Many companies assign internal investigations to Human Resources for resolution.
In this case, an expensive sweater was stolen and HR asked the accused to write out a statement.
By asking all participants to write out a statement of "What Happened?" companies are able to solve crimes, small or great, even when law enforcement either cannot, or chooses not to.
Companies with such training will find that as they solve cases, they will gain a reputation for truth gathering and may discourage shrinkage.
Enter into this statement. Don't just analyze it, enter into it. Learn what happened, and learn the nature of relationships between people.
The "Subject" is the author.
"Tommy" is the victim who has reported that the Subject stole his expensive sweater.
The company sought to learn the truth.
I will post analysis later...
Sweaters versus Hoodies!
I'm a sweater guy, who owns but a single hoodie... this is a hint!
Can you solve it? Remember, language does not change on its own!
"Saturday March 23rd, Tommy had a small get
together at his house. Tommy had a monster
I asked Tommy if I could try the sweater
on with my Jacket. Tommy complied. I only
had the hoody for about 20 minutes. I
then took off the hoody and laid it
on the back of the recliner. When I
left the hoody was still on the chair.
On Tuesday, March 26th, at about 1250pm, Tommy’s
mom found me down town and accused me of stealing his hoody. I told her
as possible what I knew about the hoody
and where I last saw it. She went on
about what would happen if the hoody wasn’t found…"