tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post8638381860754263762..comments2024-03-18T04:20:15.987-04:00Comments on Statement Analysis ®: Statement Analysis: Darlie Routier 911 Call Statement Analysis Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comBlogger59125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-24122270307648595422021-08-24T07:27:05.436-04:002021-08-24T07:27:05.436-04:00He was crying in the call darin freaked out was no...He was crying in the call darin freaked out was not calm called 1 kid by the babies name proves he wasnt calm darlie called 911 before darin was downstairs that is why she called not him if he did it how come darlie said he came from downstairs she covered for him? DaTruthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761655798265016278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-3806745783418425042021-08-24T07:21:34.650-04:002021-08-24T07:21:34.650-04:00She didnt know she was injured until police told h...She didnt know she was injured until police told her 911 call right away i was stabbed my bous were stabbed before police was thereDaTruthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761655798265016278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-56668055687360693582021-08-24T07:19:41.881-04:002021-08-24T07:19:41.881-04:00Did you say she didn't know she was injured un...Did you say she didn't know she was injured until the police said it? She said right away someone came in broke in stabbed me and my boys 4 mins before poloce arrived .. She also didnt apply pressure she used wet towels not dry towels why is that important? Wet towels she used too clean her blood off the sink would you use a wet band aid or dry band aid if you was bleeding? <br /><br />Read trial transcripts she lied was debubked at every term when the prosecutor destroyed her on the stand ruled out the 2 guys she claimed did it she couldnt idenify who was who when prosecutor said so if it wasn't those 2 guys it must have been you she then cried knowing she had just exposed herself as the perp DaTruthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10761655798265016278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-80363238470007628142019-08-03T02:19:07.171-04:002019-08-03T02:19:07.171-04:00I have gone so many times back and forth on guilt/...I have gone so many times back and forth on guilt/innocence with this case. It started with forensic files episode, then when death row stories came out. After that watched everything on YouTube that I could find. After much armchair research, I really think she intended to commit suicide, she obviously stabbed her boys first, then when it came to herself she just couldn't follow through (probably more painful than anticipated, she couldn't follow all the way through)<br /><br /> it was stated that Darlie and Darin were in financial trouble, so that was motive.<br /><br />I have heard the 911 call multiple times, and if you listen to the call at one point she even sounds like she is trying to convince Darin that someone broke in, but in an angry way. <br /><br />She is probably a master manipulator. <br /><br />The analysis of this 911 call has completely convinced me she is guilty <br /><br />Have you ever looked into Steven Avery? It would be awesome to hear an analysis of that.CraBBy GaBByhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00710315334887219456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-74516553615562509672019-05-26T11:03:37.568-04:002019-05-26T11:03:37.568-04:00If the intruder did it...!? There would be, Darli...If the intruder did it...!? There would be, Darlie & the 2 boys blood...! Cause remember, whn she wakes up frm Damon, touches her shoulder & sayn, Mommie...! The stranger is @ the foot of her as she sits up, he leaves thru thm kitchen 2 the utility room, so if he got the Sock, it should have all 3, cause he stabs @ her & slices her throat...! But, it's only the boys...? BS, as bloody as the Scene was, it's only a lil Blood....!? Com on now Ppl, use ur Common Sense...! Darin staged the Scene & took that Sock dwn the Street...! Remember, he claimed he wnt across the street 2 gt a Nurse that never made it 2 the Boys...! He said, he's Certified n CPR...! So, why r u givn CPR 2 a dead child & nt the 1 that's tryn 2 Live....!? They both, Guilty...! Darlie is a Ride or Die Chick, wit her Dumb Ass...! Do 21 more yrs....!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06540031014258526509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7771767574237608872019-05-26T10:56:25.511-04:002019-05-26T10:56:25.511-04:00If the intruder did it...!? There would be, Darlie...If the intruder did it...!? There would be, Darlie & the 2 boys blood on the Sock...! Cause remember, whn she wakes up frm Damon, touches her shoulder & sayn, Mommie...! The stranger is @ the foot of her as she sits up, he leaves thru thm kitchen 2 the utility room, so if he got the Sock, it should have all 3, cause he stabs @ her & slices her throat...! But, it's only the boys...? BS, as bloody as the Scene was, it's only a lil Blood....!? Com on now Ppl, use ur Common Sense...! Darin staged the Scene & took that Sock dwn the Street...! Remember, he claimed he wnt across the street 2 gt a Nurse that never made it 2 the Boys...! He said, he's Certified n CPR...! So, why r u givn CPR 2 a dead child & nt the 1 that's tryn 2 Live....!? They both, Guilty...! Darlie is a Ride or Die Chick, wit her Dumb Ass...! Do 21 more yrs....!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06540031014258526509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-28121811197645711702018-07-27T11:33:53.148-04:002018-07-27T11:33:53.148-04:00Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reply and info.
Was tha...Hi Peter,<br /><br />Thanks for the reply and info.<br /><br />Was that a recent study in the UK? Unfortunately, it seems that less money is going into the funding of our police forces every year. It's a shame those who took part in that study weren't able to complete the training needed for a more accurate result.<br /> <br />It's a very interesting area and one I'd like to study more but I imagine formal training would be too expensive for me right now.<br /><br />I'll check out your youtube vids and keep my eyes open for the submissions you mentioned.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Jenny.<br />Jennynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-46512024928214851292018-07-27T09:10:10.428-04:002018-07-27T09:10:10.428-04:00Hi Jenny,
The UK study showed 74% accuracy for th...Hi Jenny,<br /><br />The UK study showed 74% accuracy for the SCAN method (a brand of Statement Analysis) after 2 1/2 days of training. They concluded that it was not worth the cost. <br /><br />The same law enforcement officials who hit 74% accuracy after 20 hours of training are likely to run at or near 100% accuracy with even a semester of training. <br /><br />Deception Detection will conclude:<br /><br />a. Deception Indicated<br />b. Veracity Indicated<br />c. "Unreliable" which is inconclusive. <br /><br />When an analyst is not certain ("the subject must talk us out of presupposition of truth), the analyst will not be conclusive. This mostly due to "insufficient sample." <br /><br />This is proper restraint. <br /><br />Some may be heavy loaded in "c" as a means of wanting to protect accuracy record, but those I train, work with, or associate with, allow the Statement to dictate the result. These are not hypotheticals, but live cases; they want and need answers.<br /><br />Analysts are also trained to spot "contamination"; that is, a statement in which the subject is answering questions, for example, previously asked. They are taught to set the statement aside, though team analysis will address.<br /><br />When someone writes an anonymous threatening letter to a recipient and we are able to identify 7 of 10 (70%) of the characteristics, almost always the recipient will know precisely who we are describing. <br /><br />Only deception detection (true or false) runs at 100%. Content runs 80% or more, and the Psycho-linguistic profile 70%. <br /><br />discernment of influence of others, prescription medication, Developmental Disabilities, regionalism and expressions, second language and so much more...are all considerations. <br /><br />I have a few poorly edited You Tube videos up that highlight principle and in the upcoming months, you will see submissions from certified analysts on recent cases that are useful for both training and inspiration. <br /><br />Thank you,<br /><br />Peter Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-37664336107186334542018-07-25T21:12:17.479-04:002018-07-25T21:12:17.479-04:00Hi Peter,
Sorry for the delay, I wanted to look i...Hi Peter,<br /><br />Sorry for the delay, I wanted to look into statement analysis a bit more before I replied so I could get a better understanding of it.<br /><br />I'm not trained in the field, I've done a short forensic course and part way through a forensic psycholgy course.<br /><br />I came accross your blog while I was looking into the Darlie Routier case (and going back and forth on my guilty/not guilty view on it). I was having a hard time believing she could actually be guilty of such a horrendous crime and after hearing the 911 call, I wondered if anyone had analysed it, so I googled it and your blog came up. <br /><br />My comment here was to a claim of something being 100% accurate... this leaves no room for factors perhaps not already known/considered or human error. However, after reading and learning from your blogs and looking at previous cases (police interviews, your Maccann analysis, etc), I can see the bigger picture and how effective this kind of analysis is. <br /><br />I'd be very interested to read any analysis you might have on Amanda Knox? <br /><br />Jenny.Jennynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-50330991797467222332018-07-22T19:13:42.898-04:002018-07-22T19:13:42.898-04:00LifeLifeima.grandmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09319771909287767461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-13503639108559147482018-07-22T10:08:34.258-04:002018-07-22T10:08:34.258-04:00If you can identity where you’ve learned the above...If you can identity where you’ve learned the above assertions, I’d appreciate a reply. It’s fascinating to see the need to assert and am curious as to your experiences after your training, in Statement Analysis. (Without regard to the brand) Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-55732312168884512822018-07-22T07:45:41.966-04:002018-07-22T07:45:41.966-04:00Yes, 100% accuracy in detecting deception.
90% ac...Yes, 100% accuracy in detecting deception. <br />90% accuracy in content. <br />70% in psycho-linguistic profiling. <br /><br />The profiling takes into account and often discerns:<br />Substance abuse <br />Mental illness <br />Greater Context (defensiveness) <br />Parental Instinct. <br /><br />With your views, where did you study Statement Analysis? <br /><br />Peter Hyatt. Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-33565312341696051872018-07-22T01:50:37.744-04:002018-07-22T01:50:37.744-04:00Wow 100% accurate? Not even DNA testing is that ac...Wow 100% accurate? Not even DNA testing is that accurate.<br /><br />It's a very interesting area and I can see how this could play an important part. However, it doesn't take into account mental illness, mental disability or drug/alcohol use of the caller. All of which could skew the results. I also believe that unfortunately, there are mother's and father's out there that put themselves before their kids. Imagine a situation where such a person had been attacked and also their children, who would they put first? Probably themselves, but hardly enough evidence to say they attacked their children. I struggle with a "one size fits all" approach, but I appreciate this kind of analysis could be a good starting point. 100% accurate though? hmmm.<br /> jennynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-13282440746543453192018-07-04T09:10:23.451-04:002018-07-04T09:10:23.451-04:00Federico Matias Alvarez Zarza said...
Very interes...Federico Matias Alvarez Zarza said...<br />Very interesting analysis. I have a couple of questions:<br /><br />1. What degree of certainty do you have of Darlie's guilt only from the 911 call analysis?<br />2. Could she still be innocent in spite of your findings in the analysis?<br />3. Have you ever encountered a case in which a subject clearly seemed to be deceptive but turned out being completely innocent?<br />4. Could another analyst arrive to a completely different conclusion than yours and conclude that Darlie does not have guilty knowledge or is deceptive? I ask this question just to know if there would be a consensus among statement analysts or if there could be a variety of opinions.<br /><br />Have a good day,<br /><br />Federico<br /><br /><br />Thank you for your questions. Here are Peter's responses.<br /><br />1. 100% accuracy. <br />2. No<br />3. No<br />4. No<br /><br />This is a scientific process by which analysts all follow the same procedures. The ultimate conclusion is that Darlie Routier is "concealing the identity of the killer" and that she has a "positive linguistic disposition towards the killer."<br /><br />Where an error is made, it is readily traced and corrected. <br /><br />Peter said that this was not a challenging analysis and that anyone with even a few months of formal training will be able to accomplish. Much deeper is analysis into the subject's profile (personality, background, experiences). This has a minimum of 70% accuracy. For example, if we offer 7 of 10 traits of an author of an anonymous threat letter, the recipient is very likely to identify who it is. <br /><br />Often they score higher, but 70% is a fair estimate. <br /><br />In detecting deception, 100% is expected. <br /><br />www.hyattanalysis.com <br /><br /><br />Heather Hyatt Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-7550722647693887352018-07-04T08:19:58.013-04:002018-07-04T08:19:58.013-04:00Very interesting analysis. I have a couple of ques...Very interesting analysis. I have a couple of questions:<br /><br />1. What degree of certainty do you have of Darlie's guilt only from the 911 call analysis?<br />2. Could she still be innocent in spite of your findings in the analysis?<br />3. Have you ever encountered a case in which a subject clearly seemed to be deceptive but turned out being completely innocent?<br />4. Could another analyst arrive to a completely different conclusion than yours and conclude that Darlie does not have guilty knowledge or is deceptive? I ask this question just to know if there would be a consensus among statement analysts or if there could be a variety of opinions.<br /><br />Have a good day,<br /><br />FedericoFederico Alvarezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08516572479160032049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-39988636832639808212018-03-10T11:51:18.286-05:002018-03-10T11:51:18.286-05:00Interesting comment from Anonymous 9 March, 2018 2...Interesting comment from Anonymous 9 March, 2018 2:55pm above. <br /><br />I've not done a profile on her specifically, but I think you may be correct. I think it is easy to assume attention getting but even behind this can be suicidal ideation. Statement Analysis Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13607372649929274491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-71359643788344643942018-03-09T14:55:46.084-05:002018-03-09T14:55:46.084-05:00Darlie had snapped and intended on letting Darin f...Darlie had snapped and intended on letting Darin find her and the two boys dead but she couldn't go through with her suicide.<br />Thus she was stuck there with absolutely no evidence of an intruder. She was stuck there with a big lie.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-24620932696176941792017-08-02T00:22:19.733-04:002017-08-02T00:22:19.733-04:00Oh horse crap on what you (Jo) said. Darlie killed...Oh horse crap on what you (Jo) said. Darlie killed her kids no body else. Darin is a jackass for sure because he lied for his psycho wife but he's not the killer. So here we are today...21 years after Darlie Routier murdered her boys and absolutely ZERO new evidence that points to anyone other than the boys mother. Sick rotten woman. She deserves to be stabbed to death just like she stabbed her boys.Lynnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10542782842010970087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-72323111583455645752017-04-27T23:51:53.098-04:002017-04-27T23:51:53.098-04:00^^^Your probably Darlies mother or friend. Sorry b...^^^Your probably Darlies mother or friend. Sorry but forensic analysis is an extremely reliable science. I also read a forensic report on how drops of the boys blood were found on the back of her shirt caused by the blood flying off the knife while she was stabbing her kids to death. Also the DNA evidence they were waiting on came back showing nothing in killer Darlies favor. Yeah...so...guilty as hellAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-14491816572273950392017-04-27T23:34:28.955-04:002017-04-27T23:34:28.955-04:00It's so obvious Darlie Routier killed her kids...It's so obvious Darlie Routier killed her kids Stevie Wonder could give a physical description of "the killer". I just cant figure out how Darin Routier can be so stupid. And cant imagine why be keeps covering for the killer of his children Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-80509356660137215272016-06-25T03:14:28.707-04:002016-06-25T03:14:28.707-04:00i had to read that bullshit twice...darlie did it....i had to read that bullshit twice...darlie did it..and she will die for it watch she might have 3 yrs left...if u believe darlie is innocent...i guess u believe theres aliens at my front doorbcoming to take me away...will u believe me just cause u cant see u just want attention like darlie...this probley her mom or someoneAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12727121094260880183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-82386626389600980472016-06-25T03:11:27.183-04:002016-06-25T03:11:27.183-04:00i had to read that bullshit twice...darlie did it....i had to read that bullshit twice...darlie did it..and she will die for it watch she might have 3 yrs left...if u believe darlie is innocent...i guess u believe theres aliens at my front doorbcoming to take me away...will u believe me just cause u cant see u just want attention like darlie...this probley her mom or someoneAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12727121094260880183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-80560076679646021272016-05-29T20:37:53.834-04:002016-05-29T20:37:53.834-04:00Are you kidding, Look at Darins comments he is tr...Are you kidding, Look at Darins comments he is trying to convince Darlie that there was a robbery, Every theory fits Darin. After the police arrived Darin was trying to convince them that a man had followed his wife home from the tanning salon. The guy is a perverted creep that killed his boys out of revenge. I cant even look at his picture anymore I want to vomitAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-62922149669802487912016-05-11T06:12:52.359-04:002016-05-11T06:12:52.359-04:00Its really too bad that this couldn't have bee...Its really too bad that this couldn't have been done before the trial. The lawyer, Cooper insisted that Darin was not involved, but I believe he knew all along Darin was involved and deliberately kept evidence away the jury and prosecution.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7164794708270892518.post-31865129559072542332016-05-11T06:10:36.953-04:002016-05-11T06:10:36.953-04:00I can hardly believe what I am reading here. Does...I can hardly believe what I am reading here. Does this person not read what he is writing. He said there was deception when Darlie talked about her babies in past tense, but he says nothing when she refers to her children as still being alive after the police arrive. Meaning she hasn't accepted their death.<br /><br />The term Darlie uses when say they, she isn't using that word to mean past tense. If you want to pick Darlie apart then why not use this call to decide if Darin is involved or not.<br /><br />Darin has never refered to his boys by name he has always used the words babies.<br /><br />Darin is in the background trying to convince Darlie that it was an intruder that broke into the house. He even goes on further to say they took, he is pushing to make sure that the police hear him clearly when he is describing where the intruder went.<br /><br />It was Darlie who was argueing with Darin telling him they didn't take anything, Darin isn't heard but you can hear Darlie telling Darin this was not a robbery, she is convinced someone tried to kill her and her boys. At this time nobody knows that Darin had been asking around to find someone to do a home robbery so he can collect the insurance.<br /><br />The deception here isn't with Darlie its with Darin, now that we know more about the case and have watched and read Darins versions of the what happened, this just confirms his involvement.<br /><br />If the same theorys on Darin it makes him look guilty not Darlie<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com