Saturday, August 3, 2019
We get quite a few email requests for training information of which it is best for those interested to do some research first. We look for self motivated effort regarding those who are likely to do best in training.
The training is not easy, yet it is thorough. The expectation is excellence to the point of being able to move on to advanced work.
Some recent submissions have been most encouraging where we find for example in homework and tests:
a. answering the question
b. explaining the principle employed
c. adding one's own examples
This puts the student analyst in the role of teacher, thus deepening his or her own understanding, and preparing them for--
preparation for District Attorney prosecution
Clarity for business and hiring
Deeper understanding within social sciences
Statement Analysis training teaches how to discern deception from truth.
Learning is to be confrontational. It is to make us uncomfortable so as to move forward to new areas.
It is for discernment minded critical thinkers.
Seminars for law enforcement, social services and businesses are both general and specialized. Sex Crimes Units are urged for deeper training, while Employment Analysis, an advanced form of Statement Analysis, is critical for good hiring.
The training will allow for legally sound interviewing for religious and non profit organizations as well as screening volunteers.
The basis for all advanced work is the grasping of the Complete Statement Analysis Course.
This is done in your home, at your pace, which, if one slows down, the absorption is deeper leading to greater effectiveness in analysis. It comes with 12 months of e support in which work is monitored; issues addressed and recommendations for improvement made.
Whether law enforcement, intelligence, business, psychology or communication, the greater the degree one is capable of lie detection, the better prepared and better protected.
The course is in English; those who are bilingual or multilingual are at a distinct advantage.
If you wish to enroll, or to book a seminar, please email email@example.com
Friday, August 2, 2019
In analysis, we view the "Linguistic Disposition" under the same principle of "expected versus unexpected", which is not based upon what we may, personally, expect, but upon a massive data base of statements to draw from.
For example, when a child goes missing, there is an expectation that the parents will show the missing child as priority, within the language.
In a recent analysis, Michael Barrymore was indicated for deception in the rape and murder of Stuart Lubbock, a guest in his home of which Barrymore staged a scene to "discover" the body.
From following our presupposition of believing Barrymore that the victim died by way of an unfortunate accident, the expectation was that Barrymore would speak of the deceased in an empathetic reverential manner.
Instead, even with years to consider, Barrymore indicated a distinct lack of human empathy with a negative linguistic disposition towards the victim.
Guilt is powerful.
In innocence, we expected Barrymore to show pity for a life cut short and for the family the victim left behind.
In this suicide tragedy, the parents issued a statement that fulfills the "expected" response--
“We are heartbroken at the loss of our wonderful, beautiful daughter, who lit up every room she walked in to, and made people smile just by being there.
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Analysis of "what happened" based upon his interview with Piers Morgan t
As an innocent victim of drowning, we expect the subject to be not only positive, but with the passage of years, to use 'angelic-like' language---where the deceased's faults do not enter the language, but how wonderful the person was. This includes 'waxing nostalgic' about someone hardly known, or even unmet.
We also expect that the subject (Barrymore) will have long considered the suffering of the victim's family and be cognizant of the public interview.
resistance or fight? This may be him reliving what happened. Consider "lights" with possible rape of the victim. *see notes
He is asked to take responsibility which he begins only about the invitation, but immediately blames the others.
Note the rhetorical question within the answer is a form of deceptive avoidance. It is revelatory in analysis, beyond the scope of a blog entry; suffice for now; he is likely thinking of the victim, who is the reason for this interview. It is likely that Stuart was not homosexual and likely he articulated this to Michael Barrymore.
Stuart, robbed of his voice by Barrymore, and without justice for his family, may still speak to us, even through the deception of Michael Barrymore.
Please peruse the blog as well as youtube for examples and further detail on the "Complete Statement Analysis Course."
We offer at training in your home, at your own pace, as well as seminars for law enforcement, business, private sector and others seeking to learn to discern between truth and falsehood.