As the inevitable pendulum swing moves, prosecutors are fighting back.
Fake Hate is not a victimless crime. It exploits the good will of citizens, and it creates tensions falsely that harms our society and can even weaken the resolve of society to protect real victims as cynicism builds.
It is something that should be prosecuted and here we have a solid example of such.
Fake Hate victims: take notice. Law enforcement is fighting back.
Just the past few months:
A black law student with political ambitions claimed he was "racially profiled" by a "blonde white woman" and the local police, only to have his story come apart at the seams in the light of both Statement Analysis, and the young woman's public rebuttal. He had hoped for, and received, political capital, initially, only to have it exposed as not only race baiting, but his own "racial profiling" of the young woman with his story of faux struggles to overcome.
A Lindenhurst, NY, family with "Go Fund Me" like plans was derailed when analysis showed that the "hate letter" telling them to move out of their neighborhood, was actually penned by them. This case was dropped when they dropped plans to go to "the next step" with media.
What began as 15 minutes of fame, fizzled to...just about 15 minutes and nothing more. Had they gone to the "next step" in fundraising for their "move", they would have faced potential prosecution. They smeared their own community as "racist" as Fake Hate is not a victimless crime as the liar must demonize someone including those who question the veracity.
A Baltimore woman, Julie Baker, raised more than $43,000 in another "fake hate" anonymous letter which exposed not only her theft, but her hatred of people of faith. She has since claimed to have received 'death threats' with the same level of credibility as her claim of 'hate' as investigators had not only analysis of the letter but a host of writing (hate speech against Christians) with the same style easily noted. She smeared Christians, but also insulted the same sex community presupposing them to be incapable of discernment.
Unfortunately for her, the state trooper recorded the exchange.
She was brought in for an interview, affirmed her letter in a sworn affidavit, and was subsequently arrested, with her college informed of her arrest. Which is more shocking, that she is an English professor who is deficient in grammar and usage, or that she sought to cash in, as others from her school have, on the victim status? Imagine paying high tuition fees to have her teach your children English?
Fake Hate perpetrators should take note. Once a claim is made and an investigation commenced, you will be asked to attest to the truth of your claim, locking you into a position where consequences await you.
Here is her account of what happened followed by the transcripts of the audio recording. The letter is exact with no corrections made. There are aspects of importance to analysis found within her letter.
I was traveling to Wethersfield on Route 15/5 to attend a meeting 9th May. I was on the left lane on route 15 and had to take exit 85. After the Brainard Airport exit, and after the merging lane ended, I signaled and went to the right lane to take exit 85. An unmarked police car with flashing light stopped me on the ramp after I had taken the exit. The policeman asked me if I could speak English and if I knew why he had stopped me. I said, “yes” to speaking English and “no” to why he had stopped me. He then asked me for my driver’s license and registration. He returned with an envelope and said that I could simply mail in the infraction.
The officer did not give me any reason as to why had stopped me. His asking if I could speak English shows that he had racially profiled me and was not able to give me a concrete reason for stopping me. Further, the officer had checked “Hispanic” in the race category in the infraction ticket. I am a Professor in English at Capital Community College, I teach about diversity and the negative impact of racial profiling, I have now become a target of the same insidious behavior! It is easy to connect the dots with the nationwide racial profiling which has led to serious consequences. I request that my infraction charges be dropped and action be taken against the officer. I have talked with the Senator and Legislator of my constituency regarding this matter and I am sending a copy of this letter to them as well.
Thank you in advance, Sincerely, Minati Roychoudhuri
Here is the transcript of the recording:
Officer: Hi ma’am, do you know why I’m stopping you today?
Officer: OK. There’s that big gore area with white lines painted across it and you cut in front of it, in front of me, thinking it’s a lane or something. You have to wait until it’s a dotted white line. License and registration.
(She handed him insurance, so he requested the registration again, which she gave him)
Officer: Thank you. This is for your Subaru car.
Roychoudhuri: This is my Subaru car.
Officer: Is this a station wagon, color green? The plate doesn’t match what’s on there.
Roychoudhuri: [Inaudible]…I thought that was my [inaudible]
Officer: I’ll run the plate and see what it comes back with.
Roychoudhuri: This is the [inaudible] that I have.
(Officer returns to his car for three minutes to write out the ticket for failure to drive in the established lane)
Officer: Ma’am. So I wrote you the infraction for that improper lane change that you did.
Roychoudhuri: Please, you know, I probably crossed over there, and that’s why I did it.
Roychoudhuri: Obviously I did that.
Roychoudhuri: My [inaudible] is absolutely clean.
Officer: Ok. So I wrote you an infraction for that improper lane change that you did.
Officer: The answer date is on the front of it and the instructions are on the back of it.
Roychoudhuri: Wait, what?
Officer: It’s a mail in infraction. All you have to do is mail in, either a check or money order, and mail it in.
Roychoudhuri: Thank you
This is the letter from State police to her employer. Note the strength of its language: