Long term readers of Statement Analysis should:
a. Be able to discern if Steven Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey killed the victim or not;
b. If police were deceptive in attempting to prove this...
This next one will take a bit more analysis:
c. If it is known how the victim died outside of the use of a gun from the words revealed in the documentary. This is something that deeper analysis should be able to have a strong opinion about and cite the specific reason for their opinion based upon principle.
d. Readers should be able to discern not only deception, but be able to properly assess the interview of the 16 year old and give details about it based upon principle.
Some deeper analysis:
*If you concluded police deception, did you learn why?
*Do you know specifically who was deceptive, and in what statements (topics) that deception was indicated?
*Did the prosecutor reveal information of a personal nature of his own, via language?