.<br /><br />'And if there is any thought in that person's head to get in contact with the authorities who are investigating this situation, then I would appeal to them to please not to think any further about it but just to go ahead and give the police any information they can. There are many police officers working on the case, and if your information is not relevant then let the police officers please decide that.'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15297720974559008572019-01-15T06:51:20.905-05:002019-01-15T06:51:20.905-05:00This is fascinating, thank you! As the interview w...This is fascinating, thank you! As the interview was 10 years after Madeleine's death, is it possible that they have simply accepted her death, as a kind of defence mechanism, and this could account for the flawed responses. Perhaps it is easier to accept that she has died, rather than torment themselves about what is happening to a living child over ten years. I recall seeing an interview with Kate McCann very soon after the disappearance where she was crying about whether anyone was brushing Madeleine's teeth - do you have statement analysis from earlier interviews closer to the disappearance? <br />I know parents kill their children, both accidentally and intentionally.... my primary reservation about how the McCanns could have killed Madeleine is that I don't understand how they could have manipulated the timeline enough to have time to hide her body. Especially in a foreign country. Your analysis has given me a lot to think about, and I'd like to read your views on earlier statements of the McCanns. <br />Annahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02723457121757431084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-16191394726396772862017-09-20T12:28:21.467-04:002017-09-20T12:28:21.467-04:00Thank you for this excellent analysis.A lot of e...Thank you for this excellent analysis.A lot of experts agree that the mccanns are deceptive.Jan Taljaardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11366169719391193847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-50664063218045646872017-07-11T14:23:41.086-04:002017-07-11T14:23:41.086-04:00What was their 'reason'?What was their 'reason'?Sunshinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02372483104008233666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-84121095677917309712017-05-26T06:47:16.964-04:002017-05-26T06:47:16.964-04:00Gerry McCann refers to "a child" that...Gerry McCann refers to "a child" that's missing, rather than Madeleine. Could it be that he refers to her thus because there are two Madeleines - the real Madeleine, who has disappeared and is likely now passed on, and a Madeleine that has been constructed in the media, out of the Find Madeleine campaign, and crucially in their minds, so that they have a granule of something left behind in their psyche to talk about when asked about the real Madeleine's "kidnapping"? It's a form of substitution out of necessity; since the "case" isn't going away, it becomes a synonym for a living Madeleine.alxlr8https://www.blogger.com/profile/04216531223776626569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-48418151691237602072017-05-08T12:33:56.645-04:002017-05-08T12:33:56.645-04:00An excellent analysis as always Peter, spot on and...An excellent analysis as always Peter, spot on and thank you so much for all your hard work on the McCann case .<br />For anyone who wants to find out the TRUE facts of the Madeleine McCann case and to read the Official Portuguese Police files where the conclusion was ..... that Madeleine died in apartment 5A. .....Her parents were complicit in hiding her body and they fabricated an abduction........ Please join us here .......<br />https://www.facebook.com/groups/294438490999838/ Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-25713722273883795302017-05-07T17:21:59.675-04:002017-05-07T17:21:59.675-04:00Exactly! Some very good points here!Exactly! Some very good points here!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-72701824216195276142017-05-07T07:35:06.670-04:002017-05-07T07:35:06.670-04:00Hi Peter,
How do you counter for Colloquialisms?
...Hi Peter,<br />How do you counter for Colloquialisms?<br /><br />Derek<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-47541488397349732332017-05-06T15:09:33.027-04:002017-05-06T15:09:33.027-04:00Many thanks Peter.
Of course I understand your p...Many thanks Peter. <br /><br />Of course I understand your position and that you can only analyse the language in statements themselves. I was actually quite hoping that you could dispel this particular fear from the close analysis that you have done.<br /><br />Just to clarify one point, actually I wasn't suggesting that those particular images (the so-called Floorboard, Ice Lolly and Make-Up photos) were faked or doctored in any way. My point about those is more that I find them, as I'm sure many do, disturbing in the extreme given the again very real possibility that they were actually taken on the day of her death, perhaps only very shortly beforehand. The evidence I have seen very much seems to point toward at least the timing on this point.<br /><br />Thanks again,<br />SteveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-24750428064819994612017-05-06T09:25:45.586-04:002017-05-06T09:25:45.586-04:00Steve,
Good questions.
You could see that I ski...Steve,<br /><br />Good questions. <br /><br />You could see that I skirted around the questions and here is why:<br /><br />I must be strict to the interview before me. I can only say what the analysis of that particular interview said. It is a discipline analysts use and it is why we can run at or very close to 100% accuracy. Regarding the timing issue, to give a definitive answer, I would have needed statements to examine. In terms of a doctored photograph, this is not my area of expertise. If Richard had some statements made ABOUT the photograph, I could analyze them. <br /><br />Re: sexual abuse. <br /><br />Yes, there were a few things that warranted exploration but to explain why to an untrained audience would have been very lengthy and my conclusion would have been the same: I need more statements. <br /><br />I do have strong opinions on the case, but I keep them to myself because the audience is expecting analysis which means I must prove what I assert. <br /><br />It would be as if I gave opinion "A", definitely saying, this is deceptive, and then "B" with "this is truthful" and then "C" with "this is deceptive."<br /><br />Then, with point "D", which is speculative, the potential to betray the audience, having trusted my authoritative conclusion, is not fair to them. <br /><br />I tried to walk this tight rope in the Amanda Blackburn murder. I concluded that the husband was deceptive but it could be homosexuality and /or it could be guilty knowledge of the murder. <br /><br />I added that every investigator I spoke with concluded murder, and that I could find none to the contrary but the opinion blurred. I felt that I should have stayed to the language. <br /><br />Subjectively speaking, (only!) parents who are willing to sedate a child and leave such young children unattended are alarming enough, but then to carry on this deception for ten years, TAKING the offensive, compounds this concern. <br /><br />Add in some linguistic indicators of possible sexual abuse and it is not a stretch to see how bizarre and unnatural they can be. <br /><br />This does not make them sociopaths (which angers people) but as a former child protective worker, the odds of sexual abuse are up there. <br /><br />People cross a line and once crossed, it is difficult to tell where they will stop. <br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-62168061857400406512017-05-06T09:14:02.867-04:002017-05-06T09:14:02.867-04:00...I forgot to say that the Gaspar's statement......I forgot to say that the Gaspar's statement about David Payne and the gestures he made to Gerry McCann on more than one occasion also reinforces the supposition of abuse (of which even some of the McCanns' friends were aware) in my mind.<br /><br />SteveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-77767952165099849412017-05-06T08:19:00.739-04:002017-05-06T08:19:00.739-04:00A couple of questions for Peter:
I watched with g...A couple of questions for Peter:<br /><br />I watched with great interest your interview with Richard Hall. During that interview he repeatedly asked you if it was possible to glean from the McCann's language whether Madeleine had died at a different time than they claim. Having watched all his related videos I know that Richard believes she died most likely on Sunday 29th April, and personally I agree with his analysis that there is zero evidence she was actually alive after that point. At one point you confirmed that there is at least the possibility that Richard is correct in this belief.<br /><br />My first question is, does their language in this interview still contain similar (possible) indications of temporal shifting?<br /><br />In that same Richard Hall interview you also said there was a possibility of sexual abuse being somehow involved. After watching Richard's "Film 8 - Why The Cover-Up?" I was personally left with the impression that sex may also somehow be directly related to her death. The photo of Madeleine with make-up on, which Richard believes was taken on Sunday 29th April in either the afternoon or evening, coupled with the immediate response of the very highest-level people in UK and the subsequent disinformation campaign (which is clearly still ongoing) leaves me with a very nasty feeling in the pit of my stomach and I just cannot expunge from my mind the spectre of some violent and sadistic yet highly-placed and "important" personage abusing her with the full knowledge of her parents. In truth, after seeing the "make-up" photo and the other 2 released at the same time showing a coquettish and sexualised Madeleine, and given Richard's analysis and his own thoughts on the subject (and my own predilection for seeing the very worst aspects of human behaviour everywhere I look), I cannot completely shake off the (hopefully entirely erroneous!) feeling that these pictures were taken after she had been prepared by her parents for a "big night" with this "someone." <br /><br />Second question: Is there any hint of anything like this inherent in the McCanns' language, either now or in the past?<br /><br />Many thanks,<br />SteveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-53521996483296122852017-05-04T14:16:16.509-04:002017-05-04T14:16:16.509-04:00OT - Reddit Confession Allegedly by Agar Hasan, [n...OT - Reddit Confession Allegedly by Agar Hasan, [now] Wanted for Murder<br /><br />A person claiming to be Agar Hasan, the man charged with second-degree murder of his ex-girlfriend Melinda Vasilije in Canada, has posted what appears to be a confession on Reddit.<br /><br />Police found Vasilije dead in her home on April 28. She had been stabbed to death. <br /><br />"I did it," said the person who claimed to be Hasan, 24. Waterloo Regional Police are investigating the authenticity of the post, which was taken down by 12:30 PM on Tuesday.<br /><br />The post read:<br /><br />"Out of shock and fear I grab one (a knife). I hit her with it, almost blindly. A few times. I didn't know what happened. I was confused, shocked, and scared. I had no intentions of that happening. When I left I honestly thought she just passed out. Then I looked at the blood, and started freaking out and just ran. We were each other's best friends. The amount of regret and sadness is without words."<br /><br />"Almost out of nowhere she grabs a knife by the sink," the post said. "She comes at me in full force, aiming towards my face. I tell her to stop. She doesn't." .... "I'm sorry, to everyone. Especially Melinda's family. I hope you forgive me in the afterlife."<br /><br /><br />He's currently at large and wanted by police for her murder.TiffGGGGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12210542372647666549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-36648094026811988112017-05-04T12:52:00.542-04:002017-05-04T12:52:00.542-04:00Well thank goodness the last 5 years haven't b...Well thank goodness the last 5 years haven't been so hard on these negligent parents. I feel so bad for their twins. At least, for the most part, unlike with the Ramsey's, the majority of the world seems to believe the Mccann's did negligently kill their daughter. TiffGGGGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12210542372647666549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-13729507028779745772017-05-04T09:39:04.232-04:002017-05-04T09:39:04.232-04:00He knows nothing more than what has been said.
A...He knows<b> nothing more</b> than what has been said.<br /><br /><br />Again, this is third-party translations, but this phrase comes up repeatedly. It's in the same vein as "I can't say anything else." Except the translator isn't saying he can't "say" anything more, (limited either by lack of knowledge or circumstance/nondisclosure). The translator is saying GM is saying he "knows" nothing more. <br /><br />GM reports in the negative making what is reported in the negative sensitive, and in the context of "what has been said" (distancing/dropped pronoun). Is this in context of GM not knowing more than what GM, himself, has provided during the interview, or is what's translated in context of GM referring to not just himself, but what others would have said. How would he know what was said and that his knowledge was nothing more than that, unless it was decided what would be said ahead of time; or, if he had an opportunity to speak to the others before he was to given the opportunity to provide his statement of that night, then that would be/come across as collusion. jmo<br /><br />Were the interviews ever recorded? They would be interesting to watch.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-55649446451795649752017-05-04T09:36:42.777-04:002017-05-04T09:36:42.777-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-42551267794307923132017-05-04T09:10:56.286-04:002017-05-04T09:10:56.286-04:00"When asked if he has anything to add, he sai..."When asked if he has anything to add, <b>he said that he has not seen any proof that his daughter Madeleine is dead,</b> and therefore he will continue to search for her in the hope she is alive. He knows nothing more than what has been said."<br />"The defense lawyer said that he wishes the arguido to be asked again if Madeleine bled. To which he (Gerry Mccann) saidit was common for Madeleine to have nosebleeds.<b>He says that he doesn’t know if infact his daughter bled while on holiday in Portugal, because he does not want to be influenced by the news in the Press, regarding the detection of human blood in the apartment where his daughter <br />disappeared."</b><br /><br />This is third-party (translated?) <br />So he wants LE to "prove" it (that Madeleine is dead). <br />"hope" she is alive. <br /><br />It's too bad that this is third-party, because on one hand GM is saying he wants LE to prove to him she is dead (had not been shown any proof) on the other hand he is "hoping" (uncertainty) that she is alive. Again this is a translation, so it's hard to say definitely that this is what he "said".<br />_________<br /><br />.He says that he doesn’t know if infact his daughter bled while on holiday in Portugal <b>because</b> he does not want to be influenced by the news in the Press<br /><br />He was Madeleine's dad and arguably the primary caretaker/provider, along with KM of all three kids (father). A father giving statement that his missing daughter had a nosebleeds and also suffered a nosebleed while on vacation isn't incriminating unless it's a lie. <br /><br />jmo<br />Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-75115475681580081852017-05-04T09:03:07.507-04:002017-05-04T09:03:07.507-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-67101308087372650782017-05-04T08:04:43.501-04:002017-05-04T08:04:43.501-04:00Though I cursed the abductor and the PJ
abductor,...<b>Though I cursed the abductor and the PJ</b><br /><br />abductor, not abductors, not people or "they", or whoever has Madeleine.<br /><br />cursed<br />I realize this book was written in hindsight, but "cursed" is past tense and beside the abductor and in context of being forced for provide hair samples. She doesn't curse the abductor for victimizing her daughter and not allowing her daughter to come back home. Instead, she curses "someone" to begin with like as if someone didn't do their job properly. <br /><br />jmoNichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39194143829309404052017-05-04T07:39:17.493-04:002017-05-04T07:39:17.493-04:00I looked as if I had alopecia. Though I cursed t...<b>I looked as if I had alopecia. Though I cursed the abductor and the PJ, I had bigger things to worry about</b><br /><br />Hyperbole. <br /><br />Alopecia is a disease wherein the sufferer literally loses all of their hair. Not just on their head, but their eyebrows, eyelashes and body hair. <br /><br />Taking hair samples and what the results would "bare" (!) was very sensitive to Kate. <br /><br />What "bigger things" (plural) did she ("I") have to worry about? Was she not worried for Madeleine and what she was going through? Why curse the very person and team dedicated to finding her daughter? <br /><br />Why is abductor a title and not a person? Why is it singular?<br /><br />What would have happened if the results would have revealed the babies had been sedated? What "things" would happen if tests revealed they were sedated? Or, what would happen if tests revealed that Dr. Kate took drugs? Would it affect her ability to practice medicine? Would it mean losing her kids for a period of time while she was forced into rehab? Would [they] suspend her license? <br /><br />That certainly would be a lot of "things" to worry about.<br /><br />jmoNichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-88226793900112247522017-05-04T07:08:21.540-04:002017-05-04T07:08:21.540-04:00I felt angry that the children had to go through t...<b> I felt angry that the children had to go through this further insult. </b><br /><br />She felt anger. So she didn't quite achieve anger. <br /><br />How much ego does a baby have that they would be "further" insulted about providing hair samples? <br /><br />So two feelings she reports are not fully angered and insulted, albeit she does not assign "insult" to the babies per se. Insult is very far away from Kate, though. "I" is literally the first word of the sentence and "insult" is literally the last word of the statement. That's a lot of distance. Of all the emotions a parent could feel about their kidnapped daughter, IMO, "insulted" would be at the bottom of the barrel.<br /><br /><br />Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09150573665283919209noreply@blogger.com