Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Jonbenet Ramsey Case: Grand Jury

Mary Lacy sought to clear the Ramseys as did Alex Hunter.  Both sought to appease the high powered, talented private attorneys.  This is not something unusual.  
As new grads emerge from law school and pass the bar, they often start with the hollywood sensationalized title of "prosecutor", "assistant district attorney", and "assistant attorney general." 
Within a few years, the talented attorneys are recognized after a few court cases and offered positions in private firms where their income increases exponentially. 
Those remaining behind in "state service" then fear going up against their more talented counterparts of the private sector.  This will lead some state attorneys to:
*make quick plea deals
*prosecute minor cases in which the defendant will either have a court appointed attorney, or no attorney.  
Thus, they pad their "win - loss" record as such.  We recently saw in Maine a case where a man faced five years in prison for beating his dog unconscious but when the accused retained his own attorney, the prosecutor knocked it down to a civil offense, with a small fine only.  The accused went from facing 5 years in prison, to a $50 fine.  Instead, he insisted on a trial.  He was found "innocent" (not "not guilty") by a judge.  Hence, the reason to knock the charge way, way down by the state attorney.  This is why people cry "no justice for the poor", as state attorneys are often seen vigorously prosecuting cases when the defendant cannot afford a private attorney.  
There are still, however, dedicated professionals who are tough prosecutors and who take their jobs seriously, but these are in the minority.  Recently in discussions with Baby Ayla's family, I predicted to the family that they would hear "I have 25 years experience in prosecution.  This case is not prosecutable" and it translates to:  "I have been overlooked by the private sector for 20 years..."
Instead, Baby Ayla's family was told, "I have 35 years experience..."
I missed by 10 years.  
Mary Lacy held an ostentatious self-congratulatory televised celebration of this case when John Mark Carr was arrested to be "brought to justice."
A single phone call to his family would have revealed that he was not in Colorado when Jonbenet was murdered.  Thus, the "talent" of Mary Lacy.  
The grand jury in Colorado indicted John and Patsy Ramsey in the death of their child, via child abuse, just as the language, as seen through Statement Analysis has shown consistently since the case broke (see www.lsiscan.com as well as the analysis of the family interviews).  
John and Patsy Ramsey were deceptive about what happened to their daughter.  This means that they had a reason to be deceptive. 
John Ramsey used language consistent with child sexual abuse. 
This then, is no surprise when seeing the photos of the sexualized child.  It is also consistent with the chronic bed wetting and chronic urinary tract infections, as well as what we learned in the autopsy.  
State attorneys may be clever politicians, like Alex Hunter, but they are not always talented attorneys.  Alex Hunter was quick to be socially accepted by the Ramsey team attorneys, which meant he had to become an antagonist or enemy of law enforcement; the very people he was to represent. 
This was not a difficult case to solve.  There was no intruder, no "foreign faction" and no kidnapping.  
This was likely a sexually abused little girl, dressed up like a Las Vegas showgirl, who might have attempted to speak out against the abuse.  
It is not uncommon for mothers to cover for their husbands' transgressions, especially as she may have been abused herself, or as she looks at the horrific consequences and fall out from speaking up.  Threats by lawyers, loss of income, loss of social status (something important to the Ramseys), and so on.  For whatever reason, the abuser is permitted to abuse, and the abdicator makes excuses as to why she failed to protect.  The abused child is sentenced to a life time of pain, as will be every one who loves her.  What is often minimized as "oh, they're just being silly" is the ultimate betrayal of a child's trust and is violence to the very Image of the Creator that she bears. 

From the AP:  
A Colorado grand jury in 1999 voted to indict John and Patsy Ramsey on two counts each of child abuse resulting in the death of their 6-year-old daughter, JonBenet, according to grand jury documents released Friday, but did not directly accuse the couple of killing her.
The grand jury also voted to charge that the couple helped whoever killed their daughter but did not name any suspect for the slaying.
The prosecutor in the case refused to sign the grand jury indictment or prosecute the couple, saying prosecutors did not have sufficient evidence to file charges.
The four pages of documents were released Friday by a Colorado judge in response to a lawsuit by Daily Camera reporter Charlie Brennan and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
The Ramseys consistently maintained their innocence in the death of JonBenet, whose body was found in the basement of their Boulder, Colo., home in 1996.
No suspect has ever been tried in the case. Patsy Ramsey died in 2006. John Ramsey remarried in 2011.
Only two counts — a total of four pages — from the grand jury documents were released. The documents named John and Patsy Ramsey separately, but the wording was identical.
Only pages that had been signed by the grand jury foreman and were considered official action of the jury were released. The numbering of the charges implies that there were other charges the jurors considered but rejected.
John Ramsey: Read the indictment
Patsy Ramsey: Read the indictment
Count four said the Ramseys "did unlawfully, knowingly, recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat of injury to the child's life or health, which resulted in the death of JonBenét Ramsey, a child under the age of sixteen."
Count seven of the indictment said the Ramseys did "unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously render assistance to a person, with intent to hinder, delay and prevent the discovery, detention, apprehension, prosecution, conviction and punishment of such person for the commission of a crime, knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death."
The documents did not name any individual as being suspected of the first-degree murder mentioned in the counts.
The body of JonBenet, who was strangled and bludgeoned to death, was discovered in the basement several hours after the Ramseys had called police to report her missing. A ransom note was recovered.
Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter, who had convened the grand jury in 1999, refused to sign the indictment after months of presenting evidence in the case.
"I and my prosecutorial team believe we do not have sufficient evidence to warrant the filing of charges against anyone who has been investigated at this time," Hunter said at the time.
In addition to maintaining their innocence, the Ramseys offered a $100,000 reward for the killer and mounted a newspaper campaign seeking evidence.
In 2008, then-District Attorney Mary Lacy said DNA evidence suggested the killer was a stranger, not a family member. "Justice dictates that the Ramseys be treated only as victims of this very serious crime," she said.
Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said the case remains open, but it's not an active investigation. He predicted the indictment's release wouldn't change anything.
"Given the publicity that's been out there, many people have formed their opinions one way or another," he said.
Contributing: Associated Press

37 comments:

Anonymous said...

John Bennett is a dirty pedophile.I pray somebody shoots him in the face.

Jeff said...

CCN recently did an article about this, their headline reading, "DNA evidence proves Grand Jury wrong." Then, of course, they wrote very little about the supposed DNA 'evidence.' The casual reader, not understanding statment analysis nor taking the time to read the indictments, would pass by the story thinking the Ramseys weren't guilty. Again, slipshod reporting helps promote injustice in favor of page hits and advertising. Is it any wonder this country has gone to Hell?

Jeff said...

Sorry, I meant, "CNN." Stupid early morning fingers!

Anonymous said...

OT...is there any chance we can get your opinion on the Abigail Hernandez missing from NH case? Interesting commentary from the boyfriend's dad...http://www.conwaydailysun.com/index.php/newsx/local-news/109589-rich-gray-comments-on-case-from-afar.

elisa said...

I tried the links for the indictments and they didn't work.
Anyone able to see them?

jeff is stupid said...

Jeff go away.

Anonymous said...

Ask"Jeff"!he's "Mr perfect".

Anonymous said...

Elisa, Patsy's works- John's does not

Anonymous said...

elisa, this link works
http://www.courts.state.co.us/Media/Opinion_Docs/JRamsey%20Grand%20Jury.pdf

Anonymous said...

"The grand jury also voted to charge that the couple helped whoever killed their daughter but did not name any suspect for the slaying."

Did they want to prosecute the parents for child abuse (only) because they couldn't decide which one of the two killed Jonbenet? Or did they think the murderer was a third party?

Anonymous said...

Huh

marietje said...

This is an interesting albeit somewhat lengthy article which appeared in Vanity Fair. It gives the Ramsey family history context as well as specifies the corruption between Ramsey lawyers, the D.A.'s office and Boulder Police Department. In addition, characterizing Patsy and John as both ambitious climbers who used and discarded people along their way. https://bardachreports.com/articles/v_19971000.html. If the link doesn't work, Google bardach reports missing innocence.

Anonymous said...

the way i understand it, authorities cannot prove who killed her, but they can prove that she died on the parents watch, and that they did things that caused authorities to not be able to prove who did it.

im not so sure they could have proved this one:
"did unlawfully, knowingly, recklessly and feloniously permit a child to be unreasonably placed in a situation which posed a threat of injury to the child's life or health, which resulted in the death of JonBenét Ramsey, a child under the age of sixteen."

they possibly could have been found guilty on this one no matter who the suspect was:
"unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously render assistance to a person, with intent to hinder, delay and prevent the discovery, detention, apprehension, prosecution, conviction and punishment of such person for the commission of a crime, knowing the person being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death."

that would have been some justice, not much.

marietje said...

This is another site worth looking at. All the players of the entire case are here from family to freaks. Possible one in the same. It even shows the names, faces and occupations of the grand jurors plus sideshow events that took place during the entire investigation. Example: Ramsey friend "Pasta Jay" wields a baseball bat at reporters. The photo lab techs who sold the crime scene photos to The Globe. The "shock artist" James Michael Thompson who stole the morgue's log book of the Ramsey file and turned other morgue photos into Halloween flyers by adorning the corpses with party noisemakers. Then who subsequently tried to burn down the Ramsey home. The "war room" computer theft. The social service computer files relating to the Ramsey's reportedly stolen. And don't forget the former JonBenet photographer, Randy Simons, found wandering the streets nude proclaiming "I didn't kill Jonbenet." What a circus. http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/6502/primer/primer1_fam.html.

Shelley said...

Until now, it never really crossed my mind why a DA would want to plea out cases or not prosecute. To pad their results..... To get that big offer with a private firm.

It makes so much sense, just never occurred to me.

But it does scare me.

It means that even someone on the right side will go to the dark side just for money.

What is our world coming to that someone who started a career for the right reasons only to turn a blind eye to a child murderer just to better your career.

It's a sad shame just how selfish our world has become.

Shame on Alex Hunter and all the rest who have done the same thing.


On another note, to those filling the Martin Macneill trial... Am I the only one that think this tramp Gyspy was possibly the master mind or at least just as much part of the plan to kill this beautiful mother?

Anonymous said...

Shelley I agree with you about Gypsy. I hope that this blog covers that trial more. My gut says she was involved. Even on the stand she is using deceitful language. She barely acknowledges that the photos she sent to him a day after his wife died were inappropriate.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Hyatt, can you please do an analysis on the case of Erica Parsons. I keep looking to see if you post your analysis of ALL the statements her adopted parents have made in the media.

Anonymous said...

Can't they ask Burke now that he is an adult if he remembers or knows anything about what happened to JonBenet???

john said...

HI Shelley, Anon..

Iv'e followed the Martin Macneill trial a little.

Here is his 911 call, its one of the oddest 911s i have heard.

Begins around 3:15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKrD_97stDM

Anonymous said...

Plea deals are made in part due to competent attorneys, consideration of past negative or positive records of their clients, the expense of prosecuting, and often the calendar of a particular court. It has little to do with what you surmise. It would be better if you stuck to what you know, in this case statement analysis, and not what you project based on your own internal uninformed biases about the legal world.

audpaud said...

How likely is it that John Ramsey did not molest his other daughters? I know one died in a car accident, but remember the other daughter vehemently denying any sexual abuse as a child.

TopixNut said...

It seemed obvious that Patsy had written the ransom note, you have to figure out why she did.

marietje said...

From the "ransom" note. "Make sure that you bring an adequate size attaché to the bank." What kidnapper gives a hoot about where the money comes from?

Shelley said...

Kids often will deny abuse.
And even though I firmly believed that Mccullay Culkin, along with the other children that slept in Michael Jacksons bed were molested, some still attempt to deny the accusations.
And as a note, I actually initially believed Mccullay. Since not every child is molested by a molester. Proof of that…. I have 2 cousins that were molested by my uncle, but he never touched me.
And like they say, molesters know who they can do this to. Who is vunerable……Well, my cousins parents were druggies and could care less about protecting their kids BUT my mom on the other hand, was very vocal about things (she had been molested as a kid and not protected so she often spoke about this and her anger and volunteered to help victims and my whole family knew) and everyone knew she would personally murder anyone that ever even thought about touching me.
So, I was raised very aware of things and always told by my mom all the time "I don’t care what they say or do to you, you tell me and mom will protect you" and honestly, I would have told her. I had a faith in my mom as a child that she would protect me at all costs. And I believe that is why my uncle never touched me.... I believe he knew that I would tell and my mom would attack him. And I have instilled this same mind set into my 5 year old son. I even watched the news the other day with him where the man cut the screen on the little girls room and tried to pull her out but she screamed and kicked and he ran away and she is safe. And I told my son that is what you do. You scream and kick and bite! Some may say that’s a scary thing to do to your child. But I think kids today need to be aware and be told to fight and scream and kick like crazy. As unfortunate

But so back to my point...

So, while I initially did not think McCullay was molested by him. I did change that mind set after reading his testimony in the trail transcripts. It was a PDF so I can not paste, but even just look at this small portion of an interview with him on CNN. He was asked about sleeping in the same bed as Michael Jackson and he can not issue a reliable denial and in fact, he never answers the question here about the bed specifically (it was also like pulling teeth in the trial but the attorneys kept redirecting but that did not happen here) and goes on and on and on.

KING: What happened at the house? That's what all the things that people are concerned about.

CULKIN: That's what's so weird.

KING: What did happen?

CULKIN: Nothing happened. You know, nothing really. I mean, we played video games. We, you know, played at his amusement park.

KING: Did he sleep in the bed?

CULKIN: The thing is with that whole thing, oh, you slept in the same bedroom as him. It's like, I don't think you understand, Michael Jackson's bedroom is two stories and it has like three bathrooms and this and that. So, when I slept in his bedroom, yes, but you understand the whole scenario. And the thing is with Michael he's not good as explaining himself and he never really has been, because he's not a very social person. You're talking about someone who has been sheltered and sheltering himself also for the last like 30 years. And so, he's not very good at communicating to people and not good at conveying what he's actually trying to say to you. So, when he says something like that people -- he doesn't quite understand why people react the way that they do.

Anonymous said...

Correction audpaud @ 7:17 a.m., as far as I know, John Ramsey only had one other daughter. He had two children with his former wife, a son and a daughter. The daughter was killed in an automobile accident, I believe, prior to his marriage to Patsy. John & Patsy had two children, a son Burke and daughter JonBenet.

Shelley said...

Peter, I am not sure if this has been analyzed. But would you please do your analysis.

I had seen a clip on Nancy Grace Mysteries for JonBenet of her doctor speaking and his response about the molestation was to me, concerning and I felt it had a lot of qualifiers. I finally found the transcript for the short interview. I have bolded the areas I was most concerned with. And being that the childs doctor would likely know something like this, I find this very informing. And while I have always believed she was molested, I am now convinced. But please add your comments.


On Friday evening, February 14, 1997, KUSA-TV aired an interview with Dr. Beuf.

Anchor: JonBenet Ramsey's pediatrician says he is convinced she was not sexually abused.

And, he says, he told Boulder Police investigators that when they asked him.

He said he would only talk with one media person and that person was Paula Woodward.

Woodward: He said he wants the information he has as JonBenet's pediatrician out in the public, but he's appalled by media coverage and so will only talk once.

Dr. Francesco Beuf says he saw JonBenet 30 times in 3 years. He said the last time he saw her was five weeks before she died.

Woodward: When you talked with the police, did they ask you about sexual abuse of JonBenet?

Beuf: Yes, of course they did.

Woodward: What did you tell them?

Beuf: I told them absolutely, categorically no. There was absolutely no evidence - either physical or historical.

Woodward: And that's from seeing her 30 times in 3 years?

Beuf: About that.

Woodward: What else did they ask you?

Beuf: Oh, they asked many of the same questions you've been asking: relationship with her parents, what sort of child she was, if there was any indication of depression and sadness.

Woodward: And your answers?

Beuf: Only as appropriate. If she was sick, she wasn't feeling too well. If her mother was off being treated for cancer, she was sad at that.

Woodward: He talked with us in the treatment room where he saw her five weeks before she was killed.

Was she an ordinary kid?

Beuf: No. I think she was extraordinary in the amount of charm that she had. And sweetness was the quality I appreciated most.

Woodward: Where you aware of how much she was in beauty pageants or whether she was?

Beuf: I don't know how much she was in beauty pageants. When she was here, I think I heard it mentioned a couple of times. In the last year that she was doing it, it just wasn't a big deal. The big deal was how she was doing things with her friends here. How she was going to Michigan with her parents. Just the fun things in life. The beauty pageants just didn't seem to be at the top of the heap by any means.

Woodward: Tell me what she said to you.

Beuf: To be honest with you, I can't remember. I just remember it made me feel good to see that much happiness and niceness in one spot.

Woodward: Thirty visits in 3 years. He said her parents were good about getting her in and it wasn't an abnormal amount of visits.

Do you think JonBenet was sexually abused?

Beuf: I do not think she was sexually abused. I am convinced she wasn't sexually abused.


Woodward: Dr. Beuf also treats JonBenet's 10 year old brother Burke Ramsey. He describes him as a neat kid. Likes to play video games. That he's very bright and trying hard to deal with something he can't fully understand yet. Dr. Beuf says Burke Ramsey is just another nice kid whom he likes.

end of interview

Shelley said...

Peter, I am not sure if this has been analyzed. But would you please do your analysis.

I had seen a clip on Nancy Grace Mysteries for JonBenet of her doctor speaking and his response about the molestation was to me, concerning and I felt it had a lot of qualifiers. I finally found the transcript for the short interview. I have bolded the areas I was most concerned with. And being that the childs doctor would likely know something like this, I find this very informing. And while I have always believed she was molested, I am now convinced. But please add your comments.


On Friday evening, February 14, 1997, KUSA-TV aired an interview with Dr. Beuf.

Anchor: JonBenet Ramsey's pediatrician says he is convinced she was not sexually abused.

And, he says, he told Boulder Police investigators that when they asked him.

He said he would only talk with one media person and that person was Paula Woodward.

Woodward: He said he wants the information he has as JonBenet's pediatrician out in the public, but he's appalled by media coverage and so will only talk once.

Dr. Francesco Beuf says he saw JonBenet 30 times in 3 years. He said the last time he saw her was five weeks before she died.

Woodward: When you talked with the police, did they ask you about sexual abuse of JonBenet?

Beuf: Yes, of course they did.

Woodward: What did you tell them?

Beuf: I told them absolutely, categorically no. There was absolutely no evidence - either physical or historical.

Woodward: And that's from seeing her 30 times in 3 years?

Beuf: About that.

Woodward: What else did they ask you?

Beuf: Oh, they asked many of the same questions you've been asking: relationship with her parents, what sort of child she was, if there was any indication of depression and sadness.

Woodward: And your answers?

Beuf: Only as appropriate. If she was sick, she wasn't feeling too well. If her mother was off being treated for cancer, she was sad at that.

Woodward: He talked with us in the treatment room where he saw her five weeks before she was killed.

Was she an ordinary kid?

Beuf: No. I think she was extraordinary in the amount of charm that she had. And sweetness was the quality I appreciated most.

Woodward: Where you aware of how much she was in beauty pageants or whether she was?

Beuf: I don't know how much she was in beauty pageants. When she was here, I think I heard it mentioned a couple of times. In the last year that she was doing it, it just wasn't a big deal. The big deal was how she was doing things with her friends here. How she was going to Michigan with her parents. Just the fun things in life. The beauty pageants just didn't seem to be at the top of the heap by any means.

Woodward: Tell me what she said to you.

Beuf: To be honest with you, I can't remember. I just remember it made me feel good to see that much happiness and niceness in one spot.

Woodward: Thirty visits in 3 years. He said her parents were good about getting her in and it wasn't an abnormal amount of visits.

Do you think JonBenet was sexually abused?

Beuf: I do not think she was sexually abused. I am convinced she wasn't sexually abused.


Woodward: Dr. Beuf also treats JonBenet's 10 year old brother Burke Ramsey. He describes him as a neat kid. Likes to play video games. That he's very bright and trying hard to deal with something he can't fully understand yet. Dr. Beuf says Burke Ramsey is just another nice kid whom he likes.

end of interview

Shelley said...

Sorry Peter, the bold did not show.


But it was this part of his response that was to me alarming.


Woodward: When you talked with the police, did they ask you about sexual abuse of JonBenet?

Beuf: Yes, of course they did.

Woodward: What did you tell them?

Beuf: I told them absolutely, categorically no. There was absolutely no evidence - either physical or historical.

Peter Hyatt said...

There were signs of child abuse. 30 times in 3 years and no concern??
The constant urinary tract infections?
The bed wetting?
The sexualized outfits?

Some doctor!

audpaud said...

There's the daughter killed born in '69 died '92 "Elizabeth" and another daughter "Melinda" born '72

This google search yielded a creepy fact...it says Ramsey's Mom died in the 60's and then his Dad married HER MOTHER?

Am I reading this right? John Ramsey's GRANDMA was also his step-mom?
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=293538&page=6

Dani Kekoa said...

DNA evidence from a foreign white male intruder cleared the Ramseys years ago, so the killer is still out there waiting for the FBI -> The JonBenet Ramsey Murderer has returned and he is still trying to frame the Ramseys for the crime...Call this twice convicted child-abuser in CO: "Pastor" BOB ENYART LIES & tell him to confess to his crimes & turn himself into the FBI or more kids will DIE: 1-800-8-ENYART - DOB 1-10-59 - SSN# 152-60-4382

ROBERT ADOLPH ENYART = 666 = DAXIS = SON OF SATAN = GUILTY CHILD-KILLER!
www.BobEnyartMurderedJonBenetRamsey.com

GOT PROOF? POLICE RECORDINGS tell the TRUTH!

www.PoliceRecordingsKekoas.blogspot.com

*Listen to hours of PROOF the FBI & Police in Colorado know about the Serial Child-Killers who organized the kidnappings and murders of JonBenet Ramsey, Jessica Ridgeway & Dylan Redwine -- Listen & Judge for Yourself! ShadowGov founder Bob Enyart left his "Small Foreign Faction" DNA on JonBenet. There's a DIRTY Deputy from Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office too! "Law Enforcement Countermeasures & Tactics" = Gordon Carroll K-9 officer = GUILTY of CONSPIRACY!

Dani Kekoa said...

Sound like a projection statement from the killer.
*From the Legend Detective on the Ramsey murder case -
> *CNN TRANSCRIPTS with LOU SMIT on Larry King Live May 28, 2001: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0105/28/lkl.00.html

> “The person I see doing this is a very vicious, brutal criminal, perhaps a sadistic pedophile. Never recorded history where a family member -- a mother or a father has garroted their child. Child strangulation is very rare. Usually when a person is involved in the death of their child, the child is hit on the head or pushed into something, to take -- to take a piece of rope, fashion a garrote, put it on the child's neck, she is definitely struggling at the time that this is put on the neck, there are fingernail marks in her neck, which suggest very strongly, that she was awake, when this happened. But what I see in this crime is not an accidental murder. This is not a little doink on the head, and I think I killed my daughter, so I'm go going into this massive staging. I see a brutal first-degree murder. I see a very violent death of JonBenet. I see someone fashioning a garrote and putting it around her neck. I see someone tightening that garrote to control her. I see someone taking that handle and pulling it very violently tight and killing her. Whoever killed JonBenet is a criminal who knows these things. There is nothing in the background of the Ramseys to indicate any type of psychological problems, any type of anger that would be directed toward their daughter. There is just no background which suggests that the Ramseys would even know how to do these things...Take a real close look at that ransom note. That ransom note is full of violence. It tells exactly what this person's going to do to JonBenet if everything doesn't go exactly right. Many references to death and dying. She'll be 'beheaded'...Her remains will 'be denied you for her burial.'...All violent references to the death of JonBenet. The person who killed JonBenet had it in his mind that if anything went wrong, he was going to kill her, and he did... But I will tell you this: When we find who murdered JonBenet, and when we look into his background, we're going to find many more crimes he has committed.”

The JonBenet Ramsey murderer has returned & this "EXPERIENCED & SKILLED" Child-Predator is Still Out There Lurking in the Shadows:
ROBERT ADOLPH ENYART = 666 = DAXIS = SON OF SATAN = GUILTY CHILD-KILLER!
www.BobEnyartMurderedJonBenetRamsey.com

Sus said...

I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but something is strange about Dr. Beuf's words and actions.

Actions:
My experience has been that a pediatrician refers a child with constant urinary tract or kidney infecions to a specialist. Why didn't Dr. Beuf do this?

After calling 911, Patsy called Dr. Beuf and other friends. Why would she call JonBenet's pediatrician?

Four medical experts and the Pediatric Association say the autopsy shows JonBenet suffered prior sexual and physical abuse. Dr. Beuf didn't see it in 30 some examinations.

Language :
"I told them ABSOLUTELY CATEGORICALLY no. There was ABSOLUTELY no EVIDENCE."
That's a lot of modifiers to say no. All Dr. Beuf can say is what he saw, yet he is telling what is. EVIDENCE is interesting. Evidence means there was something, but he didn't see it.

"If her mother WAS OFF BEING TREATED FOR CANCER she was sad at that."
Who brought JonBenet in when Patsy was gone? "off being treated" brings to mind deserting her child. Did Dr. Beuf see JonBenet as neglected?

" I think she was extraordinary in the amount of CHARM she had. And SWEETNESS was the quality I APPRECIATED MOST."
Charm is usually thought of as something that draws you in. It sounds as if Dr. Beuf was enamored with JonBenet. He begins the next sentence with "and" =missing info. Then he states what he likes in a person...sweetness. He equates JonBenet to the qualities he likes which in his mind makes her "extraordinary.

"I just remember IT MADE ME FEEL GOOD to see that much happiness and good in one SPOT."
Dr. Beuf again tells us how he felt rather than what JonBenet was like. "Spot" is a very strange word choice. How about in a person?


Sus said...

Dr. Beuf speaks passively about beauty pageants, also. It "was mentioned." He goes out of his way to say pageants were not a big deal and list other things that were.

I'm guessing pageants were a big deal to whoever brought JonBenet in that many times. Did that person want a quick fix...a shot and/or meds...so JonBenet would be ready for a pageant? My conjecture only.

I read a review on Dr. Beuf where a mother said he willingly meets with you anytime so you don't have to take your child to the ER. As a matter of fact, he recommends against taking your child to the ER. Nice doctor, but it also makes me wonder.

Dani Kekoa said...

Listen to JonBenet's killers continue to falsely accuse the Ramsey's on his radio show Bob Enyart LIES - 1-800-8ENYART - *Of O.J & Jon Benet: Bob and Doug discuss the continuing political co-opting of liberal reporters by politicians since they burned O.J. Simpson, and the embarrassing “journalism” of Nancy Grace, Geraldo Rivera (and others) as they erroneously report a mystical "3rd party" mentioned in the indictment of John & Patsy Ramsey for the death of 6 year old Jon Benet. And the indictment does not undermine Bob’s theory of the clue that breaks the case!
*KGOV: http://kgov.com/bel/20131028

"If the whole truth could be discerned, it would explain every piece of evidence, because real events produced every bit of the crime scene. Sometimes, a single key opens many doors, and one piece pulls the puzzle together. JonBenet’s murderer inadvertently put the key piece of evidence into the ransom note." - ShadowGov.com "Small Foreign Faction" founder pastor Bob Enyart, TWICE CONVICTED CHILD ABUSER!

"...One form of destructive behavior led to another and at midnight, in a burst of anger and emotion, Enyart struck the Ramsey's daughter in the head, cracking her skull. They realized the severity of the wound, and that JonBenet was near dead....Unidentifiable DNA material was beneath her fingernails. An unidentifiable palm print of unknown age was on the wine cellar door. The panties on her body were too large for JonBenet and contained a stain that DNA could not link to any house member..."

"VICTORY, S.B.T.C" = *Strangle Bind Torture Children* & Shadowgov Breaks The Case

www.BobEnyartMurderedJonBenetRamsey.com

audpaud said...

The DNA did NOT clear the Ramsey's.

SAH said...

If anyone would like to know the identity of the "person" the Ramseys were accused of protecting, read James Kolar's book Foreign Faction.