limited to those who know her character
I have sleepless nights everyday wondering what could of happened differently.
Don’t let the media fool you with videos and false info. I have cooperated with everyone and given them all that they ask for.
avoidance of mentioning law enforcement
Does she have more that she has not been asked for?
Sometimes they let social media create these accusations to keep them busy because people involved in that nonsense have no interest in finding Gannon.
As if police would "let" social media to create accusations to keep them "busy"----
This is insight into her thinking. Police would waste resources violating free speech in order to keep people who are not interested in finding Gannon, busy. She sees life as revolving around her.
With that said, I will only tell the truth not accusations.
Here, rather than issue a denial, she sets up a comparison of her good works with what "could have happened differently."
She goes back six years to show what a "good person" she has been:
I have spent the last 6 years of my life fighting for custody battles, helped Albert pay for it all, was the only person who stood by him in the courtroom after courtroom. I took the kids from coast to coast to be with each parent even driving through the night, extreme weather conditions and countless amount of airplanes. This is not to bash any parent going through pain but to say that I have pain as well.
What of Gannon's pain? What might he be feeling now?
Did you inflict pain upon Gannon? (audio)
Did this cause him to run away?
Did you inflict physical pain upon Gannon?
Did you cause his disappearance?
Everyone remembers months upon months when I was the only provider.
Another downplaying of Albert's fatherhood (masculinity) --see prior analysis.
Note the call for testimony is from "everyone"
Albert in Alaska and Landen was all over the place.
As the "only" one, she now states:
We rescued the kids from horrible homes, living in motels, guns in the back of their cars, their house getting robbed, all the way up until I got the Instagram messages saying that she could not take care of them anymore.
While Gannon is missing, she smears others.
Out of love for my step kids and my husband, I stepped in, delayed getting my doctorate, took care of them because I wanted to.
Elsewhere, she posted that she had to because Gannon's mother would not.
Took them on adventures that most kids their age would never see.
My husband had to prep the kids every time they went with their mom for their safety, until we eventually had them in our home 90 percent of the time. He works crazy hours, lots of schools, training, and took care of our needs.
I took care these two children like my very own. I wasn’t perfect but everyone saw all our pictures and the love that I gave them.
Note the unnecessary "I wasn't perfect" is an important admission of guilt.
Note the call of testimony from "everyone" is here repeated. For her, this exaggeration is necessary ---
Was it hard sometimes? Of course, because I grew up with my step sister and all of our families got along with no problems. So it was difficult navigating through that. But, I want everyone to know that it is well with my soul because I would never harm a child especially not our children.
She avoids a reliable denial.
Would she hurt children that were not her own?
Why does she have the need to report, while Gannon is missing, about her childhood? "I grew up with..."
Her need to explain why she had difficulty is consistent with the unnecessary claim of not being perfect.
It is likely that she had experienced significant negative influences in childhood. Not the need she has to control information while expressing no concern for Gannon's suffering while missing.
On Sunday, we went on a hike and Gannon was there crying with me because I was crying.
As she recalls the hike, she could tell us anything. It is important that she report
1. Gannon was crying
2. Why Gannon was crying
3. It was because of her suffering over a stranger.
Recall the context of this statement---- Gannon is the one missing.
It was the day Kobe passed, but he had no idea who he was just that I was upset.
Where an event "begins" in statement analysis is vital to understanding.
Something took place on this hike that is related to her emotion and to Gannon's disappearance.
I had every intention of covering up the fire that he started and protecting his feelings from what punished he thought he was going to get.
She had the intention -- she does not state that she did "cover up" and "protect his feelings."
This is where a deceptive person wants the audience to interpret the language of intention as completed action.
The video that she posted indicated how she tore at his feelings to inflict psychological pain.
That was our plan the next day was to rectify the situation so that his little heart could stop crying.
The next day his "little heart" could not "stop crying."
It is likely that she kept the provocation going.
I have the video because somehow my phone was recording and you can hear how sorry he was.
She was a victim of police, Albert, social media and here she is a victim of her phone----This is "personality driven" perception as a constant victim.
I have the pictures after we returned how, so please don’t believe what these people are speculating. Albert is hurt, he has a lot on him and he has always left me in charge of the kids. He has to go through his emotions but will start to remember how I helped rescue them and have been our families rock.
She has consistently portrayed Albert as limited in his parental capacities and here she puts the burden of trust upon Albert. It is unnecessary information regarding the disappearance of Gannon.
I’m going to make the next post just about Gannon but I wanted to clear up some of these accusations/lies.
It is likely that some accusations are reliably and some are not.
These people have painted me to be this horrible person and I want people to know the truth,
"that I did not cause Gannon's disappearance"?
This would be an optimal place for the denial as she is under "accusations/lies" in context.
that I had the kids because they were in an unfit situation in which a G of Litem placed solely with me until Albert left ALAKSA.
Instead of denial, she uses a Guardian ad Litem position (which she puts a boundary of time upon) to support her as a "good mother." This is the "need to persuade" her audience that is very sensitive (repetition)
I rescued them because I love them. That the kind of person I am who would continue to love them and treat them like my own, always and forever.
Generally, the word "forever" (no future limitation) is something we do not want to hear enter the vocabulary of a parent/step parent of a missing child.
Note the need to explain why she "rescued" them.
Call it what you want because I sit back let people say horrible things that wasn’t True.
**that she "sit back" (tension/body posture) and "let" people speaks to control. She is letting them while sitting back---while she is current (at the time of this writing) not "letting" them nor "sitting back" but actually answering them here.
One should question her statement of why she could not handle step parenting---- her own family life produced this need to control.
Just some of the facts. There are 100’s more so they need to be looking at finding Gannon not blaming me.
The concern is for self, not for the victim, Gannon.
They should be searching for Gannon, not blaming her, but police are keeping them busy by allowing them to post on social media.
Mental health issues evident in her controlling, blame shifting, and aggressive postings.
Some of the language is consistent with substance abuse, which is sometimes evident in a non user who is described as being "wound tight", ("dry drunk" in control) or someone who is under the influence or psychotropics.
Did she cause him to run away?
Did she cause his disappearance?