tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post4139415348922983283..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: AG Eric Schneiderman Denial Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-18314937174833153912018-05-11T20:29:54.785-04:002018-05-11T20:29:54.785-04:00https://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/nfl/lions...https://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2018/05/09/matt-patricia-indicted-sex-assault/34742627/<br /><br />http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000932220/article/matt-patricia-maintains-innocence-in-96-sexual-assault-case<br /><br />I see no reliable denial........"it never happened"Habundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-65660795543539314192018-05-11T12:29:05.063-04:002018-05-11T12:29:05.063-04:00'How many reviews of 27 appear to be fraudulen...'How many reviews of 27 appear to be fraudulent? (Shills)'<br /><br />At least 26, possibly 27.Hey Judehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05118508358051764200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-81229308702016890292018-05-11T11:18:28.469-04:002018-05-11T11:18:28.469-04:00OT:
How many reviews of 27 appear to be fraudulen...OT:<br /><br />How many reviews of 27 appear to be fraudulent t? (Shills) <br />https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/reviews/B07CM2GN19/ref=cm_cr_othr_mb_paging_btm_2?ie=UTF8&sortBy=recent&pageNumber=2<br />Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-21589637440750925882018-05-10T19:46:26.649-04:002018-05-10T19:46:26.649-04:00https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20180509_03505810...https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20180509_03505810<br /><br />ex FBI director James Comey gives interview on Belgium tv.Habundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-35262031205838803462018-05-10T19:11:05.272-04:002018-05-10T19:11:05.272-04:00http://idahonews.com/news/local/investigators-find...http://idahonews.com/news/local/investigators-find-missing-jacket-toys-at-deorr-kunzs-old-apartment<br /><br />Investigators find "missin" camo jacket, toys at Kunz apartment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-50641584275266218582018-05-09T20:47:40.881-04:002018-05-09T20:47:40.881-04:00Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yes, I get that SA is ...Anonymous Anonymous said...<br />Yes, I get that SA is not an oracle.<br /><br />post it and see if you get a response.General P. Malaisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254206981855750578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-83972783415557444702018-05-09T18:07:23.007-04:002018-05-09T18:07:23.007-04:00SA doesn't tell you what to do. SA seeks for t...SA doesn't tell you what to do. SA seeks for truth and detects deception. SA analyses the words spoken/written, it's not some kind of oracle that anwsers the question "what do i do?" habundianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-40751375889441355092018-05-09T14:17:02.031-04:002018-05-09T14:17:02.031-04:00It sucks so bad, bc the story is so friggin stran...It sucks so bad, bc the story is so friggin strange, I would not believe it if it had happened to someone else & they told me about it. I probably wouldnt believe a word of it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-30548493947944157512018-05-09T14:08:39.655-04:002018-05-09T14:08:39.655-04:00What should someone do if they have a story to tel...What should someone do if they have a story to tell that would never be believed? In fact, not one aspect of the story would be believed bc it is THAT strange?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-88722252880450411652018-05-09T14:05:21.906-04:002018-05-09T14:05:21.906-04:00I cant believe my comments got deleted! I dont us...I cant believe my comments got deleted! I dont usually crack myself up, but I was laughing so hard I cried at my funny comments!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-74453956695181811052018-05-09T11:00:11.638-04:002018-05-09T11:00:11.638-04:00Perhaps one should first seek what the rules of &q...Perhaps one should first seek what the rules of "engagement" are and the fine "line" in the sand drawn before the smackdown, eh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-73973722762901503482018-05-09T10:47:17.193-04:002018-05-09T10:47:17.193-04:00Wow and none injured. Driver didnt seem bothered? ...Wow and none injured. Driver didnt seem bothered? No one arrested, what? Employees not allowed to talk? But citys instagram manager is there. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7159825602315216962018-05-09T09:30:28.565-04:002018-05-09T09:30:28.565-04:00https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14-year-old-gi...https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14-year-old-girl-crashes-car-into-dairy-queen-in-dearborn-heights-nearly-running-over-customersAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-5972060931613598242018-05-09T03:28:33.387-04:002018-05-09T03:28:33.387-04:00Off Topic: What should someone do, according to S...Off Topic: What should someone do, according to SA, if they had a story to tell that noone would ever believe, a true story much stranger than any fiction anyone could ever come up with?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-43532597354912410032018-05-08T23:24:21.108-04:002018-05-08T23:24:21.108-04:00A German 89 year old granny in prison for denying ...A German 89 year old granny in prison for denying holocaust. PRISON!!!!<br />What a mess in Europe. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-22744651492244978402018-05-08T22:55:06.337-04:002018-05-08T22:55:06.337-04:00“In the privacy of intimate relationships, I have ...<b>“In the privacy of intimate relationships, I have engaged in role-playing and other consensual sexual activity. I have not assaulted anyone. I have never engaged in nonconsensual sex, which is a line I would not cross.”</b><br /><br />He is into BDSM and thinks of himself as a Master or Dom(dominant)<br />For women it is Mistress or Domme<br />The line he would never cross would be the safe word, a word decided by the two of them before beginning, a word distant from the no, stop, don't.<br />A word such as a color, maybe traffic lights, green is go ahead, amber would be ok but go easy or slow down and red for stop when the Dom stops whatever they are doing.<br />Despite appearances, it is the submissive who is control, deciding what is OK, what is be careful and when to stop.<br />Any good Dom or Master would stop immediately.<br /><br />I would like to know what his definition of assault is given the role playing which would involve the infliction of pain, demeaning, name calling etc.<br />Perhaps a slap would be OK but a punch would not.<br />Perhaps light choking applying minimum pressure would be OK but choking hard such as strangulation would not or asphyxia play.<br />It would depend on his personal preferences as to how far to go, light right through to almost torture.<br />It would also depend on the woman/submissive and how far she wants to from light spanking right through flagellation, rope tying bondage etc.<br /><br /><b>I have not assaulted anyone.</b>In his head it was not assault regardless of what went on.<br />He may have been thinking BDSM and the woman may have been vanilla (not into BDSM) or only into gentle role play.<br />In his head it was consensual as it was role playing and for the woman who was not prepared to role play to the same degree or did not want to role play st all and thus both see it as assault, which it is.<br />It would be like the difference between a feather and a chicken :)<br /><br /><b>I have never engaged in non consensual sex, which is a line I would not cross.”</b><br />Never does not mean did not.<br />What is his definition of non consensual sex given his sexual predilections?<br />i suspect it would mean not stopping when the safe word is said regardless of what he is doing.<br />What is his definition of sex?<br />It doesn't mean penetration with a penis, remember bill clinton.<br />Sex could be different things to different people.<br /><br />The safe word is the line he would not cross.<br />Note he says <b>I have <i>never</i> engaged in non consensual sex<<br />which is a line I would not cross.”</b><br /><br />Would is future conditional which makes me wonder if he has crossed the line before but given what has come out, he would not cross the line again, he would stop when the woman says no/says the safe word or, makes it clear that she is vanilla and is not interested in role playing.<br /><br />The majority of people are vanilla and, apart from gentle role play such as doctors and nurses or blindfolds and scarves maybe even the dreaded furry handcuffs.<br /><br />For him it involves hitting, choking and strangulation and more, perhaps rape scenarios.<br /><br /><b>“In the privacy of intimate relationships</b><br />As Attorney General of New York he would not want his sexual activities to become public as Joe Public would be shocked and not vote for him.<br />He has to appear vanilla to get the votes, especially of god fearing conservatives.<br />He had power both in the senate and then as AG, it is reflected in his sex life.<br />It is all about power and domination.<br />There some that have power and dominance in the real word via jobs yet want to become submissive.<br />It is a way for them to release their stress to let someone else give the orders or a change.<br />I wonder if he is a member of a club?<br />He would expect, demand that his partner says nothing, it is his dirty little secret.<br />There will be more coming out the wood work.<br /><br />Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-60685815297563195292018-05-08T21:01:25.736-04:002018-05-08T21:01:25.736-04:00"...which is a line I would not cross."-..."...which is a line I would not cross."- Would not is future tense conditional and is not the same as "I did not cross". Schneiderman delineates <b>a</b> line he "would not cross". So, what other "lines" has he crossed before or he would cross? He's alluding to lines drawn by the woman, in defining this particular line. Notice the minimizing, legalese? Nonconsensual sex sounds so much better in black and white than Rape.Foolsfeedonfollynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-84117190574309827382018-05-08T20:44:23.112-04:002018-05-08T20:44:23.112-04:00Schneiderman acknowledges "role=playing"...Schneiderman acknowledges "role=playing" and "consensual sexual activity" (intentionally vague). What does he define as "sexual activity"? Verbally, to him, role-playing is distinct from sexual activity as he categorizes them separately.<br /><br />"I have never engaged in nonconsensual sex..."- Engaged in? That phrase sounds like one who indulges himself in something, as opposed to I did not sexually abuse/sexually assault/rape any woman. He makes an obvious distinction between sexual activity and sex, so I'd want him to define the difference. What about non-consensual sexual activity? In not addressing that, he is addressing it as the role-playing is indeed separate from sexual activity (his own verbalized perception in his statement), with the "role-playing" being the unprovoked physical abuse of the woman. Verbally, to him, the "role paying" comes before the "sexual activity"-it's the precursor to, the warm-up.Foolsfeedonfollynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-36359530961977152662018-05-08T16:11:31.313-04:002018-05-08T16:11:31.313-04:00 Nauseating. Nauseating. LuciaDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03658572205280231522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-16491334529237793982018-05-08T15:12:27.808-04:002018-05-08T15:12:27.808-04:00“In the privacy of intimate relationships, I have ...“In the <b>privacy of intimate relationships</b>, I have <b>engaged in role-playing and other consensual sexual activity.</b> I have not <b>assaulted</b> anyone. I have never <b>engaged (x2) in nonconsensual sex, which is a line I would not cross.”</b><br /><br />His internal subjective dictionary explanations would be a gold mine to analyse.John Mc Gowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00430624388902099338noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-41728145718601033272018-05-08T14:59:27.975-04:002018-05-08T14:59:27.975-04:00For lawyers, and especially lawyers in New York wi...For lawyers, and especially lawyers in New York with a criminal law background, "assault" has a specific legal definition which is different from the general meaning that most people would assume. Hitting or choking someone -- which he doesn't deny -- is not "assault" under this definition unless it causes a physical injury.<br /><br />New York Penal Law article 120.00:<br /><br />"120.00 Assault in the third degree.<br />A person is guilty of assault in the third degree when:<br />1. With intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person; or<br />2. He recklessly causes physical injury to another person; or<br />3. With criminal negligence, he causes physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument.<br /><br />Assault in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor."<br /><br />https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2015/pen/part-3/title-h/article-120/120.00/<br /><br />So, in New York, someone who non-consensually choked, slapped, punched, kicked, spit on or otherwise attacked someone else has not committed an "assault" unless it caused "physical injury". IMO that is why he said he had not "assaulted" anyone as opposed to saying that he had not hit or choked anyone.<br />Katprintnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-15653662192187249372018-05-08T14:17:01.532-04:002018-05-08T14:17:01.532-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-64934264255427387652018-05-08T13:58:21.663-04:002018-05-08T13:58:21.663-04:00Excerpt: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/...Excerpt: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/four-women-accuse-new-yorks-attorney-general-of-physical-abuse<br /><br />"About four weeks after they became physically involved, she says, Schneiderman grew violent. One night, they were in the bedroom of his Upper West Side apartment, still clothed but getting ready for bed, and lightly baiting each other. As she recalls it, he called her “a whore,” and she talked back. They had both been drinking, and her recollection of their conversation is blurry, but what happened next remains vivid. Schneiderman, she says, backed her up to the edge of his bed. “All of a sudden, he just slapped me, open-handed and with great force, across the face, landing the blow directly onto my ear,” Manning Barish says. “It was horrendous. It just came out of nowhere. My ear was ringing. <b>I lost my balance and fell backward onto the bed. I sprang up, but at this point there was very little room between the bed and him. I got up to try to shove him back, or take a swing, and he pushed me back down. He then used his body weight to hold me down, and he began to choke me. The choking was very hard. It was really bad. I kicked.</b> In every fibre, I felt I was being beaten by a man.”<br /><br />She finally freed herself and got back on her feet. “I was crying and in shock,” she says. She recalls shouting, “Are you crazy?” To her astonishment, Schneiderman accused her of scratching him. At one point—she can’t remember if it was at this moment or in a later conversation—he told her, “You know, hitting an officer of the law is a felony.”<br /><br />After the incident, Manning Barish left the apartment, telling him that she would never come back. “I want to make it absolutely clear,” she says. <b>“This was under no circumstances a sex game gone wrong. This did not happen while we were having sex. I was fully dressed and remained that way. It was completely unexpected and shocking. I did not consent to physical assault.”</b><br /><br />In the following days, Manning Barish confided to three close female friends that Schneiderman had hit her. All of them have confirmed this to The New Yorker. “She was distraught,” one of the friends, a high-profile media figure, says. “She was very, very upset. This wasn’t a gentle smack. He clocked her ear. I was shocked.” She notes, “Michelle had mentioned that he drank a lot, and that he changed under the influence of alcohol, but I’d never anticipated that he would be violent.” The friend describes Manning Barish as having seemed “sad” and “torn,” because “she’d really wanted the relationship to work.”<br /><br />The novelist Salman Rushdie, who dated Manning Barish before Schneiderman did, and who has been her close friend for nearly fifteen years, says that she confided in him as well. “She called me and told me he had hit her,” Rushdie recalls. “She was obviously very upset. I was horrified.” In his view, Schneiderman’s behavior does not fall into the kind of gray area that should remain private. “It was clear to me that it <b>crossed a line</b>,” he says. Rushdie, who describes Manning Barish as “a very truthful person, in my experience,” advised her to stay away from Schneiderman."Bobcatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-31269846495604734002018-05-08T13:07:38.891-04:002018-05-08T13:07:38.891-04:00Interesting observations and questions.
Sonjay: ...Interesting observations and questions. <br /><br />Sonjay: "privacy" is a good question. It is very important to him and may indicate a messiah like mentality where he had an expectation of privacy similar to those who say, "I will not allow people to..." expressing control over others. <br /><br />General, without Heather holding the camera, the video is off, but we'd need to know who "anyone" is but also what an ":assault" is. <br /><br />I think we can explore his "line" with much material. <br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-56590203540040750112018-05-08T12:45:21.212-04:002018-05-08T12:45:21.212-04:00Anonymous CQuinn said
he does mention assaults an...Anonymous CQuinn said<br /><br />he does mention assaults and denies doing so. "I have not assaulted anyone."<br /><br />he also claims to be role playing with the women. so his definition of assault and assault in "role playing" would need to be explored. while the response "I have not assaulted anyone." leaves out the individuals who claim to be assaulted. who is "anyone"?General P. Malaisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254206981855750578noreply@blogger.com