tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post5034119119527509529..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Lance Armstrong: Liars "Stop At Nothing"Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-62325860752742559822015-04-21T13:15:37.353-04:002015-04-21T13:15:37.353-04:00Hugs you tight TrustmeigetitHugs you tight TrustmeigetitTania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-89708644950016650062015-04-21T10:36:26.525-04:002015-04-21T10:36:26.525-04:00This describes my mother to a T. She has lied my ...This describes my mother to a T. She has lied my whole life and does not speak to anyone but me in our family. Because they have all called her out and she refused to speak to them again. The only reason we speak is that I am her only child who has her only grandchild.<br /><br />The best ever was the time she lied to me about her ex maxing out her credit cards. I knew she was lying so one night at her house I looked for her credit card statement. I was right. She has just a $200 balance with a limit of $15k.<br /><br />never told her how I knew the truth, just that I knew. Telling her your truth is like helping her lie.<br /><br />She has spent 2 years trying to validate that lie as the truth.<br /><br />Emailed me that she was “attaching proof” several times with no attachments. Sent a statement with the dates and balances blacked out, accused me of hacking into her credit report, and of course her go to response “how dare you call me a liar, I hate liars”. That one always gets me. She hates lairs. Yet lies to no end.<br /><br />She is the person that if you had her signature on a document, her response would be “it was forged”. <br /><br />That is how she is. She like Lance, holds others in contempt. If she lies and they call her on it, they are the problem. They are cut from her life. Never once in my 42 years of life has she owned a mistake or apologized. Everything…… every single thing is someone elses fault.<br /><br />Period.<br /><br />I think that's why I love SA so much. It's therapy for me... trustmeigetithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05707304982363758140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-32014130429146724322015-04-21T00:31:44.776-04:002015-04-21T00:31:44.776-04:00So when you talk about "outright liars" ...So when you talk about "outright liars" you mean sociopaths right? It seems that your description of "outright liars" matches the description of what a sociopath is. Unless you do mean something different then I'd love some clarification. <br /><br />Thanks!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00181277532493314995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-44194296186284014712015-04-20T12:40:19.813-04:002015-04-20T12:40:19.813-04:00Hobs OT:
It's disgusting that authorities wou...Hobs OT:<br /><br />It's disgusting that authorities would sanction the imprisonment of these girls within their own home, so that their mother can carry on her disgusting relationship with a pedophile! Why is their right to feel safe, and exist without restrictions in their own home being removed to accommodate their Mom's bizarre love life? <br /><br />Locking an 18yo girl up in a room every night would be false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, etc...but just because these girls are a few years younger they have no rights? <br /><br />As Anon also stated, what about the dangers? A fire? Carbon Monoxide? A sudden aliment leaving them in need of medical help? An intruder entering their room through a window? (*or the predator their mother allows into their home going through a window to gain access to them, for that matter!) They have no easily accessible escape!<br /><br />This so called 'mother' should have her parental rights terminated. She is sick, and apparently devoid of any common sense, or sense of duty to protect her kids. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02680510856590830567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-30559527427737959652015-04-20T07:35:31.106-04:002015-04-20T07:35:31.106-04:00OMG Hobnob. This is a horrible HORRIBLE situation...OMG Hobnob. This is a horrible HORRIBLE situation. Pure evil in progress for these young girls. Whose to say the mother doesn't participate with her pedo hubby in the abuse of her children? The statistics are very high and getting higher for mothers who ALLOW and participate in the sexual abuse of their children! Do they ever admit to their crimes? Of course not; they are the best liars at setting up ways to keep the abuse of their children under wraps and continuing. <br /><br />Last but not least, suppose the house would catch on fire and it's 'every man for himself'? Just as they have no protection from moms guarded sexual abuse by or with her hubby, they have no way of escape from their locked on-fire prison cell! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-6113100854762075162015-04-20T07:16:46.565-04:002015-04-20T07:16:46.565-04:00You are SOOO right. Pathological liars stop at no...You are SOOO right. Pathological liars stop at nothing. I honestly believe they would see you dead before they would admit too or apologize for their lies. They have no empathy or feelings of remorse for the consequences to those they hurt because of their lies, no matter to what extent they hurt them, or regardless as to who they destroy. <br /><br />I have personally seen this in action over a long period of time. It is a horrible thing to fall under the evil of a pathological liar. Yes, I do believe they would kill those they lie and connive against. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-5041620150916463282015-04-20T00:13:47.496-04:002015-04-20T00:13:47.496-04:00Is he a Pakistani?????Is he a Pakistani?????Muslim pig rapist shitenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-26004327781772658952015-04-19T17:50:49.483-04:002015-04-19T17:50:49.483-04:00This situation is beyond belief given what we know...This situation is beyond belief given what we know about the propensity of the people who commit – and are convicted of these crimes – to re-offend.<br /><br />No parent and no authority should be allowed to take such a risk with these children’s safety by sanctioning this bizarre situation. This man should not be living in that house.<br /><br />All the alarms, bells and whistles in the world can’t stop abuse. Children are children, and they WILL need to get up in the night, they will need the attention of their mother, and if there is a man living under their roof with that history, that conviction, those children will be in danger.<br /><br />If they are abused, which seems quite possible, who will bear the responsibility for that in the future? Certainly the mother will, but so will Devon County Council for sanctioning such a risky scenario.<br /><br />The use of a bedroom door alarm is crazy.<br /><br />This man is a sex offender who is banned from having any unsupervised conduct with any child aged under 16.<br /><br />This is a clear example of a mother abdicating her responsibilty for her children and that’s when society – the state, the local authority – are supposed to step in.<br /><br />For them to risk the safety of these children doesn’t make any kind of child protection sense. Just a couple of days ago I was reading a heart-breaking letter from a woman who was abused in her home by her parents.<br /><br />Her local social services knew she was being abused and did nothing about it.<br /><br />An alarm on a child’s bedroom door to protect them from a paedophile living in their home sounds like the beginning of a satirical comedy sketch.<br /><br />But there is nothing funny about this situation.<br /><br />This man is clearly a risk. The only way to guarantee the children’s safety is to remove him from the house.<br /><br />http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-locks-young-girls-bedroom-5546343Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-87514413175665469522015-04-19T17:50:41.621-04:002015-04-19T17:50:41.621-04:00A few months later the council recommended the chi...A few months later the council recommended the children should be placed with other relatives or put in care if the mother wanted her relationship to carry on .<br /><br />Its report noted she had “instigated the relationship” with the paedophile. Yet still the children stayed with their mother.<br /><br />Then last year she made a further request for her husband – understood to have been spending an increasing amount of time with the daughters – to “stay overnight occasionally” at her home.<br /><br />Her request was turned down by the council as her new partner was still deemed a risk. But within months came the astonishing U-turn.<br /><br />It is understood the mother bought and installed the lock and alarm in her two-bedroom home after seeking advice from a charity that helps people affected by underage sexual abuse – including the paedophiles themselves.<br /><br />A team including a social worker and solicitors visited her property last autumn and were satisfied with the measures she had taken. Her solicitor and a lawyer for the girls’ father were also present.<br /><br />A family source told us: “It was decided that because there was a baby monitor in their bedroom the children could wake their mother up who could open the door for them. And they thought the alarm on the door was adequate because it couldn’t be shut off after it had been set off.”<br /><br />The source also claimed the mother told the social worker the paedophile could sleep on a side of the bed which meant he would wake his partner if he got up in the night because he would have to climb over her.<br /><br />Late last year, the man was given the right to stay overnight at the family’s house following a lengthy appeal to the council.<br /><br />Yesterday the Council confirmed a “professionals meeting” had taken place last autumn “to discuss any areas the local authority may have missed that would help to determine (the paedophile’s) return to the family home. The professionals were of the view there are enough protective factors in place for<br />the children.”<br /><br />A spokesman later added: “Numerous reviews by a variety of agencies have concluded that his partner, who wants him to be able to stay overnight, can adequately supervise him.<br /><br />“A safety plan has to be in place and his partner has to supervise contact at all times. The police have been informed and the local authority is monitoring the situation very closely with regular visits to the family home.”<br /><br />The mum and the paedophile have since been living together, according to sources. When approached by the Sunday Mirror yesterday, the paedophile denied he was a sex offender, adding: “What business have you got even if I was a paedophile?”<br /><br />Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-18371328367955471912015-04-19T17:50:08.764-04:002015-04-19T17:50:08.764-04:00off topic ( and scarily worrying)
Their grandmoth...off topic ( and scarily worrying)<br /><br />Their grandmother is appalled that social workers allowed him to move in - with one ‘safety’ factor being he would have to climb over the mum to get to them<br /><br /> <br />Two young sisters are being locked inside an alarmed bedroom at night to protect them from their mother’s paedophile husband – and social workers say it’s fine.<br /><br />The authorities have astonishingly given the go-ahead to the monstrous plan the mum dreamed up so she can sleep with their vile stepfather.<br /><br />The convicted abuser, once jailed for attacking a girl under 13, has now been allowed to move in with her and the children – also both under 13.<br /><br />And among other ‘safety’ factors believed to have been taken into account in a shocking official report was that the paedophile would have to climb over the mum from his side of the bed to get to the girls – and would therefore wake her up.<br /><br />County council officials who rubber-stamped the decision were also happy that the imprisoned children could use a baby monitor to call for their mother if they needed to be let out to go to the toilet.<br /><br />They allowed the child abuser to move in only a few months after describing him as a “continuing risk” to the girls.<br /><br />Details of the decision emerged after the children’s worried grandmother contacted the Sunday Mirror over her fears for their safety. She said: “The alarm and the other so-called precautions to stop my granddaughters being abused are a load of rubbish.<br /><br />“Since learning my daughter’s new husband was a paedophile I’ve tried to express my concerns to social services.<br /><br />“I’m appalled this man was allowed to move into the family home with my granddaughters. Other family members also feel their concerns are being ignored.<br /><br />“It feels like my granddaughters are isolated and at risk. Social services don’t seem to want to listen to me.<br /><br />“It’s heartbreaking, but I have to keep fighting this for the sake of the girls.”<br /><br />A source close to the troubling case said: “We can’t believe that this mother has been so stupid as to take up with this man.<br /><br />“And how on earth is an alarm going to stop him if he decides he wants to abuse those children? Everyone involved in this atrocious situation should hang their heads in shame.”<br /><br />The identity of the paedophile, his wife and the children, who live in Devon, are all known to the Sunday Mirror but cannot be revealed for legal reasons.<br /><br />The children’s mother got together with the child abuser, a man in his 40s, less than five years ago.<br /><br />She had split from the girls’ father who moved out and at first saw his children at weekends. But he then relocated with a new partner and does not now have regular access.<br /><br />The mother told social workers she was fully aware of the paedophile’s past and that he had been a previous boyfriend in the Eighties. As a convicted child abuser he is subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) which bans him from having unsupervised contact with under-16s. He also has to sign the Sex Offenders Register.<br /><br />But a year after they began dating, the mother applied to be an ‘approved person’ to provide supervision of contact between the paedophile and her children, a requirement of his SOPO.<br /><br />That move was rubber-stamped by a body called the Devon Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub. It is made up of police, probation officers, social workers and other agencies.<br /><br />The couple married the following year – with the mother sharing details of her and the paedophile’s growing relationship on her Facebook page. It tells how the couple enjoyed spending time with the girls, jaunts to the seaside and pub meals.<br /><br />After their wedding the mum wrote online that they “had a fantastic day with the family”.<br /><br />But later she had to call police to her home after a neighbour loudly called her partner “an animal”.<br /><br />By the end of that year, a Devon County Council council children’s services review of the case found there remained a “continuing risk” that the paedophile would sexually abuse the vulnerable girls.<br /><br />Tania Cadoganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06511272355142175684noreply@blogger.com